FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Sci Rep / Social buffering in horses is influenced by context but not ...
Scientific reports2021; 11(1); 8862; doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88319-z

Social buffering in horses is influenced by context but not by the familiarity and habituation of a companion.

Abstract: Social buffering occurs when the presence of one animal attenuates another's stress response during a stressful event and/or helps the subject to recover more quickly after a stressful event. Inconsistent previous results might reflect previously unrecognised contextual influences, such as the nature of the stimulus presented or social factors. We addressed these issues in a two-part study of horses paired with familiar (16 subjects) or unfamiliar (16 subjects) companions. Each subject performed 4 tests in a counterbalanced order: novel object test (static ball)-alone or with companion; and umbrella opening test-alone or with companion. Social buffering was significantly influenced by the nature of the stimulus presented, but not by companion's habituation status or familiarity. Importantly, the stimulus used produced differential effects on behavioural and physiological measures of buffering. A companion significantly reduced behavioural response (reactivity) in the novel object test but not in the umbrella test. However, heart rate recovered more quickly for subjects with a companion in the umbrella test but not in the novel object test. We propose that circumstances which permit greater contextual processing may facilitate demonstration of behavioural effects of social buffering, whereas buffering in response to startling events may be manifest only during post-event physiological recovery.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-04-23 PubMed ID: 33893366PubMed Central: PMC8065151DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88319-zGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The paper studied how the presence of a companion horse can calm a horse undergoing stress. It concluded that the effect, known as “social buffering,” is affected by the type of stressor, but not by the other horse’s familiarity or habituation status.

Context

  • The phenomenon addressed in the research is “social buffering,” where the presence of another animal can reduce the stress response or expedite recovery after exposure to a stressful stimulus. This has been found in numerous species and is being explored in horses within this study. This is pertinent as understanding how to manage stress in horses can have implications for their wellbeing.
  • The research was instigated due to inconsistencies in prior studies. This hinted at possible unknown contextual factors, such as the type of stimulus or social elements that affect the impact of social buffering.

Methodology

  • The researchers analyzed this phenomenon via a two-part study involving horses. The teams consisted of familiar and unfamiliar pairs of horses, involving 16 subjects in each grouping.
  • Each horse was exposed to two types of stress tests, either alone or with a companion. These tests were an interaction with a novel object (a static ball) and the opening of an umbrella – both were designed to provoke stress responses.

Findings

  • The findings reveal that social buffering in horses did not depend on familiarization or habituation status of the companion horse. Instead, it was primarily influenced by the nature of the stimulus presented.
  • The type of stimulus used displayed differing effects on behavior and physiological measures of social buffering. In the novel object test, a companion significantly lowered the behavioral response (reactivity) but this was not the same for the umbrella test.
  • Interesting to note, heart rate recovered at a quicker pace for subjects that had a companion during the umbrella test, though the same did not hold true for the novel object test.

Conclusion

  • The paper concludes that allowing for additional contextual processing can boost evidence of behavioral impacts of social buffering. Furthermore, its effects on distress related to startling events might only reveal themselves in speed of post-event physiological recovery.

Cite This Article

APA
Ricci-Bonot C, Romero T, Nicol C, Mills D. (2021). Social buffering in horses is influenced by context but not by the familiarity and habituation of a companion. Sci Rep, 11(1), 8862. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88319-z

Publication

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
NlmUniqueID: 101563288
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 1
Pages: 8862
PII: 8862

Researcher Affiliations

Ricci-Bonot, Claire
  • Animal Behaviour, Cognition and Welfare Group, School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 7TS, UK. cRicciBonot@lincoln.ac.uk.
Romero, Teresa
  • Animal Behaviour, Cognition and Welfare Group, School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 7TS, UK.
Nicol, Christine
  • Animal Behaviour, Cognition and Welfare Group, School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 7TS, UK.
  • The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane North Mymms Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK.
Mills, Daniel
  • Animal Behaviour, Cognition and Welfare Group, School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 7TS, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Fear / physiology
  • Heart Rate / physiology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Horses / psychology
  • Social Behavior
  • Stress, Psychological

