Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1989; 21(3); 186-188; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02138.x

Rectal tears in the horse: an analysis of 35 cases.

Abstract: The records of 35 horses with Grade 3 or 4 rectal tears, presented to the Veterinary Medical Center at Texas A & M University over a five year period, were reviewed. Grade 3 tears were sub-classified according to whether the remaining tissue was serosa (Grade 3a) or mesorectum (Grade 3b). Five horses were destroyed on presentation and 30 were treated by primary suture closure (8 horses), faecal diversion alone (9 horses) or in combination with suture closure (11 horses) and packing of the tear with medicated gauze sponges (two horses). Faecal diversion was achieved with a temporary indwelling rectal liner (TIRL) in 19 horses and colostomy in one. Survival was related to classification of the tear, efficacy of first aid measures administered at time of injury and method of treatment. Seventy-four per cent of horses with Grade 3a tears and 44 per cent of those with Grade 3b tears survived. Grade 4 tears had a grave prognosis. Horses given adequate first aid before admission had a better survival rate. With proper patient selection, primary closure of the tear with sutures yielded excellent results. In horses which were not candidates for suture closure alone, a combination of faecal diversion and suturing gave better results than faecal diversion only. In addition, selected horses were treated successfully by packing the rectal tear with gauze sponges. The results demonstrate the value of a TIRL to divert faeces and appropriate first aid measures in treating rectal tears.
Publication Date: 1989-05-01 PubMed ID: 2731505DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02138.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study explores the treatment and survival rates of 35 horses that had severe rectal tears and were treated at the Veterinary Medical Center at Texas A & M University over five years. It highlights how survival rates varied depending upon the grade of tear, initial first aid, and different treatment methods applied.

Study Details and Methodology

  • The study analysed the medical records of 35 horses which were presented to the Veterinary Medical Center at Texas A & M University over a 5-year period. Each horse had experienced severe rectal tears, specifically Grade 3 or 4.
  • Grade 3 tears were subdivided into two categories: Grade 3a (remaining tissue was serosa) or Grade 3b (remaining tissue was mesorectum).
  • Five horses were euthanised upon arrival due to the severity of their injuries. The remaining 30 horses underwent various treatment methods:
    • Primary suture closure (8 horses)
    • Faecal diversion alone (9 horses)
    • Faecal diversion in combination with suture closure (11 horses)
    • Packing of the tear with medicated gauze sponges (2 horses)
  • Faecal diversion was achieved with a temporary indwelling rectal liner (TIRL) in 19 horses and a colostomy in one.

Findings and Conclusion

  • The study found the survival rate was directly related to the grade of the rectal tear, the efficiency of the first aid provided at the time of injury and the specific treatment method utilized.
  • The survival rates were disaggregated by tear grade: 74% of the horses with Grade 3a tears survived while 44% with Grade 3b tears survived. Grade 4 tears had the least favourable prognosis.
  • Furthermore, prompt and effective first aid provided prior to professional treatment significantly improved the survival rate.
  • In terms of treatment techniques, primary closure of the tear using sutures showed excellent results when the patient was suitably selected. For horses which were not ideal candidates for suture closure only, combining faecal diversion and suturing provided better outcomes than just faecal diversion alone.
  • The temporary indwelling rectal liner (TIRL) was particularly useful in managing faecal diversion and improved treatment results.
  • Even in critical cases, some horses were successfully treated by solely packing the rectal tear with gauze sponges.

Implications of the Study

  • This research has significant implications for the veterinary treatment of severe rectal tears in horses. It advises on the most effective techniques for different scenarios, stressing the importance of quick and effective first aid, and the benefits of a TIRL and suture closure.
  • It helps vet practitioners improve the prognosis of such conditions and choose the most appropriate treatment method based on the severity of the tear and the general condition of the horse.

Cite This Article

APA
Watkins JP, Taylor TS, Schumacher J, Taylor JR, Gillis JP. (1989). Rectal tears in the horse: an analysis of 35 cases. Equine Vet J, 21(3), 186-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02138.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 3
Pages: 186-188

Researcher Affiliations

Watkins, J P
  • Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, Texas Veterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A & M University, College Station 77843-4457.
Taylor, T S
    Schumacher, J
      Taylor, J R
        Gillis, J P

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Female
          • Horses / injuries
          • Horses / surgery
          • Male
          • Prognosis
          • Rectum / injuries
          • Rectum / surgery
          • Retrospective Studies
          • Rupture
          • Sutures / veterinary

          Citations

          This article has been cited 1 times.
          1. Welland LM. Transmural rectal intestinal evisceration associated with parturition in a primiparous mare.. Can Vet J 2003 Sep;44(9):740-2.
            pubmed: 14524630