Analyze Diet
Animal cognition2018; 21(5); 631-637; doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1196-9

Sensory laterality in affiliative interactions in domestic horses and ponies (Equus caballus).

Abstract: Many studies have been carried out into both motor and sensory laterality of horses in agonistic and stressful situations. Here we examine sensory laterality in affiliative interactions within four groups of domestic horses and ponies (N = 31), living in stable social groups, housed at a single complex close to Vienna, Austria, and demonstrate for the first time a significant population preference for the left side in affiliative approaches and interactions. No effects were observed for gender, rank, sociability, phenotype, group, or age. Our results suggest that right hemisphere specialization in horses is not limited to the processing of stressful or agonistic situations, but rather appears to be the norm for processing in all social interactions, as has been demonstrated in other species including chicks and a range of vertebrates. In domestic horses, hemispheric specialization for sensory input appears not to be based on a designation of positive versus negative, but more on the perceived need to respond quickly and appropriately in any given situation.
Publication Date: 2018-06-09 PubMed ID: 29948296PubMed Central: PMC6097077DOI: 10.1007/s10071-018-1196-9Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article is about the study of sensory laterality in horses in non-stressful, friendly situations and it uncovers that horses generally prefer to use their left side in these types of social interactions, with no significant impact from factors like age or gender.

Research Objectives and Methodology

  • This research article primarily focused on investigating sensory laterality in horses during affiliative (non-antagonistic or friendly) interactions. Previous studies have generally concentrated on horses’ behavioural tendencies in stressful or agonistic (conflict or competition) situations.
  • This project looked at four different groups of domestic horses and ponies (total of 31 animals) that were housed in a single complex near Vienna, Austria. These horses and ponies were living in stable social groups, which facilitated easier observation of their social interactions.

Research Findings and Implications

  • The study found that there is a significant population preference for using the left side during affiliative approaches and interactions among horses. This suggests that the right hemisphere of the horse’s brain, which controls the left side of the body, is mainly used for processing these social interactions.
  • Interestingly, this preference for the left side was not influenced by factors typically seen as influencing behaviour, such as gender, social rank, how sociable the animal is, phenotype, group, or age.
  • These results imply that in horses, the right hemisphere is not just specialized for processing stressful or conflict situations, which previous research often has suggested. Instead, it appears to be the go-to hemisphere for processing all kinds of social interactions.
  • The results also suggest a new perspective in understanding the hemispheric specialization in animals. The authors propose that in domestic horses, the division of sensory input between hemispheres does not appear to be based on a simplistic designation of positive versus negative. Instead, it’s more likely based on the perceived need to respond quickly and appropriately in a situation.
  • These findings align with what has been found in other species, such as chicks and a range of vertebrates, where similar lateralized behaviors have been observed.

Cite This Article

APA
Farmer K, Krüger K, Byrne RW, Marr I. (2018). Sensory laterality in affiliative interactions in domestic horses and ponies (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn, 21(5), 631-637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1196-9

Publication

ISSN: 1435-9456
NlmUniqueID: 9814573
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 5
Pages: 631-637

Researcher Affiliations

Farmer, Kate
  • School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews, St. Mary's Quad, South Street, St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland, KY16 9JP, UK. katefarmer@utanet.at.
Krüger, Konstanze
  • University of Regensburg, Zoology/Evolutionary Biology, Universitaetsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Department Equine Economics, Faculty Agriculture, Economics and Management, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622, Nürtingen, Germany.
Byrne, Richard W
  • School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews, St. Mary's Quad, South Street, St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland, KY16 9JP, UK.
Marr, Isabell
  • Department Equine Economics, Faculty Agriculture, Economics and Management, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622, Nürtingen, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Animals, Domestic
  • Female
  • Functional Laterality
  • Horses / physiology
  • Male
  • Perception
  • Stress, Psychological

Conflict of Interest Statement

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

This article includes 42 references
  1. Austin NP, Rogers LJ. Asymmetry of flight and escape turning responses in horses.. Laterality 2007 Sep;12(5):464-74.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500701495307pubmed: 17712716google scholar: lookup
  2. Austin NP, Rogers LJ. Limb preferences and lateralization of aggression, reactivity and vigilance in feral horses, Equus caballus. Anim Behav Vol. 2012;83:239–247.
  3. Austin NP, Rogers LJ. Lateralization of agonistic and vigilance responses in Przewalski horses (Equus Przewalskii). Appl Anim Behav Sci 2014;151:43–50.
  4. Bisazza A, Brown C. Lateralization of cognitive functions in fish. .
  5. Borod JC, Cicero BA, Obler LK, Welkowitz J, Erhan HM, Santschi C, Grunwald IS, Agosti RM, Whalen JR. Right hemisphere emotional perception: evidence across multiple channels.. Neuropsychology 1998 Jul;12(3):446-58.
    doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.446pubmed: 9673999google scholar: lookup
  6. Canli T, Desmond JE, Zhao Z, Glover G, Gabrieli JD. Hemispheric asymmetry for emotional stimuli detected with fMRI.. Neuroreport 1998 Oct 5;9(14):3233-9.
  7. Cioni G, Pellegrinetti G. Lateralization of sensory and motor functions in human neonates.. Percept Mot Skills 1982 Jun;54(3 Pt 2):1151-8.
    doi: 10.2466/pms.1982.54.3c.1151pubmed: 7110855google scholar: lookup
  8. Davidson RJ. Anterior cerebral asymmetry and the nature of emotion.. Brain Cogn 1992 Sep;20(1):125-51.
    doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(92)90065-Tpubmed: 1389117google scholar: lookup
  9. Davidson RJ, Tomarken AJ. Laterality and emotion: an electrophysiological approach. pp. 419–441.
  10. De Boyer Des Roches A, Richard-Yris MA, Henry S, Ezzaouïa M, Hausberger M. Laterality and emotions: visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) differs with objects' emotional value.. Physiol Behav 2008 Jun 9;94(3):487-90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.03.002pubmed: 18455205google scholar: lookup
  11. Farmer K, Krueger K, Byrne RW. Visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) interacting with humans.. Anim Cogn 2010 Mar;13(2):229-38.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0260-xpubmed: 19618222google scholar: lookup
  12. Feh C, de Mazières J. Grooming at a preferred site reduces heart rate in horses. Anim Behav 1993;46(6):1191–1194.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1309google scholar: lookup
  13. Godfrey HK, Grimshaw GM. Emotional language is all right: Emotional prosody reduces hemispheric asymmetry for linguistic processing.. Laterality 2016 Jul-Nov;21(4-6):568-584.
    doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2015.1096940pubmed: 26508356google scholar: lookup
  14. Harrison KE, Byrne RW. Hand preferences in unimanual and bimanual feeding by wild vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops).. J Comp Psychol 2000 Mar;114(1):13-21.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.13pubmed: 10739308google scholar: lookup
  15. Hemelrijk CK, Wantia J, Gygax L. The construction of dominance order: comparing performance of five methods using an individual-based model. Behaviour 2005;142:1043–1064.
  16. Hews DK, Worthington RA. Fighting from the right side of the brain: left visual field preference during aggression in free-ranging male tree lizards (Urosaurus ornatus).. Brain Behav Evol 2001;58(6):356-61.
    doi: 10.1159/000057576pubmed: 12016354google scholar: lookup
  17. Karenina K, Giljov A, Ingram J, Rowntree VJ, Malashichev Y. Lateralization of mother-infant interactions in a diverse range of mammal species.. Nat Ecol Evol 2017 Jan 9;1(2):30.
    pubmed: 28812615doi: 10.1038/s41559-016-0030google scholar: lookup
  18. Killgore WD, Yurgelun-Todd DA. The right-hemisphere and valence hypotheses: could they both be right (and sometimes left)?. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2007 Sep;2(3):240-50.
    doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm020pmc: PMC2569811pubmed: 18985144google scholar: lookup
  19. Koboroff A, Kaplan G, Rogers LJ. Hemispheric specialization in Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen) shown as eye preferences during response to a predator.. Brain Res Bull 2008 Jun 15;76(3):304-6.
  20. Larose C, Richard-Yris MA, Hausberger M, Rogers LJ. Laterality of horses associated with emotionality in novel situations.. Laterality 2006 Jul;11(4):355-67.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500600624221pubmed: 16754236google scholar: lookup
  21. Lindell AK. Continuities in emotion lateralization in human and non-human primates.. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:464.
    pmc: PMC3737467pubmed: 23964230doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00464google scholar: lookup
  22. MacNeilage PF, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G. Origins of the left & right brain.. Sci Am 2009 Jul;301(1):60-7.
  23. McDonnell SM. The equid ethogram: a practical field guide to horse behaviour. .
  24. McDonnell SM, Haviland JCS. Agonistic ethogram of the equid bachelor band. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995;43:147–188.
