Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1990; 22(3); 152-156; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1990.tb04235.x

Prolonged luteal activity in mares–a semantic quagmire.

Abstract: Prolonged luteal activity is one of the most formidable terminology challenges in mare reproductive biology. Prolonged luteal activity can be a result of persistence of an individual corpus luteum or the sequential development of luteal glands, each of which may have a normal life span. Luteal tissue can originate from an unovulated follicle or from an ovulation occurring during either follicular or luteal dominance. These complexities, together with ambiguous and inconsistent terminology, have resulted in confusion regarding those conditions which can be grouped broadly under the term prolonged luteal activity. Persistence of an individual corpus luteum can occur in association with severe damage to the endometrium resulting in loss of the uterine luteolytic mechanism. Spontaneous (no known uterine pathology) persistence of the corpus luteum from the follicular-phase ovulation has not been documented adequately as a clinical entity. The occurrence of ovulation towards the end of dioestrus may cause confusion about the origin of prolonged luteal activity. Such immature dioestrous corpora lutea may not respond to the release of uterine luteolysin, thereby leading to prolonged luteal activity even though the original corpus luteum regressed at the normal time. In the absence of critical monitoring of the corpus luteum (eg by ultrasound) the prolonged activity could be attributed erroneously to persistence of the corpus luteum from the follicular-phase ovulation. Pseudopregnancy is another confusing term that is sometimes used to describe persistence of the corpus luteum, especially when the luteal persistence is caused by embryonic loss after the embryo has blocked the uterine luteolytic mechanism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Publication Date: 1990-05-01 PubMed ID: 2193807DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1990.tb04235.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research looks into the complexities surrounding prolonged luteal activity in mare reproductive biology brought about by two different processes and aggravated by inconsistent language.

Understanding Prolonged Luteal Activity

The paper reveals that prolonged luteal activity is an issue in mare’s reproductive biology due to its complex nature. Some of its notable complexities include:

  • The prolonged luteal activity being the result of either a single corpus luteum’s persistence or the sequential formation of luteal glands, each living a normal life span.
  • The luteal tissue’s origin can be an unovulated follicle or from an ovulation during follicular or luteal dominance periods.

These complexities, along with inconsistent language, lead to substantial confusion about how to categorize disorders under prolonged luteal activity.

Persistence of Corpus Luteum and Its Effects

It’s revealed in the study that:

  • Persistence of an individual corpus luteum can take place in conjunction with serious damages to the endometrium, leading to loss of the uterine luteolytic mechanism.
  • The researchers note that spontaneous persistence (with no known uterine pathology) of the corpus luteum from follicular-phase ovulation is not sufficiently documented as a clinical entity.

Confusion Regarding Origin of Prolonged Luteal Activity

The paper points out the possible misconceptions and irregularities about the onset of prolonged luteal activity:

  • Ovulation towards the end of dioestrus might create confusion regarding the origin of prolonged luteal activity.
  • Immature dioestrous corpora lutea might not react to the release of uterine luteolysin, leading to prolonged luteal activity while the original corpus luteum regresses at normal timing.
  • Without critical monitoring of the corpus luteum (via ultrasound), the prolonged activity could be incorrectly attributed to the previous corpus luteum’s persistence.

Misconceptions with Pseudopregnancy

Last but not least, the research emphasizes that:

  • The term pseudopregnancy is often used inaccurately to explain the persistence of the corpus luteum, especially when persistence is caused by embryonic loss after the embryo has blocked the uterine luteolytic mechanism.

Cite This Article

APA
Ginther OJ. (1990). Prolonged luteal activity in mares–a semantic quagmire. Equine Vet J, 22(3), 152-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1990.tb04235.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 3
Pages: 152-156

Researcher Affiliations

Ginther, O J
  • University of Wisconsin, Department of Veterinary Science, Madison 53706.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Corpus Luteum / physiology
  • Corpus Luteum Maintenance / physiology
  • Estrus / physiology
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / physiopathology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Luteolysis / physiology
  • Ovulation / physiology
  • Pregnancy
  • Pseudopregnancy / physiopathology
  • Pseudopregnancy / veterinary
  • Terminology as Topic
  • Ultrasonography / veterinary
  • Uterus / physiology

Citations

This article has been cited 6 times.
  1. Robeck T, Katsumata E, Arai K, Montano G, Schmitt T, DiRocco S, Steinman KJ. Growth, maturity, reproduction, and life expectancy in ex-situ pacific walruses (Odobenus rosmarus divergens).. BMC Zool 2022 Dec 5;7(1):57.
    doi: 10.1186/s40850-022-00158-1pubmed: 37170158google scholar: lookup
  2. Aurich C, Kaps M. Suppression of reproductive behaviour and gonadal function in female horses-An update.. Reprod Domest Anim 2022 Sep;57 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):4-12.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.14129pubmed: 35467049google scholar: lookup
  3. Okada CTC, Kaps M, Perez Quesada J, Gautier C, Aurich J, Aurich C. Diestrous Ovulations in Pregnant Mares as a Response to Low Early Postovulatory Progestogen Concentration.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Nov 30;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122249pubmed: 33266083google scholar: lookup
  4. Pallin L, Robbins J, Kellar N, Bérubé M, Friedlaender A. Validation of a blubber-based endocrine pregnancy test for humpback whales.. Conserv Physiol 2018;6(1):coy031.
    doi: 10.1093/conphys/coy031pubmed: 29942518google scholar: lookup
  5. Takahashi Y, Akai M, Murase H, Nambo Y. Seasonal changes in serum progesterone levels in Thoroughbred racehorses in training.. J Equine Sci 2015;26(4):135-9.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.26.135pubmed: 26858579google scholar: lookup
  6. Hedberg Y, Dalin AM, Santesson M, Kindahl H. A preliminary study on the induction of dioestrous ovulation in the mare--a possible method for inducing prolonged luteal phase.. Acta Vet Scand 2006 Jul 26;48(1):12.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-48-12pubmed: 16987391google scholar: lookup