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 60 references
  1. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.. Psychol Bull 1985 Sep;98(2):310-57.
    doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310pubmed: 3901065google scholar: lookup
  2. Wittig RM, Crockford C, Weltring A, Langergraber KE, Deschner T, Zuberbühler K. Social support reduces stress hormone levels in wild chimpanzees across stressful events and everyday affiliations.. Nat Commun 2016 Nov 1;7:13361.
    doi: 10.1038/ncomms13361pmc: PMC5097121pubmed: 27802260google scholar: lookup
  3. Kikusui T, Winslow JT, Mori Y. Social buffering: relief from stress and anxiety.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006 Dec 29;361(1476):2215-28.
    pmc: PMC1764848pubmed: 17118934doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1941google scholar: lookup
  4. Hennessy MB, Kaiser S, Sachser N. Social buffering of the stress response: diversity, mechanisms, and functions.. Front Neuroendocrinol 2009 Oct;30(4):470-482.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.06.001pubmed: 19545584google scholar: lookup
  5. Rault J. Friends with benefits: Social support and its relevance for farm animal welfare.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;136(1):1–14.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.002google scholar: lookup
  6. Smith TE, McGreer-Whitworth B, French JA. Close proximity of the heterosexual partner reduces the physiological and behavioral consequences of novel-cage housing in black tufted-ear marmosets (Callithrix kuhli).. Horm Behav 1998 Dec;34(3):211-22.
    doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1998.1469pubmed: 9878270google scholar: lookup
  7. Kiyokawa Y, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y. Two types of social buffering differentially mitigate conditioned fear responses.. Eur J Neurosci 2007 Dec;26(12):3606-13.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05969.xpubmed: 18052972google scholar: lookup
  8. Nakayasu T, Ishii K. Effects of pair-housing after social defeat experience on elevated plus-maze behavior in rats.. Behav Processes 2008 Jul;78(3):477-80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.02.007pubmed: 18358638google scholar: lookup
  9. Berardi A, Trezza V, Palmery M, Trabace L, Cuomo V, Campolongo P. An updated animal model capturing both the cognitive and emotional features of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).. Front Behav Neurosci 2014;8:142.
    doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00142pmc: PMC4010768pubmed: 24808840google scholar: lookup
  10. Ben-Ami Bartal I, Shan H, Molasky NM, Murray TM, Williams JZ, Decety J, Mason P. Anxiolytic Treatment Impairs Helping Behavior in Rats.. Front Psychol 2016;7:850.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00850pmc: PMC4896909pubmed: 27375528google scholar: lookup
  11. Graves FC, Hennessy MB. Comparison of the effects of the mother and an unfamiliar adult female on cortisol and behavioral responses of pre- and postweaning guinea pigs.. Dev Psychobiol 2000 Mar;36(2):91-100.
    doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(200003)36:2<91::AID-DEV1>3.0.CO;2-1pubmed: 10689280google scholar: lookup
  12. Hennessy MB, Maken DS, Graves FC. Presence of mother and unfamiliar female alters levels of testosterone, progesterone, cortisol, adrenocorticotropin, and behavior in maturing Guinea pigs.. Horm Behav 2002 Aug;42(1):42-52.
    doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1794pubmed: 12191646google scholar: lookup
  13. Rukstalis M, French JA. Vocal buffering of the stress response: exposure to conspecific vocalizations moderates urinary cortisol excretion in isolated marmosets.. Horm Behav 2005 Jan;47(1):1-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.09.004pmc: PMC2987614pubmed: 15579259google scholar: lookup
  14. Terranova ML, Cirulli F, Laviola G. Behavioral and hormonal effects of partner familiarity in periadolescent rat pairs upon novelty exposure.. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1999 Aug;24(6):639-56.
    doi: 10.1016/S0306-4530(99)00019-0pubmed: 10399773google scholar: lookup
  15. Kiyokawa Y, Honda A, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y. A familiar conspecific is more effective than an unfamiliar conspecific for social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats.. Behav Brain Res 2014 Jul 1;267:189-93.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.03.043pubmed: 24698797google scholar: lookup
  16. Castro WL, Matt KS. The importance of social condition in the hormonal and behavioral responses to an acute social stressor in the male Siberian dwarf hamster (Phodopus sungorus).. Horm Behav 1997 Dec;32(3):209-16.
    doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1997.1423pubmed: 9454672google scholar: lookup
  17. Castro WL, Matt KS. Neuroendocrine correlates of separation stress in the Siberian dwarf hamster (Phodopus sungorus).. Physiol Behav 1997 Apr;61(4):477-84.
    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00456-8pubmed: 9108564google scholar: lookup
