Analyze Diet
Mycobiology2025; 53(2); 200-213; doi: 10.1080/12298093.2025.2455214

Preussia jejuensis sp. nov., P. koreensis sp. nov., and P. isomera, Coprophilous Fungi Isolated from Horse Dung in Seopjikoji, Jeju Island in the Republic of Korea.

Abstract: The genus is widely distributed and includes species with ecological and biotechnological importance. In this study, morphological and phylogenetic analyses of the ITS and LSU rDNA sequences revealed two novel species, sp. nov. and sp. nov., as well as one previously unrecorded species in Korea, , from horse dung collected in Seopjikoji, Jeju Island, Republic of Korea. sp. nov. is unique in producing conidia from conidiomata instead of teleomorphic structures, a feature not observed in any other known species of the genus. sp. nov. is morphologically distinguished by the absence of a neck, a smaller ascocarp diameter, smaller asci, and larger ascospores. In the phylogenetic analysis, sp. nov. was closely related to and , while sp. nov. was closely related to , , and . However, sp. nov. and sp. nov. were clearly distinguished from their related species. This study expands the understanding of the biodiversity of coprophilous fungi and its distribution in Jeju Island, a region where horse breeding has been practiced for centuries, emphasizing the ecological importance of dung as a fungal habitat.
Publication Date: 2025-02-07 PubMed ID: 40098939PubMed Central: PMC11912246DOI: 10.1080/12298093.2025.2455214Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research article reports the discovery and description of two new species of coprophilous fungi, Preussia jejuensis sp. nov. and Preussia koreensis sp. nov., as well as the first Korean record of Preussia isomera, all isolated from horse dung in Seopjikoji, Jeju Island, South Korea.
  • The study integrates morphological characteristics and molecular phylogenetic analyses to distinguish these new species and expand knowledge on fungal biodiversity in this ecological niche.

Introduction and Background

  • The genus Preussia consists of fungi widely distributed in various environments, well known for their ecological roles and potential biotechnological applications.
  • Coprophilous fungi, which grow on animal dung, play important roles in nutrient cycling and ecosystem dynamics.
  • Jeju Island, with a long history of horse breeding, provides a unique habitat for coprophilous fungi, yet fungal biodiversity in this niche is still underexplored.

Objectives

  • To identify and describe new species of the genus Preussia isolated from horse dung on Jeju Island.
  • To perform morphological analyses and molecular phylogenetic studies using ITS (Internal Transcribed Spacer) and LSU (Large Subunit rDNA) gene sequences to clarify species delineations.
  • To document the presence of previously unrecorded Preussia species from Korea.

Materials and Methods

  • Sample Collection: Horse dung samples were collected from Seopjikoji region on Jeju Island.
  • Isolation and Cultivation: Fungi were isolated from dung samples and cultivated under controlled laboratory conditions.
  • Morphological Analysis: Key fungal structures such as conidiomata, ascocarps, asci, and ascospores were examined microscopically.
  • Molecular Phylogenetics: DNA was extracted, and ITS and LSU rDNA regions were sequenced.
  • Phylogenetic trees were constructed to assess relationships between isolated fungi and related species in the genus Preussia.

Key Findings

  • Two new species were identified and named Preussia jejuensis sp. nov. and Preussia koreensis sp. nov.
  • Preussia jejuensis is distinguished by producing conidia from conidiomata rather than teleomorphic (sexual) structures, a unique feature among Preussia species.
  • Preussia koreensis is characterized by:
    • Absence of a neck structure on the ascocarp
    • Smaller ascocarp diameter
    • Smaller asci (spore-containing sacs)
    • Larger ascospores compared to related species
  • Phylogenetic analyses:
    • Showed that Preussia jejuensis is closely related to Preussia terricola and Preussia aemulans but genetically distinct.
    • Indicated that Preussia koreensis clusters near Preussia persica, Preussia africana, and Preussia minima but is a separate species.
  • The previously unrecorded species Preussia isomera was also identified from the collected samples, marking its first report from Korea.

