Analyze Diet
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2024; 22(11); e9016; doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9016

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil derived from the flowering stems of Salvia sclarea L. (clary sage oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).

Abstract: Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of an essential oil from the fresh or dried flowering stems of L. (clary sage oil) when used as a sensory additive in feed and in water for drinking for all animal species. The EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) concluded that the additive under assessment is considered safe up to the maximum use level in complete feed of 15 mg/kg for veal calves (milk replacers), cattle for fattening, sheep/goats, 10 mg/kg for horses, 20 mg/kg for dogs, salmonids and ornamental fish. For the other target species, the calculated safe concentrations were 5 mg/kg for chickens for fattening, 8 mg/kg for laying hens, 7 mg/kg for turkeys for fattening, 9 mg/kg for piglets, 11 mg/kg for pigs for fattening, 14 mg/kg for sows, 13 mg/kg for dairy cows, 8 mg/kg for rabbits and 4 mg/kg for cats. These conclusions were extrapolated to other physiologically related species. For any other species, the additive is safe at 4 mg/kg complete feed. The FEEDAP Panel considered that the use level in water of clary sage oil is safe provided that the total daily intake of the additive does not exceed the daily amount that is considered safe when consumed via feed. The use of clary sage oil in animal feed under the proposed conditions of use is safe for the consumer and the environment. Regarding user safety, the essential oil under assessment should be considered as an irritant to skin and eyes and as a dermal and respiratory sensitiser. Since the oil of the flowering stems of is recognised to flavour food and its function in feed would be essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy was considered necessary.
Publication Date: 2024-11-14 PubMed ID: 39545222PubMed Central: PMC11561422DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9016Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of clary sage oil, an essential oil derived from the flowering stems of Saliva sclarea L., as an additive in both animal feed and drinking water. The EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) concluded it is safe for various animal species within specific concentration limits and safe for the consumer and the environment.

Overview of the Research

  • The research was conducted by EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) following a request from the European Commission.
  • The aim was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of clary sage oil, an essential oil extracted from the fresh or dried flowering stems of Salvia sclarea L., as a sensory additive in feed and in water for drinking for all animal species.
  • The research managed to establish safe consumption levels for various animal species and affirmed that the essential oil is safe for the environment and consumers.

Findings of the Research

  • The research established safe maximum use levels in complete animal feed: 15 mg/kg for veal calves, cattle for fattening, sheep/goats; 10mg/kg for horses; 20mg/kg for dogs, salmonids, and ornamental fish. For other species, it calculated safe concentrations ranging from 4mg/kg to 14mg/kg.
  • The use level in water was considered safe as long as the total daily intake of the additive does not exceed the safe daily amount consumed via feed.
  • The panel extrapolated these conclusions to other physiologically related species.

Implications for Users and Consumers

  • Regarding user safety, clary sage oil should be considered an irritant to the skin and eyes and regarded as a dermal and respiratory sensitizer.
  • The research affirms that the use of clary sage oil in animal feed, under proposed conditions, is safe for the consumer and the environment.
  • Given the widely recognised use of the oil for flavouring food, the panel did not find it necessary to demonstrate further efficacy regarding its identical function in feed.

Cite This Article

APA
Villa RE, Azimonti G, Bonos E, Christensen H, Durjava M, Dusemund B, Gehring R, Glandorf B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, Marcon F, Nebbia C, Pechová A, Prieto-Maradona M, Röhe I, Theodoridou K, Bastos ML, Brantom P, Chesson A, Schlatter J, Westendorf J, Dirven Y, Manini P. (2024). Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil derived from the flowering stems of Salvia sclarea L. (clary sage oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl). EFSA J, 22(11), e9016. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9016

Publication

ISSN: 1831-4732
NlmUniqueID: 101642076
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 11
Pages: e9016
PII: e9016

