Analyze Diet

Prevalence of reovirus 1, 2 and 3 antibodies in Ontario racehorses.

Abstract: The sera of 2596 thoroughbred and standardbred racehorses from Ontario were examined by hemagglutination-inhibition for antibodies to reovirus types 1, 2 and 3. The prevalence of antibodies differed between the standardbred and thoroughbred horses and varied with the age groups within the two populations. While reovirus 1 was the principal virus type infecting thoroughbreds, all three types seemed to infect standardbred horses. Differences of these findings with data from similar studies in Europe are mentioned and the epizootiological and pathological significance of these findings are discussed.
Publication Date: 1980-07-01 PubMed ID: 7427849PubMed Central: PMC1789765
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research analyzes the presence of reovirus 1, 2, and 3 antibodies in the blood of 2596 thoroughbred and standardbred racehorses from Ontario. It finds that reovirus 1 primarily infects thoroughbreds, but all three types appear in standardbred horses. The prevalence of these antibodies varies by horse breed and age groups.

Methodology

  • The researchers collected sera, which is the clear, liquid portion of blood, from 2596 thoroughbred and standardbred racehorses from Ontario.
  • They then tested these samples using a process called hemagglutination-inhibition to detect antibodies of reovirus types 1, 2 and 3. Hemagglutination-inhibition is a laboratory procedure often used to identify and measure levels of specific viral antibodies in a blood sample.

Results

  • The research found that the presence of these antibodies varied between the two breeds of horses. This shows a difference in susceptibility to reovirus types among standardbred and thoroughbred horses.
  • The age of the horses also seemed to have an impact on antibody prevalence. This suggests that older horses might have a different response to these virus types compared to younger ones, although the study doesn’t specify the details of this age-related variation.
  • Reovirus 1 was found to be the most common infection type in thoroughbred horses, implying that these horses may have a greater vulnerability to this specific virus.
  • Surprisingly, all three types of reovirus seemed to infect standardbred horses. This indicates that this breed may be more prone to multiple types of the virus.

Comparison with Similar Studies and Implications

  • The researchers compare their findings with similar studies conducted in Europe. While the exact differences aren’t detailed in the abstract, the mention implies that the reovirus antibodies prevalence showed different patterns in European horse populations.
  • The epizootiological (regarding the spread of diseases among animal populations) and pathological (related to diseases) implications of this study are discussed. This finding could have significant impacts on horse health and disease management strategies.

Cite This Article

APA
Sturm RT, Lang GH, Mitchell WR. (1980). Prevalence of reovirus 1, 2 and 3 antibodies in Ontario racehorses. Can Vet J, 21(7), 206-209.

Publication

ISSN: 0008-5286
NlmUniqueID: 0004653
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 7
Pages: 206-209

Researcher Affiliations

Sturm, R T
    Lang, G H
      Mitchell, W R

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Antibodies, Viral / analysis
        • Horses / immunology
        • Ontario
        • Reoviridae / immunology

        References

        This article includes 15 references
        1. Bachmann PA, Härtl G, Thein P, Bibrack B, Mayr A. [Occurrence and spread of types of viruses possibly involved in equine respiratory diseases in the Federal Republic of Germany].. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 1972 Dec;19(10):801-13.
          pubmed: 4656555
        2. McFerran JB, Nelson R, McCracken JM, Ross JG. Viruses isolated from sheep.. Nature 1969 Jan 11;221(5176):194-5.
          pubmed: 4302399doi: 10.1038/221194a0google scholar: lookup
        3. Thein P. [Demonstration of a clinically manifested mixed reovirus serotype III and rhinopneumonitis virus infection in a horse].. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 1978 Mar 15;91(6):103-6.
          pubmed: 205205
        4. ZALAN E, LEERS WD, LABZOFFSKY NA. Occurrence of reovirus infection in Ontario.. Can Med Assoc J 1962 Sep 29;87(13):714-5.
          pubmed: 14009709
        5. ROSEN L. Serologic grouping of reoviruses by hemagglutination-inhibition.. Am J Hyg 1960 Mar;71:242-9.
        6. Fairchild GA, Cohen D. Serologic study of reovirus infection in dogs.. Am J Vet Res 1967 Sep;28(126):1487-90.
          pubmed: 4293278
        7. Massie EL, Shaw ED. Reovirus type 1 in laboratory dogs.. Am J Vet Res 1966 May;27(118):783-7.
          pubmed: 5961414
        8. Holzinger EA, Griesemer RA. Effects of reovirus, type 1, on germfree and disease-free dogs.. Am J Epidemiol 1966 Nov;84(3):426-30.
        9. McFerran JB, Connor T. A reovirus isolated from a pig.. Res Vet Sci 1970 Jul;11(4):388-90.
          pubmed: 5499327
        10. Kasza L. Isolation and characterisation of a reovirus from pigs.. Vet Rec 1970 Nov 28;87(22):681-6.
          pubmed: 4320905doi: 10.1136/vr.87.22.681google scholar: lookup
        11. Scott FW, Kahn DE, Gillespie JH. Feline viruses: isolation, characterization, and pathogenicity of a feline reovirus.. Am J Vet Res 1970 Jan;31(1):11-20.
          pubmed: 4313157
        12. Belák S, Pálfi V. Isolation of reovirus type 1 from lambs showing respiratory and intestinal symptoms.. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 1974;44(3):177-83.
          pubmed: 4365602doi: 10.1007/BF01240605google scholar: lookup
        13. Kokles R. [Isolation of reoviruses from mink].. Arch Exp Veterinarmed 1975;29(5):781-8.
          pubmed: 180927
        14. Osterhaus A, Berghuis-De Vries J, Steur K. Antiviral antibodies in dogs in the Netherlands.. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 1977 Feb;24(2):123-33.
        15. Sherman J, Thorsen J, Barnum DA, Mitchell WR, Ingram DG. Infectious causes of equine respiratory disease on Ontario standardbred racetracks.. J Clin Microbiol 1977 Mar;5(3):285-9.
          pubmed: 192757doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.3.285-289.1977google scholar: lookup

        Citations

        This article has been cited 0 times.