FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Equine Vet J / Reproductive efficiency of Flatrace and National Hunt Thorou...
Equine veterinary journal2007; 39(5); 438-445; doi: 10.2746/042516407x1737581

Reproductive efficiency of Flatrace and National Hunt Thoroughbred mares and stallions in England.

Abstract: Previous surveys of reproductive efficiency in British Thoroughbreds included only mares and stallions standing on studfarms in and around Newmarket. The present study was widened to compare Flatrace (FR) (Group A) and National Hunt (NH) (Group B) mares and stallions on studfarms throughout England. Objective: To assess the influences of mare type, status and age, and veterinary manipulations on reproductive efficiency parameters. To compare the inherent fertility of stallions, based on singleton and twin pregnancy rates and pregnancy loss rates, in Groups A and B Thoroughbred breeding stock. Methods: Managers of 24 FR and 9 NH public studfarms were asked to complete a questionnaire for each mated oestrous cycle shown by 2321 Group A and 1052 Group B mares throughout the 2002 mating season. Parameters such as per cycle singleton and twin pregnancy rates, and pregnancy loss rates were noted, and the success of hormone treatments to induce oestrus and ovulation assessed. The number of matings per oestrus and per pregnancy were recorded, together with the incidence and effectiveness of uterine and other veterinary treatments. The inherent fertility of 84 Group A and 43 Group B stallions in the study, as measured by the singleton and twin early pregnancy rates and the pregnancy loss rates recorded in the mares they mated, was also estimated. Results: Per cycle early pregnancy (Days 13-16) was 63.2% for Group A and 65.3% for Group B mares; and 10.3% and 13.1%, respectively, of those pregnancies were twins or triplets. Early, middle and late pregnancy loss rates were 7.2% vs. 8.0% (Days 15-42), 3.6% vs. 6.1% (Days 42-1st October) and 2.7% vs. 2.1% (October-foaling), respectively. Matings per oestrus and per early pregnancy were significantly higher in Group B vs. Group A mares. For stallions that mated > or = 30 mares, overall early pregnancy rates per cycle in mares mated ranged from 30-89% across the 2 groups. Conclusions: No major differences in reproductive efficiency were identified between FR and NH mares and stallions. Increasing mare age was the single biggest limiting factor to an otherwise high rate of fertility in well-managed English Thoroughbreds. Conclusions: This study identified factors that influence reproductive efficiency in the Thoroughbred.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2007-10-04 PubMed ID: 17910269DOI: 10.2746/042516407x1737581Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study investigated the reproductive efficiency of Flatrace and National Hunt Thoroughbred mares and stallions throughout England. The study concluded that there are no significant differences in reproductive efficiency between these groups, however, the main factor limiting fertility was the increasing age of mares.

Objective and Methodology

  • The primary focus of the study was to assess the influence of type, status, age of mares, and veterinary manipulations on reproductive efficiency parameters.
  • It also aimed to compare the inherent fertility of stallions based on singleton and twin pregnancy rates, and pregnancy loss rates.
  • The researchers used a questionnaire filled out by managers of 24 Flatrace (Group A) and 9 National Hunt (Group B) English studfarms, documenting each mating oestrous cycle shown by 2321 Group A and 1052 Group B mares during the 2002 mating season.
  • Parameters such as singleton and twin pregnancy rates per cycle, pregnancy loss rates, efficiency of hormone treatments inducing ovulation, matings per pregnancy and per oestrus, and incidence of uterine and other veterinary treatments were recorded.
  • The inherent fertility of 84 Group A and 43 Group B stallions was estimated based on the pregnancy loss rates and early pregnancy rates recorded in the mares they mated.

Results

  • The early pregnancy rate was slightly higher for National Hunt mares (65.3%) than for Flatrace mares (63.2%); additionally, the rate of twin or triplet pregnancies was higher in the former group (13.1% compared to 10.3% in FR mares).
  • The study noted different stages of pregnancy loss rates, with no major divergence between the Group A and B mares.
  • The number of matings per oestrus and per early pregnancy was significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A.
  • There was a wide range of early pregnancy rates (30-89%) among stallions which mated with 30 or more mares, with no significant divergence between the two groups.

Conclusions

  • The study indicates no significant differences in reproductive efficiency between Flatrace and National Hunt mares and stallions, suggesting their inherent fertility is roughly equivalent.
  • The major limiting factor identified to fertility rates in these Thoroughbreds was the increasing age of the mares, proving that age is a crucial factor in reproductive success within this species.

