FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Genome Res / Random X inactivation in the mule and horse placenta.
Genome research2012; 22(10); 1855-1863; doi: 10.1101/gr.138487.112

Random X inactivation in the mule and horse placenta.

Abstract: In eutherian mammals, dosage compensation of X-linked genes is achieved by X chromosome inactivation. X inactivation is random in embryonic and adult tissues, but imprinted X inactivation (paternal X silencing) has been identified in the extra-embryonic membranes of the mouse, rat, and cow. Few other species have been studied for this trait, and the data from studies of the human placenta have been discordant or inconclusive. Here, we quantify X inactivation using RNA sequencing of placental tissue from reciprocal hybrids of horse and donkey (mule and hinny). In placental tissue from the equid hybrids and the horse parent, the allelic expression pattern was consistent with random X inactivation, and imprinted X inactivation can clearly be excluded. We characterized horse and donkey XIST gene and demonstrated that XIST allelic expression in female hybrid placental and fetal tissues is negatively correlated with the other X-linked genes chromosome-wide, which is consistent with the XIST-mediated mechanism of X inactivation discovered previously in mice. As the most structurally and morphologically diverse organ in mammals, the placenta also appears to show diverse mechanisms for dosage compensation that may result in differences in conceptus development across species.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2012-05-29 PubMed ID: 22645258PubMed Central: PMC3460181DOI: 10.1101/gr.138487.112Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on how X chromosome inactivation occurs in mammals, specifically mule and horse placenta. The study utilises RNA sequencing of placental tissue from horse-donkey hybrids to show that their X inactivation pattern aligns with random X inactivation, negating the possibility of imprinted X inactivation.

Understanding X Chromosome Inactivation

  • The study revolves around X chromosome inactivation—an essential biological process—where one of the two copies of the X chromosome present in female mammals gets inactivated. This process ensures balance or dosage compensation of X-linked genes between males (XY) and females (XX). Each female cell silences one X chromosome during embryonic development—a process that’s random.
  • Imprinted X inactivation is a non-random type of X chromosome inactivation where the paternal X chromosome is always inactivated in certain extra-embryonic tissues.

Pacental X Inactivation in Horse-Donkey Hybrids

  • The study used RNA sequencing on placental tissue obtained from horse and donkey hybrids (mule and hinny) to examine the pattern of X inactivation.
  • The results showed that the X inactivation in these specimens was random, thereby ruling out imprinted X inactivation.

About XIST Gene

  • The XIST (X-inactive specific transcript) gene is crucial in the X-chromosome inactivation process. This gene’s primary function is to inactivate extra X chromosomes.
  • The researchers studied the XIST gene in both horse and donkey and observed that the pattern of XIST allelic expression in female hybrid placental and fetal tissues is inversely related with other X-linked genes throughout the chromosome, consistent with prior discoveries in mice.

Implication of Findings

  • The finding implies potential variations in the mechanism of dosage compensation across different species. This could lead to varying development patterns in offspring.
  • The placenta, noted for its structural and morphological diversity among mammals, may also manifest diverse mechanisms for dosage compensation. The difference in dosage compensation mechanisms may subsequently impact the developmental patterns of mammalian offspring across different species.

Cite This Article

APA
Wang X, Miller DC, Clark AG, Antczak DF. (2012). Random X inactivation in the mule and horse placenta. Genome Res, 22(10), 1855-1863. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.138487.112

Publication

Genome research
ISSN: 1549-5469
NlmUniqueID: 9518021
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 10
Pages: 1855-1863

Researcher Affiliations

Wang, Xu
  • Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Miller, Donald C
    Clark, Andrew G
      Antczak, Douglas F

        MeSH Terms

        • Alleles
        • Animals
        • Equidae
        • Female
        • Gene Expression Profiling
        • Genes, X-Linked
        • Genomic Imprinting
        • Horses
        • Male
        • Placenta / metabolism
        • Pregnancy
        • Transcriptome
        • X Chromosome Inactivation

