Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2010; 39(5); 616-620; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00636.x

Risk factors for incisional complications after exploratory celiotomy in horses: do skin staples increase the risk?

Abstract: To assess risk factors for celiotomy incisional infection in horses, especially the use of staples for skin closure. Methods: Case series. Methods: Horses (n=356) that had 1 exploratory celiotomy for colic and survived >2 weeks after surgery between March 1, 2004 and December 31, 2007. Methods: Incisions were classified as "normal" (no complication, only edema, serous drainage lasting <24 hours) or as "surgical site infection (SSI)" (persistent serosanguinous drainage or purulent drainage with or without positive bacterial culture). All possible risk factors, including method of skin closure (monofilament sutures or staples), were statistically analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of 356 horses, 303 (85%) had normal wound healing and 53 (15%) developed a SSI (purulent: 48 [14%]; persistent serosanguinous: 5 [1%]). Bacterial cultures were positive in 33 of 40 cases. Factors significantly associated with SSI in the multivariate analysis were: use of staples for skin closure (odds ratio [OR] 3.85, P<.001) and surgical site closure by a 1st or 2nd year resident (OR 2.20, P=.016). Lavage of the linea alba with sterile saline solution after closure was a protective factor (OR 0.38, P=.004). Conclusions: Use of staples for skin closure and less experienced surgeons closing the abdomen are risk factors for incisional infection. Incisional lavage after linea alba closure was a protective factor. Conclusions: Despite their ease and speed of application, skin staples can lead to an increase in celiotomy wound complications in horses.
Publication Date: 2010-07-20 PubMed ID: 20636556DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00636.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper analyzes risk factors associated with incisional infection in horses post-celiotomy (abdominal surgery), particularly noting the correlation of using staples for skin closure. The findings suggest that using staples and having less experienced surgeons increase the risk of infection, while lavaging the incisional area post surgery serves as a protective measure.

Methods

  • The study is based on a case series methodology, involving 356 horses that had one-exploratory celiotomy for colic and survived more than two weeks post surgery between March 1, 2004, and December 31, 2007.
  • The incisions were categorized as “normal” (no complication, only edema or serous drainage lasting less than 24 hours) or “surgical site infection (SSI)” (persistent serosanguinous drainage or purulent drainage with or without positive bacterial culture).
  • All potential risk factors including the use of either monofilament sutures or staples for skin closure were statistically analyzed utilizing both univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

  • Of the 356 horses analyzed, 303 (85%) showed normal wound healing, while 53 (15%) developed a SSI. Among the horses with SSI, bacterial cultures were found to be positive in 33 of the 40 cases.
  • Through multivariate analysis, it was found that factors significantly associated with SSI were the use of staples for skin closure (having an odds ratio [OR] 3.85) and surgical site closure being performed by a first or second year resident (OR 2.20).
  • Interestingly, the act of lavaging the linea alba with sterile saline solution post closure was identified as a protective factor against SSI, with an odds ratio of 0.38.

Conclusions

  • The research concludes that the use of staples for skin closure post-celiotomy increases the chance of incisional infections in horses. The proficiency level of surgeons also surfaced as a risk factor, with first or second year residents presenting a higher incidence of infections in surgeries they closed.
  • On the flip side, lavaging the linea alba (a fibrous structure in the lower abdomen) with sterile saline solution after closing it was found to be a protective factor against incisional infection.
  • Despite the ease and quickness of applying skin staples, the study results indicate their use can lead to an increase in post-celiotomy wound complications in horses. This is a critical point to consider in veterinary surgical practices.

Cite This Article

APA
Torfs S, Levet T, Delesalle C, Dewulf J, Vlaminck L, Pille F, Lefere L, Martens A. (2010). Risk factors for incisional complications after exploratory celiotomy in horses: do skin staples increase the risk? Vet Surg, 39(5), 616-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00636.x

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 39
Issue: 5
Pages: 616-620

Researcher Affiliations

Torfs, Sara
  • Department of Surgery and Anesthesiology of Domestic Animals; Large Animal Internal Medicine; Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health; and Unit for Veterinary Epidemiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. sara.torfs@ugent.be
Levet, Tamara
    Delesalle, Catherine
      Dewulf, Jeroen
        Vlaminck, Lieven
          Pille, Frederik
            Lefere, Laurence
              Martens, Ann