Cite This Article

APA
Allen WR, Brown L, Wright M, Wilsher S. (2007). Reproductive efficiency of Flatrace and National Hunt Thoroughbred mares and stallions in England. Equine Vet J, 39(5), 438-445. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516407x1737581

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 39
Issue: 5
Pages: 438-445

Researcher Affiliations

Allen, W R
  • University of Cambridge, Department of Veterinary Medicine Equine Fertility Unit, Mertoun Paddocks, Woodditton Road, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 9BH, UK.
Brown, L
    Wright, M
      Wilsher, S

        MeSH Terms

        • Age Factors
        • Animals
        • Breeding
        • England
        • Estrus / physiology
        • Female
        • Fertility
        • Horses / physiology
        • Male
        • Ovulation / physiology
        • Pregnancy
        • Pregnancy Rate
        • Pregnancy, Animal / physiology
        • Pregnancy, Multiple
        • Reproduction / physiology
        • Seasons
        • Surveys and Questionnaires
        • Time Factors

        Citations

        This article has been cited 27 times.
        1. Jlassi M, Jemmali B, Ouzari HI, Lasfer F, Aoun BB, Ben Gara A. Reproductive Performance of Tunisian Arabian Stallions: A Study on the Variance and Estimation of Heritability. Animals (Basel) 2023 Mar 9;13(6).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13060991pubmed: 36978534google scholar: lookup
        2. Roach J, Arango Sabogal JC, Smith K, Foote A, Verheyen K, de Mestre AM. Multivariable analysis to determine risk factors associated with abortion in mares. Reprod Fertil 2022 Nov 1;3(4):301-12.
          doi: 10.1530/RAF-22-0087pubmed: 36374277google scholar: lookup
        3. Salem SE, Sinnott A, Roach JM, Verheyen KLP, de Mestre AM. Mixed-Effects Modelling of the Risk Factors Associated with Multiple Pregnancies in Thoroughbred Mares. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jul 20;12(14).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12141841pubmed: 35883388google scholar: lookup
        4. Derisoud E, Jouneau L, Dubois C, Archilla C, Jaszczyszyn Y, Legendre R, Daniel N, Peynot N, Dahirel M, Auclair-Ronzaud J, Wimel L, Duranthon V, Chavatte-Palmer P. Maternal age affects equine day 8 embryo gene expression both in trophoblast and inner cell mass. BMC Genomics 2022 Jun 15;23(1):443.
          doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08593-7pubmed: 35705916google scholar: lookup
        5. Macleay CM, Carrick J, Shearer P, Begg A, Stewart M, Heller J, Chicken C, Brookes VJ. A Scoping Review of the Global Distribution of Causes and Syndromes Associated with Mid- to Late-Term Pregnancy Loss in Horses between 1960 and 2020. Vet Sci 2022 Apr 13;9(4).
          doi: 10.3390/vetsci9040186pubmed: 35448683google scholar: lookup
        6. Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar C, Herskin M, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Roberts HC, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Spoolder H, Ståhl K, Calvo AV, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Carvelli A, Paillot R, Broglia A, Kohnle L, Baldinelli F, Van der Stede Y. Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): infection with Equine Herpesvirus-1. EFSA J 2022 Jan;20(1):e07036.
          doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7036pubmed: 35035581google scholar: lookup
        7. Antczak DF, Allen WRT. Placentation in Equids. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 2021;234:91-128.
          doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-77360-1_6pubmed: 34694479google scholar: lookup
        8. Monteiro de Barros MR, Davies-Morel MCG, Mur LAJ, Creevey CJ, Alison RH, Nash DM. Characterization of an Ex Vivo Equine Endometrial Tissue Culture Model Using Next-Generation RNA-Sequencing Technology. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 3;11(7).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11071995pubmed: 34359123google scholar: lookup
        9. Fawcett JA, Innan H, Tsuchiya T, Sato F. Effect of advancing age on the reproductive performance of Japanese Thoroughbred broodmares. J Equine Sci 2021 Jun;32(2):31-37.
          doi: 10.1294/jes.32.31pubmed: 34220269google scholar: lookup
        10. Catandi GD, Obeidat YM, Broeckling CD, Chen TW, Chicco AJ, Carnevale EM. Equine maternal aging affects oocyte lipid content, metabolic function and developmental potential. Reproduction 2021 Apr;161(4):399-409.
          doi: 10.1530/REP-20-0494pubmed: 33539317google scholar: lookup
        11. Carluccio A, Bucci R, Fusi J, Robbe D, Veronesi MC. Effect of age and of reproductive status on reproductive indices in horse mares carrying mule pregnancies. Heliyon 2020 Oct;6(10):e05175.
          doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05175pubmed: 33083622google scholar: lookup
