Analyze Diet

Preliminary evaluation of reference intervals for a point-of-care viscoelastic coagulation monitor (VCM Vet) in healthy adult horses.

Abstract: To evaluate a point-of-care viscoelastic coagulation monitor (VCM Vet) for use in horses by assessing variability between devices and establish reference intervals (RIs) for healthy adult horses. Methods: Prospective observational study. Methods: Two university teaching hospitals. Methods: Healthy adult horses (n = 68). Methods: None. Results: Blood collected by direct jugular venipuncture was applied directly from the syringe into 2 VCM Vet cassettes to establish coefficients of variation (CVs) and RIs for reported parameters of clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), alpha angle, amplitude at 10 and 20 minutes, maximum clot firmness, and lysis index at 30 and 45 minutes. CVs for each parameter were within clinical tolerance. There was a significant difference in CT between institutions (P < 0.001). Differences in CV were found between institutions for CT (P = 0.003) and CFT (P = 0.01). Healthy horse RIs were calculated for the overall data set and each individual institution. Calculated RIs were as follows: CT, 255.6-1233.9 seconds; CFT, 89.4-581 seconds; alpha angle, 11.4-53.6°; maximum clot firmness, 18-37.7; lysis index at 30 minutes, 97.3%-102.1%; lysis index at 45 minutes, 80.8%-103.3%; amplitude at 10 minutes, 8.7-28.3; and amplitude at 20 minutes, 17.4-35.7. Conclusions: VCM Vet is a repeatable and practical option for rapid point-of-care assessment of hemostasis in horses but has a wide RI and is susceptible to variability. Establishment of institution-specific RIs is recommended.
Publication Date: 2023-08-10 PubMed ID: 37561043DOI: 10.1111/vec.13317Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research aimed to evaluate the use of a point-of-care viscoelastic coagulation monitor (VCM Vet) in horses. The findings show that the VCM Vet can effectively monitor blood coagulation in horses but there is potential for variability and institution-specific reference intervals should be considered.

Experiment Methodology

  • The authors took this study as a prospective observational experiment, conducted in two university teaching hospitals.
  • The experiment relied on the blood samples from 68 healthy adult horses. Blood was collected through direct jugular venipuncture and applied straight from the syringe into two VCM Vet cassettes.
  • The primary aim was to assess the possible variability between devices and establish reference intervals (RIs) for the clotted blood of these healthy adult horses.

Collected Data and Findings

  • Several parameters were monitored during this study, including clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), alpha angle, the amplitude at 10 and 20 minutes, maximum clot firmness, and lysis index at 30 and 45 minutes.
  • The research team established coefficients of variation (CVs) and the RIs for the parameters observed. According to the results, CVs for each parameter were found to be within clinically acceptable tolerance.
  • However, there was a noted significant difference in CT between institutions, and differences were identified in CVs of CT and CFT across the two institutions.
  • Based on the collected overall data, the team computed the RIs. For instance, the RIs for CT, CFT, alpha angle were found to be 255.6-1233.9 seconds, 89.4-581 seconds, and 11.4-53.6° respectively.

Conclusion and Suggestions

  • The study concluded that VCM Vet offers repeatable results and is a practical choice for rapid point-of-care assessment of hemostasis in horses.
  • But, it’s susceptible to variability, as reflected in the wide-ranging RIs. Hence, the study recommends establishing institution-specific reference intervals to mitigate these discrepancies in the future.

Cite This Article

APA
Bishop RC, Kemper AM, Burges JW, Jandrey KE, Wilkins PA. (2023). Preliminary evaluation of reference intervals for a point-of-care viscoelastic coagulation monitor (VCM Vet) in healthy adult horses. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.13317

Publication

ISSN: 1476-4431
NlmUniqueID: 101152804
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Bishop, Rebecca C
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Kemper, Ann M
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Burges, Julie W
  • William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Jandrey, Karl E
  • William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Wilkins, Pamela A
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.

