Analyze Diet

Role of endothelium and nitric oxide in the in vitro response of equine colonic venous rings to vasoconstrictor agents.

Abstract: To determine in vitro contractile responses of equine colonic veins to various vasoconstrictor agents. Methods: Colonic veins collected from 8 adult horses. Methods: Veins were cut into 4-mm-wide rings, placed in organ baths at 37 C, and attached to a force-transducer interfaced with a polygraph; 2 g of tension was applied, and rings were allowed to equilibrate for 45 minutes. Bath solution was replaced, and tension was reapplied at 15-minute intervals. Cumulative concentration responses (10(-8) to 10(-4) M) were determined for each agent, using separate rings (n = 8). Three vein groups were evaluated: endothelium-intact, endothelium-denuded, and N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 10(-5) M)-treated. Maximal responses by each vein to each agent were considered 100%; responses to lower concentrations were calculated as percentage of maximum. Results: Considering all vein groups, comparison of the doses that caused 50% of the maximal contraction revealed relative sensitivity of colonic veins to be: angiotensin II (ANG) > thromboxane B2 analogue (TXB) > 5-hydoxytryptamine (5HT) > norepinephrine (NE) > histamine (HST) > prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF) > vasopressin (VP). Compared with ANG, PGF, TXB, and VP, treatment with HST, 5HT, and NE evoked significantly greater responses. Endothelium-denuded and L-NAME-treated colonic veins had significantly greater maximal contractile responses than did endothelium-intact veins. Conclusions: Response of colonic veins to vasoconstrictor agents was differential; sensitivity was not altered by endothelium removal or L-NAME treatment; maximal responses of endothelium-intact veins were greater than those of endothelium-denuded and L-NAME-treated veins; and responses of endothelium-denuded and L-NAME-treated veins were not different. Conclusions: Alterations in colonic veins that mimic conditions associated with large-colon volvulus may contribute to blood flow alterations, edema formation, and vascular responses to hypovolemic and endotoxic shock.
Publication Date: 1997-11-05 PubMed ID: 9328669
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates how the veins from horse colons respond in-vitro to various substances that cause veins to narrow, with a focus on whether endothelium presence or treatment with a certain chemical (L-NAME) changes these responses.

Methodology

  • The study was conducted on colonic veins collected from 8 adult horses.
  • The veins were cut into small rings, placed in warm baths and tension force was applied to them. Rings were left to equilibrate for 45 minutes.
  • The bath solution was replenished and tension reapplied at intervals of 15 minutes.
  • Responses to cumulative concentrations (10(-8) to 10(-4) M) of each vasoconstrictor agent were determined for each vein ring.
  • Three different groups of vein rings were evaluated: veins with the endothelium intact, veins with the endothelium stripped away (denuded), and veins treated with N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor).

Results

  • The study found that the sensitivity of colonic veins varied between the different vasoconstrictor agents used.
  • The relative sensitivity was greatest for Angiotensin II and least for Vasopressin.
  • Responses to Histamine, 5-Hydoxytryptamine and Norepinephrine were significantly greater than responses to Angiotensin II, Prostaglandin F2 alpha, Thromboxane B2 analogue and Vasopressin.
  • Veins either with the endothelium stripped away or treated with L-NAME experienced higher maximal contractile responses than veins with the endothelium intact.

Conclusions

  • The responses of colonic veins to vasoconstrictor agents were noticeably different; however, the sensitivity of these veins was not influenced by the presence of endothelium or by treatment with L-NAME.
  • Veins with intact endothelium had higher responses than those where the endothelium had been removed or treated with L-NAME.
  • Changes to the colonic veins that mimic conditions often seen in pathological enlargement of a horse’s colon, can influence blood flow, cause edema, and alter vascular responses to low blood volume and toxins in the blood.

Cite This Article

APA
Moore RM, Venugopalan CS, Sedrish SA, Holmes EP. (1997). Role of endothelium and nitric oxide in the in vitro response of equine colonic venous rings to vasoconstrictor agents. Am J Vet Res, 58(10), 1145-1151.

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 58
Issue: 10
Pages: 1145-1151

Researcher Affiliations

Moore, R M
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803-8410, USA.
Venugopalan, C S
    Sedrish, S A
      Holmes, E P

        MeSH Terms

        • Analysis of Variance
        • Angiotensin II / pharmacology
        • Animals
        • Colon / blood supply
        • Colon / drug effects
        • Dinoprost / pharmacology
        • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
        • Endothelium, Vascular / drug effects
        • Endothelium, Vascular / physiology
        • Histamine / pharmacology
        • Horses / physiology
        • In Vitro Techniques
        • NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester / pharmacology
        • Nitric Oxide / physiology
        • Norepinephrine / pharmacology
        • Sensitivity and Specificity
        • Thromboxane B2 / pharmacology
        • Vasoconstriction / drug effects
        • Vasoconstriction / physiology
        • Vasoconstrictor Agents / pharmacology
        • Vasopressins / pharmacology
        • Veins / drug effects
        • Veins / physiology

        Citations

        This article has been cited 0 times.