        References

        This article includes 39 references
        1. Al Nadaf S, Waters PD, Koina E, Deakin JE, Jordan KS, Graves JA. Activity map of the tammar X chromosome shows that marsupial X inactivation is incomplete and escape is stochastic.. Genome Biol 2010;11(12):R122.
          pmc: PMC3046482pubmed: 21182760doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r122google scholar: lookup
        2. Amos-Landgraf JM, Cottle A, Plenge RM, Friez M, Schwartz CE, Longshore J, Willard HF. X chromosome-inactivation patterns of 1,005 phenotypically unaffected females.. Am J Hum Genet 2006 Sep;79(3):493-9.
          pmc: PMC1559535pubmed: 16909387doi: 10.1086/507565google scholar: lookup
        3. Antczak DF, Oriol JG, Donaldson WL, Poleman C, Stenzler L, Volsen SG, Allen WR. Differentiation molecules of the equine trophoblast.. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1987;35:371-8.
          pubmed: 3479591
        4. Bowling AT, Breen M, Chowdhary BP, Hirota K, Lear T, Millon LV, Ponce de Leon FA, Raudsepp T, Stranzinger G. International system for cytogenetic nomenclature of the domestic horse. Report of the Third International Committee for the Standardization of the domestic horse karyotype, Davis, CA, USA, 1996.. Chromosome Res 1997 Nov;5(7):433-43.
          pubmed: 9421259doi: 10.1023/a:1018408811881google scholar: lookup
        5. Cattanach BM, Isaacson JH. Controlling elements in the mouse X chromosome.. Genetics 1967 Oct;57(2):331-46.
          pmc: PMC1211730pubmed: 5584570doi: 10.1093/genetics/57.2.331google scholar: lookup
        6. Chadwick LH, Pertz LM, Broman KW, Bartolomei MS, Willard HF. Genetic control of X chromosome inactivation in mice: definition of the Xce candidate interval.. Genetics 2006 Aug;173(4):2103-10.
          pmc: PMC1569705pubmed: 16582439doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.054882google scholar: lookup
        7. Cheng MK, Disteche CM. Silence of the fathers: early X inactivation.. Bioessays 2004 Aug;26(8):821-4.
          pubmed: 15273983doi: 10.1002/bies.20082google scholar: lookup
        8. Cooper DW, Johnston PG, Vandeberg JL, Robinson ES. X-chromosome inactivation in marsupials. Aust J Zool 37: 411–417.
        9. Courtier B, Heard E, Avner P. Xce haplotypes show modified methylation in a region of the active X chromosome lying 3' to Xist.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995 Apr 11;92(8):3531-5.
          pmc: PMC42201pubmed: 7536936doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3531google scholar: lookup
        10. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(5):1792-7.
          pmc: PMC390337pubmed: 15034147doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340google scholar: lookup
        11. Goto T, Wright E, Monk M. Paternal X-chromosome inactivation in human trophoblastic cells.. Mol Hum Reprod 1997 Jan;3(1):77-80.
          pubmed: 9239711doi: 10.1093/molehr/3.1.77google scholar: lookup
        12. Hamerton JL, Giannelli F, Collins F, Hallett J, Fryer A, McGuire VM, Short RV. Non-random x-inactivation in the female mule.. Nature 1969 Jun 28;222(5200):1277-8.
          pubmed: 5789668doi: 10.1038/2221277a0google scholar: lookup
        13. Hamerton JL, Richardson BJ, Gee PA, Allen WR, Short RV. Non-random X chromosome expression in female mules and hinnies.. Nature 1971 Jul 30;232(5309):312-5.
          pubmed: 5094834doi: 10.1038/232312a0google scholar: lookup
