Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2002; 163(2); 161-167; doi: 10.1053/tvjl.2001.0624

Pharmacokinetics of doramectin and ivermectin after oral administration in horses.

Abstract: A study was undertaken in order to compare plasma disposition kinetic parameters of doramectin (DRM) and ivermectin (IVM) in horses after oral administration. Ten crossbreed adult horses, clinically healthy, weighing 380-470 kg body weight (bw) were selected for study. Faecal examinations were performed to determine faecal parasite egg counts. Horses were allocated to two groups of five animals to provide an even distribution considering the variables sex, body weight and faecal egg count. Group I, were treated with an oral paste formulation of IVM at 0.2 mg/kg b/w and Group II, were treated with an oral dose of 0.2 mg/kg bw of DRM prepared as paste from the injectable formulation for oral administration. Blood samples were collected by jugular puncture between 0 h and 75 days post-treatment. Plasma was separated and later solid phase extraction and derivatization samples were analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC); a computerised kinetic analysis was carried out. Data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The mean plasma concentrations of DRM and IVM after oral administration in horses were detected until 30 and 20 days, respectively. Both drugs showed similar patterns of absorption and no significant differences were found for peak concentration, the time to peak concentration, or for absorptive half-life. The terminal elimination half-life was significantly (P<0.05) longer in the DRM treated group than for the IVM treated group. The differences observed in the elimination half-life explain the longer mean residence time and high values of area under the concentration time curve for the group treated with DRM, which are 30% higher than those of the IVM group. Considering its pharmacokinetics, tolerance and anthelmintic efficacy, the oral administration of DRM, could be an alternative to IVM for the control of parasitic diseases of horses.
Publication Date: 2002-07-03 PubMed ID: 12093191DOI: 10.1053/tvjl.2001.0624Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the comparative effectiveness of two drugs, doramectin and ivermectin, in treating parasitic diseases in horses when orally administered. The findings show that doramectin stays longer in a horse’s system and may thus form an effective alternative to ivermectin.

Study Design

  • The research team used ten crossbreed adult horses for the study, which underwent fecal examinations to establish their faecal parasite egg counts. The horses, all clinically healthy and with varying body weights, were then divided into two groups of five, considering factors such as sex, body weight, and faecal egg count.
  • Blood samples were collected from these horses at different intervals from the time of drug administration up to 75 days post-treatment. High-performance liquid chromatography was then used to analyze the collected blood for levels of the administered drug. The analysis employed computerized kinetic analysis.

Treatment Groups

  • Group I were treated with an oral paste formulation of ivermectin at 0.2 mg/kg body weight.
  • Group II received an oral dose of 0.2 mg/kg body weight of doramectin, prepared as a paste from an injectable formulation.

Findings

  • Doramectin and ivermectin plasma concentrations after oral administration in horses were detected until 30 and 20 days accordingly. Both drugs showed a similar absorption pattern, with no significant differences in peak concentration, time to peak concentration, or absorptive half-life.
  • They found the terminal elimination half-life, which is the time for the drug concentration in the body to decrease by half during the elimination phase, to be statistically significantly longer for doramectin than for ivermectin.
  • The difference in the elimination half-life led to doramectin having larger mean residence time and area under the concentration time curve values. These were about 30% higher than those of the ivermectin group.
  • Based on these results, the researchers concluded that doramectin could be an alternative to ivermectin for controlling parasitic diseases in horses, given its pharmacokinetics, tolerance, and anthelmintic efficacy.

Cite This Article

APA
Pérez R, Cabezas I, Godoy C, Rubilar L, Muñoz L, Arboix M, Castells G, Alvinerie M. (2002). Pharmacokinetics of doramectin and ivermectin after oral administration in horses. Vet J, 163(2), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2001.0624

Publication

ISSN: 1090-0233
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 163
Issue: 2
Pages: 161-167

Researcher Affiliations

Pérez, R
  • Laboratorio de Farmacología, Facultad Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán, Chile. rubperez@udec.cl
Cabezas, I
    Godoy, C
      Rubilar, L
        Muñoz, L
          Arboix, M
            Castells, G
              Alvinerie, M

                MeSH Terms

                • Administration, Oral
                • Animals
                • Anthelmintics / administration & dosage
                • Anthelmintics / pharmacokinetics
                • Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
                • Female
                • Half-Life
                • Horses
                • Ivermectin / administration & dosage
                • Ivermectin / analogs & derivatives
                • Ivermectin / pharmacokinetics
                • Male

                Citations

                This article has been cited 5 times.
                1. Scherr N, Pluschke G, Thompson CJ, Ramón-García S. Selamectin Is the Avermectin with the Best Potential for Buruli Ulcer Treatment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015 Aug;9(8):e0003996.
                  doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003996pubmed: 26270480google scholar: lookup
                2. Hernando G, Bouzat C. Caenorhabditis elegans neuromuscular junction: GABA receptors and ivermectin action. PLoS One 2014;9(4):e95072.
                  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095072pubmed: 24743647google scholar: lookup
                3. El-Banna HA, Goudah A, El-Zorba H, Abd-El-Rahman S. Comparative pharmacokinetics of ivermectin alone and a novel formulation of ivermectin and rafoxanide in calves and sheep. Parasitol Res 2008 May;102(6):1337-42.
                  doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-0915-6pubmed: 18297309google scholar: lookup
                4. Bassissi F, Lespine A, Alvinerie M. Assessment of a liposomal formulation of ivermectin in rabbit after a single subcutaneous administration. Parasitol Res 2006 Feb;98(3):244-9.
                  doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-0073-zpubmed: 16341879google scholar: lookup
                5. Hou B, Wang H, Jiang N, Haosi B, Hasi S. Establishment of the HPLC fluorescence detection method for plasma trace ivermectin and its pharmacokinetics in Bactrian camel. Vet Med Sci 2024 May;10(3):e1447.
                  doi: 10.1002/vms3.1447pubmed: 38613174google scholar: lookup