        12. Köhne M, Kuhlmann M, Tönißen A, Martinsson G, Sieme H. Diagnostic and Treatment Practices of Equine Endometritis-A Questionnaire. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:547.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00547pubmed: 32984410google scholar: lookup
        13. Aouane N, Nasri A, Bekara MAA, Metref AK, Kaidi R. Retrospective study of the reproductive performance of Barb and Thoroughbred stallions in Algeria. Vet World 2019 Jul;12(7):1132-1139.
          doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.1132-1139pubmed: 31528044google scholar: lookup
        14. Kowalczyk A, Czerniawska-Piątkowska E, Kuczaj M. Factors Influencing the Popularity of Artificial Insemination of Mares in Europe. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jul 19;9(7).
          doi: 10.3390/ani9070460pubmed: 31331026google scholar: lookup
        15. Rizzo M, Ducheyne KD, Deelen C, Beitsma M, Cristarella S, Quartuccio M, Stout TAE, de Ruijter-Villani M. Advanced mare age impairs the ability of in vitro-matured oocytes to correctly align chromosomes on the metaphase plate. Equine Vet J 2019 Mar;51(2):252-257.
          doi: 10.1111/evj.12995pubmed: 30025174google scholar: lookup
        16. Miyakoshi D, Sato F, Murase H, Inoue Y, Shikichi M, Iwata K, Okai K, Ito K, Nambo Y. Foaling rate of mares that were rebred after pregnancy loss in Hidaka, Japan. J Equine Sci 2017;28(4):159-161.
          doi: 10.1294/jes.28.159pubmed: 29270074google scholar: lookup
        17. Skive B, Rohde M, Molinari G, Braunstein TH, Bojesen AM. Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus Invades and Survives in Epithelial Cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017;7:465.
          doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00465pubmed: 29164073google scholar: lookup
        18. Haadem CS, Nødtvedt A, Farstad W, Thomassen R. A retrospective cohort study on fertility in the Norwegian Coldblooded trotter after artificial insemination with cooled, shipped versus fresh extended semen. Acta Vet Scand 2015 Nov 14;57:77.
          doi: 10.1186/s13028-015-0161-8pubmed: 26578337google scholar: lookup
        19. Warriach HM, Memon MA, Ahmad N, Norman ST, Ghafar A, Arif M. Reproductive Performance of Arabian and Thoroughbred Mares under Subtropical Conditions of Pakistan. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014 Jul;27(7):932-6.
          doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13547pubmed: 25050033google scholar: lookup
        20. Hanada M, Maeda Y, Oikawa MA. Equine Endometrial Gland Density and Endometrial Thickness Vary among Sampling Sites in Thoroughbred Mares. J Equine Sci 2012;23(3):35-40.
          doi: 10.1294/jes.23.35pubmed: 24833993google scholar: lookup
        21. Murase H, Endo Y, Tsuchiya T, Kotoyori Y, Shikichi M, Ito K, Sato F, Nambo Y. Ultrasonographic evaluation of equine fetal growth throughout gestation in normal mares using a convex transducer. J Vet Med Sci 2014 Jul;76(7):947-53.
          doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0259pubmed: 24662520google scholar: lookup
        22. Sabbagh M, Danvy S, Ricard A. Genetic and environmental analysis of dystocia and stillbirths in draft horses. Animal 2014 Feb;8(2):184-91.
          doi: 10.1017/S1751731113002061pubmed: 24433956google scholar: lookup
        23. Katila T, Reilas T, Nivola K, Peltonen T, Virtala AM. A 15-year survey of reproductive efficiency of Standardbred and Finnhorse trotters in Finland--descriptive results. Acta Vet Scand 2010 Jun 14;52(1):40.
          doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-52-40pubmed: 20546559google scholar: lookup
        24. Fehin B, Scott CJ, Arango-Sabogal JC, de Mestre AM, Mouncey R. Associations between endometrial swab bacteriology and cytology findings and live foal rates in Thoroughbred broodmares in the United Kingdom. Equine Vet J 2026 Mar;58(2):348-358.
          doi: 10.1111/evj.70086pubmed: 40888035google scholar: lookup
        25. Scholtz M, Guthrie AJ, Newton R, Schulman ML. Review of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae as venereal pathogens in horses. Equine Vet J 2025 May;57(3):587-597.
          doi: 10.1111/evj.14201pubmed: 39103748google scholar: lookup
        26. Li L, Li S, Ma H, Akhtar MF, Tan Y, Wang T, Liu W, Khan A, Khan MZ, Wang C. An Overview of Infectious and Non-Infectious Causes of Pregnancy Losses in Equine. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 2;14(13).
          doi: 10.3390/ani14131961pubmed: 38998073google scholar: lookup
        27. Donato GG, Necchi D, Vandaele H, Vita ME, Bertero A, Vincenti L, Nervo T. Influence of Intrauterine Fluid Detection, Number of Transfers and Age of the Recipient on Pregnancy Rate and Early Embryonic Loss in a Commercial Embryo Transfer Program. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 29;13(11).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13111799pubmed: 37889745google scholar: lookup
        Subscribe to our newsletter
        Join 99,005 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.