Analyze Diet
Australian veterinary journal2019; 97(7); 220-224; doi: 10.1111/avj.12825

Serological responses of Australian horses using a commercial duplex indirect ELISA following vaccination against strangles.

Abstract: To determine the nature of serological responses in Australian horses using a commercial duplex indirect ELISA (iELISA) following vaccination against strangles. Methods: A group (n = 19) of client-owned horses from five properties were recruited to receive a primary course of a Streptococcus equi subsp. equi (S. equi) extract vaccine. Serological responses were determined by duplex iELISA incorporating S. equi-specific fragments of two cell wall proteins, SEQ2190 and SeM (antigens (Ag) A and C, respectively). Methods: The horses were administered a primary strangles vaccination course. Blood was collected immediately prior to each of the three vaccinations at 2-week intervals and additionally at 28 and 56 days following the 3rd vaccination (V3). Results: Significant increases in mean antibody levels of horses following vaccination were limited only to AgC, which was significantly increased at T2/V3, 14 days following V2 (ratio of geometric means = 3.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6, 8.4; P = 0.003). There was no increase in mean antibody to Ag A (ratio of geometric means = 1.4; 95% CI: 0.6, 3.2; P = 0.39). Four horses (22%) exceeded the test cut-off for AgC following vaccination. Conclusions: Vaccination of Australian horses is unlikely to interfere greatly with detection of strangles using the duplex iELISA. No responses would be anticipated to AgA following vaccination with Equivac© S/Equivac© 2in1 and only a minority are likely to respond to AgC. We conclude that the results of this study validate the usefulness of the duplex iELISA to assist control measures for strangles outbreaks in Australian horse populations.
Publication Date: 2019-06-27 PubMed ID: 31236928DOI: 10.1111/avj.12825Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study evaluates the effectiveness of a commercial vaccine in protecting Australian horses from a bacterial infection called strangles. The results, based on performances of 19 horses, suggest that this vaccine is unlikely to interfere much with the ability to detect the disease and may thus serve as a useful tool in controlling strangles outbreaks in this population.

Research Method

  • The researchers administered a primary course of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi (S. equi) extract vaccine to a sample of 19 horses owned by clients from five different properties.
  • The immune response of these horses to the vaccine was measured using a duplex indirect ELISA (iELISA), a laboratory test that can detect antibodies produced by the immune system in response to antigens, which in this case were fragments of two specific proteins found on the cell wall of the S. equi bacteria.
  • Blood samples were taken from the horses at various time points surrounding the vaccination process, including immediately before each of the three vaccinations, and again 28 and 56 days after the third vaccination.

Findings

  • The results showed that significant increases in mean antibody levels among horses being vaccinated were only observed in response to one of the two antigens tested; AgC, implying the immune response was specific.
  • There was no substantial increase in the average quantity of antibodies in response to the other antigen, AgA, highlighting the importance of the specificity of immune responses.
  • Only a minority, specifically 22% of the horses, exceeded the test cut-off for antigen C, indicating the majority of horses were unlikely to respond to this antigen.

Conclusion

  • The researchers concluded that vaccination of Australian horses is unlikely to interfere significantly with the detection of strangles using the duplex iELISA.
  • They also discovered that most horses did not respond to AgC, which suggests that the vaccine was only effective for a small percentage of horses.
  • Based on these findings, they suggested that the results of this study validate the usefulness of the duplex iELISA to assist control measures for strangles outbreaks in Australian horse populations.

Cite This Article

APA
El-Hage CM, Bannai H, Wiethoelter AK, Firestone SM, Heislers CM, Allen JL, Waller AS, Gilkerson JR. (2019). Serological responses of Australian horses using a commercial duplex indirect ELISA following vaccination against strangles. Aust Vet J, 97(7), 220-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12825

Publication

ISSN: 1751-0813
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 97
Issue: 7
Pages: 220-224

Researcher Affiliations

El-Hage, C M
  • Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Bannai, H
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association Tochigi, Japan.
Wiethoelter, A K
  • Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Firestone, S M
  • Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Heislers, C M
  • Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Allen, J L
  • Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Waller, A S
  • Animal Health Trust, Kennett, Newmarket, UK.
Gilkerson, J R
  • Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Bacterial / blood
  • Australia
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / methods
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / veterinary
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / blood
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Streptococcal Infections / blood
  • Streptococcal Infections / prevention & control
  • Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
  • Streptococcus equi
  • Vaccination / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Rotinsulu DA, Ewers C, Kerner K, Amrozi A, Soejoedono RD, Semmler T, Bauerfeind R. Molecular Features and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi Isolates from Strangles Cases in Indonesia.. Vet Sci 2023 Jan 10;10(1).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci10010049pubmed: 36669050google scholar: lookup
  2. Frosth S, Morris ERA, Wilson H, Frykberg L, Jacobsson K, Parkhill J, Flock JI, Wood T, Guss B, Aanensen DM, Boyle AG, Riihimäki M, Cohen ND, Waller AS. Conservation of vaccine antigen sequences encoded by sequenced strains of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi.. Equine Vet J 2023 Jan;55(1):92-101.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13552pubmed: 35000217google scholar: lookup