Significance and Implications

  • This study expands the taxonomic understanding of coprophilous fungi diversity, especially within the genus Preussia.
  • By highlighting novel species and previously unrecorded species in Korea, the research emphasizes the rich but understudied fungal biodiversity associated with herbivore dung in Jeju Island.
  • It underscores the ecological role of horse dung as a specialized habitat that supports unique fungal communities, contributing to decomposition and nutrient cycling.
  • Morphological and genetic characterization methods illustrated in this study provide a framework for future fungal biodiversity surveys in similar habitats.

Conclusions

  • The discovery of Preussia jejuensis sp. nov. and Preussia koreensis sp. nov., alongside Preussia isomera’s new record, reflects the hidden fungal diversity on Jeju Island.
  • Distinctive morphological traits combined with phylogenetic evidence reliably differentiated these new species from known relatives.
  • This research enhances the global and regional fungal taxonomy and ecology knowledge, particularly relating to coprophilous fungal species.

Cite This Article

APA
Noh H, Cho HU, Kim SH. (2025). Preussia jejuensis sp. nov., P. koreensis sp. nov., and P. isomera, Coprophilous Fungi Isolated from Horse Dung in Seopjikoji, Jeju Island in the Republic of Korea. Mycobiology, 53(2), 200-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2025.2455214

Publication

ISSN: 1229-8093
NlmUniqueID: 100960027
Country: Korea (South)
Language: English
Volume: 53
Issue: 2
Pages: 200-213

Researcher Affiliations

Noh, HyeongJin
  • Department of Microbiology, Dankook University, Cheonan, the Republic of Korea.
Cho, Hyun Uk
  • Department of Microbiology, Dankook University, Cheonan, the Republic of Korea.
Kim, Seong Hwan
  • Department of Microbiology, Dankook University, Cheonan, the Republic of Korea.