Researcher Affiliations

Villa, Roberto Edoardo
    Azimonti, Giovanna
      Bonos, Eleftherios
        Christensen, Henrik
          Durjava, Mojca
            Dusemund, Birgit
              Gehring, Ronette
                Glandorf, Boet
                  Kouba, Maryline
                    López-Alonso, Marta
                      Marcon, Francesca
                        Nebbia, Carlo
                          Pechová, Alena
                            Prieto-Maradona, Miguel
                              Röhe, Ilen
                                Theodoridou, Katerina
                                  Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
                                    Brantom, Paul
                                      Chesson, Andrew
                                        Schlatter, Josef
                                          Westendorf, Johannes
                                            Dirven, Yvette
                                              Manini, Paola

                                                References

                                                This article includes 45 references
                                                1. Araujo IB, Souza CA, De‐Carvalho RR, Kuriyama SN, Rodrigues RP, Vollmer RS, Alves EN, Paumgartten FJ. Study of the embryofoetotoxicity of alpha‐terpinene in the rat. Food and Chemical Toxicology 34, 477–482.
                                                  doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(96)87358-3pubmed: 8655097google scholar: lookup
                                                2. Bhatia SP, McGinty D, Letizia CS, Api AM. Fragrance material review on sclareol. Food and Chemical Toxicology 46, S270–S274.
                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.06.074pubmed: 18640178google scholar: lookup
                                                3. Burdock GA. Fenaroli's handbook of flavor ingredients (6th ed., pp. 327–328). .
                                                  doi: 10.1201/9781439847503google scholar: lookup
                                                4. Comments on PhEur . (2019). Salviae sclareae aetheroleum. Kommentar Zur Ph. Eur. 7.0. In German.
                                                5. Court MH, Greenblatt DJ. Molecular basis for deficient acetaminophen glucuronidation in cats. An interspecies comparison of enzyme kinetics in liver microsomes. Biochemical Pharmacology 53, 1041–1047.
                                                  doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00072-5pubmed: 9174118google scholar: lookup
                                                6. Cramer GM, Ford RA, Hall RL. Estimation of toxic hazard–a decision tree approach. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology 16, 255–276.
                                                  doi: 10.1016/s0015-6264(76)80522-6pubmed: 357272google scholar: lookup
                                                7. ECHA (European Chemical Agency). CLH report for alpha‐terpinene. Proposal for Harmonised Classification and Labelling. Substance Name: p‐mentha‐1,3‐diene; 1‐isopropyl‐4‐methylcyclohexa‐1,3‐diene; alpha‐terpinene. Part A. .
                                                8. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific Opinion of the panel on food contact materials, enzymes, Flavourings and processing aids (AFC) on a request from the commission on Flavouring group evaluation 11, revision 1 (FGE.11Rev1) aliphatic dialcohols, diketones, and hydroxyketones from chemical group 10. EFSA Journal 493, 1–50.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.493google scholar: lookup
                                                9. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Compendium of botanicals reported to contain naturally occurring substances of possible concern for human health when used in food and food supplements. EFSA Journal 10(5), 2663.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2663google scholar: lookup
                                                10. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Guidance on the data required for the risk assessment of flavourings. EFSA Journal 8(6), 1623.
                                                  doi: 10.2093/j.efsa.2010.1623google scholar: lookup
                                                11. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 18, revision 2 (FGE.18Rev2): Aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic saturated and unsaturated tertiary alcohols, aromatic tertiary alcohols and their esters from chemical groups 6 and 8. EFSA Journal 9(5), 1847.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1847google scholar: lookup
                                                12. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 59, revision 1 (FGE.59Rev1): Consideration of aliphatic and aromatic ethers evaluated by JECFA (61st meeting and 63rd meeting) structurally related to aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives evaluated by EFSA in FGE.23 Rev2 (2010). EFSA Journal 9(5), 2158.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2158google scholar: lookup
                                                13. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 25, revision 2 (FGE.25Rev2): Aliphatic hydrocarbons from chemical group 31. EFSA Journal 9(6), 2177.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2177google scholar: lookup
                                                14. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 82, revision 1 (FGE.82Rev1): Consideration of epoxides evaluated by the JECFA (65th meeting). EFSA Journal 12(6), 3708.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3708google scholar: lookup
                                                15. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 25, revision 3 (FGE.25Rev3): Aliphatic hydrocarbons from chemical group 31. EFSA Journal 13(4), 4069.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4069google scholar: lookup
