FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Can Vet J / Pharmacokinetics of ceftiofur in the metacarpophalangeal joi...
The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2021; 62(9); 975-981;

Pharmacokinetics of ceftiofur in the metacarpophalangeal joint after standing intravenous regional limb perfusion in horses.

Abstract: This study investigated the pharmacokinetics of ceftiofur after intravenous regional limb perfusion (IVRLP). Six horses were involved in 3 IVRLP sessions. For each session, operators with varying clinical experience placed the tourniquet. A wide-rubber tourniquet was applied in the antebrachium as 2 g of ceftiofur in a total volume of 100 mL was injected into the cephalic vein. Plasma and metacarpophalangeal synovial fluid samples were obtained to evaluate perfusate leakage and synovial fluid concentrations of ceftiofur over 24 h. Overall, mean plasma concentrations were not significantly different before and after tourniquet removal. Mean synovial fluid ceftiofur concentrations were significantly higher 5 min and 8 h after tourniquet removal 24 h, after which values above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (1 μg/mL) were not detected. Concentrations above the MIC were detected in 72% and 50% of the horses at 5 min and 8 h, respectively. Overall, higher synovial fluid concentrations were obtained for the operator with the most recent clinical experience performing IVRLP. . Cette étude a examiné la pharmacocinétique du ceftiofur après perfusion intraveineuse loco-régionale des membres (PLR). Six chevaux ont participé à trois séances PLR. Pour chaque séance, un opérateur d’expérience clinique différente a placé le garrot. Un garrot large en caoutchouc a été appliqué dans l’avant-bras tandis que 2 g de ceftiofur dans un volume total de 100 mL ont été injectés dans la veine céphalique. Des échantillons de plasma et de liquide synovial métacarpophalangien ont été prélevés pour évaluer les fuites de perfusion et les concentrations de liquide synovial de ceftiofur au fil du temps. Dans l’ensemble, les concentrations plasmatiques moyennes n’étaient pas significativement différentes avant et après le retrait du garrot. Les concentrations moyennes de ceftiofur dans le liquide synovial étaient significativement plus élevées 5 min et 8 h après le retrait du garrot par rapport à 24 h, où les valeurs supérieures à la CMI (1 μg/mL) n’étaient pas détectées. Des concentrations supérieures à la CMI ont été détectées chez 72 % et 50 % des chevaux à 5 min et 8 h, respectivement. Des concentrations plus élevées de liquide synovial ont été obtenues pour l’opérateur avec une expérience clinique plus récente sur PLR.(Traduit par les auteurs).
Copyright and/or publishing rights held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-09-04 PubMed ID: 34475583PubMed Central: PMC8360312
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores how the antibiotic ceftiofur behaves in horse bodies when administered using a specific method called intravenous regional limb perfusion (IVRLP), focusing on effects in the horse’s metacarpophalangeal joint (part of horse’s front leg). The study also considered how operator experience influenced the results.

Study Methodology

  • The study involved six horses and each underwent IVRLP three times. Ceftiofur was used because of its common use in equine medicine for treating infections.
  • The injections were administered by operators with different levels of clinical experience, to study any potential variation it may cause. The tourniquet placement, an important step in IVRLP, was hence subject to varying execution.
  • A tourniquet was used in the horse’s forelimb (antebrachium), and 2 grams of ceftiofur dissolved in 100 mL of solution was infused into the cephalic vein.
  • At specific intervals post-infusion, the researchers took plasma and synovial fluid samples from the metacarpophalangeal joint (a joint situated in horse’s lower limb) for analysis. The goal was to track the presence and concentration of ceftiofur in these fluids, over a 24-hour period.

Findings and Implications

  • Generally, there was no meaningful difference in ceftiofur plasma concentrations before and after tourniquet removal. The tourniquet, which is intended to restrict the infused drug to a specific body part, thus worked as expected.
  • However, the ceftiofur concentration in synovial fluid was significantly higher 5 minutes and 8 hours after the tourniquet was removed, as compared to 24 hours. In fact, after 24 hours, the concentration was largely below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC – a concentration at which a drug still has its intended effects). The high initial concentrations could mean that ceftiofur rapidly diffuses into the synovial fluid.
  • Interestingly, the percentage of horses with ceftiofur synovial fluid concentrations above the MIC at 5 minutes and 8 hours (72% and 50% respectively) indicates the antibiotic impacts vary across different individuals and over time.
  • Last but not least, the study found that the operator with the most recent clinical experience in performing IVRLP achieved higher ceftiofur concentrations in the synovial fluid. This might suggest that precision in administering the drug can play a big role in its effectiveness.