                MeSH Terms

                • Abdominal Pain / surgery
                • Abdominal Pain / veterinary
                • Age Factors
                • Animals
                • Female
                • Horse Diseases / surgery
                • Horses / surgery
                • Laparotomy / adverse effects
                • Laparotomy / veterinary
                • Male
                • Multivariate Analysis
                • Postoperative Complications / etiology
                • Postoperative Complications / veterinary
                • Risk Factors
                • Sex Factors
                • Surgical Stapling / adverse effects
                • Surgical Stapling / veterinary
                • Surgical Wound Infection / etiology
                • Surgical Wound Infection / veterinary

                Citations

                This article has been cited 11 times.
                1. Southwood LL, Long A, Perez J, Daniel S, Bittinger K, Aitken M, Redding L. Effect of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis duration for colic surgery on complications and resistome. Equine Vet J 2026 Mar;58(2):390-403.
                  doi: 10.1002/evj.70137pubmed: 41369016google scholar: lookup
                2. Cerullo A, Di Nicola MR, Scilimati N, Bertoletti A, Pollicino G, Moroni B, Pepe M, Nannarone S, Gialletti R, Passamonti F. Intra- and Post-Operative Bacteriological Surveys of Surgical Site in Horses: A Single-Centre Study. Microorganisms 2025 Apr 17;13(4).
                3. Griessel TS, Muñoz Morán JA, Byaruhanga C, Smit Y. A single-centre retrospective study of surgical site infection following equine colic surgery (2013‒2021). Vet Rec 2025 May 17;196(10):e5227.
                  doi: 10.1002/vetr.5227pubmed: 40123113google scholar: lookup
                4. Isgren CM, Pinchbeck GL, Salem SE, Hann MJ, Townsend NB, Cullen MD, Archer DC. Evaluation of a stent dressing and abdominal bandage on surgical site infection following emergency equine laparotomy: A randomised controlled trial. Equine Vet J 2025 Nov;57(6):1466-1477.
                  doi: 10.1111/evj.14482pubmed: 39967458google scholar: lookup
                5. Gehlen H, Klein KS, Merle R, Lübke-Becker A, Stoeckle SD. Does colonization with MRSA, ESBL - producing Enterobacteriaceae, and/or Acinetobacter baumannii - increase the risk for postoperative surgical site infection?. Vet Med Sci 2023 Mar;9(2):729-737.
                  doi: 10.1002/vms3.1073pubmed: 36646070google scholar: lookup
                6. Gandini M, Cerullo A, Franci P, Giusto G. Changes in Perioperative Antimicrobial and Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Regimens for Colic Surgery in Horses: A Single Center Report. Vet Sci 2022 Oct 4;9(10).
                  doi: 10.3390/vetsci9100546pubmed: 36288159google scholar: lookup
                7. Stöckle SD, Kannapin DA, Kauter AML, Lübke-Becker A, Walther B, Merle R, Gehlen H. A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing a Short-Term Perioperative Prophylaxis Regimen to a Long-Term Standard Protocol in Equine Colic Surgery. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021 May 16;10(5).
                  doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050587pubmed: 34065712google scholar: lookup
                8. Crosa AT, Katzman SA, Kelleher ME, Nieto JE, Kilcoyne I, Dechant JE. Incidence of incisional complications after exploratory celiotomy in equids affected with enterolithiasis. Can Vet J 2020 Oct;61(10):1085-1091.
                  pubmed: 33012825
                9. Scharner D, Gittel C, Winter K, Blaue D, Schedlbauer C, Vervuert I, Brehm W. Comparison of incisional complications between skin closures using a simple continuous or intradermal pattern: a pilot study in horses undergoing ventral median celiotomy. PeerJ 2018;6:e5772.
                  doi: 10.7717/peerj.5772pubmed: 30430040google scholar: lookup
                10. Rousseau M, Anderson DE, Rozell TG, Hand JM, Faris BR. Comparison of polyglactin-910 and polydioxanone for closure of the linea alba following caudal ventral midline laparotomy in sheep. Can Vet J 2015 Sep;56(9):959-63.
                  pubmed: 26345301
                11. López C, Alvarez ME, Carmona JU. Temporal Bacteriostatic Effect and Growth Factor Loss in Equine Platelet Components and Plasma Cultured with Methicillin-Sensitive and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Vet Med Int 2014;2014:525826.
                  doi: 10.1155/2014/525826pubmed: 25506468google scholar: lookup