                                                16. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 78, revision 2 (FGE.78Rev2): Consideration of aliphatic and alicyclic and aromatic hydrocarbons evaluated by JECFA (63rd meeting) structurally related to aliphatic hydrocarbons evaluated by EFSA in FGE.25Rev3. EFSA Journal 13(4), 4067.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4067google scholar: lookup
                                                17. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic saturated and unsaturated tertiary alcohols and esters with esters containing tertiary alcohols ethers (chemical group 6) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 10(11), 2966.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2966google scholar: lookup
                                                18. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Opinion on the safety and efficacy of furanones and tetrahydrofurfuryl derivatives: 4‐hydroxy‐2,5‐dimethylfuran‐3(2H)‐one, 4,5‐dihydro‐2‐methylfuran‐3(2H)‐one, 4‐acetoxy‐2,5‐dimethylfuran‐3(2H)‐one and linalool oxide (chemical Group 13) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 10(7), 2786.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2786google scholar: lookup
                                                19. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of phenyl ethyl alcohols, phenylacetic acids, related esters, phenoxyacetic acids and related esters (chemical group 15) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 10(3), 2625.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2625google scholar: lookup
                                                20. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and alicyclic ethers (chemical group 16) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 10(11), 2967.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2967google scholar: lookup
                                                21. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of benzyl alcohols, aldehydes, acids, esters and acetals (chemical group 23) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 10(7), 2785.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2785google scholar: lookup
                                                22. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of straight‐chain primary aliphatic alcohols/aldehydes/acids, acetals and esters with esters containing saturated alcohols and acetals containing saturated aldehydes (chemical group 01) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 11(4), 3169.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3169google scholar: lookup
                                                23. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of saturated and unsaturated aliphatic secondary alcohols, ketones and esters with esters containing secondary alcohols belonging chemical group 5 when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 13(11), 4268.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4268google scholar: lookup
                                                24. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons (chemical group 31) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 13(3), 4053.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4053google scholar: lookup
                                                25. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of a,b‐unsaturated straight‐chain and branched‐chain aliphatic primary alcohols, aldehydes, acids and esters belonging to chemical group 3 when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 14(6), 4512.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4512pmc: PMC7009239pubmed: 32626273google scholar: lookup
                                                26. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of non‐conjugated and accumulated unsaturated straight‐chain and branched‐chain aliphatic primary alcohols, aldehydes, acids, acetals and esters belonging to chemical group 4 when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 14(8), 4559.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4559google scholar: lookup
                                                27. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of secondary alicyclic saturated and unsaturated alcohols, ketones, ketals and esters with ketals containing alicyclic alcohols or ketones and esters containing secondary alicyclic alcohols from chemical group 8 when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 14(6), 4475.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.447google scholar: lookup
                                                28. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons (chemical Group 31) when used as flavourings for all animal species and categories. EFSA Journal 14(1), 4339.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4339google scholar: lookup
                                                29. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Innocenti ML. Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives. EFSA Journal 15(10), 5023.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5023pmc: PMC7010039pubmed: 32625313google scholar: lookup
                                                30. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species. EFSA Journal 15(10), 5021.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5021pmc: PMC7009839pubmed: 32625311google scholar: lookup
                                                31. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Innocenti ML. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer. EFSA Journal 15(10), 5022.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5022google scholar: lookup
                                                32. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives. EFSA Journal 16(5), 5274.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5274pmc: PMC7009555pubmed: 32625911google scholar: lookup
                                                33. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Bampidis V, Bastos M, Christensen H, Dusemund B, Kouba M, Kos Durjava M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brock T, de Knecht J, Azimonti G. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the environment. EFSA Journal 17(4), 5648.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5648pmc: PMC7009194pubmed: 32626279google scholar: lookup