Overall, this research provides valuable insights into the behavior of ceftiofur in horses’ bodies when delivered via IVRLP, and underlines the importance of operator skill in this procedure. These findings can be useful for developing more effective treatment protocols in equine medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
Bonilla AG, Causeret L, Torrent-Crosa A. (2021). Pharmacokinetics of ceftiofur in the metacarpophalangeal joint after standing intravenous regional limb perfusion in horses. Can Vet J, 62(9), 975-981.

Publication

The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne
ISSN: 0008-5286
NlmUniqueID: 0004653
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 62
Issue: 9
Pages: 975-981

Researcher Affiliations

Bonilla, Alvaro G
  • Département de sciences cliniques, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, Québec.
Causeret, Lisa
  • Département de sciences cliniques, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, Québec.
Torrent-Crosa, Albert
  • Département de sciences cliniques, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, Québec.

MeSH Terms

  • Amikacin
  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Cephalosporins
  • Forelimb
  • Horses
  • Metacarpophalangeal Joint
  • Perfusion / veterinary
  • Synovial Fluid

References

This article includes 26 references
  1. Rubio-Martínez LM, Cruz AM. Antimicrobial regional limb perfusion in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006 Mar 1;228(5):706-12, 655.
    pubmed: 16506931doi: 10.2460/javma.228.5.706google scholar: lookup
  2. Rubio-Martínez LM, Elmas CR, Black B, Monteith G. Clinical use of antimicrobial regional limb perfusion in horses: 174 cases (1999-2009).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012 Dec 15;241(12):1650-8.
    pubmed: 23216042doi: 10.2460/javma.241.12.1650google scholar: lookup
  3. Cruz AM, Rubio-Martinez L, Dowling T. New antimicrobials, systemic distribution, and local methods of antimicrobial delivery in horses.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2006 Aug;22(2):297-322, vii-viii.
    pubmed: 16882477doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2006.03.006google scholar: lookup
  4. Kelmer G, Bell GC, Martin-Jimenez T, Saxton AM, Catasus C, Elliot SB, Meibohm B. Evaluation of regional limb perfusion with amikacin using the saphenous, cephalic, and palmar digital veins in standing horses.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2013 Jun;36(3):236-40.
    pubmed: 22607056doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2012.01414.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  5. Kelmer G. Regional limb perfusion in horses.. Vet Rec 2016 Jun 4;178(23):581-4.
    pubmed: 27256262doi: 10.1136/vr.i3082google scholar: lookup
  6. Harvey A, Kilcoyne I, Byrne BA, Nieto J. Effect of Dose on Intra-Articular Amikacin Sulfate Concentrations Following Intravenous Regional Limb Perfusion in Horses.. Vet Surg 2016 Nov;45(8):1077-1082.
    pubmed: 27684571doi: 10.1111/vsu.12564google scholar: lookup
  7. Hyde RM, Lynch TM, Clark CK, Slone DE, Hughes FE. The influence of perfusate volume on antimicrobial concentration in synovial fluid following intravenous regional limb perfusion in the standing horse.. Can Vet J 2013 Apr;54(4):363-7.
    pmc: PMC3595939pubmed: 24082163
  8. Moser DK, Schoonover MJ, Holbrook TC, Payton ME. Effect of Regional Intravenous Limb Perfusate Volume on Synovial Fluid Concentration of Amikacin and Local Venous Blood Pressure in the Horse.. Vet Surg 2016 Oct;45(7):851-858.
    pubmed: 27509840doi: 10.1111/vsu.12521google scholar: lookup
  9. Oreff GL, Dahan R, Tatz AJ, Raz T, Britzi M, Kelmer G. The Effect of Perfusate Volume on Amikacin Concentration in the Metacarpophalangeal Joint Following Cephalic Regional Limb Perfusion in Standing Horses.. Vet Surg 2016 Jul;45(5):625-30.
    pubmed: 27273831doi: 10.1111/vsu.12490google scholar: lookup
  10. Levine DG, Epstein KL, Ahern BJ, Richardson DW. Efficacy of three tourniquet types for intravenous antimicrobial regional limb perfusion in standing horses.. Vet Surg 2010 Dec;39(8):1021-4.
    pubmed: 20880139doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00732.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  11. Schoonover MJ, Moser DK, Young JM, Payton ME, Holbrook TC. Effects of tourniquet number and exsanguination on amikacin concentrations in the radiocarpal and distal interphalangeal joints after low volume intravenous regional limb perfusion in horses.. Vet Surg 2017 Jul;46(5):675-682.
