Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record1993; 133(14); 336-338; doi: 10.1136/vr.133.14.336

Postoperative analgesia using phenylbutazone, flunixin or carprofen in horses.

Abstract: Horses undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups to receive phenylbutazone at 4 mg/kg (n = 72), flunixin at 1 mg/kg (n = 68) or carprofen at 0.7 mg/kg (n = 63) by slow intravenous injection at the end of surgery, just before they were disconnected from halothane. Pain was assessed by either of two resident surgical clinicians (who did not know which non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug had been given) when the horses first stood up, two and four hours later and the next morning. If repeated doses of analgesic drugs were given the time was recorded and taken as an end point for the study. The presence or absence of side effects was also recorded. In the three groups there was no significant difference between the types of surgery performed, the numbers of horses requiring further analgesia or the pain scores at any time. In the horses needing further analgesia there was a significant difference in the time after surgery at which the further analgesia was given between those in the flunixin group, 12.8 +/- 4.3 hours (mean +/- sd) and those in the phenylbutazone group, 8.4 +/- 4.6 hours; the carprofen group had an intermediate interval of 11.7 +/- 6.9 hours. Significantly fewer of the horses that received butorphanol during surgery needed further analgesia than of those that did not receive any opioid.
Publication Date: 1993-10-02 PubMed ID: 8236675DOI: 10.1136/vr.133.14.336Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study explores the impact of three different types of drugs, phenylbutazone, flunixin, and carprofen, in providing post-surgery pain relief in horses. The research reveals no significant difference among the three drugs in terms of the need for additional analgesia or pain scores, although timing for further analgesia differed.

Methodology

  • The study was conducted on horses that went under the knife. Following the surgery, these horses were divided randomly into three groups.
  • The first group was treated with phenylbutazone at a dose of 4 mg/kg (n = 72), the second group was given flunixin at 1 mg/kg (n = 68), and the third group received carprofen at a dosage of 0.7 mg/kg (n = 63).
  • The doses were administered through slow intravenous injection at the end of the procedure, just before the horses were taken off halothane.
  • The pain levels of these horses were evaluated by surgical clinicians at several points – when the horses first stood up, two hours and four hours later, and the next morning.
  • If repeated doses of analgesic drugs were required, the time was recorded and taken as the study end point.

Results and Conclusion

  • No significant difference was found in the three groups related to the type of surgeries performed, the count of horses needing further analgesia, or the pain scores at any given time.
  • In the case of horses needing further pain relief, the time at which this was needed did vary significantly among the three groups.
  • The horses from the flunixin group needed further analgesia at an average of 12.8 hours after the surgery, while horses in the phenylbutazone group required additional analgesia at around 8.4 hours post-surgery.
  • It was also found that the horses that received butorphanol during surgery needed significantly fewer dosages of further analgesia compared to those that were not administered any opioid.
  • This study suggests that while all three drugs are effective in postoperative analgesic management, the time at which further analgesia is required differs and should be considered in the pain management strategy for post-surgical care in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Johnson CB, Taylor PM, Young SS, Brearley JC. (1993). Postoperative analgesia using phenylbutazone, flunixin or carprofen in horses. Vet Rec, 133(14), 336-338. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.133.14.336

Publication

ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 133
Issue: 14
Pages: 336-338

Researcher Affiliations

Johnson, C B
  • Animal Health Trust, Suffolk.
Taylor, P M
    Young, S S
      Brearley, J C

        MeSH Terms

        • Analgesia / veterinary
        • Anesthesia / veterinary
        • Animals
        • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / therapeutic use
        • Butorphanol
        • Carbazoles / therapeutic use
        • Clonixin / analogs & derivatives
        • Clonixin / therapeutic use
        • Horse Diseases / surgery
        • Horses
        • Injections, Intravenous / veterinary
        • Pain Measurement / veterinary
        • Pain, Postoperative / drug therapy
        • Pain, Postoperative / veterinary
        • Phenylbutazone / therapeutic use
        • Time Factors

        Citations

        This article has been cited 7 times.
        1. Mercer MA, Davis JL, McKenzie HC. The Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutic Evaluation of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Adult Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 10;13(10).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13101597pubmed: 37238029google scholar: lookup
        2. Jacobs CC, Schnabel LV, McIlwraith CW, Blikslager AT. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in equine orthopaedics.. Equine Vet J 2022 Jan 25;54(4):636-48.
          doi: 10.1111/evj.13561pubmed: 35076950google scholar: lookup
        3. Nannarone S, Giannettoni G, Laurenza C, Giontella A, Moretti G. Methadone or Butorphanol as Pre-Anaesthetic Agents Combined with Romifidine in Horses Undergoing Elective Surgery: Qualitative Assessment of Sedation and Induction.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 31;11(9).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11092572pubmed: 34573538google scholar: lookup
        4. Torcivia C, McDonnell S. Equine Discomfort Ethogram.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 23;11(2).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11020580pubmed: 33672338google scholar: lookup
        5. Guedes AGP, Aristizabal F, Sole A, Adedeji A, Brosnan R, Knych H, Yang J, Hwang SH, Morisseau C, Hammock BD. Pharmacokinetics and antinociceptive effects of the soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor t-TUCB in horses with experimentally induced radiocarpal synovitis.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2018 Apr;41(2):230-238.
          doi: 10.1111/jvp.12463pubmed: 29067696google scholar: lookup
        6. Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D, Stucke D, Canali E, Leach MC. Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration.. PLoS One 2014;9(3):e92281.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092281pubmed: 24647606google scholar: lookup
        7. Shoemaker RW, Read EK, Duke T, Wilson DG. In situ coagulation and transection of the ovarian pedicle: an alternative to laparoscopic ovariectomy in juvenile horses.. Can J Vet Res 2004 Jan;68(1):27-32.
          pubmed: 14979432