Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2019; 48(7); 1299-1308; doi: 10.1111/vsu.13280

Single-stage reconstruction of third-degree perineal lacerations in horses under general anesthesia: Utrecht repair method.

Abstract: To describe perioperative management, surgical procedure, and outcome in mares with third-degree perineal lacerations (TDPL) treated with a single-stage repair, the Utrecht repair method (URM). Methods: Retrospective study. Methods: Twenty mares with TDPL. Methods: Medical records of mares with TDPL reconstructed with a URM were reviewed for perioperative management; surgical outcome; and postoperative fertility, athletic performance, and complications. Results: Mares ranged in age from 3.5 to 11 years. Long-term follow-up was available for 13 mares. Mean duration of follow-up was 9 years (median, 9.5; range, 2-215 months (17.9 years)). Standardized perioperative fasting and postoperative refeeding protocols were used. Only five mares received supportive gastric medication. Reconstruction of the rectovestibular shelf was successful in 18 of 20 mares. Two of 20 mares developed a small rectovestibular fistula after the initial repair, which was successfully repaired with a second surgery. Other postoperative complications were observed in 13 mares and consisted of mild postanesthetic myositis, facial nerve paralysis, esophageal obstruction, rectal obstipation, partial perineal dehiscence, and rectal or vestibular wind-sucking. Six of seven mares that were subsequently bred became pregnant. One mare was successfully used for embryo recovery, and five of six mares foaled without recurrence of a TDPL. Nine of 13 mares were used for riding at various levels. Conclusions: The alternative single-stage reconstruction for TDPL was successful in 18 of 20 mares after a single surgery. No major complications related directly to the technique were noted. Conclusions: The URM is a valid alternative surgical technique for repairing TDPL in mares.
Publication Date: 2019-07-07 PubMed ID: 31282055DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13280Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research discusses a medical procedure called the Utrecht repair method (URM) used to surgically repair third-degree perineal lacerations (TDPL) in horses. The study focuses on the outcomes, postoperative fertility, athletic performance, and any complications experienced by the horses after the operation.

Methods

  • The researchers conducted a retrospective study where they examined the medical records of twenty mares (female horses) that had undergone URM to repair TDPL.
  • The records were analyzed for details on perioperative management, surgical outcomes, as well as postoperative fertility and athletic performance.
  • The study also focused on any complications that might have arisen postoperatively.

Results

  • The horses studied ranged in age from 3.5 to 11 years.
  • Long-term follow-ups were available for 13 of the mares, with an average duration of 9 years. Standardized protocols for fasting and refeeding the horses were used before and after the operation.
  • The reconstruction of the rectovestibular shelf, a crucial part of the surgery, was successful in 18 out of 20 mares.
  • Postoperative complications were observed in 13 mares, including issues such as facial nerve paralysis, esophageal obstruction, rectal obstipation, mild postanesthetic myositis, partial dehiscence of the perineum, and wind-sucking of the rectum or vestibule.
  • Of the seven mares that were then bred, six became pregnant. One of these was successfully used for embryo recovery. Of the mares that became pregnant, five gave birth without recurrence of a TDPL.
  • A total of 13 mares were used for riding at various levels post-operation.

Conclusions

  • The URM procedure proved successful in 18 out of 20 cases, indicating it as a valid surgery method for repairing TDPL in mares.
  • No major complications that could be attributed directly to the URM technique were noted.
  • The study concludes that URM is a valid alternative surgical technique for the repair of TDPL in mares.

Cite This Article

APA
Frietman SK, Compagnie E, Stout TAE, Jonker FH, Ter Braake F. (2019). Single-stage reconstruction of third-degree perineal lacerations in horses under general anesthesia: Utrecht repair method. Vet Surg, 48(7), 1299-1308. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13280

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 48
Issue: 7
Pages: 1299-1308

Researcher Affiliations

Frietman, Sjoerd K
  • Equine Department, Equine Veterinary Clinic Emmeloord, Emmeloord, The Netherlands.
Compagnie, Ellen
  • Equine Department, Equine Veterinary Clinic Emmeloord, Emmeloord, The Netherlands.
Stout, Tom A E
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jonker, F Herman
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ter Braake, Frerik
  • Equine Department, Equine Veterinary Clinic Emmeloord, Emmeloord, The Netherlands.

MeSH Terms

  • Anesthesia, General
  • Animals
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Horses / injuries
  • Lacerations / surgery
  • Lacerations / veterinary
  • Perineum / injuries
  • Perineum / surgery
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Rectum
  • Retrospective Studies

References

This article includes 34 references
  1. Belknap JK, Nickels FA. A one stage repair of 3rd degree of perineal lacerations and rectovestibular fistulae in 17 mares.. Vet Surg 1992;21:378-381.
  2. O'Rielly JL, Maclean AA, Lowis TC. Repair of third-degree perineal laceration by a modified Goetz technique in twenty mares.. Equine Vet Educ 1998;10:2-7.
  3. McKinnon AO, Jalim SL. Surgery of the caudal reproductive tract.. In: McKinnon AO, Squires EL, Vaala WE, Varner DD, eds. Equine Reproduction. 2nd ed. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2011:2552-2557.
  4. Aanes WA. Surgical management of foaling injuries.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1988;4:417-438.
  5. Woodie JB. Vulva, vestibulae, vagina, and cervix.. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, eds. Equine Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2012:870-880.
  6. Embertson RM. Perineal lacerations.. In: White NA, Moore JN, eds. Current Practice of Equine Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1990:669-704.
  7. Climent F, Ribera T, Argüelles D, Nomen C, Prades M. Modified technique for the repair of third-degree rectovaginal lacerations in mares.. Vet Rec 2009;164:393-396.
  8. Schönfelder AM, Sobiraj A. A vaginal mucosal pedicle flap technique for repair of rectovaginal fistula in mares.. Vet Surg 2004;33:517-520.
  9. Stickle RL, Fessler JF, Adams SB. A single stage technique for repair of rectovestibular lacerations in the mare.. Vet Surg 1979;8:25-27.
  10. Huber MJ. Modified technique for single stage rectovestibular fistula closure in three mares.. Equine Vet J 1998;30:82-84.
  11. Mosbah E. A modified one-stage-repair of third-degree rectovestibular lacerations in mares.. J Equine Vet Sci 2012;32:211-215.
  12. Adams SB, Benker F, Brandenburg T. Direct rectovestibular fistula repair in five mares.. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1996;42:156-159.
  13. Phillips TN, Foerner JJ. Semitransverse closure technique for the repair of perineal lacerations in the mare.. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1998;44:191-193.
  14. LeBlanc MM. Diseases of the vagina, vestibule and vulva.. In: Colahan PT, Mayhew IG, Merritt AM, Moore JN, eds. Equine Medicine and Surgery. 5th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1999:1175.
  15. Aanes WA. Progress in rectovaginal surgery.. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1973;19:225-240.
  16. Straub OC, Fowler ME. Repair of perineal lacerations in the mare and cow.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1961;138:659-664.
  17. Ansari MM, Matros LE. Surgical repair of rectovestibular lacerations in mares.. Compend Contin Educ Vet 1983;5:129-134.
  18. Slusher RL. Broodmare infertility Part 6: rectovestibular laceration repair.. Mod Vet Pract 1987;68:532-537.
  19. Desjardins MR, Trout DR, Little CB. Surgical repair of rectovaginal fistulae in mares: twelve cases (1983-1991).. Can Vet J 1993;34:226-231.
  20. Adams SB, Fessler JF. Third-degree perineal laceration repair.. Atlas of Equine Surgery. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2000:241-244.
  21. Baird ND. Female urogenital surgery perineal lacerations.. In: Wolfe DF, Moll HD, eds. Large Animal Urogenital Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Williams and Wilkins; 1998:418-419.
  22. Kazemi MH, Sardari K, Emami MR. Surgical repair of third-degree perineal laceration by Goetz technique in the mare: 7 cases (2000-2005).. Iran J Vet Res 2010;11:184-188.
  23. Trotter GW. Surgery of the perineum in the mare.. Equine Reproduction. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1992:417-428.
  24. Turner AS, McIlwraith CW. Aanes’ method of repair of third-degree perineal laceration.. Techniques in Large Animal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1989:211-217.
  25. Colbern GT, Aanes WA, Stashak TS. Surgical management of perineal lacerations and rectovestibular fistulae in the mare: a retrospective study of 47 cases.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985;186:265-269.
  26. Hospes R, Bleul U. The effect of extended preoperative fasting in mares undergoing surgery of the perineal region.. J Equine Vet Sci 2007;(12):542-545.
  27. Freeman D. Gastrointestinal pharmacology.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1999;15:535-559.
  28. Baverud V, Gustafsson A, Franklin A, Aspan A, Gunnarsson A. Clostridium difficile: prevalence in horses and environment, and antimicrobial susceptibility.. Equnie Vet J 2003;35:465-471.
  29. Robinson EP, Natalini CC. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia in horses.. Vet Clin Equine Pract 2002;18:61-82.
  30. Roberts SJ. Injuries and diseases of the puerperal period.. Veterinary Obstetrics and Genital Diseases. Vol 1986. 3rd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Edwards Brothers:359-360.
  31. Walker DF, Vaughan JT. Repair of third-degree perineal lacerations.. Bovine and Equine Urogenital Surgery. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1980:201-210.
  32. Karrouf GI, Zaghloul AE. Surgical correction of third-degree rectovestibular lacerations in equine.. Mansoura Vet Med J 2003;6:95-110.
  33. Mair T, Love S, Schumacher J, Watson E. Equine Medicine, Surgery and Reproduction.. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1998:177-179.
  34. Schumacher J, Schumacher J, Blanchard T. Comparison of endometrium before and after repair of third-degree rectovestibular lacerations in mares.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992;200:1336-1338.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Sharshar A, Hammad A, Salem M, El-Sunsafty M. Evaluation of a modified one-stage technique for repair of third-degree perineal laceration and rectovestibular fistula with rectal pull-back technique in 12 mares: a retrospective case series. BMC Vet Res 2025 Sep 17;21(1):538.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04824-7pubmed: 40963117google scholar: lookup