Serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after intravenous and intragastric administration to mares.
Abstract: Serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin were studied in 6 mares after intravenous (IV) and intragastric (IG) administration at a single dose rate of 7.5 mg/kg body weight. In experiment 1, an injectable formulation of enrofloxacin (100 mg/mL) was given IV. At 5 min after injection, mean serum concentration was 9.04 microg/mL and decreased to 0.09 microg/mL by 24 h. Elimination half-life was 5.33 +/- 1.05 h and the area under the serum concentration vs time curve (AUC) was 21.03 +/- 5.19 mg x h/L. In experiment 2, the same injectable formulation was given IG. The mean peak serum concentration was 0.94 +/- 0.97 microg/mL at 4 h after administration and declined to 0.29 +/- 0.12 microg/mL by 24 h. Absorption of this enrofloxacin preparation after IG administration was highly variable, and for this reason, pharmacokinetic values for each mare could not be determined. In experiment 3, a poultry formulation (32.3 mg/mL) was given IG. The mean peak serum concentration was 1.85 +/- 1.47 microg/mL at 45 min after administration and declined to 0.19 +/- 0.06 microg/mL by 24 h. Elimination half-life was 10.62 +/- 5.33 h and AUC was 16.30 +/- 4.69 mg x h/L. Bioavailability was calculated at 78.29 +/- 16.55%. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of enrofloxacin were determined for equine bacterial culture specimens submitted to the microbiology laboratory over an 11-month period. The minimum inhibitory concentration of enrofloxacin required to inhibit 90% of isolates (MIC90) was 0.25 microg/mL for Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Klebsiella spp., and Pasteurella spp. The poultry formulation was well tolerated and could be potentially useful in the treatment of susceptible bacterial infections in adult horses. The injectable enrofloxacin solution should not be used orally.
Publication Date: 2000-08-10 PubMed ID: 10935883PubMed Central: PMC1189609
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article discusses the study of serum levels and pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin in horses, administered either through intravenous injection or intragastric intake. Three experiments were carried out, analyzing its effects and application in treating bacterial infections in horses.
Experiment 1: Intravenous Administration
- The first experiment involved administering an injectable formulation of enrofloxacin to horses through intravenous injection (IV).
- A single dose of 7.5 mg/kg of body weight was used.
- The mean serum concentration of the drug after 5 minutes of administration was 9.04 microg/mL, which reduced to 0.09 microg/mL after 24 hours.
- Pharmacokinetic data, such as the elimination half-life (5.33 +/- 1.05 h) and the area under the serum concentration vs time curve (AUC of 21.03 +/- 5.19 mg x h/L), were listed.
Experiment 2: Intragastric Administration with Injectable Solution
- In the second experiment, the injectable formulation of enrofloxacin was administered orally (intragastric or IG).
- The peak serum concentration after 4 hours of intake was 0.94 +/- 0.97 microg/mL, declining to 0.29 +/- 0.12 microg/mL after 24 hours.
- Owing to the highly variable absorption rate of enrofloxacin after intragastric administration, individual pharmacokinetic values for each mare couldn’t be precisely determined.
Experiment 3: Intragastric Administration with Poultry Formulation
- The third experiment involved the intragastric administration of a different formulation of enrofloxacin, typically used for poultry.
- The peak serum concentration after 45 minutes of intake was 1.85 +/- 1.47 microg/mL, dropping to 0.19 +/- 0.06 microg/mL after 24 hours.
- The drug’s elimination half-life was 10.62 +/- 5.33 h and its AUC was 16.30 +/- 4.69 mg x h/L.
- The bioavailability of this formulation (the degree and rate at which the drug is absorbed) was calculated to be 78.29 +/- 16.55%.
Effectiveness Against Bacterial Cultures
- Minimum inhibitory concentrations of enrofloxacin were measured against bacterial cultures from horses obtained over an 11-month period.
- The minimum quantity of enrofloxacin required to inhibit 90% of bacterial isolates was 0.25 microg/mL for Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Klebsiella spp., and Pasteurella spp.
- The poultry formulation was deemed well-tolerated and potentially useful in treating bacterial infections in adult horses.
- The research concluded with a recommendation against the oral use of the injectable enrofloxacin solution.
Cite This Article
APA
Haines GR, Brown MP, Gronwall RR, Merritt KA.
(2000).
Serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after intravenous and intragastric administration to mares.
Can J Vet Res, 64(3), 171-177.
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0136, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Absorption
- Animals
- Anti-Infective Agents / administration & dosage
- Anti-Infective Agents / pharmacokinetics
- Antineoplastic Agents / administration & dosage
- Antineoplastic Agents / pharmacokinetics
- Bacterial Infections / prevention & control
- Bacterial Infections / veterinary
- Biological Availability
- Chemistry, Pharmaceutical
- Enrofloxacin
- Female
- Fluoroquinolones
- Horses / physiology
- Infusions, Intravenous
- Infusions, Parenteral
- Quinolones / administration & dosage
- Quinolones / pharmacokinetics
References
This article includes 22 references
- Appl Microbiol. 1966 Mar;14(2):170-7
- J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Oct;20(5):402-4
- Can J Vet Res. 1990 Jan;54(1):195-7
- Vet Pathol. 1990 May;27(3):162-70
- J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991 Mar 1;198(5):839-42
- Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Apr;10(4):378-83
- Vet Pathol. 1992 May;29(3):230-8
- Equine Vet J. 1992 Nov;24(6):450-6
- Toxicol Pathol. 1992;20(2):246-52
- Toxicol Pathol. 1992;20(3 Pt 1):436-49; discussion 449-50
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Feb;37(2):234-9
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Mar;37(3):483-90
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 May;37(5):1073-81
- Equine Vet J. 1993 Jul;25(4):309-13
- J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Jul 15;203(2):284-8
- J Toxicol Environ Health. 1994 May;42(1):73-88
- Am J Vet Res. 1995 Sep;56(9):1219-24
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Sep;39(9):2013-8
- Am J Vet Res. 1996 Jul;57(7):1025-30
- J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Aug;19(4):316-9
- Equine Vet J. 1997 Sep;29(5):378-81
- J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1989 Feb 1;194(3):405-9
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists