Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics1999; 21(6); 433-436; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2885.1998.00168.x

Pharmacokinetics of cisapride in the horse.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of cisapride after intravenous (i.v.) and intragastric (i.g.) administration in healthy, adult horses. Five animals received single doses of 0.1 mg/kg, 0.2 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg cisapride by the i.g. route in an open, randomized fashion on different occasions separated by a washout period of at least 48 h. Four of these horses were also given a single i.v. dose of 0.1 mg/kg cisapride. Jugular venous blood was collected periodically up to 24 h after dosing. Plasma cisapride concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. There was considerable inter individual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters. The mean (SD) values for systemic clearance (CI) and steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) were 494 (43.6) mL/h/kg and 1471 (578) mL/kg, respectively. Although the rate of cisapride absorption was quite rapid, only about half the i.g. dose was absorbed systemically. The average terminal half-life (t1/2) calculated over three i.g. doses was 2.06 h and that for i.v. administration was 2.12 h. The pharmacokinetics of cisapride from 0.1 mg/kg to 0.4 mg/kg were independent of the i.g. dose.
Publication Date: 1999-01-14 PubMed ID: 9885965DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2885.1998.00168.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates how the drug cisapride is metabolized and circulated within horses after it is administered through intragastric (i.g.) and intravenous (i.v.) means. It found that, despite significant variance between individuals, cisapride is absorbed rapidly, yet only about half the orally administered dose enters the bloodstream.

Objective and Methodology

  • The objective of the study was to understand the pharmacokinetics (how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted) and absolute bioavailability (percentage of the administrated drug that reaches the systemic circulation) of cisapride in horses.
  • The researchers experimented on five adult, healthy horses. The horses were given single doses of 0.1 mg/kg, 0.2 mg/kg, and 0.4 mg/kg of cisapride through intragastric (i.g.) administration in an open, randomized manner on different occasions with washout intervals of at least 48 hours.
  • Four of these horses were also given a single intravenous (i.v.) dose of 0.1 mg/kg of cisapride.
  • Jugular venous blood samples were collected periodically for 24 hours after each drug administration. The plasma cisapride concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography.

Findings

  • The results revealed high inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters. This means that the drug behavior varied significantly between individual horses.
  • Despite the variability, the mean values for systemic clearance (CI) and steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) were found to be 494 (43.6) mL/h/kg and 1471 (578) mL/kg, respectively.
  • The rate of cisapride absorption was quite rapid. However, only about half the intragastrically administered dose was absorbed into the systemic circulation.
  • The average terminal half-life (the time taken for the concentration of the drug to reduce to half its initial value) calculated over the three i.g. doses was 2.06 hours. On the other hand, the half-life for intravenous administration was slightly higher, 2.12 hours.
  • Interestingly, the pharmacokinetic behavior of cisapride was found to be independent of the i.g. administered dose, ranging from 0.1 mg/kg to 0.4 mg/kg. This implies that changing the dosage does not significantly affect the rate at which the drug is metabolized and eliminated from the body.

Implications

  • The findings of this study provide valuable insights into how cisapride behaves within the bodies of horses, contributing to more effective treatment plans involving this drug.
  • The unexpectedly low rate of absorption of cisapride when administered orally and the independence of its pharmacokinetics from dosage level might influence the way it is used for treatment, potentially leading towards preference for intravenous administration.

Cite This Article

APA
Steel CM, Bolton JR, Preechagoon Y, Charles BG. (1999). Pharmacokinetics of cisapride in the horse. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 21(6), 433-436. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2885.1998.00168.x

Publication

ISSN: 0140-7783
NlmUniqueID: 7910920
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 6
Pages: 433-436

Researcher Affiliations

Steel, C M
  • Department of Applied Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia.
Bolton, J R
    Preechagoon, Y
      Charles, B G

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Anti-Ulcer Agents / administration & dosage
        • Anti-Ulcer Agents / pharmacokinetics
        • Area Under Curve
        • Biological Availability
        • Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
        • Cisapride / administration & dosage
        • Cisapride / pharmacokinetics
        • Horses / blood
        • Horses / metabolism
        • Injections, Intravenous / veterinary
        • Intubation, Gastrointestinal / veterinary
        • Male
        • Random Allocation

        Citations

        This article has been cited 1 times.
        1. Marzok M, Kandeel M, Alkhodair K, Abdel-Raheem S, Ismail H, Farag A, Ibrahim H, El-Ashkar M, Shousha S, El-Khodery S. Evaluation of cardiac indices using M-mode echocardiography after administration of metoclopramide and ondansetron in donkeys (Equus asinus): an experimental study. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1189710.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1189710pubmed: 37680391google scholar: lookup