Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2018; 234; 72-76; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.02.006

Plasma and peritoneal fluid concentrations of ceftriaxone after intravenous and intraperitoneal administration in horses.

Abstract: Intraperitoneal (IP) use of antimicrobial agents may lead to therapeutic effects with better clinical results than intravenous (IV) administration. The aim of this study was to compare plasma and peritoneal fluid concentrations of ceftriaxone after IP and IV administration in horses, and to evaluate possible adverse effects. One group of five horses received 25mg/kg ceftriaxone diluted in 1L saline solution by IP catheter once daily for 5 days, while a second group of five horses received 25mg/kg ceftriaxone diluted in 250mL saline solution by IV injection once daily for 5days and 1L saline solution by IP catheter once daily for 5 days. Peritoneal fluid and plasma were collected to determine ceftriaxone concentrations after the first and fifth administration. IP administration of ceftriaxone resulted in concentrations above a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1μg/mL for 24h in peritoneal fluid and for 12h in plasma, while IV administration of ceftriaxone resulted in lower peritoneal fluid concentrations, which remained above a MIC of 1μg/mL for 12h in peritoneal fluid and 10h in plasma. No adverse effects were observed. Comparisons of ceftriaxone concentrations, time of occurrence of the maximum (T) and minimum (T) concentrations, and the mean residence time (MRT), between the two groups showed that IP administration provided greater availability of cephalosporin in peritoneal fluid. The IP use of ceftriaxone (25mg/kg diluted in 1L saline solution once daily) may be useful for the prophylaxis and/or treatment of peritonitis in horses.
Publication Date: 2018-02-14 PubMed ID: 29680398DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.02.006Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper explores the effects of intraperitoneal (IP) and intravenous (IV) administration of ceftriaxone, an antibiotic, in horses. The study suggests that IP administration may provide more effective results in managing peritonitis in horses than the traditional IV method.

Research Objective

  • The purpose of this research was to compare plasma and peritoneal fluid concentrations of ceftriaxone after administration through IP and IV routes in horses.
  • Another goal was to identify any adverse effects related to the administration of this medication.

Methodology

  • The study involved ten horses, divided equally into two groups.
  • One group received the antibiotic via IP catheter and the other received the drug through IV injection, both dosed at 25mg/kg and diluted in saline solution.
  • Each treatment was administered once a day over five days.
  • The researchers collected plasma and peritoneal fluid samples after the first and fifth treatments. The samples were then analyzed to determine ceftriaxone levels.

Results

  • The study found that ceftriaxone concentrations remained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) – the least concentration that prevents bacterial growth – for longer periods following IP administration than following IV injection; 24 hours in peritoneal fluid and 12 hours in plasma for IP, while 12 hours in peritoneal fluid and 10 hours in plasma for IV.
  • No negative effects were noted from either administration method throughout the five-day regimen.
  • The IP method provided a greater availability of the drug in peritoneal fluid as compared to the IV method.

Conclusion

  • Based on the results, it was observed that IP administration of ceftriaxone may be more beneficial for prophylaxis and/or treatment of peritonitis in horses.
  • The reason being that the IP method enhances the availability of ceftriaxone in peritoneal fluid, where the bacteria causing peritonitis are likely found, making the treatment potentially more effective.

Cite This Article

APA
Alonso JM, Peccinini RG, Campos ML, Nitta TY, Akutagawa TYM, Crescencio AP, Alves ALG, Rodrigues CA, Watanabe MJ, Hussni CA. (2018). Plasma and peritoneal fluid concentrations of ceftriaxone after intravenous and intraperitoneal administration in horses. Vet J, 234, 72-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.02.006

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 234
Pages: 72-76
PII: S1090-0233(18)30037-6

Researcher Affiliations

Alonso, J M
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Botucatu, Brazil.
Peccinini, R G
  • Department of Natural Active Principles and Toxicology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil.
Campos, M L
  • Department of Natural Active Principles and Toxicology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil.
Nitta, T Y
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Botucatu, Brazil.
Akutagawa, T Y M
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Botucatu, Brazil.
Crescencio, A P
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Botucatu, Brazil.
Alves, A L G
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Botucatu, Brazil.
Rodrigues, C A
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Botucatu, Brazil.
Watanabe, M J
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Botucatu, Brazil.
Hussni, C A
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Botucatu, Brazil. Electronic address: cahussni@fmvz.unesp.br.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / metabolism
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacokinetics
  • Ascitic Fluid / chemistry
  • Ceftriaxone / metabolism
  • Ceftriaxone / pharmacokinetics
  • Horses / metabolism
  • Injections, Intraperitoneal / veterinary
  • Injections, Intravenous / veterinary
  • Peritonitis / drug therapy
  • Peritonitis / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Mzyk DA, Halleran JL, Neumann LM, Baynes RE, Foster DM. Pharmacokinetics of Ampicillin Trihydrate in Plasma, Interstitial, and Peritoneal Fluid Following Intraperitoneal or Intramuscular Administration in Steers at the Beginning of a Standing Flank Laparotomy. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2026 Jan;49(1):44-54.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.70023pubmed: 40905606google scholar: lookup