  25. McGreevy PD, Rogers LJ. Motor and sensory laterality in thoroughbred horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005;92(4):337–352.
  26. McGreevy PD, Thompson PC. Differences in motor laterality between breeds of performance horse. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006;99(1–2):183–190.
  27. Normando S, Haverbeke A, Meers L, Odberg FO, Ibáñez Talegón M, Bono G. Effect of manual imitation of grooming on riding horses' heart rate in different environmental situations.. Vet Res Commun 2003 Sep;27 Suppl 1:615-7.
  28. Petersen JL, Mickelson JR, Cothran EG, Andersson LS, Axelsson J, Bailey E, Bannasch D, Binns MM, Borges AS, Brama P, da Câmara Machado A, Distl O, Felicetti M, Fox-Clipsham L, Graves KT, Guérin G, Haase B, Hasegawa T, Hemmann K, Hill EW, Leeb T, Lindgren G, Lohi H, Lopes MS, McGivney BA, Mikko S, Orr N, Penedo MC, Piercy RJ, Raekallio M, Rieder S, Røed KH, Silvestrelli M, Swinburne J, Tozaki T, Vaudin M, M Wade C, McCue ME. Genetic diversity in the modern horse illustrated from genome-wide SNP data.. PLoS One 2013;8(1):e54997.
  29. Pirault P, Danvy S, Verrier E, Leroy G. Genetic structure and gene flows within horses: a genealogical study at the french population scale.. PLoS One 2013;8(4):e61544.
  30. Robins A, Phillips C. Lateralised visual processing in domestic cattle herds responding to novel and familiar stimuli.. Laterality 2010 Sep;15(5):514-34.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500903049324pubmed: 19629847google scholar: lookup
  31. Rogers LJ. A matter of degree: strength of brain asymmetry and behaviour. Symmetry 2017;9:57.
    doi: 10.3390/sym9040057google scholar: lookup
  32. Rogers LJ, Zucca P, Vallortigara G. Advantages of having a lateralized brain.. Proc Biol Sci 2004 Dec 7;271 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S420-2.
    pmc: PMC1810119pubmed: 15801592doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0200google scholar: lookup
  33. Schneider G, Krüger K. Third-party interventions keep social partners fromexchanging affiliative interactions with others. Anim Behav 2012;83(2):377–387.
  34. Shetland Stud Book Society. Breed history, 2007–2012. .
  35. Sigurjónsdóttir H, van Dierendonck MC, Snorrason S, Thorhallsdottir AG. Social relationships in a group of horses without a mature stallion. Behaviour 2003;140(6):783–804.
  36. Siniscalchi M, Sasso R, Pepe AM, Vallortigara G, Quaranta A. Dogs turn left to emotional stimuli.. Behav Brain Res 2010 Apr 2;208(2):516-21.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.042pubmed: 20060016google scholar: lookup
  37. Smith AV, Proops L, Grounds K, Wathan J, McComb K. Functionally relevant responses to human facial expressions of emotion in the domestic horse (Equus caballus).. Biol Lett 2016 Feb;12(2):20150907.
    pmc: PMC4780548pubmed: 26864784doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0907google scholar: lookup
  38. Sorvano VA, Rainoldi C, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G. Roots of brain specializations: preferential left-eye use during mirror-image inspection in six species of teleost fish.. Behav Brain Res 1999 Dec;106(1-2):175-80.
    doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00105-9pubmed: 10595433google scholar: lookup
  39. Takeuchi Y, Hori M. Behavioural laterality in the shrimp earing cichlid fish (Neolamprologus faciatus) in Lake Tanganyika. Anim Behav 2008;75:1359–1366.
  40. Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ. Differential involvement of right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in the domestic chick.. Behav Processes 1994 Dec;33(1-2):41-57.
    doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(94)90059-0pubmed: 24925239google scholar: lookup
  41. White LE, Lucas G, Richards A, Purves D. Cerebral asymmetry and handedness.. Nature 1994 Mar 17;368(6468):197-8.
    doi: 10.1038/368197a0pubmed: 8145817google scholar: lookup
  42. Zucca P, Cerri F, Carluccio A, Baciadonna L. Space availability influence laterality in donkeys (Equus asinus).. Behav Processes 2011 Sep;88(1):63-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.06.012pubmed: 21741459google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 22 times.
  1. Rogers LJ. Knowledge of lateralized brain function can contribute to animal welfare. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1242906.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1242906pubmed: 37601762google scholar: lookup
  2. Jardat P, Destrez A, Damon F, Menard-Peroy Z, Parias C, Barrière P, Keller M, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Horses discriminate human body odors between fear and joy contexts in a habituation-discrimination protocol. Sci Rep 2023 Feb 25;13(1):3285.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30119-8pubmed: 36841856google scholar: lookup
  3. Giljov A, Karenina K. Positional biases in social behaviors: Humans vs. saiga antelopes. Front Behav Neurosci 2022;16:1103584.
    doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1103584pubmed: 36699656google scholar: lookup
