Analyze Diet
Veterinary immunology and immunopathology2007; 119(1-2); 63-80; doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.06.034

Screening of anti-human leukocyte monoclonal antibodies for reactivity with equine leukocytes.

Abstract: Three hundred and seventy-nine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against various human CD molecules supplied to the HLDA8 animal homologues section (including four isotype controls) were analysed for cross-reactivity with equine leukocytes. First, flow cytometric identification of positively reacting mAbs was performed in one laboratory. Thereafter, a second round of flow cytometric evaluation was performed, involving three laboratories participating in the study. The first test-round indicated 17 mAbs as potentially positive. After the second round of flow cytometric analysis, 14 mAbs remained (directed against CD2, CD11a, CD18, CD44, CD45, CD49d, CD91, CD163 and CD172) where cross-reactivity was anticipated based on similarities between the human and equine staining pattern. Additionally, there was 1 mAb with weak likely positive reactivity, 12 mAbs with positive staining, which likely do not reflect valuable data, 5 mAbs with clear alternate expression pattern from that expected from humans, 5 mAbs with a questionable staining pattern itself, i.e. that was variable between the three labs, 32 mAbs with weak-positive expression and alternate staining pattern, and 279 negative mAbs (including the four isotype controls) were detected. In 31 cases, more appropriate target cells, such as thymocytes or stem cells, were not available for the screening. The results underline the value of this "cross-reactivity" approach for equine immunology. However, as only a few mAbs against leukocyte surface antigens reacted positively (approximately 4% of the mAbs submitted), the analysis of further anti-human mAbs and directed efforts to develop species-specific anti-CD mAb are still required.
Publication Date: 2007-07-03 PubMed ID: 17707518DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.06.034Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research team tested a range of anti-human leukocyte monoclonal antibodies to see if they could also react with horse leukocytes, as part of their efforts to improve understandings of equine immunology.

Research Methodology

  • 379 different monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) initially submitted to the HLDA8 animal homologues section were tested for cross-reactivity with equine leukocytes.
  • The testing process involved two rounds of flow cytometric analysis, both initially in one lab and then with the results corroborated in a further two independent labs.
  • The testing procedure looked for similarities between the human and equine staining pattern in the antibodies, as this was one possible indication of cross-reactivity.

Initial Findings

  • After the first round of testing, 17 mAbs were flagged as potentially cross-reactive.
  • This was narrowed down to 14 mAbs directed against CD2, CD11a, CD18, CD44, CD45, CD49d, CD91, CD163 and CD172, in the second round of testing.
  • Other findings included:
    • 1 mAb with weak likely positive reactivity.
    • 12 mAbs with positive staining that likely do not reflect valuable data.
    • 5 mAbs with clear alternate expression pattern different from that of humans.
    • 5 mAbs with a questionable staining pattern.
    • 32 mAbs with weak-positive expression and an alternate staining pattern.
    • 279 mAbs showed negative responses.

Shortcomings and Recommendations for Further Research

  • The researchers were unable to test certain types of cells, such as thymocytes or stem cells, because they were unavailable for the screening.
  • As only 4% of mAbs submitted reacted positively, there is a need for further testing with a greater variety of anti-human mAbs, as well as developing species-specific anti-CD mAb.

Implications of the Study

  • This study highlighted the potential value of a “cross-reactivity” approach to advancing equine immunology.
  • The findings also serve as a guide for future research in the field, and underscore the need for continued efforts.

Cite This Article

APA
Ibrahim S, Saunders K, Kydd JH, Lunn DP, Steinbach F. (2007). Screening of anti-human leukocyte monoclonal antibodies for reactivity with equine leukocytes. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 119(1-2), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.06.034

Publication

ISSN: 0165-2427
NlmUniqueID: 8002006
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 119
Issue: 1-2
Pages: 63-80

Researcher Affiliations

Ibrahim, Sherif
  • Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred Kowalke Street 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
Saunders, Kelly
    Kydd, Julia H
      Lunn, D Paul
        Steinbach, Falko

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Antibodies, Monoclonal / immunology
          • Antigens, CD / immunology
          • Cross Reactions
          • Flow Cytometry
          • Horses / immunology
          • Humans
          • Leukocytes / immunology
          • Rats

