Analyze Diet
Animal reproduction science2008; 107(3-4); 219-228; doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.04.012

Practical review of self-mutilation in horses.

Abstract: Self-mutilation in horses includes biting, stomping and kicking, rubbing, and lunging into objects. Based on the author's clinical experience, three distinct types of self-mutilation are proposed and described. Type I represents normal behavioral response to continuous or intermittent physical discomfort. Type II, seen in stallions and geldings, can be recognized as self-directed intermale aggression. The behavior includes the elements and order of the natural interactive sequence typical of encounters between two stallions, except that the stallion himself is the target of his intermale behavior. Type III involves a more quiet, often rhythmically repetitive or methodical behavioral sequence of a stereotypy, for example nipping at various areas of the body in a relatively invariant pattern, stomping, or kicking rhythmically against an object. The prevalence of the various types of self-mutilation in horses is not known. In one survey, results suggested that self-mutilation of one form or another has been observed in as many as 2% of domestic stallions. Among and between stallions, self-mutilation varies in frequency and intensity, and can reach levels that are fertility and/or life threatening. Careful evaluation of the horse's behavior is often necessary to distinguish the specific type. Type I self-mutilation, where physical discomfort is the root cause, can be eliminated by relieving the discomfort. For Types II and III, understanding of intermale interactive behavior of horses and the environmental factors that may trigger or exacerbate the self-mutilative form, can be useful in guiding humane management or behavior modification. Pharmacologic interventions may be a useful adjunct to management and nutritional changes.
Publication Date: 2008-04-29 PubMed ID: 18541393DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.04.012Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article discusses the concept of self-mutilation in horses, proposing three distinct types of this behavior and exploring potential methods for management and modification.

Understanding Self-Mutilation in Horses

  • The article begins by defining self-mutilation in horses as behaviors such as biting, stomping, kicking, rubbing, and lunging into objects. This is considered a concerning issue as it can lead to severe injuries and even potentially threaten the life and fertility of the horse.
  • Based on the author’s clinical experience, three types of self-mutilation are proposed: Type I, which represents a normal behavioral response to continuous or intermittent physical discomfort; Type II, found predominantly in stallions and geldings and is characterized as intermale aggression directed towards oneself; and Type III, which describes more quiet and usually rhythmically repetitive or methodical behavioral patterns, such as nipping at various areas of the body.

Prevalence and Variation of Self-Mutilation

  • The author acknowledges that the exact prevalence of self-mutilation in horses is uncertain, but one survey suggests that it may be observed in up to 2% of domestic stallions. The behavior can vary greatly in frequency and intensity between different stallions.

Evaluating and Managing Self-Mutilation

  • According to the study, careful evaluation of the horse’s behavior is often necessary to distinguish the specific type of self-mutilation. Type I, rooted in physical discomfort, can often be eliminated by addressing and relieving this discomfort.
  • For Types II and III, understanding of the intermale interactive behavior of horses and the potential environmental triggers can guide effective and humane management or modification of the behavior.
  • Additionally, the author suggests that pharmacologic interventions might be a useful supplementary strategy to manage self-mutilation, alongside management and dietary changes. This indicates a potential interdisciplinary approach to handling the issue, combining elements of veterinary medicine, behavioral science, and environmental management.

Cite This Article

APA
McDonnell SM. (2008). Practical review of self-mutilation in horses. Anim Reprod Sci, 107(3-4), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.04.012

Publication

ISSN: 0378-4320
NlmUniqueID: 7807205
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 107
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 219-228

Researcher Affiliations

McDonnell, Sue M
  • Equine Behavior Clinic, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, New Bolton Center, Kennett Square, PA 19348, United States. suemcd@vet.upenn.edu

MeSH Terms

  • Aggression / physiology
  • Animals
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / etiology
  • Horse Diseases / therapy
  • Horses / physiology
  • Male
  • Self Mutilation / epidemiology
  • Self Mutilation / etiology
  • Self Mutilation / therapy

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Ferlini Agne G, May BE, Lovett A, Simon O, Steel C, Santos L, Guedes do Carmo L, Barbosa B, Werner LC, Daros RR, Somogyi AA, Sykes B, Franklin S. Horse Grimace Scale Does Not Detect Pain in Horses with Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 12;13(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13101623pubmed: 37238054google scholar: lookup
  2. Zollinger A, Wyss C, Bardou D, Bachmann I. Social Box: A New Housing System Increases Social Interactions among Stallions. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 20;13(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13081408pubmed: 37106974google scholar: lookup
  3. Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 5;12(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
  4. Starling M, McLean A, McGreevy P. The Contribution of Equitation Science to Minimising Horse-Related Risks to Humans. Animals (Basel) 2016 Feb 23;6(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani6030015pubmed: 26907354google scholar: lookup
  5. Sykes BW, Hewetson M, Hepburn RJ, Luthersson N, Tamzali Y. European College of Equine Internal Medicine Consensus Statement--Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in Adult Horses. J Vet Intern Med 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):1288-99.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.13578pubmed: 26340142google scholar: lookup
  6. Padalino B, Aubé L, Fatnassi M, Monaco D, Khorchani T, Hammadi M, Lacalandra GM. Could dromedary camels develop stereotypy? The first description of stereotypical behaviour in housed male dromedary camels and how it is affected by different management systems. PLoS One 2014;9(2):e89093.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089093pubmed: 24586522google scholar: lookup
  7. Devine DP. Self-injurious behaviour in autistic children: a neuro-developmental theory of social and environmental isolation. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2014 Mar;231(6):979-97.
    doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3279-2pubmed: 24057764google scholar: lookup
  8. Amari M, Brioschi FA, Auletta L, Ravasio G. Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment for Chronic Lameness Due to Distal Forelimb Disease in Horses: A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel) 2025 Aug 10;15(16).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15162341pubmed: 40867669google scholar: lookup