Conflict of Interest Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Krug JC, Benny GL, Keller HW. Coprophilous fungi. In Biodiversity of fungi. Academic Press, Burlington; 2004.467–499.
  2. Parker AD. Associations between coprophilous ascomycetes and fecal substrates in Illinois. Mycologia 1979;71(6):1206–1214.
  3. Hudson HJ. The ecology of fungi on plant remains above the soil. New Phytol 1968;67(4):837–874.
  4. Harley JL. Fungi in ecosystems. J. Ecol. 1971;59(3):653–668.
    doi: 10.2307/2258131google scholar: lookup
  5. Angel SK, Wicklow DT. Relationships between coprophilous fungi and fecal substrates in a Colorado grassland. Mycologia 1975;67(1):63–74.
    doi: 10.1080/00275514.1975.12019722pubmed: 1167620google scholar: lookup
  6. Lussenhop J, Kumar R, Wicklow DT. Insect effects on bacteria and fungi in cattle dung. Oikos 1980;34(1):54–58.
    doi: 10.2307/3544549google scholar: lookup
  7. Harper JE, Webster J. An experimental analysis of the coprophilous fungus succession. TBMS 1964;47(4):511–530.
  8. Kruys A, Wedin M. Phylogenetic relationships and an assessment of traditionally used taxonomic characters in the Sporormiaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota), utilising multi-gene phylogenies. Syst Biodivers 2009;7(4):465–478.
    doi: 10.1017/S1477200009990119google scholar: lookup
  9. Sandberg DC, del Olmo-Ruiz M, Sykes BE. Three distinctive (Sporormiaceae) from photosynthetic stems of (Ephedraceae, Gnetophyta) in southeastern Arizona. Plant Nad Fungal Syst 2022;67(2):63–74.
    doi: 10.35535/pfsyst-2022-0008google scholar: lookup
  10. Nisa H, Kamili AN, Nawchoo IA. Fungal endophytes as a prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products: a review. Microb Pathog 2015;82:50–59.
    doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.04.001pubmed: 25865953google scholar: lookup
  11. Premalatha K, Kalra AJFE. Molecular phylogenetic identification of endophytic fungi isolated from resinous and healthy wood of , a red-listed and highly exploited medicinal tree. Fungal Ecol 2013;6(3):205–211.
  12. Fuckel L. Fungi Rhenani Cent. 18(1), no 1702-1764. Hedwigia 1867;6:174–175.
  13. Mapperson RR, Kotiw M, Davis RA. The diversity and antimicrobial activity of sp. endophytes isolated from Australian dry rainforests. Curr Microbiol 2014;68(1):30–37.
    doi: 10.1007/s00284-013-0415-5pubmed: 23975673google scholar: lookup
  14. Gonzalez-Menendez V, Martin J, Siles JA. Biodiversity and chemotaxonomy of isolates from the . Mycol Progress 2017;16(7):713–728.
    doi: 10.1007/s11557-017-1305-1google scholar: lookup
  15. Asgari B, Zare R. Two new species of from Iran. nova_hedwigia 2010;90(3-4):533–548.
  16. Chang JH, Wang YZ. The genera and (Sporormiaceae, Pleosporales) in Taiwan.. nova_hedwigia 2009;88(1-2):245–254.
  17. Guarro J, Abdullah SK, GenÉ J. A new species of from submerged plant debris.. Mycol Res 1997;101(3):305–308.
    doi: 10.1017/S0953756296002638google scholar: lookup
  18. Cain RF. Studies of coprophilous ascomycetes VII. .. Can J Bot 1961;39(7):1633–1666.
    doi: 10.1139/b61-144google scholar: lookup
  19. Ellis JB, Everhart BM. The North American Pyrenomycetes.. .
  20. Von Arx JA. Ostiolate and nonostiolate Pyrenomycetes.. K Ned Akad Wet. Proc, Ser C 1973;76:289–296.
  21. Von Arx JA, Van der Aa HA. gen. et sp. nov.. Trans Br Mycol Soc 1987;89(1):117–120.
  22. Guarro J, Al-Saadoon AH, Abdullah SK. Two new coprophilous species of (Ascomycota) from Iraq.. nova_hedwigia 1997;64(1-2):177–183.
  23. Nyberg Kruys Å. Phylogenetic relationships and species richness of coprophilous ascomycetes. 2005. [Doctoral dissertation]. Ekologi, miljö och geovetenskap.
  24. Weber HA, Gloer JB. The preussomerins: novel antifungal metabolites from the coprophilous fungus Cain.. J Org Chem 1991;56(14):4355–4360.
    doi: 10.1021/jo00014a007google scholar: lookup
  25. Paudel B, Bhattarai K, Bhattarai HD. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of two polyketides from lichen-endophytic fungus sp.. Z Naturforsch C J Biosci 2018;73(3-4):161–163.
    doi: 10.1515/znc-2017-0105pubmed: 29320367google scholar: lookup
  26. Sharma A. Investigation of Queensland dry rainforest endophyte and their production of antimicrobial agents. 2021. [Doctoral dissertation]. Univ Southern Queensland.
  27. Chen X, Shi Q, Lin G. Spirobisnaphthalene analogs from the endophytic fungus sp.. J Nat Prod 2009;7:1712–1715.
    pubmed: 19708679