        14. Heard E, Disteche CM. Dosage compensation in mammals: fine-tuning the expression of the X chromosome.. Genes Dev 2006 Jul 15;20(14):1848-67.
          pubmed: 16847345doi: 10.1101/gad.1422906google scholar: lookup
        15. Horvath JE, Sheedy CB, Merrett SL, Diallo AB, Swofford DL, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Green ED, Willard HF. Comparative analysis of the primate X-inactivation center region and reconstruction of the ancestral primate XIST locus.. Genome Res 2011 Jun;21(6):850-62.
          pmc: PMC3106318pubmed: 21518738doi: 10.1101/gr.111849.110google scholar: lookup
        16. Huynh KD, Lee JT. Imprinted X inactivation in eutherians: a model of gametic execution and zygotic relaxation.. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001 Dec;13(6):690-7.
          pubmed: 11698184doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00272-6google scholar: lookup
        17. Huynh KD, Lee JT. X-chromosome inactivation: a hypothesis linking ontogeny and phylogeny.. Nat Rev Genet 2005 May;6(5):410-8.
          pubmed: 15818384doi: 10.1038/nrg1604google scholar: lookup
        18. Ideraabdullah FY, Vigneau S, Bartolomei MS. Genomic imprinting mechanisms in mammals.. Mutat Res 2008 Dec 1;647(1-2):77-85.
          pmc: PMC2645997pubmed: 18778719doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.08.008google scholar: lookup
        19. LYON MF. Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.).. Nature 1961 Apr 22;190:372-3.
          pubmed: 13764598doi: 10.1038/190372a0google scholar: lookup
        20. Mak W, Nesterova TB, de Napoles M, Appanah R, Yamanaka S, Otte AP, Brockdorff N. Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos.. Science 2004 Jan 30;303(5658):666-9.
          pubmed: 14752160doi: 10.1126/science.1092674google scholar: lookup
        21. Marsh S. 2007. Pyrosequencing protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
        22. Monk M, Harper MI. Sequential X chromosome inactivation coupled with cellular differentiation in early mouse embryos.. Nature 1979 Sep 27;281(5729):311-3.
          pubmed: 551278doi: 10.1038/281311a0google scholar: lookup
        23. Moreira de Mello JC, de Araújo ES, Stabellini R, Fraga AM, de Souza JE, Sumita DR, Camargo AA, Pereira LV. Random X inactivation and extensive mosaicism in human placenta revealed by analysis of allele-specific gene expression along the X chromosome.. PLoS One 2010 Jun 4;5(6):e10947.
          pmc: PMC2881032pubmed: 20532033doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010947google scholar: lookup
        24. Mukherjee BB, Milet RG. Nonrandom X-chromosome inactivation--an artifact of cell selection (mouse chimera).. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1972 Jan;69(1):37-9.
          pmc: PMC427539pubmed: 4500554doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.37google scholar: lookup
        25. Mukherjee BB, Mukherjee AB, Mukherjee AB. Is inactivation of the X chromosome in the female mule non-random?. Nature 1970 Dec 26;228(5278):1321-2.
          pubmed: 5488106doi: 10.1038/2281321a0google scholar: lookup
        26. MUKHERJEE BB, SINHA AK. SINGLE-ACTIVE-X HYPOTHESIS: CYTOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR RANDOM INACTIVATION OF X-CHROMOSOMES IN A FEMALE MULE COMPLEMENT.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1964 Feb;51(2):252-9.
          pmc: PMC300057pubmed: 14124323doi: 10.1073/pnas.51.2.252google scholar: lookup
