FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Animal reproduction science2014; 145(1-2); 47-53; doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.01.005

Removal of bacteria from stallion semen by colloid centrifugation.

Abstract: Bacteria (environmental contaminants and occasionally potential pathogens) are found in most stallion ejaculates and may negatively affect sperm quality during storage. Since the use of antibiotics can lead to the development of resistance, an alternative means of microbial control is desirable. The removal of bacteria from stallion semen using Single Layer Centrifugation through Androcoll-E was investigated. Known doses of cultured bacteria were added to freshly collected ejaculates (15mL aliquots) before processing by Single Layer Centrifugation. The resulting sperm pellets and controls (not processed by Single Layer Centrifugation) were cultured and the bacteria identified. In experiment 1, doses of E. coli from 2×10(2) to 2×10(7) colony forming units were added to aliquots of semen. In experiment 2, Taylorella equigenitalis or a mix of E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus (approximately 7×10(6), 5×10(6), and 6×10(6)cfu, respectively) were added to 15mL aliquots of semen. In experiment 1, more than 90% of the bacteria were removed where loading doses were >×10(4)cfu/mL. In experiment 2, varying proportions of different bacteria were removed, ranging from 68% for naturally occurring Corynebacterium spp. to >97% for added cultured E. coli. Thus, Single Layer Centrifugation can separate spermatozoa from many, but not all bacteria in stallion ejaculates and could be a useful alternative to adding antibiotics to semen extenders to control bacterial contamination. However, further research is needed to determine the effect of small numbers of bacteria on sperm quality.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2014-01-17 PubMed ID: 24485764DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.01.005Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research analyzed the use of Single Layer Centrifugation (SLC) as an alternative method to antibiotics in removing bacteria from stallion semen, concluding that it was effective in removing a significant portion of the bacteria which can negatively impact sperm quality during storage.

Background of the Study

  • There is an inherent presence of environmental contaminants and potential pathogens, comprising mostly bacteria, in stallion semen. These bacteria can adversely affect the quality of sperm during storage.
  • Antibiotics have been commonly used to combat this bacterial presence; however, the continuous use of antibiotics can potentially lead to the development of antibiotic resistance. Hence, the study sought to find an alternative method for microbial control.

Research Process and Experiment Design

  • The study focused on applying a specific centrifugation process known as Single Layer Centrifugation (SLC) using Androcoll-E to remove bacteria from the semen.
  • Cultured bacteria were intentionally added to fresh ejaculates before proceeding with the SLC processing. The resultant sperm pellets were subjected to Culturing and Identification of the bacteria.
  • The spiking of semen was done in two rounds of experiment:
    • Experiment 1: Doses of bacteria called E. coli, ranging from 2×102 to 2×107 colony-forming units (cfu), were added.
    • Experiment 2: Bacteria, including Taylorella equigenitalis or a combination of E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus, were added in specific quantities.

Results and Conclusion

  • In Experiment 1, more than 90% of the bacteria were removed where the loading dose was >x104 cfu/mL.
  • In Experiment 2, varying proportions of different bacteria were removed, which ranged from 68% for naturally occurring Corynebacterium spp. to >97% for added cultured E. coli.
  • The results demonstrate that SLC can separate spermatozoa from several, but not all, bacteria in stallion ejaculates, thus revealing the potential of SLC as a practical alternative to the addition of antibiotics to control bacterial contamination in semen extenders.
  • The research, however, calls for additional studies to determine the effects of residual bacteria on sperm quality.

Cite This Article

APA
Morrell JM, Klein C, Lundeheim N, Erol E, Troedsson MH. (2014). Removal of bacteria from stallion semen by colloid centrifugation. Anim Reprod Sci, 145(1-2), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.01.005

Publication

Animal reproduction science
ISSN: 1873-2232
NlmUniqueID: 7807205
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 145
Issue: 1-2
Pages: 47-53

Researcher Affiliations

Morrell, J M
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: jane.morrell@slu.se.
Klein, C
  • Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Lundeheim, N
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Erol, E
  • University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Lexington, USA.
Troedsson, M H T
  • Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Bacteria / isolation & purification
  • Centrifugation / methods
  • Colloids / pharmacology
  • Decontamination / methods
  • Ejaculation
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Microbiological Techniques / methods
  • Semen / microbiology
  • Semen Analysis