                                                34. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Kouba M, Kos Durjava M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Dusemund B. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of 26 compounds belonging to chemical group 3 (α,β‐unsaturated straight‐chain and branched‐chain aliphatic primary alcohols, aldehydes, acids and esters) when used as flavourings for all animal species and categories. EFSA Journal 17(3), 5654.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5654pmc: PMC7009239pubmed: 32626273google scholar: lookup
                                                35. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (ESA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Dusemund B, Durjava MF, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Manini P. Scientific Opinion on the safety of 31 flavouring compounds belonging to different chemical groups when used as feed additives for all animal species. EFSA Journal 18(12), 6338.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6338pmc: PMC7744023pubmed: 33343735google scholar: lookup
                                                36. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Kouba M, Fašmon Durjava M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Dusemund B. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of feed additives consisting of expressed lemon oil and its fractions from Citrus limon (L.) Osbeck and of lime oil from Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle for use in all animal species. EFSA Journal 19(4), 6548.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6548pmc: PMC8085978pubmed: 33968248google scholar: lookup
                                                37. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Durjava M, Dusemund B, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Galobart J. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the users. EFSA Journal 21(12), e8469.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8469pmc: PMC10698700pubmed: 38075627google scholar: lookup
                                                38. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Durjava M, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of feed additives consisting of essential oils derived from the flower buds or the leaves of Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. & L.M. Perry (clove bud oil and clove leaf oils) for all animal species (FEFANA asbl). EFSA Journal 21(7), 8183.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8183pmc: PMC10375362pubmed: 37522096google scholar: lookup
                                                39. EFSA Scientific Committee. Guidance on safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use as ingredients in food supplements, on request of EFSA. EFSA Journal 7(9), 1249.
                                                  doi: 10.2093/j.efsa.2009.1249google scholar: lookup
                                                40. EFSA Scientific Committee, More SJ, Hardy A, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bennekou SH, Bragard C, Boesten J, Halldorsson TI, Hernandez‐Jerez AF, Jeger MJ, Knutsen HK, Koutsoumanis KP, Naegeli H, Noteborn H, Ockleford C, Ricci A, Rychen G, Schlatter JR, Hogstrand C. Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals. EFSA Journal 17(3), 5634.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5634pmc: PMC7009070pubmed: 32626259google scholar: lookup
                                                41. EFSA Scientific Committee, More S, Bampidis V, Benford D, Boesten J, Bragard C, Halldorsson T, Hernandez‐Jerez A, Hougaard‐Bennekou S, Koutsoumanis K, Naegeli H, Nielsen SS, Schrenk D, Silano V, Turck D, Younes M, Aquilina G, Crebelli R, Gürtler R, Schlatter J. Statement on the genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures. EFSA Journal 17(1), 5519.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5519pmc: PMC7009058pubmed: 32626066google scholar: lookup
                                                42. EFSA Scientific Committee, More SJ, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bragard C, Halldorsson TI, Hernandez‐Jerez AF, Hougaard BS, Koutsoumanis KP, Machera K, Naegeli H, Nielsen SS, Schlatter JR, Schrenk D, Silano V, Turck D, Younes M, Gundert‐Remy U, Kass GE N, Wallace HM. Guidance on the use of the threshold of toxicological concern approach in food safety assessment. Guidance on the use of the threshold of toxicological concern approach in food safety assessment. EFSA Journal 17(6), 5708.
                                                  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5708pmc: PMC7009090pubmed: 32626331google scholar: lookup
                                                43. Lautz LS, Jeddi MZ, Girolami F, Nebbia C, Dorne JLCM. Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of pharmaceuticals in cats (Felix sylvestris catus) and implications for the risk assessment of feed additives and contaminants. Toxicology Letters 338, 114–127.
                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.11.014pubmed: 33253781google scholar: lookup
                                                44. Munro IC, Ford RA, Kennepohl E, Sprenger JG. Correlation of structural class with no‐observed‐effect levels: A proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. Food and Chemical Toxicology 34, 829–867.
                                                  doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(96)00049-xpubmed: 8972878google scholar: lookup
                                                45. PhEur (European Pharmacopoeia). “Clary sage oil (Salviae sclareae aetheroleum)” European pharmacopoeia, 11th Edition, Monograph 01/2008:1850. European pharmacopoeia 11th Edition, Monograph 01/2008:1850.

                                                Citations

                                                This article has been cited 0 times.