        27. Okamoto I, Otte AP, Allis CD, Reinberg D, Heard E. Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development.. Science 2004 Jan 30;303(5658):644-9.
          pubmed: 14671313doi: 10.1126/science.1092727google scholar: lookup
        28. Payer B, Lee JT. X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance.. Annu Rev Genet 2008;42:733-72.
          pubmed: 18729722doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091711google scholar: lookup
        29. Raudsepp T, Santani A, Wallner B, Kata SR, Ren C, Zhang HB, Womack JE, Skow LC, Chowdhary BP. A detailed physical map of the horse Y chromosome.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004 Jun 22;101(25):9321-6.
          pmc: PMC438975pubmed: 15197257doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403011101google scholar: lookup
        30. Serov OL, Zakijan SM, Kulichkov VA. Analysis of mechanisms regulating the expression of parental alleles at the GPD locus in mule erythrocytes.. Biochem Genet 1978 Jun;16(5-6):379-86.
          pubmed: 736879doi: 10.1007/bf00484205google scholar: lookup
        31. Simmler MC, Cattanach BM, Rasberry C, Rougeulle C, Avner P. Mapping the murine Xce locus with (CA)n repeats.. Mamm Genome 1993 Sep;4(9):523-30.
          pubmed: 8118102doi: 10.1007/bf00364788google scholar: lookup
        32. Tan SS, Williams EA, Tam PP. X-chromosome inactivation occurs at different times in different tissues of the post-implantation mouse embryo.. Nat Genet 1993 Feb;3(2):170-4.
          pubmed: 8499950doi: 10.1038/ng0293-170google scholar: lookup
        33. Valley CM, Willard HF. Genomic and epigenomic approaches to the study of X chromosome inactivation.. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2006 Jun;16(3):240-5.
          pubmed: 16647845doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2006.04.008google scholar: lookup
        34. van den Berg IM, Laven JS, Stevens M, Jonkers I, Galjaard RJ, Gribnau J, van Doorninck JH. X chromosome inactivation is initiated in human preimplantation embryos.. Am J Hum Genet 2009 Jun;84(6):771-9.
          pmc: PMC2694969pubmed: 19481196doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.05.003google scholar: lookup
        35. Wake N, Takagi N, Sasaki M. Non-random inactivation of X chromosome in the rat yolk sac.. Nature 1976 Aug 12;262(5569):580-1.
          pubmed: 958416doi: 10.1038/262580a0google scholar: lookup
        36. Wang X, Sun Q, McGrath SD, Mardis ER, Soloway PD, Clark AG. Transcriptome-wide identification of novel imprinted genes in neonatal mouse brain.. PLoS One 2008;3(12):e3839.
          pmc: PMC2585789pubmed: 19052635doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003839google scholar: lookup
        37. Wang X, Soloway PD, Clark AG. Paternally biased X inactivation in mouse neonatal brain.. Genome Biol 2010;11(7):R79.
          pmc: PMC2926790pubmed: 20663224doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-7-r79google scholar: lookup
        38. Wang X, Soloway PD, Clark AG. A survey for novel imprinted genes in the mouse placenta by mRNA-seq.. Genetics 2011 Sep;189(1):109-22.
          pmc: PMC3176116pubmed: 21705755doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.130088google scholar: lookup
        39. Xue F, Tian XC, Du F, Kubota C, Taneja M, Dinnyes A, Dai Y, Levine H, Pereira LV, Yang X. Aberrant patterns of X chromosome inactivation in bovine clones.. Nat Genet 2002 Jun;31(2):216-20.
          pubmed: 12032569doi: 10.1038/ng900google scholar: lookup