    pubmed: 28460426doi: 10.1111/vsu.12662google scholar: lookup
  12. Alkabes SB, Adams SB, Moore GE, Alkabes KC. Comparison of two tourniquets and determination of amikacin sulfate concentrations after metacarpophalangeal joint lavage performed simultaneously with intravenous regional limb perfusion in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2011 May;72(5):613-9.
    pubmed: 21529212doi: 10.2460/ajvr.72.5.613google scholar: lookup
  13. Kilcoyne I, Dechant JE, Nieto JE. Evaluation of 10-minute versus 30-minute tourniquet time for intravenous regional limb perfusion with amikacin sulfate in standing sedated horses.. Vet Rec 2016 Jun 4;178(23):585.
    pubmed: 27076528doi: 10.1136/vr.103609google scholar: lookup
  14. Aristizabal FA, Nieto JE, Guedes AG, Dechant JE, Yamout S, Morales B, Snyder J. Comparison of two tourniquet application times for regional intravenous limb perfusions with amikacin in sedated or anesthetized horses.. Vet J 2016 Feb;208:50-4.
    pubmed: 26639821doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.017google scholar: lookup
  15. Plunkett AH, Schoonover MJ, Young JM, Taylor JD, Holbrook TC. Subtourniquet pressures generated by application of wide-rubber tourniquets in standing, sedated horses.. Vet Surg 2019 Apr;48(3):417-423.
    pubmed: 30773652doi: 10.1111/vsu.13181google scholar: lookup
  16. Mahne AT, Rioja E, Marais HJ, Villarino NF, Rubio-Martinez LM. Clinical and pharmacokinetic effects of regional or general anaesthesia on intravenous regional limb perfusion with amikacin in horses.. Equine Vet J 2014 May;46(3):375-9.
    pubmed: 23789781doi: 10.1111/evj.12125google scholar: lookup
  17. Sole A, Nieto JE, Aristizabal FA, Snyder JR. Effect of emptying the vasculature before performing regional limb perfusion with amikacin in horses.. Equine Vet J 2016 Nov;48(6):737-740.
    pubmed: 26278891doi: 10.1111/evj.12501google scholar: lookup
  18. Miagkoff L, Archambault M, Bonilla AG. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates cultured from synovial fluid samples from horses with suspected septic synovitis: 108 cases (2008-2017).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2020 Apr 1;256(7):800-807.
    pubmed: 32176585doi: 10.2460/javma.256.7.800google scholar: lookup
  19. Pille F, De Baere S, Ceelen L, Dewulf J, Croubels S, Gasthuys F, De Backer P, Martens A. Synovial fluid and plasma concentrations of ceftiofur after regional intravenous perfusion in the horse.. Vet Surg 2005 Nov-Dec;34(6):610-7.
    pubmed: 16343149doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00095.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  20. Cox KS, Nelson BB, Wittenburg L, Gold JR. Plasma, subcutaneous tissue and bone concentrations of ceftiofur sodium after regional limb perfusion in horses.. Equine Vet J 2017 May;49(3):341-344.
    pubmed: 27458113doi: 10.1111/evj.12614google scholar: lookup
  21. Whitehair KJ, Adams SB, Parker JE, Blevins WE, Fessler JF. Regional limb perfusion with antibiotics in three horses.. Vet Surg 1992 Jul-Aug;21(4):286-92.
    pubmed: 1455637doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1992.tb00066.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  22. Mahrt CR. Safety of ceftiofur sodium administered intramuscularly in horses.. Am J Vet Res 1992 Nov;53(11):2201-5.
    pubmed: 1466520
  23. Kelmer G, Tatz AJ, Famini S, Bdolah-Abram T, Soback S, Britzi M. Evaluation of regional limb perfusion with chloramphenicol using the saphenous or cephalic vein in standing horses.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2015 Feb;38(1):35-40.
    pubmed: 25073920doi: 10.1111/jvp.12140google scholar: lookup
  24. Grice SC, Morell RC, Balestrieri FJ, Stump DA, Howard G. Intravenous regional anesthesia: evaluation and prevention of leakage under the tourniquet.. Anesthesiology 1986 Sep;65(3):316-20.
    pubmed: 3752578
  25. Errico JA, Trumble TN, Bueno AC, Davis JL, Brown MP. Comparison of two indirect techniques for local delivery of a high dose of an antimicrobial in the distal portion of forelimbs of horses.. Am J Vet Res 2008 Mar;69(3):334-42.
    pubmed: 18312131doi: 10.2460/ajvr.69.3.334google scholar: lookup
  26. Hoerdemann M, Smith RL, Hosgood G. Duration of action of mepivacaine and lidocaine in equine palmar digital perineural blocks in an experimental lameness model.. Vet Surg 2017 Oct;46(7):986-993.
    pubmed: 28703891doi: 10.1111/vsu.12689google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.