Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1997; 29(5); 378-381; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03143.x

Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin in horses after single intravenous and intramuscular administration.

Abstract: Pharmacokinetic behaviour of enrofloxacin was studied in 6 horses after intravenous (i.v.) or intramuscular (i.m.) administration of enrofloxacin (5 mg/kg bwt). Concentration of enrofloxacin and ciproflaxin were measured by high performance liquid chromatography in serum. Antimicrobial activity of the samples was determined with an agar-diffusion technique. Reactions at the site of i.m. injection were monitored clinically and by determination of serum creatine kinase (CK) activity. After i.v. administration, elimination half-life of enrofloxacin was 4.4 h and volume of distribution was 2.3 1/kg bwt. Enrofloxacin was rapidly metabolised to ciprofloxacin. The half-life of ciprofloxacin parallelled that of the parent drug, its concentration in serum reached 20-35% of that of the parent drug. After i.m. administration, elimination half-life of enrofloxacin was longer (9.9 h) than after i.v. administration. Mean absorption time of enrofloxacin was also long (9.9 h). No statistically significant differences were found when half-life and mean residence time of antimicrobial activity were compared with those of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin from chemically analysed data. Intramuscular injection of enrofloxacin was found to be very irritating. After i.m. administration, CK activity in serum, compared with pre-injection levels, increased over 10-fold. CK activity also stayed high during the 32 h follow-up period. Clinical reactions, such as swelling or tenderness at the i.m. injection sites, were observed in 2 horses.
Publication Date: 1997-11-05 PubMed ID: 9306065DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03143.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study is about understanding how the drug enrofloxacin behaves in the body of horses when administered either intravenously or intramuscularly, the potential side effects of the drug, and its effectiveness in circulating within the horse body.

Research Purpose and Procedure

  • The objective of the research was to assess the pharmacokinetics—the way the body absorbs, distributes, metabolizes, and excretes a drug—of the veterinary antibiotic enrofloxacin when injected into horses either through the veins (intravenously) or into the muscles (intramuscularly).
  • The study used 6 horses and administered enrofloxacin at a dosage of 5 mg/kg body weight. The concentrations of enrofloxacin and its metabolite, ciprofloxacin, in the horses’ blood serum were measured using high performance liquid chromatography, a method used to identify and quantify components in a mixture.
  • Reactions at the injection site were also monitored both clinically (through physical observation) and through the determination of serum creatine kinase (CK) activity, an enzyme whose increased levels can indicate muscle damage.

Findings of the Research

  • Following intravenous administration, the drug had an elimination half-life—the time it takes for the drug’s concentration in the body to reduce by half—of about 4.4 hours and its distribution volume within the body was 2.3 liters per kilogram of body weight.
  • The drug was found to be quickly metabolized into ciprofloxacin, and the half-life of this metabolite paralleled that of the original drug. The concentration of ciprofloxacin in the serum reached 20-35% of that of the initial drug.
  • However, when administered intramuscularly, the elimination half-life of the drug was longer, at 9.9 hours, and the time taken for the drug to be absorbed was also found to be long, at the same duration.
  • When comparing the half-life and mean residence time—the average time a molecule stays in the body—no significant differences were found between the antimicrobial activity of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin.
  • Interestingly, intramuscular injection of enrofloxacin was found to cause significant irritation. This was evident from the sharp increase in CK enzyme activity in the serum, which was more than 10 times its level before injection, and it remained high during the 32-hour follow-up period.
  • Clinical reactions were observed in two out of six horses, exhibited by swelling and tenderness at the injection site.

Cite This Article

APA
Kaartinen L, Panu S, Pyörälä S. (1997). Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin in horses after single intravenous and intramuscular administration. Equine Vet J, 29(5), 378-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03143.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 29
Issue: 5
Pages: 378-381

Researcher Affiliations

Kaartinen, L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Panu, S
    Pyörälä, S

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Anti-Infective Agents / administration & dosage
      • Anti-Infective Agents / metabolism
      • Anti-Infective Agents / pharmacokinetics
      • Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / methods
      • Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / veterinary
      • Ciprofloxacin / analysis
      • Ciprofloxacin / metabolism
      • Creatine Kinase / blood
      • Enrofloxacin
      • Female
      • Fluoroquinolones
      • Half-Life
      • Horses / blood
      • Horses / metabolism
      • Horses / physiology
      • Injections, Intramuscular / methods
      • Injections, Intramuscular / veterinary
      • Injections, Intravenous / methods
      • Injections, Intravenous / veterinary
      • Quinolones / administration & dosage
      • Quinolones / metabolism
      • Quinolones / pharmacokinetics

      Citations

      This article has been cited 8 times.
      1. Grabowski Ł, Gaffke L, Pierzynowska K, Cyske Z, Choszcz M, Węgrzyn G, Węgrzyn A. Enrofloxacin-The Ruthless Killer of Eukaryotic Cells or the Last Hope in the Fight against Bacterial Infections?. Int J Mol Sci 2022 Mar 26;23(7).
        doi: 10.3390/ijms23073648pubmed: 35409007google scholar: lookup
      2. Ramesh S, Rao GS, Malik JK. Pharmacokinetic disposition of subcutaneously administered enrofloxacin in goats.. Vet Res Commun 2002 Oct;26(7):563-9.
        doi: 10.1023/a:1020295632767pubmed: 12416871google scholar: lookup
      3. Fumuso E, Checura C, Losinno L, Soto P, Sánchez S. Endometrial tissue concentrations of enrofloxacin after intrauterine administration to mares.. Vet Res Commun 2002 Jul;26(5):371-80.
        doi: 10.1023/a:1016242812772pubmed: 12212727google scholar: lookup
      4. Malik JK, Rao GS, Ramesh S, Muruganandan S, Tripathi HC, Shukla DC. Pharmacokinetics of pefloxacin in goats after intravenous or oral administration.. Vet Res Commun 2002 Feb;26(2):141-9.
        doi: 10.1023/a:1014047702196pubmed: 11922483google scholar: lookup
      5. Rao GS, Ramesh S, Ahmad AH, Tripathi HC, Sharma LD, Malik JK. Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin and its metabolite ciprofloxacin after intramuscular administration of enrofloxacin in goats.. Vet Res Commun 2001 Apr;25(3):197-204.
        doi: 10.1023/a:1006481625615pubmed: 11334149google scholar: lookup
      6. Elmas M, Tras B, Kaya S, Bas AL, Yazar E, Yarsan E. Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after intravenous and intramuscular administration in Angora goats.. Can J Vet Res 2001 Jan;65(1):64-7.
        pubmed: 11227198
      7. Haines GR, Brown MP, Gronwall RR, Merritt KA. Serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after intravenous and intragastric administration to mares.. Can J Vet Res 2000 Jul;64(3):171-7.
        pubmed: 10935883
      8. Srivastava AK, Dumka VK, Deol SS. Disposition kinetics and urinary excretion of pefloxacin after intravenous injection in crossbred calves.. Vet Res Commun 2000 Apr;24(3):189-96.
        doi: 10.1023/a:1006408415431pubmed: 10836277google scholar: lookup