        Citations

        This article has been cited 21 times.
        1. Singh A, Rappolee DA, Ruden DM. Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mice and Humans: From Fertilization to Primordial Germ Cell Development.. Cells 2023 Jul 17;12(14).
          doi: 10.3390/cells12141874pubmed: 37508536google scholar: lookup
        2. Phung TN, Olney KC, Pinto BJ, Silasi M, Perley L, O'Bryan J, Kliman HJ, Wilson MA. X chromosome inactivation in the human placenta is patchy and distinct from adult tissues.. HGG Adv 2022 Jul 14;3(3):100121.
          doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100121pubmed: 35712697google scholar: lookup
        3. Antczak DF, Allen WRT. Placentation in Equids.. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 2021;234:91-128.
          doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-77360-1_6pubmed: 34694479google scholar: lookup
        4. Li S, Zhao G, Han H, Li Y, Li J, Wang J, Cao G, Li X. Genome collinearity analysis illuminates the evolution of donkey chromosome 1 and horse chromosome 5 in perissodactyls: A comparative study.. BMC Genomics 2021 Sep 15;22(1):665.
          doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07984-6pubmed: 34521340google scholar: lookup
        5. Brekke TD, Moore EC, Campbell-Staton SC, Callahan CM, Cheviron ZA, Good JM. X chromosome-dependent disruption of placental regulatory networks in hybrid dwarf hamsters.. Genetics 2021 May 17;218(1).
          doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab043pubmed: 33710276google scholar: lookup
        6. Balaton BP, Fornes O, Wasserman WW, Brown CJ. Cross-species examination of X-chromosome inactivation highlights domains of escape from silencing.. Epigenetics Chromatin 2021 Feb 17;14(1):12.
          doi: 10.1186/s13072-021-00386-8pubmed: 33597016google scholar: lookup
        7. Loux SC, Dini P, El-Sheikh Ali H, Kalbfleisch T, Ball BA. Characterization of the placental transcriptome through mid to late gestation in the mare.. PLoS One 2019;14(11):e0224497.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224497pubmed: 31725741google scholar: lookup
        8. Zou H, Yu D, Du X, Wang J, Chen L, Wang Y, Xu H, Zhao Y, Zhao S, Pang Y, Liu Y, Hao H, Zhao X, Du W, Dai Y, Li N, Wu S, Zhu H. No imprinted XIST expression in pigs: biallelic XIST expression in early embryos and random X inactivation in placentas.. Cell Mol Life Sci 2019 Nov;76(22):4525-4538.
          doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03123-3pubmed: 31139846google scholar: lookup
        9. Sahakyan A, Yang Y, Plath K. The Role of Xist in X-Chromosome Dosage Compensation.. Trends Cell Biol 2018 Dec;28(12):999-1013.
          doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.05.005pubmed: 29910081google scholar: lookup
        10. Wang M, Lin F, Xing K, Liu L. Random X-chromosome inactivation dynamics in vivo by single-cell RNA sequencing.. BMC Genomics 2017 Jan 17;18(1):90.
          doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3466-8pubmed: 28095777google scholar: lookup
        11. Tozaki T, Kikuchi M, Kakoi H, Hirota KI, Mukai K, Aida H, Nakamura S, Nagata SI. Profiling of exercise-induced transcripts in the peripheral blood cells of Thoroughbred horses.. J Equine Sci 2016;27(4):157-164.
          doi: 10.1294/jes.27.157pubmed: 27974875google scholar: lookup
        12. Chen Z, Hagen DE, Wang J, Elsik CG, Ji T, Siqueira LG, Hansen PJ, Rivera RM. Global assessment of imprinted gene expression in the bovine conceptus by next generation sequencing.. Epigenetics 2016 Jul 2;11(7):501-16.
          doi: 10.1080/15592294.2016.1184805pubmed: 27245094google scholar: lookup
        13. Slavney A, Arbiza L, Clark AG, Keinan A. Strong Constraint on Human Genes Escaping X-Inactivation Is Modulated by their Expression Level and Breadth in Both Sexes.. Mol Biol Evol 2016 Feb;33(2):384-93.
          doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv225pubmed: 26494842google scholar: lookup
        14. Rosenfeld CS. Sex-Specific Placental Responses in Fetal Development.. Endocrinology 2015 Oct;156(10):3422-34.
          doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1227pubmed: 26241064google scholar: lookup
        15. Gundling WE Jr, Wildman DE. A review of inter- and intraspecific variation in the eutherian placenta.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2015 Mar 5;370(1663):20140072.
          doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0072pubmed: 25602076google scholar: lookup
        16. Rodríguez-Delgado CL, Waters SA, Waters PD. Paternal X inactivation does not correlate with X chromosome evolutionary strata in marsupials.. BMC Evol Biol 2014 Dec 24;14:267.
          doi: 10.1186/s12862-014-0267-zpubmed: 25539578google scholar: lookup
        17. Zhang B, Xing X, Li J, Lowdon RF, Zhou Y, Lin N, Zhang B, Sundaram V, Chiappinelli KB, Hagemann IS, Mutch DG, Goodfellow PJ, Wang T. Comparative DNA methylome analysis of endometrial carcinoma reveals complex and distinct deregulation of cancer promoters and enhancers.. BMC Genomics 2014 Oct 6;15(1):868.
          doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-868pubmed: 25286960google scholar: lookup
        18. Finno CJ, Bannasch DL. Applied equine genetics.. Equine Vet J 2014 Sep;46(5):538-44.
          doi: 10.1111/evj.12294pubmed: 24802051google scholar: lookup
        19. Deng X, Berletch JB, Nguyen DK, Disteche CM. X chromosome regulation: diverse patterns in development, tissues and disease.. Nat Rev Genet 2014 Jun;15(6):367-78.
          doi: 10.1038/nrg3687pubmed: 24733023google scholar: lookup
        20. Pessia E, Engelstädter J, Marais GA. The evolution of X chromosome inactivation in mammals: the demise of Ohno's hypothesis?. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014 Apr;71(8):1383-94.
          doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1499-6pubmed: 24173285google scholar: lookup
        21. Wang X, Douglas KC, Vandeberg JL, Clark AG, Samollow PB. Chromosome-wide profiling of X-chromosome inactivation and epigenetic states in fetal brain and placenta of the opossum, Monodelphis domestica.. Genome Res 2014 Jan;24(1):70-83.
          doi: 10.1101/gr.161919.113pubmed: 24065774google scholar: lookup
        Subscribe to our newsletter
        Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.