  18. Armario A, Luna G, Balasch J. The effect of conspecifics on corticoadrenal response of rats to a novel environment.. Behav Neural Biol 1983 Mar;37(2):332-7.
    doi: 10.1016/S0163-1047(83)91425-5pubmed: 6684916google scholar: lookup
  19. Armario A, Ortiz R, Balasch J. Corticoadrenal and behavioral response to open field in pairs of male rats either familiar or non-familiar to each other.. Experientia 1983 Nov 15;39(11):1316-7.
    doi: 10.1007/BF01990391pubmed: 6641916google scholar: lookup
  20. Boissy A, Le Neindre P. Behavioral, cardiac and cortisol responses to brief peer separation and reunion in cattle.. Physiol Behav 1997 May;61(5):693-9.
    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00521-5pubmed: 9145939google scholar: lookup
  21. Cirulli F, Terranova ML, Laviola G. Affiliation in periadolescent rats: behavioral and corticosterone response to social reunion with familiar or unfamiliar partners.. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1996 May;54(1):99-105.
    doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02169-8pubmed: 8728545google scholar: lookup
  22. Boissy A, Terlouw C, Le Neindre P. Presence of cues from stressed conspecifics increases reactivity to aversive events in cattle: evidence for the existence of alarm substances in urine.. Physiol Behav 1998 Feb 15;63(4):489-95.
    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(97)00466-6pubmed: 9523888google scholar: lookup
  23. Edgar J, Held S, Paul E, Pettersson I, Price RI, Nicol C. Social buffering in a bird.. Anim. Behav. 2015;105:11–19.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.04.007google scholar: lookup
  24. DAVITZ JR, MASON DJ. Socially facilitated reduction of a fear response in rats.. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1955 Jun;48(3):149-51.
    doi: 10.1037/h0046411pubmed: 13242680google scholar: lookup
  25. Kiyokawa Y, Kikusui T, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y. Partner's stress status influences social buffering effects in rats.. Behav Neurosci 2004 Aug;118(4):798-804.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.798pubmed: 15301605google scholar: lookup
  26. Christensen JW, Malmkvist J, Nielsen BL, Keeling LJ. Effects of a calm companion on fear reactions in naive test horses.. Equine Vet J 2008 Jan;40(1):46-50.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X245171pubmed: 18083659google scholar: lookup
  27. Klein B, Bautze V, Maier AM, Deussing J, Breer H, Strotmann J. Activation of the mouse odorant receptor 37 subsystem coincides with a reduction of novel environment-induced activity within the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus.. Eur J Neurosci 2015 Mar;41(6):793-801.
    doi: 10.1111/ejn.12838pubmed: 25619114google scholar: lookup
  28. Takeda K, Sato S, Sugawara K. Familiarity and group size affect emotional stress in Japanese black heifers.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003;82(1):1–11.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00039-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  29. Feh C. Relationships and communication in socially natural herds.. In: Mills D, McDonnell S, editors. The domestic horse, the evolution, development and management of its behaviour. Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 83–93.
  30. Cozzi A, Sighieri C, Gazzano A, Nicol CJ, Baragli P. Post-conflict friendly reunion in a permanent group of horses (Equus caballus).. Behav Processes 2010 Oct;85(2):185-90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.007pubmed: 20659538google scholar: lookup
  31. Wathan J, McComb K. The eyes and ears are visual indicators of attention in domestic horses.. Curr Biol 2014 Aug 4;24(15):R677-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.023pmc: PMC4123162pubmed: 25093554google scholar: lookup
  32. Fureix C, Bourjade M, Henry S, Sankey C, Hausberger M. Exploring aggression regulation in managed groups of horses equus caballus.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;138(3):216–228.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.009google scholar: lookup
  33. Wathan J, Proops L, Grounds K, McComb K. Horses discriminate between facial expressions of conspecifics.. Sci Rep 2016 Dec 20;6:38322.
    doi: 10.1038/srep38322pmc: PMC5171796pubmed: 27995958google scholar: lookup
  34. Lansade L, Bouissou M, Erhard HW. Fearfulness in horses: A temperament trait stable across time and situations.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;115(3):182–200.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.06.011google scholar: lookup
  35. Rørvang MV, Ahrendt LP, Christensen JW. A trained demonstrator has a calming effect on naïve horses when crossing a novel surface.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2015;171:117–120.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.008google scholar: lookup
  36. Visser EK, Ellis AD, Van Reenen CG. The effect of two different housing conditions on the welfare of young horses stabled for the first time.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;114(3):521–533.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.03.003google scholar: lookup
