Analyze Diet
BMC veterinary research2009; 5; 32; doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-5-32

Prevalence-dependent use of serological tests for diagnosing glanders in horses.

Abstract: The internationally mandatory complement fixation test (CFT) for testing of equine sera for the absence of glanders has repeatedly led to discrepant results. Not only do "false positive" sera pose a problem for the diagnostician and the animal health authorities but they can also result in significant financial losses for the animal owners.Due to the very low prevalence of glanders in the horse population it is of major importance to use tests with a high specificity to overcome unreliable predictive values. We have compared formalin-fixed B. mallei whole cell antigen and a well characterised mouse monoclonal antibody with regard to their specificity and sensitivity for glanders serodiagnosis using CFT, an indirect (i) and a competitive (c) ELISA platform. Results: Our results show that the CFT is still a very reliable technique in horse populations with very low glanders prevalence. The cELISA has a high sensitivity and specificity comparable to that of the CFT. The cELISA offers the possibility for automatisation, can be applied to non-complement fixing sera and used for various host species. Conclusions: The CFT is still the method of choice for testing horses for the absence of glanders.
Publication Date: 2009-09-01 PubMed ID: 19723336PubMed Central: PMC2745380DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-5-32Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the effectiveness of various testing methods for diagnosing glanders in horses, emphasizing the importance of high specificity tests in populations with low glanders prevalence.

Research Background

  • The research focuses on diagnosing glanders, a disease in horses, that causes major economic losses for affected horse owners.
  • The prevalent test, known as the Complement Fixation Test (CFT) has exhibited inconsistent results including false positives, stirring up problems in diagnostic methods and leading to significant financial losses.
  • Detecting glanders is a critical concern because of the disease’s extremely low prevalence among the horse population.

Research Approach

  • The researchers compared a formalin-fixed B. mallei whole cell antigen and a mouse monoclonal antibody regarding their specificity and sensitivity for glanders serodiagnosis.
  • The comparison used three techniques – Complement Fixation Test (CFT), Indirect (i), and Competitive (c) ELISA platforms.

Research Results

  • The results revealed that despite the inconsistent outcomes, the CFT proves reliable for horse populations with exceptionally low glanders prevalence.
  • The Competitive ELISA (cELISA) had a high sensitivity and specificity, comparable to that of the CFT. This could potentially pave the way for automation of testing procedures, reliable application to non-complement fixing sera, and usage across different host species.

Research Conclusions

  • The research concludes that despite the advent of methods like cELISA, the Complement Fixation Test (CFT) remains the most effective technique in testing horses for glanders, primarily due to its reliability in low-prevalence populations.

Cite This Article

APA
Sprague LD, Zachariah R, Neubauer H, Wernery R, Joseph M, Scholz HC, Wernery U. (2009). Prevalence-dependent use of serological tests for diagnosing glanders in horses. BMC Vet Res, 5, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-5-32

Publication

ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 5
Pages: 32

Researcher Affiliations

Sprague, Lisa D
  • OIE Reference Laboratory for Glanders, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Naumburger Str, 96a, D-07743 Jena, Germany. natter13@gmx.de
Zachariah, Reena
    Neubauer, Heinrich
      Wernery, Renate
        Joseph, Maria
          Scholz, Holger C
            Wernery, Ulrich

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Antigens, Bacterial
              • Burkholderia mallei / immunology
              • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / standards
              • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / veterinary
              • Glanders / diagnosis
              • Glanders / epidemiology
              • Prevalence
              • Serologic Tests / standards
              • Serologic Tests / veterinary

              References

              This article includes 17 references
              1. Neubauer H, Sprague LD, Zachariah R, Tomaso H, Al Dahouk S, Wernery R, Wernery U, Scholz HC. Serodiagnosis of Burkholderia mallei infections in horses: State-of-the-art and perspectives.. J Vet Med B 2005;52:201–205.
              2. Anonymus OIE, 2007
              3. Elschner M, Liebler-Tenorio E, Wohlsein P, Lange E, Kaden V. Rotz - Ein im Jahr 2006 nach Deutschland importierter Rotzfall zeigt, dass diese Erkrankung eine allgegenwärtige Gefahr ist.. Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut Jahresbericht Insel Riems 2007.
              4. Cravitz L, Miller WR. Immunologic studies with Malleomyces mallei and Malleomyces pseudomallei I: Serological relationships between M. mallei and M. pseudomallei.. J Infect Dis 1950;86:46–51.
                pubmed: 15402290
              5. Martin SW. The evaluation of tests.. Can J Comp Med 1977;41:19–25.
                pmc: PMC1277688pubmed: 556679
              6. Jana AM, Gupta AK, Pandya G, Verma RD, Rao KM. Rapid diagnosis of glanders in equines by counter-immunoelectrophoresis.. Ind J Vet 1982;59:5–9.
              7. Katz JB, Dewald R, Nicholson J. Procedurally similar competitive immunoassay systems for the serodiagnosis of Babesia equi, Babesia caballi, Trypanosoma equiperdum, and Burkholderia mallei infection in horses.. J Vet Diagn Invest 2000;12:46–50.
                pubmed: 10690775
              8. Katz JB, Chieves LP, Hennager SG, Nicholson JM, Fisher TA, Byers PE. Serodiagnosis of equine piroplasmosis, dourine, and glanders using an arrayed immunoblotting method.. J Vet Diagn Invest 1999;11:292–294.
                pubmed: 10353365
              9. . Glanders.. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2004.
              10. Naureen AM, Saqib Muhammad G, Hussain MH, Asi MN. Comparative evaluation of Rose Bengal plate agglutination test, mallein test, and some conventional serological tests for diagnosis of equine glanders.. J Vet Diagn Invest 2007;19:362–367.
              11. Scholz HC, Joseph M, Tomaso H, Al Dahouk S, Witte A, Kinne J, Hagen RM, Wernery R, Wernery U, Neubauer H. Detection of the re-emerging agent Burkholderia mallei in a recent outbreak of glanders in the United Arabic Emirates by a newly developed flip-based PCR assay.. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2006;54:241–247.
              12. Anuntagool N, Sirisinha S. Antigenic relatedness between Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei.. Microbiol Immunol 2002;46:143–150.
                pubmed: 12008922
              13. Wernery U, Kinne J, Morton T. Pictoral guide to the diagnosis of equine glanders.. CVRL Brochure, CVRL 2004 pp. 1–22.
              14. Piven' NN, Iliukhin VI, Timoshin VB, Viktorov DV, Abramenko AV. Cross-reacting antigens of pathogenic Burkholderia and some dangerous causative agents of infectious diseases.. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 2005;2:14–9.
                doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(90)90095-Dpubmed: 15881932google scholar: lookup
              15. Verma RD, Sharma JK, Venkateswaran KS, Batra HV. Development of an avidin-biotin dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and its comparison with other serological tests for diagnosis of glanders in equines.. Vet Microbiol 1990;25:77–85.
                doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(90)90095-Dpubmed: 2247938google scholar: lookup
              16. Nottbohm H. Unspezifische Reaktionen bei der serologischen Feststellung des Malleus.. Deutsche Tierärztl Wochenschrift 1947;54:173–175.
              17. Srinivasan A, Kraus CN, DeShazer D, Becker PM, Dick JD, Spacek L, Bartlett JG, Byrne WR, Thomas DL. Glanders in a military research microbiologist.. N Engl J Med 2001;345:256–8.
                doi: 10.1056/NEJM200107263450404pubmed: 11474663google scholar: lookup