          Citations

          This article has been cited 14 times.
          1. Simonin EM, Wagner B. IgE-binding monocytes upregulate the coagulation cascade in allergic horses.. Genes Immun 2023 Jun;24(3):130-138.
            doi: 10.1038/s41435-023-00207-wpubmed: 37193769google scholar: lookup
          2. Bagge J, MacLeod JN, Berg LC. Cellular Proliferation of Equine Bone Marrow- and Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Decline With Increasing Donor Age.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:602403.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.602403pubmed: 33363241google scholar: lookup
          3. Larson EM, Babasyan S, Wagner B. Phenotype and function of IgE-binding monocytes in equine Culicoides hypersensitivity.. PLoS One 2020;15(5):e0233537.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233537pubmed: 32442209google scholar: lookup
          4. Bundgaard L, Stensballe A, Elbæk KJ, Berg LC. Mapping of equine mesenchymal stromal cell surface proteomes for identification of specific markers using proteomics and gene expression analysis: an in vitro cross-sectional study.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2018 Oct 25;9(1):288.
            doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-1041-8pubmed: 30359315google scholar: lookup
          5. Zahedi M, Parham A, Dehghani H, Mehrjerdi HK. Stemness Signature of Equine Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.. Int J Stem Cells 2017 May 30;10(1):93-102.
            doi: 10.15283/ijsc16036pubmed: 28222255google scholar: lookup
          6. Delcambre GH, Liu J, Herrington JM, Vallario K, Long MT. Immunohistochemistry for the detection of neural and inflammatory cells in equine brain tissue.. PeerJ 2016;4:e1601.
            doi: 10.7717/peerj.1601pubmed: 26855862google scholar: lookup
          7. Mohanty N, Gulati BR, Kumar R, Gera S, Kumar S, Kumar P, Yadav PS. Phenotypical and functional characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells derived from equine umbilical cord blood.. Cytotechnology 2016 Aug;68(4):795-807.
            doi: 10.1007/s10616-014-9831-zpubmed: 25487085google scholar: lookup
          8. Mohanty N, Gulati BR, Kumar R, Gera S, Kumar P, Somasundaram RK, Kumar S. Immunophenotypic characterization and tenogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells isolated from equine umbilical cord blood.. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2014 Jun;50(6):538-48.
            doi: 10.1007/s11626-013-9729-7pubmed: 24414976google scholar: lookup
          9. Ramsay JD, Ueti MW, Johnson WC, Scoles GA, Knowles DP, Mealey RH. Lymphocytes and macrophages are infected by Theileria equi, but T cells and B cells are not required to establish infection in vivo.. PLoS One 2013;8(10):e76996.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076996pubmed: 24116194google scholar: lookup
          10. Moyo NA, Marchi E, Steinbach F. Differentiation and activation of equine monocyte-derived dendritic cells are not correlated with CD206 or CD83 expression.. Immunology 2013 Aug;139(4):472-83.
            doi: 10.1111/imm.12094pubmed: 23461413google scholar: lookup
          11. Cavatorta DJ, Erb HN, Felippe MJ. Activation-induced FoxP3 expression regulates cytokine production in conventional T cells stimulated with autologous dendritic cells.. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2012 Oct;19(10):1583-92.
            doi: 10.1128/CVI.00308-12pubmed: 22855393google scholar: lookup
          12. Dakin SG, Werling D, Hibbert A, Abayasekara DR, Young NJ, Smith RK, Dudhia J. Macrophage sub-populations and the lipoxin A4 receptor implicate active inflammation during equine tendon repair.. PLoS One 2012;7(2):e32333.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032333pubmed: 22384219google scholar: lookup
          13. Hackett CH, Fortier LA. Embryonic stem cells and iPS cells: sources and characteristics.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2011 Aug;27(2):233-42.
            doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2011.04.003pubmed: 21872756google scholar: lookup
          14. Radcliffe CH, Flaminio MJ, Fortier LA. Temporal analysis of equine bone marrow aspirate during establishment of putative mesenchymal progenitor cell populations.. Stem Cells Dev 2010 Feb;19(2):269-82.
            doi: 10.1089/scd.2009.0091pubmed: 19604071google scholar: lookup