Prevalence of helminths in horses in the state of Brandenburg, Germany.
Abstract: The objective of the study was to estimate the prevalence of helminths in the horse population of the state of Brandenburg, Germany. One hundred and twenty-six horse farms in the state were selected by randomised stratified sampling. In total, 1,407 horses across all farms were examined coproscopically. The experimental unit was the horse farm: a farm was considered infected when at least one horse on the farm investigated was positive for helminth eggs. Animal details such as age, breed and sex were collected for all study horses and analysed for risk of infection. Risk was defined as horses having an above-average shedding of strongyle eggs. The following prevalence on horse farm level were established: Cyathostominae (98.4%), ascarids (16.7%), tapeworms (14.3%), pinworms (8.7%) and strongyloides (4,0%). The large strongyle Strongylus vulgaris was identified on only one farm. Liver flukes and lungworms were not found. Age, breed and sex were identified as risk factors for high shedding of strongyle eggs of individual animals: odds ratios for higher shedding intensities were 4.18 for yearlings and 2.42 for fillies compared to adult animals, and 3.69 for heavy breeds and 4.94 for wild horses compared to thoroughbreds. Mares and stallions did shed more strongyle eggs than geldings. Knowledge about the helminth prevalence will allow the issuance of specific treatment recommendations. Furthermore, the information on risk factors of individual horses will facilitate targeting single animals for selective treatments.
Publication Date: 2011-04-07 PubMed ID: 21472400DOI: 10.1007/s00436-011-2362-zGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of parasitic worms, or helminths, in horses from the Brandenburg state of Germany. A total of 126 horse farms were randomly selected and analyzed, with factors such as age, breed, and sex being considered as potential risk factors for infection.
Research Methodology
- The researchers examined the fecal matter (coproscopy) of 1,407 horses from these 126 different horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany. These farms were selected through randomized stratified sampling.
- The “experimental unit” of the study was the horse farm itself. A farm was defined as infected if at least one horse on the premises tested positive for the presence of helminth eggs.
- The researchers also collected and analyzed data about each horse’s details, such as its age, breed, and sex, as potential risk factors for helminth infection.
- The risk was considered to be if a horse was shedding more strongyle eggs than average.
Research Findings
- Out of all the farms investigated, the prevalences of different types of worms were found to be: Cyathostominae (98.4%), ascarids (16.7%), tapeworms (14.3%), pinworms (8.7%) and strongyloides (4,0%). Only one farm had horses infected with the large strongyle Strongylus vulgaris. None of the horses were found to be infected with liver flukes or lungworms.
- Through analysis, the researchers found that certain categories of horses were more likely to shed higher amounts of strongyle eggs and thus be at greater risk of infection. For instance, yearlings were 4.18 times more likely and fillies were 2.42 times more likely than adult horses. Heavy breeds and wild horses were also found to be at elevated risk of infection, with odds ratios of 3.69 and 4.94 respectively, compared to thoroughbreds. Moreover, mares and stallions shed more strongyle eggs than geldings, indicating a higher risk of infection.
Implications of the Research
- The findings from this research can be used to develop specific treatment recommendations for horses, tailored to the prevalence of particular helminths in the region.
- The data on the risk factors of individual horses will enable the development of targeted treatments for specific animals, which might be more effective and efficient.
Cite This Article
APA
Hinney B, Wirtherle NC, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin KH, Clausen PH.
(2011).
Prevalence of helminths in horses in the state of Brandenburg, Germany.
Parasitol Res, 108(5), 1083-1091.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2362-z Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, 14193, Berlin, Germany. Barbara.hinney@vetmeduni.ac.at
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Female
- Germany / epidemiology
- Helminthiasis, Animal / epidemiology
- Helminthiasis, Animal / parasitology
- Helminths / classification
- Helminths / isolation & purification
- Horse Diseases / epidemiology
- Horse Diseases / parasitology
- Horses
- Male
- Prevalence
- Sex Factors
References
This article includes 40 references
- Vet Parasitol. 1999 Aug 31;85(2-3):113-21; discussion 121-2, 215-25
- Vet Parasitol. 2005 Jan 20;127(2):115-9
- Vet Parasitol. 2006 Sep 10;140(3-4):289-95
- Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2007 Aug;23(2):509-17
- Vet Parasitol. 2004 Oct 5;124(3-4):249-58
- Cornell Vet. 1992 Oct;82(4):453-63
- Equine Vet J. 2007 Nov;39(6):529-33
- Vet Parasitol. 2008 May 6;153(1-2):73-84
- Acta Vet Scand. 2002;43(2):99-106
- Vet Parasitol. 2006 Jan 15;135(1):47-55
- Vet Rec. 2005 May 7;156(19):597-600
- Equine Vet J. 1999 Jan;31(1):68-72
- Vet Parasitol. 1984 Jul;15(1):75-83
- Vet Parasitol. 2005 Jun 30;130(3-4):233-40
- Vet Rec. 1994 May 14;134(20):515-8
- Equine Vet J. 1990 Jul;22(4):251-4
- Vet Q. 1996 Mar;18(1):7-9
- Int J Parasitol. 1995 Jun;25(6):711-24
- Vet Parasitol. 2008 Feb 14;151(2-4):249-55
- Vet Parasitol. 1999 Sep 15;86(1):15-21
- Vet Parasitol. 1989 Nov;34(1-2):135-43
- J Parasitol. 1990 Aug;76(4):487-94
- Acta Vet Scand. 1995;36(3):319-28
- Vet Parasitol. 1987 Feb;23(3-4):273-84
- Vet Rec. 1992 Jul 25;131(4):71-2
- Equine Vet J. 1998 Jul;30(4):289-93
- J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2004 Sep;75(3):129-36
- J Parasitol. 1986 Dec;72(6):926-30
- Equine Vet J. 1991 May;23(3):226-8
- Parasitol Res. 2004 Mar;92(5):400-4
- Vet Rec. 2004 Jan 10;154(2):39-41
- Vet Parasitol. 2009 Oct 14;164(2-4):357-62
- Vet Parasitol. 1995 May;58(1-2):99-108
- Pol J Vet Sci. 2009;12(2):225-30
- Vet Parasitol. 2010 Feb 26;168(1-2):84-92
- Vet Parasitol. 2002 Dec 11;110(1-2):77-83
- Vet Parasitol. 1997 Dec 31;73(3-4):277-89
- Vet Parasitol. 2010 Jun 24;170(3-4):268-77
- Parasitol Res. 2006 Jul;99(2):114-8
- Appl Parasitol. 1996 Dec;37(4):239-44
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists