FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Surg / Serial postoperative peritoneal fluid analyses in horses wit...
Veterinary surgery : VS2026; doi: 10.1111/vsu.70089

Serial postoperative peritoneal fluid analyses in horses with naturally-occurring strangulating and non-strangulating gastrointestinal lesions.

Abstract: To describe characteristics of postoperative peritoneal fluid following exploratory laparotomy for naturally-occurring gastrointestinal lesions in horses. Methods: Prospective, observational cohort study. Methods: A total of 26 client-owned horses that underwent exploratory laparotomy for naturally-occurring gastrointestinal lesions. Methods: Abdominocentesis was performed pre- or intraoperatively, and at three time points postoperatively (24, 72, and 168 h). Peritoneal lactate, total protein (TP), total nucleated cell count (TNCC), cytology, and systemic lactate were performed at each time point, if possible. To account for repeated measures, a linear mixed model analysis was performed for each dependent variable listed above. Results: Horses were divided into groups based on the gastrointestinal lesion diagnosed at surgery (14 strangulating and 12 non-strangulating). Peritoneal lactate (p < .001) and TP (p = .02) were significantly higher preoperatively in horses with strangulating compared to non-strangulating lesions, with no significant differences between lesion groups for any postoperative measurement. Peritoneal lactate and TP concentrations remained above normal for the entire postoperative study period in both groups. Systemic lactate returned to normal concentrations by 24 h postoperatively with both groups being significantly lower than preoperative concentrations (p = .02). Peritoneal TNCC concentrations increased in strangulating (p = .001) and non-strangulating (p < .001) horses at 24 h postoperatively compared to preoperatively. Conclusions: Regardless of lesion, peritoneal fluid lactate and TP remained above normal at 1 week following exploratory laparotomy for naturally-occurring gastrointestinal lesions in horses. Conclusions: Current reference values for preoperative fluid sample analyses should not be used in the postoperative period.
© 2026 The Author(s). Veterinary Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2026-02-22 PubMed ID: 41725118DOI: 10.1111/vsu.70089Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Cite This Article

APA
Granello ME, Young JM, Cleff DB, Banks EBM, Trumble TN. (2026). Serial postoperative peritoneal fluid analyses in horses with naturally-occurring strangulating and non-strangulating gastrointestinal lesions. Vet Surg. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70089

Publication

Veterinary surgery : VS
ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Granello, Maria E
  • Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Young, Jenna M
  • Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Cleff, Dana B
  • Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Banks, Emma B M
  • Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Trumble, Troy N
  • Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Grant Funding

  • College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota
  • 6259 / American College of Veterinary Surgeons Foundation

