Analyze Diet
Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases1982; 5(1-3); 369-376; doi: 10.1016/0147-9571(82)90061-3

[Sensitivity and fidelity of the rabies laboratory diagnosis].

Abstract: The author describes a method for evaluating the minimal number of diagnosis failures for each animal species (this diagnosis uses the Fluorescent Rabies Antibodies Test and mouse inoculation simultaneously). The percentage of well diagnosed rabid animals on total rabid ones is called sensibility of the diagnosis: it varies according to the species of animal examined: from 99.98% for the fox, to 98.61% for the horse. The percentage of errored negative diagnosis on total negative diagnosis is called infidelity of negative responses: it varies for each species according to the sensibility of the diagnosis and to the ratio of non-rabid animals on total examined.
Publication Date: 1982-01-01 PubMed ID: 6751679DOI: 10.1016/0147-9571(82)90061-3Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • English Abstract
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is about a method to evaluate the accuracy of rabies diagnosis in different animal species using the Fluorescent Rabies Antibodies Test and mouse inoculation.

Objective of the Research

  • The aim of the research was to develop a method for assessing the minimum number of diagnosis failures for each animal species. This was conducted using two types of tests: the Fluorescent Rabies Antibodies Test, a common method for diagnosing rabies, and mouse inoculation, wherein a sample is injected into a mouse to observe for signs of disease.

Concept of Sensibility and Infidelity of Diagnosis

  • The research introduces two terms in regards to disease diagnosis – “sensibility” and “infidelity of negative responses”.
  • Sensibility refers to the percentage of correctly diagnosed rabid animals out of all rabid ones. In simpler terms, it measures how accurate the tests are in identifying positive cases of rabies.
  • On the other hand, infidelity of negative responses refers to the percentage of false negatives in all negative diagnoses. It measures inaccuracies in the tests, specifically their failure to detect actual positive cases, thus classifying them as negative.

Variation in Sensibility and Infidelity Among Different Species

  • The research found that the sensibility of the diagnosis varies according to the species of the animal examined. This ranged from a high sensitivity of 99.98% for foxes to a lower sensitivity of 98.61% for horses.
  • The infidelity of negative responses also varied for each species, dependent on the sensitivity of the diagnosis and the ratio of non-rabid animals to the total number examined. However, the research did not provide specific figures or detail for these variations.

Implication of the Research

  • The research highlights the importance of considering the species-specific variability in diagnostic tests for diseases like rabies. This could have implications for the effectiveness of disease control and prevention strategies in different species.

Cite This Article

APA
Aubert MF. (1982). [Sensitivity and fidelity of the rabies laboratory diagnosis]. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis, 5(1-3), 369-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-9571(82)90061-3

Publication

ISSN: 0147-9571
NlmUniqueID: 7808924
Country: England
Language: fre
Volume: 5
Issue: 1-3
Pages: 369-376

Researcher Affiliations

Aubert, M F

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Diagnostic Errors
    • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
    • Foxes
    • Horses
    • Mice
    • Rabies / diagnosis
    • Serologic Tests / standards