Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2024; 143; 105207; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105207

Physiological responses and agreement between two traditional lunging protocols for physical fitness training in untrained ponies.

Abstract: Lunging is a training technique commonly performed in a round pen or on a lunge line. This study investigated the effort intensity, autonomic responses, and method agreement in applying different lunging protocols to untrained ponies. Sixteen untrained ponies (aged 13.6 ± 6.3 years and weighing 358 ± 47.4 kg) were studied. Each pony underwent the same research-focused lunging program on a lunge line and, subsequently, in a round pen with a two-day interval between sessions. The heart rate variability (HRV) and effort intensity, indicated as a percentage of maximum heart rate (%HRmax), were determined pre-lunging, during lunging at distinct gaits, and at 30 min intervals for 120 min post-lunging. The correlation and method agreement between the two lunging methods were analysed. Ponies ran faster and covered longer distances during exercise on a lunge line than in a round pen. The effort intensity during cantering reached moderate levels (75.10 ± 2.39 % HRmax) with occasional high-intensity levels (88.07 ± 1.29 % HRmax) via both lunging methods. The HRV reached a minimum during cantering and returned to the baseline 120 min post-lunging. The HRV parameters (SDNN, RMSSD, LF, HF, SD1, and SD2) were strongly correlated (r ≥ 0.97 and p 0.85) and excellent agreement (average differences were within mean ± 1.96 SD) between the two lunging methods. In conclusion, lunging can elicit high physiological responses in untrained ponies, and both lunging methods demonstrate excellent agreement and yield similar physiological responses in these ponies.
Publication Date: 2024-10-15 PubMed ID: 39414095DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105207Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the physiological responses and degree of agreement in different lunging training methods for untrained ponies. Findings demonstrate that lunging can trigger high physiological responses and both training methods elicited similar results.

Study Overview

  • The study aimed to understand how untrained ponies respond physically to different lunging training methods and to assess how well these methods agreed in their effects on the ponies.
  • Sixteen untrained ponies were employed in the study. Each underwent two types of lunging programs: on a lunge line and in a round pen. There was a two-day interval between the sessions.

Measures and Methods

  • Several parameters were examined during the study: heart rate variability (HRV) and effort intensity (determined as a percentage of maximum heart rate (%HRmax)) before, during, and at 30-minute intervals for 120 minutes after lunging.
  • The running speed and distance covered by the ponies were also recorded.
  • The heart rate variability parameters including SDNN, RMSSD, LF, HF, SD1, and SD2 were scrutinized, and the correlation and agreement between the two lunging methods were analyzed.

Findings

  • Findings indicate that ponies ran faster and covered longer distances during exercise performed on a lunge line than in a round pen.
  • The effort intensity during cantering reached moderate levels (75.10 ± 2.39 % HRmax) with occasional spikes up to high-intensity levels (88.07 ± 1.29 % HRmax) under both lunging procedures.
  • The lowest HRV was recorded during cantering, but it reverted to the baseline 120 minutes after lunging.
  • The HRV parameters presented a strong correlation (r ≥ 0.97 and p 0.85) and excellent agreement (average differences were within mean ± 1.96 SD) between the two lunging methods.
  • The authors concluded that lunging can evoke high physiological responses in untrained ponies, and both lunging methods demonstrated excellent connection and stimulated similar physiological responses in the ponies.

Cite This Article

APA
Huangsaksri O, Wonghanchao T, Sanigavatee K, Poochipakorn C, Sukhong P, Chanda M. (2024). Physiological responses and agreement between two traditional lunging protocols for physical fitness training in untrained ponies. J Equine Vet Sci, 143, 105207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105207

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 143
Pages: 105207
PII: S0737-0806(24)00213-2

Researcher Affiliations

Huangsaksri, Onjira
  • Veterinary Clinical Studies Program, Graduated School, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand; Department of Large Animal and Wildlife Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.
Wonghanchao, Thita
  • Veterinary Clinical Studies Program, Graduated School, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand; Department of Large Animal and Wildlife Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.
Sanigavatee, Kanokpan
  • Veterinary Clinical Studies Program, Graduated School, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand; Department of Large Animal and Wildlife Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.
Poochipakorn, Chanoknun
  • Department of Large Animal and Wildlife Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.
Sukhong, Patskit
  • Department of Large Animal and Wildlife Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.
Chanda, Metha
  • Department of Large Animal and Wildlife Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand; Center for Veterinary Research and Innovation, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University Bang Khen Campus, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. Electronic address: fvetmtcd@ku.ac.th.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest We declared no conflict of interest in this study.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.