Analyze Diet
Veterinary parasitology2012; 190(3-4); 461-466; doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.07.018

Real-time PCR evaluation of Strongylus vulgaris in horses on farms in Denmark and Central Kentucky.

Abstract: Strongyle parasites are ubiquitous in grazing horses, and the large strongyle Strongylus vulgaris is considered the most pathogenic helminth parasite of horses. Recent investigations have suggested an association between occurrence of this parasite and usage of selective therapy based on regular fecal egg counts. The established diagnostic method for S. vulgaris involves larval culture and subsequent morphological identification of third stage larvae under the microscope. Recently, a real-time PCR assay was developed and validated for the detection and semi-quantification of S. vulgaris eggs in equine fecal samples. The purposes of the present study were (a) to determine the presence of S. vulgaris by real-time PCR in Danish and American horses on farms using vastly different anthelmintic treatment regimens and (b) to evaluate the association between larval culture results and the PCR. A total of 991 horses representing 53 different horse farms in Denmark and Central Kentucky were studied. Fresh fecal samples were collected from all horses, and strongyle eggs retrieved for DNA extraction and subsequent real-time PCR analysis. Individual larval cultures were performed on the Danish part of the data set (663 horses on 42 farms). On the Danish farms, the S. vulgaris PCR prevalence was found to be 9.2% on farms not basing parasite control on fecal egg counts, and 14.1% on farms using selective therapy. No horses were PCR positive in the American part of the study (328 horses on 11 farms). Kappa-values indicated a moderate agreement between PCR and larval culture results, while McNemar tests revealed no statistical difference between the paired proportions. Significant associations were found between PCR cycle of threshold (Ct) value groups and larval culture counts. Results indicate that both diagnostic methods can be useful for determining the occurrence of S. vulgaris on horse farms, but that they both are affected by potential sources of error. The PCR results confirmed previous findings suggesting that S. vulgaris can reemerge under selective therapy regimens.
Publication Date: 2012-07-21 PubMed ID: 22877828DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.07.018Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper investigates the prevalence of a common and harmful parasite in horses, Strongylus vulgaris, in Denmark and Central Kentucky farms using a real-time PCR diagnostic method. The study also explores the relationship between parasite control methods and parasite occurrence.

Objective and Methodology

  • The main aim of the study was to identify the occurrence of Strongylus vulgaris in horses in Denmark and Central Kentucky, and evaluate the association between different methods of diagnosing the presence of this parasite.
  • These goals were achieved by collecting fresh fecal samples from 991 horses across 53 different farms and analysing these samples using real-time PCR— a technique used to amplify and simultaneously quantify targeted DNA molecules.
  • For the Danish subset of data, larval cultures (another diagnostic method) were also performed.

Results and Observations

  • The study found that the prevalence of S. vulgaris was 9.2% on Danish farms that were not using fecal egg counts for parasite control, and 14.1% on farms that were using this selective therapy.
  • Conversely, no horses tested positive for the parasite in the American segment of the study.
  • The research indicated a moderate agreement between the PCR and larval culture results, meaning that both methods can potentially be used to detect the presence of S. vulgaris.

Significance and Conclusion

  • The findings confirmed previous studies suggesting that S. vulgaris can reemerge under selective therapy regimens, thereby highlighting the need for continuous, effective parasite management strategies in horse farms.
  • The research also identified both PCR and larval culture as potentially useful methods for diagnosing the existence of the parasite. However, both of these methods are affected by potential sources of error that need to be accounted for in future investigations.

Cite This Article

APA
Nielsen MK, Olsen SN, Lyons ET, Monrad J, Thamsborg SM. (2012). Real-time PCR evaluation of Strongylus vulgaris in horses on farms in Denmark and Central Kentucky. Vet Parasitol, 190(3-4), 461-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.07.018

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2550
NlmUniqueID: 7602745
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 190
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 461-466
PII: S0304-4017(12)00372-X

Researcher Affiliations

Nielsen, M K
  • M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. martin.nielsen@uky.edu
Olsen, S N
    Lyons, E T
      Monrad, J
        Thamsborg, S M

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
          • Denmark / epidemiology
          • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
          • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
          • Horse Diseases / parasitology
          • Horses
          • Kentucky / epidemiology
          • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
          • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
          • Strongylida Infections / drug therapy
          • Strongylida Infections / epidemiology
          • Strongylida Infections / veterinary
          • Strongylus / classification

          Citations

          This article has been cited 7 times.
          1. Boelow H, Krücken J, Thomas E, Mirams G, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Comparison of FECPAK(G2), a modified Mini-FLOTAC technique and combined sedimentation and flotation for the coproscopic examination of helminth eggs in horses.. Parasit Vectors 2022 May 12;15(1):166.
            doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05266-ypubmed: 35549990google scholar: lookup
          2. Dauparaitė E, Kupčinskas T, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Petkevičius S. Anthelmintic resistance of horse strongyle nematodes to ivermectin and pyrantel in Lithuania.. Acta Vet Scand 2021 Jan 25;63(1):5.
            doi: 10.1186/s13028-021-00569-zpubmed: 33494770google scholar: lookup
          3. Cain JL, Foulk D, Jedrzejewski E, Stofanak H, Nielsen MK. The importance of anthelmintic efficacy monitoring: results of an outreach effort.. Parasitol Res 2019 Oct;118(10):2877-2883.
            doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06423-6pubmed: 31422463google scholar: lookup
          4. Kaspar A, Pfister K, Nielsen MK, Silaghi C, Fink H, Scheuerle MC. Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture - method comparison and occurrence assessment.. BMC Vet Res 2017 Jan 11;13(1):19.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0918-ypubmed: 28077153google scholar: lookup
          5. Nielsen MK, Scare J, Gravatte HS, Bellaw JL, Prado JC, Reinemeyer CR. Changes in Serum Strongylus Vulgaris-Specific Antibody Concentrations in Response to Anthelmintic Treatment of Experimentally Infected Foals.. Front Vet Sci 2015;2:17.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00017pubmed: 26664946google scholar: lookup
          6. Schneider S, Pfister K, Becher AM, Scheuerle MC. Strongyle infections and parasitic control strategies in German horses - a risk assessment.. BMC Vet Res 2014 Nov 12;10:262.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0262-zpubmed: 25387542google scholar: lookup
          7. Nielsen MK, Vidyashankar AN, Bellaw J, Gravatte HS, Cao X, Rubinson EF, Reinemeyer CR. Serum Strongylus vulgaris-specific antibody responses to anthelmintic treatment in naturally infected horses.. Parasitol Res 2015 Feb;114(2):445-51.
            doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-4201-5pubmed: 25358238google scholar: lookup