References

This article includes 32 references
  1. Tinker MK, White NA, Lessard P, et al. Prospective study of equine colic incidence and mortality. Equine Vet J. 1997;29:448‐453.
  2. Bach LG, Ricketts SW. Paracentesis as an aid to the diagnosis of abdominal disease in the horse. Equine Vet J. 1974;6:116‐121.
  3. Moore JN, Traver DS, Turner MF, White FJ, Huesgen JG, Butera TS. Lactic acid concentration in peritoneal fluid of normal and diseased horses. Res Vet Sci. 1977;23:117‐118.
  4. Latson KM, Nieto JE, Beldomenico PM, Snyder JR. Evaluation of peritoneal fluid lactate as a marker of intestinal ischaemia in equine colic. Equine Vet J. 2005;37:342‐346.
  5. Peloso JG, Cohen ND. Use of serial measurements of peritoneal fluid lactate concentration to identify strangulating intestinal lesions in referred horses with signs of colic. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012;240:1208‐1217.
  6. Radcliffe RM, Liu SY, Cook VL, Hurcombe SDA, Divers TJ. Interpreting abdominal fluid in colic horses: understanding and applying peritoneal fluid evidence. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2022;32:81‐96.
  7. Long AE, Southwood LL, Morris TB, Brandly JE, Stefanovski D. Use of multiple admission variables better predicts intestinal strangulation in horses with colic than peritoneal or the ratio of peritoneal:blood l‐lactate concentration. Equine Vet J. 2024;56:437‐448.
  8. Parra‐Moyano LA, Cedeño A, Darby S, Johnson JP, Gomez DE. Blood and peritoneal lactate, ratio and difference, and peritoneal lactate to total solids ratio for detection of intestinal strangulating obstructions in horses. J Vet Intern Med. 2025;39:e70121.
  9. Shearer TR, Norby B, Carr EA. Peritoneal fluid lactate evaluation in horses with nonstrangulating versus strangulating small intestinal disease. J Equine Vet Sci. 2018;61:18‐21.
  10. Yamout SZ, Nieto JE, Beldomenico PM, Dechant JE, leJeune S, Snyder JR. Peritoneal and plasma D‐lactate concentrations in horses with colic. Vet Surg. 2011;40:817‐824.
  11. Mair TS, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 2: short‐term complications. Equine Vet J. 2005;37:303‐309.
  12. Santschi EM, Grindem CB, Tate LP Jr, Corbett WT. Peritoneal fluid analysis in ponies after abdominal surgery. Vet Surg. 1988;17:6‐9.
  13. Hanson RR, Nixon AJ, Gronwall R, Meyer D, Pendergast J. Evaluation of peritoneal fluid following intestinal resection and anastomosis in horses. Am J Vet Res. 1992;53:216‐221.
  14. Chanutin S, Bauck AG, Roberts JF, Denagamage TN, Freeman DE. Comparison of two techniques to blind end jejunum and ileum for jejunocaecostomy in horses. Equine Vet J. 2025;57:1690‐1702.
  15. Nieto JE, Dechant JE, le Jeune SS, Snyder JR. Evaluation of 3 handheld portable analyzers for measurement of L‐lactate concentrations in blood and peritoneal fluid of horses with colic. Vet Surg. 2015;44:366‐372.
  16. Lumsden JH, Rowe R, Mullen K. Hematology and biochemistry reference values for the light horse. Can J Comp Med. 1980;44:32‐42.
  17. Brownlow MA, Hutchins DR, Johnston KG. Reference values for equine peritoneal fluid. Equine Vet J. 1981;13:127‐130.
  18. Tennent‐Brown BS, Wilkins PA, Lindborg S, Russell G, Boston RC. Sequential plasma lactate concentrations as prognostic indicators in adult equine emergencies. J Vet Intern Med. 2010;24:198‐205.
  19. Radcliffe RM, Divers TJ, Fletcher DJ, Mohammed H, Kraus MS. Evaluation of L‐lactate and cardiac troponin I in horses undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2012;22:313‐319.
  20. Edner AH, Nyman GC, Essén‐Gustavsson B. Metabolism before, during and after anaesthesia in colic and healthy horses. Acta Vet Scand. 2007;49:34.
  21. Edner AH, Essén‐Gustavsson B, Nyman GC. Metabolism during anaesthesia and recovery in colic and healthy horses: a microdialysis study. Acta Vet Scand. 2009;51:10.
  22. Blackford JT, Schneiter HL, VanSteenhouse JL, Sanders WL. Equine peritoneal fluid analysis following celiotomy, Proceedings, Equine Colic Research, 2nd Symposium, University of Georgia, Athens Georgia. 1986.
  23. Bowlby C, Mudge M, Schroeder E, Godman J, Hurcombe S. Equine inflammatory response to abdominal surgery in the absence of gastrointestinal disease. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2021;31:601‐607.
  24. Estepa JC, Lopez I, Mayer‐Valor R, Rodriguez M. Aguilera‐Tejero The influence of anticoagulants on the measurement of toal protein concentration in equine peritoneal fluid. Res Vet Sci. 2006;80:5‐10.
  25. Malark JA, Peyton LC, Galvin MJ. Effects of blood contamination on equine peritoneal fluid analysis. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992;201:1545‐1548.
  26. Martin E, Sarkan K, Viall A, Hostetter S, Epstein K. Clinicopathologic parameters of peritoneal fluid as predictors of gastrointestinal lesions, complications, and outcomes in equine colic patients: a retrospective study. Animals. 2025;15:12.
  27. Mueller PO, Hunt RJ, Allen D, Parks AH, Hay WP. Intraperitoneal use of sodium carboxymethylcellulose in horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy. Vet Surg. 1995;24:112‐117.
  28. Schumacher J, Spano JS, Moll HD. Effects of enterocentesis on peritoneal fluid constituents in the horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1985;186:1301‐1303.
  29. Freeman DE, Rotting AK, Inoue OJ. Abdominal closure and complications. Clin Tech Equine Pract. 2002;1:174‐187.
  30. Kelmer G. What do we currently know about incisional complications of colic surgery? Equine Vet Educ. 2023;35:489‐497.
  31. Gibson KT, Curtis CR, Turner AS, McIlwraith CW, Aanes WA, Stashak TS. Incisional hernias in the horse. Incidence and predisposing factors. Vet Surg. 1989;18:360‐366.
  32. Parry BW, Anderson GA, Gay CC. Prognosis in equine colic: a study of individual variables used in case assessment. Equine Vet J. 1983;15:337‐344.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,034 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.