Analyze Diet
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia2011; 38(5); 505-509; doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00642.x

Preliminary investigation of concurrent administration of phenylbutazone and romifidine in healthy horses.

Abstract: To characterize the cardiorespiratory and electrocardiographic effects of the combined administration of phenylbutazone and romifidine. Methods: Prospective four-period, four-treatment, blinded, randomized, crossover trial. Methods: Five, healthy, mixed breed horses. Methods: Prior to treatment administration, a catheter was introduced into the intra-thoracic cranial vena cava via the jugular vein and a subcutaneously located carotid artery was catheterised. All treatments were administered intravenously (IV) and consisted of saline placebo (PLC), phenylbutazone (PBZ, 4.4 mg kg(-1) ) romifidine (ROM, 80 μg kg(-1) ) and a combination of phenylbutazone (4.4 mg kg(-1) ) and romifidine (80 μg kg(-1) ). There was at least a 1 week washout period between treatments. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (f(R) ), systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressures and central venous pressure (CVP) were recorded for baseline (prior to drug administration) and at 5 minute intervals thereafter for 30 minutes. Electrocardiographic abnormalities were recorded. Data were analyzed by anova. Results: For the cardiovascular variables there were no statistically significant (p>0.05) differences between horses treated with ROM and PBZ_ROM. Statistically significant (p<0.05) differences only occurred between treatments with romifidine (ROM and PBZ_ROM) and without romifidine (PLC and PBZ). Within treatments, for ROM, changes over time were statistically significant (p<0.05) for HR, SAP, DAP, MAP and CVP. For PBZ_ROM, changes over time were statistically significant (p<0.05) for CVP. Sino-atrial and atrio-ventricular blocks occurred in horses treated with ROM and PBZ_ROM. Conclusions: The combined IV administration of phenylbutazone and romifidine had no statistically significant effect on cardiorespiratory variables. These limited data suggest no evidence why both agents should not be included in a preoperative medication protocol for healthy horses but do not exclude the possibility of interactions occurring in a larger population.
Publication Date: 2011-08-13 PubMed ID: 21831057DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00642.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the effects of co-administering two drugs, phenylbutazone and romifidine, on the cardiorespiratory system and electrocardiograms of healthy horses through a blinded, randomized, and cross-over trial.

Methodology

  • The preliminary study utilized a prospective four-period, four-treatment, blinded, randomized, crossover trial method. This means that the participants (in this case, five healthy mixed breed horses) received each treatment in a random order, with each treatment separated by a washout period of at least one week to allow any effects of the previous treatment to wear off.
  • The administration of treatment was performed using intravenous injection. The treatment groups included a saline placebo (intended as a control), phenylbutazone alone, romifidine alone, and a combination of phenylbutazone and romifidine.
  • Before administering the drugs, the researchers inserted a catheter into the horses’ cranial vena cava through the jugular vein. A carotid artery was also catheterised using subcutaneous access (under the skin).
  • To monitor physiological responses, several parameters were recorded, including heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressures, and central venous pressure (CVP). These records were taken before drug administration (baseline) and at 5-minute intervals for 30 minutes post-administration. Any abnormalities in the electrocardiogram were also reported.

Results

  • The results showed no statistically significant differences in the cardiovascular parameters between horses treated with romifidine only and those treated with a combination of phenylbutazone and romifidine.
  • Statistically significant differences were found between those treatments including romifidine (be it alone or in combination) and those not containing romifidine (the control and phenylbutazone alone).
  • Over time, significant changes were observed in heart rate, arterial pressures, and central venous pressure for the romifidine group, and in central venous pressure for the combined group.
  • Sino-atrial and atrio-ventricular blockages (certain types of heart rhythm issues) were observed in horses treated with romifidine alone and the combined treatment.

Conclusion

  • The experiment concluded that no significant effects on cardiorespiratory variables were observed when phenylbutazone and romifidine were administered together, compared to when administered separately.
  • The researchers stated that their findings don’t offer any reasons why these two drugs shouldn’t be used together in preoperative medication for healthy horses, although they caution that these results may not apply to a larger population, or the possibility of interactions can’t be entirely excluded.

Cite This Article

APA
Kruger K, Stegmann GF, Becker PJ. (2011). Preliminary investigation of concurrent administration of phenylbutazone and romifidine in healthy horses. Vet Anaesth Analg, 38(5), 505-509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00642.x

Publication

ISSN: 1467-2995
NlmUniqueID: 100956422
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 38
Issue: 5
Pages: 505-509

Researcher Affiliations

Kruger, Karin
  • Department of Companion Animal Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Stegmann, George F
    Becker, Piet J

      MeSH Terms

      • Anesthesia, Intravenous / methods
      • Anesthesia, Intravenous / veterinary
      • Anesthetics, Combined / administration & dosage
      • Anesthetics, Combined / pharmacology
      • Anesthetics, Intravenous / administration & dosage
      • Anesthetics, Intravenous / pharmacology
      • Animals
      • Blood Pressure / drug effects
      • Heart Rate / drug effects
      • Horses
      • Imidazoles / administration & dosage
      • Imidazoles / pharmacology
      • Phenylbutazone / administration & dosage
      • Phenylbutazone / pharmacology
      • Respiratory Rate / drug effects

      Citations

      This article has been cited 2 times.
      1. Taguchi T, Morales Yniguez FJ, Takawira C, Andrews FM, Lopez MJ. Agmatine Administration Effects on Equine Gastric Ulceration and Lameness. J Clin Med 2022 Dec 8;11(24).
        doi: 10.3390/jcm11247283pubmed: 36555900google scholar: lookup
      2. Conde Ruiz C, Cruz Benedetti IC, Guillebert I, Portier KG. Effect of Pre- and Postoperative Phenylbutazone and Morphine Administration on the Breathing Response to Skin Incision, Recovery Quality, Behavior, and Cardiorespiratory Variables in Horses Undergoing Fetlock Arthroscopy: A Pilot Study. Front Vet Sci 2015;2:58.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00058pubmed: 26664985google scholar: lookup