Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2011; 34(3); 232-237; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2010.01213.x

Pharmacokinetics of oral terbinafine in horses and Greyhound dogs.

Abstract: The objective of the study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of terbinafine administered orally to horses and Greyhound dogs. A secondary objective was to assess terbinafine metabolites. Six healthy horses and six healthy Greyhound dogs were included in the pharmacokinetic data. The targeted dose of terbinafine was 20 and 30 mg/kg for horses and dogs, respectively. Blood was collected at predetermined intervals for the quantification of terbinafine concentrations with liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. The half-life (geometric mean) was 8.1 and 8.6 h for horses and Greyhounds, respectively. The mean maximum plasma concentration was 0.31 and 4.01 μg/mL for horses and Greyhounds, respectively. The area under the curve (to infinity) was 1.793 h·μg/mL for horses and 17.253 h·μg/mL for Greyhounds. Adverse effects observed in one study horse included pawing at the ground, curling lips, head shaking, anxiety and circling, but these resolved spontaneously within 30 min of onset. No adverse effects were noted in the dogs. Ions consistent with carboxyterbinafine, n-desmethylterbinafine, hydroxyterbinafine and desmethylhydroxyterbinafine were identified in horse and Greyhound plasma after terbinafine administration. Further studies are needed assessing the safety and efficacy of terbinafine in horses and dogs.
Publication Date: 2011-04-16 PubMed ID: 21492187PubMed Central: PMC3078771DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2010.01213.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • N.I.H.
  • Extramural
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article describes a study to determine the behavior of the drug terbinafine in horses and Greyhound dogs after oral administration, and also to identify terbinafine metabolites in these animals.

Study Design

  • The study involved six healthy horses and six healthy Greyhound dogs. The researchers administered terbinafine orally to these animals at a target dose of 20 mg/kg for horses and 30 mg/kg for dogs.
  • To track the behavior of the drug in the animals’ bodies, blood was collected at pre-decided intervals. The concentrations of terbinafine in the blood samples were estimated using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry – both standard laboratory techniques for detecting specific substances.

Findings

  • The average half-life of terbinafine was found to be 8.1 hours in horses and 8.6 hours in greyhounds. The half-life of a drug essentially indicates how long it takes for half of the drug to be eliminated from the body; in this case, it takes around 8 hours for half of the terbinafine to be eliminated.
  • The maximum concentration of terbinafine in the blood – which is a marker of how much of the drug is present in the body at peak levels – was lower in horses (0.31 μg/mL) compared to greyhounds (4.01 μg/mL).
  • The ‘area under the curve’, another pharmacokinetic parameter that essentially provides a measure of the total drug exposure over time, was also lower in horses than in greyhounds.

Adverse Effects

  • One horse displayed signs of discomfort or distress, including pawing at the ground, curling lips, head shaking, anxiety, and circling. However, these symptoms spontaneously resolved within 30 minutes without any intervention.
  • No adverse effects were observed in the dogs.

Metabolites

  • The study also found ions that were consistent with the presence of certain metabolites of terbinafine. These included carboxyterbinafine, n-desmethylterbinafine, hydroxyterbinafine, and desmethylhydroxyterbinafine.
  • Detection of these metabolites indicates that terbinafine, once inside the body, is altered by metabolic processes. The details of how these metabolic pathways function in horses and dogs, however, would need more research.

Implications and Future Research

  • The paper concludes by noting that further research is needed to assess the safety and efficacy of terbinafine in horses and dogs fully.
  • The researchers also expressed the need for more studies to confirm the safety of terbinafine for these animals, and to optimize the dosage and administration regimen for therapeutic purposes.

Cite This Article

APA
Williams MM, Davis EG, KuKanich B. (2011). Pharmacokinetics of oral terbinafine in horses and Greyhound dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 34(3), 232-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2010.01213.x

Publication

ISSN: 1365-2885
NlmUniqueID: 7910920
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 34
Issue: 3
Pages: 232-237

Researcher Affiliations

Williams, M M
  • Department of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Davis, E G
    KuKanich, B

      MeSH Terms

      • Administration, Oral
      • Animals
      • Antifungal Agents / administration & dosage
      • Antifungal Agents / metabolism
      • Antifungal Agents / pharmacokinetics
      • Dogs / metabolism
      • Drug Administration Schedule / veterinary
      • Female
      • Horses / metabolism
      • Male
      • Naphthalenes / administration & dosage
      • Naphthalenes / metabolism
      • Naphthalenes / pharmacokinetics
      • Tablets
      • Terbinafine

