Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1982; 14(4); 322-324; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1982.tb02443.x

Serum protein electrophoresis in horses and ponies.

Abstract: A method of electrophoresis of horse serum on agarose gels (pH 8.6) is described, together with a system for interpreting changes in the electrophoretic zones based upon the relative distribution of the major serum proteins. Differences in the protein composition of the individual electrophoretic zones of horses and ponies were recorded, although this variation probably reflects differences in management and the presence of subclinical disease.
Publication Date: 1982-10-01 PubMed ID: 7173143DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1982.tb02443.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study presents a new method for electrophoresis of horse serum and provides a system for interpreting changes in protein levels. The variations in the protein composition of horses and ponies might be due to factors such as management or subclinical diseases.

Method Development

  • The researchers developed a new method for doing electrophoresis of horse serum on agarose gels with pH 8.6. Electrophoresis is a laboratory technique used to separate proteins based on their size and charge. The specific conditions described pertain to the type of gel (agarose) used and the pH condition (8.6), which aids in accurate protein separation.
  • The method promises to deliver a clear delineation of the major proteins present in the horse serum, which can provide valuable information regarding the health status of the animal and potential disease conditions.

System for Protein Distribution Interpretation

  • A system was also presented for interpreting any changes in the protein distribution after electrophoresis was performed. This is a major benefit, as understanding the distribution of proteins helps researchers and veterinarians identify specific indication of disease or health status.

Variation in Protein Composition

  • The research team found differences in the protein composition between horses and ponies, although the exact cause of these variations is uncertain.
  • The researchers hypothesize that differences in management strategies between horses and ponies might have contributed to this variation. Another probable cause could be subclinical disease, which refers to a disease that is not detectable by usual clinical testing and is currently not showing symptoms but could potentially affect the animal’s health in the future.

Cite This Article

APA
Matthews AG. (1982). Serum protein electrophoresis in horses and ponies. Equine Vet J, 14(4), 322-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1982.tb02443.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 4
Pages: 322-324

Researcher Affiliations

Matthews, A G

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Blood Protein Electrophoresis / methods
    • Blood Protein Electrophoresis / veterinary
    • Blood Proteins / analysis
    • Haptoglobins / analysis
    • Horses / blood
    • Immunoglobulins / analysis
    • Lipoproteins / blood
    • Serum Albumin / analysis
    • Transferrin / analysis

    Citations

    This article has been cited 2 times.
    1. Hooijberg EH, Miller M, Cray C, Buss P, Steenkamp G, Goddard A. Serum protein electrophoresis in healthy and injured southern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum). PLoS One 2018;13(7):e0200347.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200347pubmed: 30044807google scholar: lookup
    2. Keay G, Doxey DL. A study of the interaction between bromocresol green dye and bovine, ovine and equine serum globulins. Vet Res Commun 1984 Feb;8(1):25-32.
      doi: 10.1007/BF02214691pubmed: 6202048google scholar: lookup