Citations

This article has been cited 18 times.
  1. Hardefeldt L, Thomas K, Page S, Norris J, Browning G, El Hage C, Stewart A, Gilkerson J, Muscatello G, Verwilghen D, van Galen G, Bauquier J, Cuming R, Reynolds B, Whittaker C, Wilkes E, Clulow J, Burden C, Begg L. Antimicrobial prescribing guidelines for horses in Australia. Aust Vet J 2025 Dec;103(12):781-889.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.70003pubmed: 40903020google scholar: lookup
  2. Basioura A, Tsakmakidis IA, Morrell JM, Ntallaris T. Artificial insemination of boar semen doses prepared with a low-density colloid under field conditions. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1611751.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1611751pubmed: 40538728google scholar: lookup
  3. Zabala SM, Serres C, Montero N, Crespo F, Lorenzo PL, Pérez-Aguilera V, Oliet A, Hijón V, Moreno S, González-Zorn B, Gutiérrez-Cepeda L. Innovative Approaches to Avoid Antibiotic Use in Equine Semen Cryopreservation: Advancing Sustainable Reproductive Technologies. Animals (Basel) 2025 May 9;15(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15101368pubmed: 40427246google scholar: lookup
  4. Morrell JM. Sperm Selection by Colloid Centrifugation. Methods Mol Biol 2025;2897:249-265.
    doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4406-5_18pubmed: 40202641google scholar: lookup
  5. Al-Kass Z, Morrell JM. Freezing Stallion Semen-What Do We Need to Focus on for the Future?. Vet Sci 2024 Feb 2;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci11020065pubmed: 38393083google scholar: lookup
  6. Zabala SM, Serres C, Montero N, Crespo F, Lorenzo PL, Pérez-Aguilera V, Galán C, Domínguez-Gimbernat M, Oliet A, Moreno S, González-Zorn B, Gutiérrez-Cepeda L. Strategies to Reduce the Use of Antibiotics in Fresh and Chilled Equine Semen. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jan 5;14(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14020179pubmed: 38254348google scholar: lookup
  7. Ďuračka M, Benko F, Chňapek M, Tvrdá E. Strategies for Bacterial Eradication from Human and Animal Semen Samples: Current Options and Future Alternatives. Sensors (Basel) 2023 Aug 6;23(15).
    doi: 10.3390/s23156978pubmed: 37571761google scholar: lookup
  8. Cojkic A, Hansson I, Johannisson A, Axner E, Morrell JM. Single layer centrifugation as a method for bacterial reduction in bull semen for assisted reproduction. Vet Res Commun 2024 Feb;48(1):39-48.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-023-10178-ypubmed: 37479850google scholar: lookup
  9. Ciornei ȘG, Drugociu D, Roşca P. Candida Genus Maximum Incidence in Boar Semen Even after Preservation, Is It Not a Risk for AI though?. Molecules 2022 Nov 3;27(21).
    doi: 10.3390/molecules27217539pubmed: 36364363google scholar: lookup
  10. Tvrdá E, Ďuračka M, Benko F, Lukáč N. Bacteriospermia - A formidable player in male subfertility. Open Life Sci 2022;17(1):1001-1029.
    doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0097pubmed: 36060647google scholar: lookup
  11. Domain G, Ali Hassan H, Wydooghe E, Bogado Pascottini O, Johannisson A, Morrell JM, Niżański W, Van Soom A. Influence of Single Layer Centrifugation with Canicoll on Semen Freezability in Dogs. Animals (Basel) 2022 Mar 11;12(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12060714pubmed: 35327111google scholar: lookup
  12. Morrell JM, Rocha A. A Novel Approach to Minimising Acute Equine Endometritis That May Help to Prevent the Development of the Chronic State. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:799619.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.799619pubmed: 35071389google scholar: lookup
  13. Malaluang P, Wilén E, Lindahl J, Hansson I, Morrell JM. Antimicrobial Resistance in Equine Reproduction. Animals (Basel) 2021 Oct 22;11(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11113035pubmed: 34827768google scholar: lookup
  14. Viudes-de-Castro MP, Marco-Jimenez F, Vicente JS, Marin C. Antibacterial Activity of Some Molecules Added to Rabbit Semen Extender as Alternative to Antibiotics. Animals (Basel) 2021 Apr 20;11(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11041178pubmed: 33924203google scholar: lookup
  15. Al-Kass Z, Eriksson E, Bagge E, Wallgren M, Morrell JM. Microbiota of semen from stallions in Sweden identified by MALDI-TOF. Vet Anim Sci 2020 Dec;10:100143.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2020.100143pubmed: 33145452google scholar: lookup
  16. Santos CS, Silva AR. Current and alternative trends in antibacterial agents used in mammalian semen technology. Anim Reprod 2020 Mar 17;17(1):e20190111.
    doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0111pubmed: 32399069google scholar: lookup
  17. Al-Kass Z, Spergser J, Aurich C, Kuhl J, Schmidt K, Johannisson A, Morrell JM. Sperm Quality during Storage Is Not Affected by the Presence of Antibiotics in EquiPlus Semen Extender but Is Improved by Single Layer Centrifugation. Antibiotics (Basel) 2017 Dec 21;7(1).
    doi: 10.3390/antibiotics7010001pubmed: 29267226google scholar: lookup
  18. Morrell JM, Wallgren M. Alternatives to antibiotics in semen extenders: a review. Pathogens 2014 Dec 15;3(4):934-46.
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens3040934pubmed: 25517429google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,824 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.