  4. Kieson E, Goma AA, Radi M. Tend and Befriend in Horses: Partner Preferences, Lateralization, and Contextualization of Allogrooming in Two Socially Stable Herds of Quarter Horse Mares. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 7;13(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13020225pubmed: 36670764google scholar: lookup
  5. Schubert CL, Ryckewaert B, Pereira C, Matsuzawa T. Garrano Horses Perceive Letters of the Alphabet on a Touchscreen System: A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 12;12(24).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12243514pubmed: 36552434google scholar: lookup
  6. Merkies K, Sudarenko Y, Hodder AJ. Can Ponies (Equus Caballus) Distinguish Human Facial Expressions?. Animals (Basel) 2022 Sep 7;12(18).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12182331pubmed: 36139191google scholar: lookup
  7. Krueger K, Schwarz S, Marr I, Farmer K. Laterality in Horse Training: Psychological and Physical Balance and Coordination and Strength Rather Than Straightness. Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 16;12(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12081042pubmed: 35454288google scholar: lookup
  8. Schwarz S, Marr I, Farmer K, Graf K, Stefanski V, Krueger K. Does Carrying a Rider Change Motor and Sensory Laterality in Horses?. Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 12;12(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12080992pubmed: 35454239google scholar: lookup
  9. Baragli P, Scopa C, Felici M, Reddon AR. Horses show individual level lateralisation when inspecting an unfamiliar and unexpected stimulus. PLoS One 2021;16(8):e0255688.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255688pubmed: 34351986google scholar: lookup
  10. Bitschi ML, Bagó Z, Rosati M, Reese S, Goehring LS, Matiasek K. A Systematic Approach to Dissection of the Equine Brain-Evaluation of a Species-Adapted Protocol for Beginners and Experts. Front Neuroanat 2020;14:614929.
    doi: 10.3389/fnana.2020.614929pubmed: 33390909google scholar: lookup
  11. Rørvang MV, Nielsen BL, McLean AN. Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:633.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633pubmed: 33033724google scholar: lookup
  12. Lansade L, Colson V, Parias C, Trösch M, Reigner F, Calandreau L. Female horses spontaneously identify a photograph of their keeper, last seen six months previously. Sci Rep 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6302.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62940-wpubmed: 32286345google scholar: lookup
  13. Marr I, Preisler V, Farmer K, Stefanski V, Krueger K. Non-invasive stress evaluation in domestic horses (Equus caballus): impact of housing conditions on sensory laterality and immunoglobulin A. R Soc Open Sci 2020 Feb;7(2):191994.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.191994pubmed: 32257351google scholar: lookup
  14. Johnson PJ, Janvier V, Luh WM, FitzMaurice M, Southard T, Barry EF. Equine Stereotaxtic Population Average Brain Atlas With Neuroanatomic Correlation. Front Neuroanat 2019;13:89.
    doi: 10.3389/fnana.2019.00089pubmed: 31636547google scholar: lookup
  15. Esch L, Wöhr C, Erhard M, Krüger K. Horses' (Equus Caballus) Laterality, Stress Hormones, and Task Related Behavior in Innovative Problem-Solving. Animals (Basel) 2019 May 22;9(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9050265pubmed: 31121937google scholar: lookup
  16. Marr I, Farmer K, Krüger K. Evidence for Right-Sided Horses Being More Optimistic than Left-Sided Horses. Animals (Basel) 2018 Nov 22;8(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani8120219pubmed: 30469484google scholar: lookup
  17. Bhave A, Kieson E, Hafner A, Gloor PA. Identifying Novel Emotions and Wellbeing of Horses from Videos Through Unsupervised Learning. Sensors (Basel) 2025 Jan 31;25(3).
    doi: 10.3390/s25030859pubmed: 39943498google scholar: lookup
  18. Haussler KK, le Jeune SS, MacKechnie-Guire R, Latif SN, Clayton HM. The Challenge of Defining Laterality in Horses: Is It Laterality or Just Asymmetry?. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 21;15(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030288pubmed: 39943060google scholar: lookup
  19. Hall C, Kay R. Living the good life? A systematic review of behavioural signs of affective state in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) and factors relating to quality of life. Part I: Fulfilment of species-specific needs. Anim Welf 2024;33:e40.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.38pubmed: 39464387google scholar: lookup
  20. Gainotti G. Mainly Visual Aspects of Emotional Laterality in Cognitively Developed and Highly Social Mammals-A Systematic Review. Brain Sci 2024 Jan 5;14(1).
    doi: 10.3390/brainsci14010052pubmed: 38248267google scholar: lookup
  21. Goma AA, Uddin J, Kieson E. Lateralised Behavioural Responses in Livestock to Environmental Stressors: Implications for Using Infrared Thermography to Assess Welfare Conditions. Animals (Basel) 2023 Nov 27;13(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13233663pubmed: 38067014google scholar: lookup
  22. Egenvall A, Clayton HM, Byström A. Pilot study of locomotor asymmetry in horses walking in circles with and without a rider. PeerJ 2023;11:e16373.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.16373pubmed: 37933258google scholar: lookup