      Grant Funding

      • T35 RR007064 / NCRR NIH HHS
      • T35 RR007064-11 / NCRR NIH HHS
      • 5T35RR007064-10 / NCRR NIH HHS

      References

      This article includes 29 references
      1. Court MH, Hay-Kraus BL, Hill DW, Kind AJ, Greenblatt DJ. Propofol hydroxylation by dog liver microsomes: assay development and dog breed differences.. Drug Metab Dispos 1999 Nov;27(11):1293-9.
        pubmed: 10534314
      2. Davis JL, Salmon JH, Papich MG. Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of itraconazole after oral and intravenous administration to horses.. Am J Vet Res 2005 Oct;66(10):1694-701.
        pubmed: 16273899doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1694google scholar: lookup
      3. Davis JL, Salmon JH, Papich MG. Pharmacokinetics of voriconazole after oral and intravenous administration to horses.. Am J Vet Res 2006 Jun;67(6):1070-5.
        pubmed: 16740104doi: 10.2460/ajvr.67.6.1070google scholar: lookup
      4. Goudard M, Buffard Y, Ferrari H, Regli P. [In vitro spectrum of action of a new antifungal derivative of naftifin: terbinafin (SF 86-327)].. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1986 Jun;34(5 Pt 2):680-3.
        pubmed: 3534767
      5. Guillot J, Bensignor E, Jankowski F, Seewald W, Chermette R, Steffan J. Comparative efficacies of oral ketoconazole and terbinafine for reducing Malassezia population sizes on the skin of Basset Hounds.. Vet Dermatol 2003 Jun;14(3):153-7.
      6. Gugler R, Lain P, Azarnoff DL. Effect of portacaval shunt on the disposition of drugs with and without first-pass effect.. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1975 Dec;195(3):416-23.
        pubmed: 1195128
      7. Gunn HM. The proportions of muscle, bone and fat in two different types of dog.. Res Vet Sci 1978 May;24(3):277-82.
        pubmed: 674839
      8. Gurley BJ, Barone GW, Yamashita K, Polston S, Estes M, Harden A. Extrahepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury reduces hepatic oxidative drug metabolism as determined by serial antipyrine clearance.. Pharm Res 1997 Jan;14(1):67-72.
        pubmed: 9034223doi: 10.1023/a:1012007517877google scholar: lookup
      9. Hay Kraus BL, Greenblatt DJ, Venkatakrishnan K, Court MH. Evidence for propofol hydroxylation by cytochrome P4502B11 in canine liver microsomes: breed and gender differences.. Xenobiotica 2000 Jun;30(6):575-88.
        pubmed: 10923860doi: 10.1080/004982500406417google scholar: lookup
      10. Humbert H, Cabiac MD, Denouël J, Kirkesseli S. Pharmacokinetics of terbinafine and of its five main metabolites in plasma and urine, following a single oral dose in healthy subjects.. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1995 Nov;16(8):685-94.
        pubmed: 8573687doi: 10.1002/bdd.2510160807google scholar: lookup
      11. Humphrey MJ, Jevons S, Tarbit MH. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of UK-49,858, a metabolically stable triazole antifungal drug, in animals and humans.. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1985 Nov;28(5):648-53.
        pmc: PMC176350pubmed: 3004323doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.5.648google scholar: lookup
      12. Iverson SL, Uetrecht JP. Identification of a reactive metabolite of terbinafine: insights into terbinafine-induced hepatotoxicity.. Chem Res Toxicol 2001 Feb;14(2):175-81.
        pubmed: 11258966doi: 10.1021/tx0002029google scholar: lookup
      13. Kerl ME. Update on canine and feline fungal diseases.. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2003 Jul;33(4):721-47.
        pubmed: 12910740doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(03)00035-4google scholar: lookup
      14. Kotnik T. Drug efficacy of terbinafine hydrochloride (Lamisil) during oral treatment of cats, experimentally infected with Microsporum canis.. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2002 Apr;49(3):120-2.
      15. Kovarik JM, Mueller EA, Zehender H, Denouël J, Caplain H, Millerioux L. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and distribution in tissue of terbinafine and metabolites.. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995 Dec;39(12):2738-41.
        pmc: PMC163021pubmed: 8593011doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.12.2738google scholar: lookup
      16. Kukanich B, Borum SL. Effects of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine in healthy Greyhounds.. Am J Vet Res 2008 May;69(5):664-9.
        pubmed: 18447799doi: 10.2460/ajvr.69.5.664google scholar: lookup