References

This article includes 36 references
  1. Dallap BL, Dolente B, Boston R. Coagulation profiles in 27 horses with large colon volvulus.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2003;13(4):215-225.
  2. Dallap Schaer BL, Epstein K. Coagulopathy of the critically ill equine patient.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2009;19(1):53-65.
  3. Dolente BA, Wilkins PA, Boston RC. Clinicopathologic evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation in horses with acute colitis.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220(7):1034-1038.
  4. Wilson ME, Holz CL, Kopec AK. Coagulation parameters following equine herpesvirus type 1 infection in horses.. Equine Vet J 2019;51(1):102-107.
  5. Epstein KL, Brainard BM, Lopes MA. Thrombelastography in 26 healthy horses with and without activation by recombinant human tissue factor.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2009;19(1):96-101.
  6. Epstein KL, Brainard BM, Gomez-Ibanez SE. Thrombelastography in horses with acute gastrointestinal disease.. J Vet Intern Med 2011;25(2):307-314.
  7. Epstein KL, Brainard BM, Giguere S. Serial viscoelastic and traditional coagulation testing in horses with gastrointestinal disease.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2013;23(5):504-516.
  8. Nomura M, Mizobe F, Kato T. Evaluating continuous blood coagulopathy in assessing the severity of acute colitis in Thoroughbred racehorses.. J Equine Sci 2018;29(3):79-85.
  9. Yeo WM, Osterrieder N, Stokol T. Equine herpesvirus type 1 infection induces procoagulant activity in equine monocytes.. Vet Res 2013;44(1):16.
  10. Stokol T, Serpa PBS, Brooks MB. Subcutaneous administration of low-molecular-weight heparin to horses inhibits ex vivo equine herpesvirus type 1-induced platelet activation.. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:106.
  11. Dunkel B, Chan DL, Boston R, Monreal L. Association between hypercoagulability and decreased survival in horses with ischemic or inflammatory gastrointestinal disease.. J Vet Intern Med 2010;24(6):1467-1474.
  12. DeNotta SL, Brooks MB. Coagulation assessment in the equine patient.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2020;36(1):53-71.
  13. McGovern KF, Lascola KM, Smith SA. Assessment of acute moderate hyperglycemia on traditional and thromboelastometry coagulation parameters in healthy adult horses.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2012;22(5):550-557.
  14. Cesarini C, Monreal L, Armengou L. Association of admission plasma D-dimer concentration with diagnosis and outcome in horses with colic.. J Vet Intern Med 2010;24(6):1490-1497.
  15. Cesarini C, Monreal L, Armengou L. Progression of plasma D-dimer concentration and coagulopathies during hospitalization in horses with colic.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2014;24(6):672-680.
  16. McGovern KF, Lascola KM, Smith SA. The effects of hyperglycemia and endotoxemia on coagulation parameters in healthy adult horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2013;27(2):347-353.
  17. Mendez-Angulo JL, Mudge MC, Vilar-Saavedra P. Thromboelastography in healthy horses and horses with inflammatory gastrointestinal disorders and suspected coagulopathies.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2010;20(5):488-493.
  18. McMichael MA, Smith SA. Viscoelastic coagulation testing: technology, applications, and limitations.. Vet Clin Pathol 2011;40(2):140-153.
  19. Rossi TM, Smith SA, McMichael MA, Wilkins PA. Evaluation of contact activation of citrated equine whole blood during storage and effects of contact activation on results of recalcification-initiated thromboelastometry.. Am J Vet Res 2015;76(2):122-128.
  20. Thane K, Bedenice D, Pacheco A. Operator-based variability of equine thromboelastography.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2017;27(4):419-424.
  21. Junge HK, Ringer SK, Mayer N, Schwarzwald CC. Assessment of method reliability and determination of reference intervals for rotational thromboelastometry in horses.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2016;26(5):691-703.
  22. Flatland B, Koenigshof AM, Rozanski EA. Systematic evaluation of evidence on veterinary viscoelastic testing part 2: sample acquisition and handling.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2014;24(1):30-36.
  23. deLaforcade A, Goggs R, Wiinberg B. Systematic evaluation of evidence on veterinary viscoelastic testing part 3: assay activation and test protocol.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2014;24(1):37-46.
  24. Rosati T, Jandrey KE, Burges JW, Kent MS. Establishment of a reference interval for a novel viscoelastic coagulometer and comparison with thromboelastography in healthy cats.. Vet Clin Pathol 2020;49(4):660-664.
  25. Rigor RR, Schutzman LM, Galante JM, Brown IE. Viscoelastic coagulation monitor (VCMVet) reference intervals and sex differences in mature adult mice.. Acta Haematol 2021;144(6):633-640.
  26. Buriko Y, Drobatz K, Silverstein DC. Establishment of normal reference intervals in dogs using a viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation monitor and its comparison with thromboelastography.. Vet Clin Pathol 2020;49:567-573.
  27. Anderson L, Quasim I, Steven M. Interoperator and intraoperator variability of whole blood coagulation assays: a comparison of thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry.. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014;28(6):1550-1557.
  28. Lang T, Bauters A, Braun SL. Multi-centre investigation on reference ranges for ROTEM thromboelastometry.. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2005;16(4):301-310.
  29. Friedrichs KR, Harr KE, Freeman KP. ASVCP reference interval guidelines: determination of de novo reference intervals in veterinary species and other related topics.. Vet Clin Pathol 2012;41(4):441-453.
  30. Horn PS, Feng L, Li Y, Pesce AJ. Effect of outliers and nonhealthy individuals on reference interval estimation.. Clin Chem 2001;47(12):2137-2145.
  31. Shen L, Tabaie S, Ivascu N. Viscoelastic testing inside and beyond the operating room.. J Thorac Dis 2017;9(Suppl. 4):S299-S308.
  32. Benes J, Zatloukal J, Kletecka J. Viscoelastic methods of blood clotting assessment - a multidisciplinary review.. Front Med 2015;2:62.
  33. Goggs R, Brainard B, de Laforcade AM. Partnership on Rotational ViscoElastic Test Standardization (PROVETS): evidence-based guidelines on rotational viscoelastic assays in veterinary medicine.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2014;24(1):1-22.
  34. Silverberg E, Tornqvist F, Kander T. Comparison of citrated and fresh whole blood for viscoelastic coagulation testing during elective neurosurgery.. Thromb Res 2017;156:73-79.
  35. Smith SA, McMichael M, Galligan A. Clot formation in canine whole blood as measured by rotational thromboelastometry is influenced by sample handling and coagulation activator.. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2010;21(7):692-702.
  36. Basdogan C, Sedef M, Harders M, Wesarg S. VR-based simulators for training in minimally invasive surgery.. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2007;27(2):54-66.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.