  28. Talontsi FM, Lamshöft M, Douanla-Meli C. Antiplasmodial and cytotoxic dibenzofurans from sp. harboured in . Oliv. Fitoterapia 2014;93:233–238.
    doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2014.01.003pubmed: 24440906google scholar: lookup
  29. Du L, Robles AJ, King JB. Cytotoxic dimeric epipolythiodiketopiperazines from the ascomycetous fungus .. J Nat Prod 2014;77(6):1459–1466.
    doi: 10.1021/np5002253pmc: PMC4073660pubmed: 24893224google scholar: lookup
  30. Youn UJ, Seo SS, Yim JH. Chemical constituents from the culture filtrate of a Himalayan soil fungus, sp. and their anti-inflammatory activity.. Kor J Microbiol 2018;54(1):18–23.
  31. Mun HY, Oh Y, Goh J. Evaluation of extracellular enzyme activity of fungi from freshwater environment in South Korea.. Kor J Mycol 2023;51(4):265–276.
  32. UNESCO World Heritage Centre . Jeju Volcanic Island and Lava Tubes; 2024. UNESCO. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1264.2007.
  33. Seo JH, Park KD, Lee HK. Genetic diversity of Halla horses using microsatellite markers.. J Anim Sci Technol 2016;58(1):40.
    doi: 10.1186/s40781-016-0120-6pmc: PMC5114825pubmed: 27891245google scholar: lookup
  34. Kim SH, Han A, Kronstad J. Differentiation of sapstain fungi by restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns in nuclear small subunit ribosomal DNA.. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999;177(1):151–157.
  35. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms.. Mol Biol Evol 2018;35(6):1547–1549.
    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096pmc: PMC5967553pubmed: 29722887google scholar: lookup
  36. Cho A. Constructing phylogenetic trees using maximum likelihood. Scripps Senior Theses 2012; Paper 46.
  37. Kimura MA. Simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.. J Mol Evol 1980;16(2):111–120.
    doi: 10.1007/BF01731581pubmed: 7463489google scholar: lookup
  38. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0.. Bioinform 2007;23(21):2947–2948.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404pubmed: 17846036google scholar: lookup
  39. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.. Syst Biol 2012;61(3):539–542.
    doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029pmc: PMC3329765pubmed: 22357727google scholar: lookup
  40. White T, Bruns T, Lee S. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics.. 1990; p. 315–322.
  41. Cubeta MA, Echandi E, Abernethy T. Characterization of anastomosis groups of binucleate species using restriction analysis of an amplified ribosomal RNA gene.. Phytopathol 1991;81(11):1395–1400.
    doi: 10.1094/Phyto-81-1395google scholar: lookup
  42. Vilgalys R, Hester M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several species.. J Bacteriol 1990;172(8):4238–4246.
  43. Dix NJ, Webster J. Coprophilous fungi.. 1995; 203–224.
  44. Ahmed SI, Cain RF. Revision of the genera and .. Can J Bot 1972;50(3):419–477.
    doi: 10.1139/b72-061google scholar: lookup
  45. Weber RW, Meffert A, Heidrun ANKE. Production of sordarin and related metabolites by the coprophilous fungus in submerged culture and in its natural substrate.. Mycol Res 2005;109(Pt 5):619–626.
    doi: 10.1017/s0953756205002765pubmed: 16018317google scholar: lookup
  46. Weber HA, Gloer JB.. nInterference competition among natural fungal competitors: An antifungal metabolite from the coprophilous fungus . J Nat Prod. 1988;51(5):879–883. doi: 10.1021/np50059a011.n
    doi: 10.1021/np50059a011pubmed: 21401198google scholar: lookup
  47. Al-Hosni K, Shahzad R, Khan L, et al. n sp. BSL-10 producing nitric oxide, gibberellins, and indole acetic acid and improving rice plant growth. J. Plant Interact. 2018;13(1):112–118. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2018.1432773.
  48. Chen X, Shi Q, Lin G, et al. nSpirobisnaphthalene analogues from the endophytic fungus sp. J Nat Prod. 2009;72(9):1712–1715. doi: 10.1021/np900302w.n
    doi: 10.1021/np900302wpubmed: 19708679google scholar: lookup
  49. Halda JP, Woo JJ, Liu D, et al. n gen. et sp. nov., a remarkable Pilocarpaceae (Lichen-Forming Ascomycetes) from Jeju Island. South Korea. Mycobiology. 2022;50(3):172–180. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2022.2081407.n
  50. Lee W, Kim DG, Perera RH, et al. nDiversity of (Xylariales, Apiosporaceae) species identified in Korean macroalgae including five unrecorded species. Mycobiology. 2023;51(6):401–409. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2023.2283272.n

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.