      17. KuKanich B, Coetzee JF, Gehring R, Hubin M. Comparative disposition of pharmacologic markers for cytochrome P-450 mediated metabolism, glomerular filtration rate, and extracellular and total body fluid volume of Greyhound and Beagle dogs.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2007 Aug;30(4):314-9.
      18. KuKanich B, Hubin M. The pharmacokinetics of ketoconazole and its effects on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and fentanyl in dogs.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2010 Feb;33(1):42-9.
      19. KuKanich B, Lascelles BD, Papich MG. Use of a von Frey device for evaluation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine after intravenous administration as an infusion or multiple doses in dogs.. Am J Vet Res 2005 Nov;66(11):1968-74.
        pubmed: 16334958doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1968google scholar: lookup
      20. Latimer FG, Colitz CM, Campbell NB, Papich MG. Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole following intravenous and oral administration and body fluid concentrations of fluconazole following repeated oral dosing in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2001 Oct;62(10):1606-11.
        pubmed: 11592327doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1606google scholar: lookup
      21. Petranyi G, Meingassner JG, Mieth H. Antifungal activity of the allylamine derivative terbinafine in vitro.. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987 Sep;31(9):1365-8.
        pmc: PMC174943pubmed: 3674847doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.9.1365google scholar: lookup
      22. Prades M, Brown MP, Gronwall R, Houston AE. Body fluid and endometrial concentrations of ketoconazole in mares after intravenous injection or repeated gavage.. Equine Vet J 1989 May;21(3):211-4.
      23. Roffey SJ, Cole S, Comby P, Gibson D, Jezequel SG, Nedderman AN, Smith DA, Walker DK, Wood N. The disposition of voriconazole in mouse, rat, rabbit, guinea pig, dog, and human.. Drug Metab Dispos 2003 Jun;31(6):731-41.
        pubmed: 12756205doi: 10.1124/dmd.31.6.731google scholar: lookup
      24. Rosales MS, Marsella R, Kunkle G, Harris BL, Nicklin CF, Lopez J. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of oral terbinafine and ketoconazole combined with cephalexin in the treatment of Malassezia dermatitis in dogs--a pilot study.. Vet Dermatol 2005 Jun;16(3):171-6.
      25. Ryder NS, Dupont MC. Inhibition of squalene epoxidase by allylamine antimycotic compounds. A comparative study of the fungal and mammalian enzymes.. Biochem J 1985 Sep 15;230(3):765-70.
        pmc: PMC1152681pubmed: 3877503doi: 10.1042/bj2300765google scholar: lookup
      26. Shadomy S, Espinel-Ingroff A, Gebhart RJ. In-vitro studies with SF 86-327, a new orally active allylamine derivative.. Sabouraudia 1985 Apr;23(2):125-32.
        pubmed: 2990057doi: 10.1080/00362178585380201google scholar: lookup
      27. Tell LA. Aspergillosis in mammals and birds: impact on veterinary medicine.. Med Mycol 2005 May;43 Suppl 1:S71-3.
        pubmed: 16110795doi: 10.1080/13693780400020089google scholar: lookup
      28. Yoo SD, Kang E, Shin BS, Jun H, Lee SH, Lee KC, Lee KH. Interspecies comparison of the oral absorption of itraconazole in laboratory animals.. Arch Pharm Res 2002 Jun;25(3):387-91.
        pubmed: 12135115doi: 10.1007/BF02976644google scholar: lookup
      29. Zoran DL, Riedesel DH, Dyer DC. Pharmacokinetics of propofol in mixed-breed dogs and greyhounds.. Am J Vet Res 1993 May;54(5):755-60.
        pubmed: 8317769

      Citations

      This article has been cited 3 times.
      1. Roix JJ, Harrison SD, Rainbolt EA, Meshaw KR, McMurry AS, Cheung P, Saha S. Systematic repurposing screening in xenograft models identifies approved drugs with novel anti-cancer activity. PLoS One 2014;9(8):e101708.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101708pubmed: 25093583google scholar: lookup
      2. Hardefeldt L, Thomas K, Page S, Norris J, Browning G, El Hage C, Stewart A, Gilkerson J, Muscatello G, Verwilghen D, van Galen G, Bauquier J, Cuming R, Reynolds B, Whittaker C, Wilkes E, Clulow J, Burden C, Begg L. Antimicrobial prescribing guidelines for horses in Australia. Aust Vet J 2025 Dec;103(12):781-889.
        doi: 10.1111/avj.70003pubmed: 40903020google scholar: lookup
      3. Wang A, Ding H, Liu Y, Gao Y, Zeng Z. Single dose pharmacokinetics of terbinafine in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2012 Aug;14(8):540-4.
        doi: 10.1177/1098612X12442280pubmed: 22403416google scholar: lookup