Analyze Diet
Hereditas1992; 117(2); 127-136; doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1992.tb00166.x

Putative fragile sites in the horse karyotype.

Abstract: After fluorouracil/5-bromodeoxyuridine synchronization and subsequent FPG-staining, the karyotype of 15 phenotypically normal horses displayed several breaks and gaps. Twelve bands 1q24, 4p12, 8q23, 11p12, 16q21, 17q21, 23q31, 23q32, Xp21, Xq22, Xq25 and Xq27 showed relatively frequent fragility. After thymidine/cytidine synchronization and subsequent GWL-banding the same horses display karyotypes without any fragility. Hence it is suggested that the above listed bands harbour folate and/or 5-bromodeoxyuridine sensitive fragile sites.
Publication Date: 1992-01-01 PubMed ID: 1459856DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1992.tb00166.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates potential fragile sites in the horse chromosomes, identifying several breakages and gaps in normal horses after certain treatments. These fragility sites could be sensitive to specific substances, hinting at potential genetic vulnerabilities.

Research Methodology

  • The examining team employed fluorouracil/5-bromodeoxyuridine synchronization and subsequent FPG-staining to analyze the chromosomes of 15 phenotypically normal horses.
  • This method resulted in the identification of multiple breaks and gaps in horse chromosomes, indicating potential fragile sites.
  • Twelve bands, namely 1q24, 4p12, 8q23, 11p12, 16q21, 17q21, 23q31, 23q32, Xp21, Xq22, Xq25 and Xq27, exhibited relative fragility frequently.

Further Analysis

  • The research team also experimented with thymidine/cytidine synchronization and subsequent GWL-banding on the same horses.
  • Interestingly, this second method did not reveal any chromosome fragility in the horses, showing a completely unbroken karyotype.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Based on the results of both tests, the team suggests that the bands recognized for their fragility during the first test are sensitive to folate and/or 5-bromodeoxyuridine – the substances used in the initial synchronization process.
  • These findings drive important implications for genetic-level vulnerabilities and potential disease predispositions in horses, which could have significant effects on equine health and treatment strategies.

Cite This Article

APA
Rønne M. (1992). Putative fragile sites in the horse karyotype. Hereditas, 117(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1992.tb00166.x

Publication

ISSN: 0018-0661
NlmUniqueID: 0374654
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 117
Issue: 2
Pages: 127-136

Researcher Affiliations

Rønne, M
  • Institute of Zoology and Zoophysiology, University of Aarhus, Denmark.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Bromodeoxyuridine
  • Chromosome Banding
  • Chromosome Fragile Sites
  • Chromosome Fragility
  • Female
  • Fertility / genetics
  • Horses / genetics
  • Karyotyping
  • Male

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Bugno-Poniewierska M, Raudsepp T. Horse Clinical Cytogenetics: Recurrent Themes and Novel Findings. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 16;11(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11030831pubmed: 33809432google scholar: lookup
  2. Prada CF, Laissue P. A high resolution map of mammalian X chromosome fragile regions assessed by large-scale comparative genomics. Mamm Genome 2014 Dec;25(11-12):618-35.
    doi: 10.1007/s00335-014-9537-8pubmed: 25086724google scholar: lookup
  3. Ali A, Abdullah M, Babar ME, Javed K, Nadeem A. Expression and identification of folate-sensitive fragile sites in British Suffolk sheep (Ovis aries). J Genet 2008 Dec;87(3):219-27.
    doi: 10.1007/s12041-008-0035-1pubmed: 19147906google scholar: lookup
  4. Ruiz-Herrera A, Robinson TJ. Chromosomal instability in Afrotheria: fragile sites, evolutionary breakpoints and phylogenetic inference from genome sequence assemblies. BMC Evol Biol 2007 Oct 24;7:199.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-199pubmed: 17958882google scholar: lookup
  5. Ruiz-Herrera A, Castresana J, Robinson TJ. Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility?. Genome Biol 2006;7(12):R115.
    doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-12-r115pubmed: 17156441google scholar: lookup
  6. Raudsepp T, Lee EJ, Kata SR, Brinkmeyer C, Mickelson JR, Skow LC, Womack JE, Chowdhary BP. Exceptional conservation of horse-human gene order on X chromosome revealed by high-resolution radiation hybrid mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004 Feb 24;101(8):2386-91.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308513100pubmed: 14983019google scholar: lookup
  7. Raudsepp T, Chowdhary BP. Construction of chromosome-specific paints for meta- and submetacentric autosomes and the sex chromosomes in the horse and their use to detect homologous chromosomal segments in the donkey. Chromosome Res 1999;7(2):103-14.
    doi: 10.1023/a:1009234814635pubmed: 10328622google scholar: lookup
  8. Raudsepp T, Frönicke L, Scherthan H, Gustavsson I, Chowdhary BP. Zoo-FISH delineates conserved chromosomal segments in horse and man. Chromosome Res 1996 Apr;4(3):218-25.
    doi: 10.1007/BF02254963pubmed: 8793207google scholar: lookup