Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record1996; 138(11); 253-256; doi: 10.1136/vr.138.11.253

Side effects of oral antimicrobial agents in the horse: a comparison of pivampicillin and trimethoprim/sulphadiazine.

Abstract: To evaluate the side effects of oral pivampicillin and trimethoprim/ sulphadiazine, 200 horses receiving these antimicrobial agents were studied. The horses received either trimethoprim/ sulphadiazine (30 mg/kg twice daily) or pivampicillin (25 mg/kg twice daily) for three or more days. No adverse effects other than loose faeces and diarrhoea were detected. The risk of diarrhoea was significantly less after the oral administration of pivampicillin (3 per cent) than after trimethoprim/ sulphadiazine (7 per cent). Horses whose appetite was reduced appeared to be predisposed to develop diarrhoea after the administration of either oral antimicrobial agent.
Publication Date: 1996-03-16 PubMed ID: 8734507DOI: 10.1136/vr.138.11.253Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research compared side effects of two oral antimicrobial agents, pivampicillin and trimethoprim/sulphadiazine, in horses. They found that both medications caused loose feces and diarrhea, but pivampicillin had a lower risk of causing diarrhea than trimethoprim/sulphadiazine.

Study Design

  • The research involved a study of 200 horses which had been treated with either of two oral antimicrobial agents – pivampicillin and trimethoprim/sulphadiazine. The aim was to assess their side effects.
  • The horses were treated with either trimethoprim/sulphadiazine (30 mg/kg twice a day) or pivampicillin (25 mg/kg twice a day) for a minimum of three days.

Outcome Analysis

  • The researchers carefully observed the horses during the treatment period to identify any adverse effects.
  • Loose feces and diarrhea were the only observed side effects among the horses treated with either antimicrobial agents. There were no other adverse effects detected.

Evaluating the Risk of Diarrhea

  • The study found that the risk of diarrhea was less with the administration of pivampicillin as compared to trimethoprim/sulphadiazine.
  • The probability of diarrhea was significantly lower at 3 per cent when pivampicillin was administered orally compared to 7 per cent after administration of trimethoprim/sulphadiazine.

Effects Based on Appetite

  • The researchers also examined if there existed a correlation between the horse’s appetite and the side effects.
  • They found that horses with reduced appetites were predisposed to developing diarrhea after receiving either of the antimicrobial treatments, suggesting that the horse’s appetite status may influence the side effects.

Cite This Article

APA
Ensink JM, Klein WR, Barneveld A, van Miert AS, Vulto AG. (1996). Side effects of oral antimicrobial agents in the horse: a comparison of pivampicillin and trimethoprim/sulphadiazine. Vet Rec, 138(11), 253-256. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.138.11.253

Publication

ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 138
Issue: 11
Pages: 253-256

Researcher Affiliations

Ensink, J M
  • Department of General and Large Animal Surgery, Veterinary Hospital Pharmacy, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Klein, W R
    Barneveld, A
      van Miert, A S
        Vulto, A G

          MeSH Terms

          • Administration, Oral
          • Animals
          • Anti-Infective Agents / administration & dosage
          • Anti-Infective Agents / adverse effects
          • Diarrhea / chemically induced
          • Diarrhea / epidemiology
          • Diarrhea / veterinary
          • Drug Combinations
          • Female
          • Horse Diseases / chemically induced
          • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
          • Horses
          • Incidence
          • Male
          • Pivampicillin / administration & dosage
          • Pivampicillin / adverse effects
          • Sulfadiazine / administration & dosage
          • Sulfadiazine / adverse effects
          • Trimethoprim / administration & dosage
          • Trimethoprim / adverse effects

          Citations

          This article has been cited 0 times.