  37. Visser EK, van Reenen CG, van der Werf JT, Schilder MB, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, Blokhuis HJ. Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and a handling test in young horses.. Physiol Behav 2002 Jun 1;76(2):289-96.
    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00698-4pubmed: 12044602google scholar: lookup
  38. Christensen JW, Ahrendt LP, Lintrup R, Gaillard C, Palme R, Malmkvist J. Does learning performance in horses relate to fearfulness, baseline stress hormone, and social rank?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;140(1–2):44–52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.05.003google scholar: lookup
  39. Smith AV, Proops L, Grounds K, Wathan J, McComb K. Functionally relevant responses to human facial expressions of emotion in the domestic horse (Equus caballus).. Biol Lett 2016 Feb;12(2):20150907.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0907pmc: PMC4780548pubmed: 26864784google scholar: lookup
  40. Lansade L, Simon F. Horses’ learning performances are under the influence of several temperamental dimensions.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010;125(1):30–37.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.02.010google scholar: lookup
  41. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/ (2018).
  42. Nakayasu T, Kato K. Is full physical contact necessary for buffering effects of pair housing on social stress in rats?. Behav Processes 2011 Feb;86(2):230-5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.12.002pubmed: 21146595google scholar: lookup
  43. Anderson MK, Friend TH, Evans JW, Bushong DM. Behavioral assessment of horses in therapeutic riding programs.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;63(1):11–24.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00237-8google scholar: lookup
  44. Bulens A, Sterken H, Van Beirendonck S, Van Thielen J, Driessen B. The use of different objects during a novel object test in stabled horses.. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2015;10(1):54–58.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.09.002google scholar: lookup
  45. Leiner L, Fendt M. Behavioural fear and heart rate responses of horses after exposure to novel objects: Effects of habituation.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011;131(3):104–109.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.02.004google scholar: lookup
  46. McNaughton N, Corr PJ. The neuropsychology of fear and anxiety: A foundation for Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory.. In P. J. Corr (Eds.) The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Cambridge University Press, pp 44–94 (2008).
  47. LeDoux J. The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life.. (Eds.) Simon and Schuster (1998).
  48. Górecka-Bruzda A, Jastrzębska E, Sosnowska Z, Jaworski Z, Jezierski T, Chruszczewski MH. Reactivity to humans and fearfulness tests: Field validation in polish cold blood horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011;133(3):207–215.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.011google scholar: lookup
  49. Bassett L, Buchanan-Smith HM. Effects of predictability on the welfare of captive animals.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007;102(3–4):223–245.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.029google scholar: lookup
  50. Browne WJ, Caplen G, Statham P, Nicol CJ. Mild environmental aversion is detected by a discrete-choice preference testing method but not by a free-access method.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011;134(3–4):152–163.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.07.004google scholar: lookup
  51. Mills DS, Ricci-Bonot C, Hall SS. Mental health issues in the horse.. In: McMillan, F.D. (Eds.) Mental Health and Well-being in Animals. CABI, pp 242–256 (2019).
  52. Lansade L, Bouissou MF, Boivin X. Temperament in preweanling horses: development of reactions to humans and novelty, and startle responses.. Dev Psychobiol 2007 Jul;49(5):501-13.
    doi: 10.1002/dev.20233pubmed: 17577236google scholar: lookup
  53. Popescu S, Diugan E. The relationship between behavioral and other welfare indicators of working horses.. J. Equine Vet. 2013;33(1):1–12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.04.001google scholar: lookup
  54. Baragli P, Vitale V, Banti L, Sighieri C. Effect of aging on behavioural and physiological responses to a stressful stimulus in horses (equus caballus). Behaviour 2014;151(11):1513–1533.
    doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003197google scholar: lookup
  55. Yarnell K, Hall C, Billett E. An assessment of the aversive nature of an animal management procedure (clipping) using behavioral and physiological measures.. Physiol Behav 2013 Jun 13;118:32-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.05.013pubmed: 23685232google scholar: lookup
  56. Squibb K, Griffin K, Favier R, Ijichi C. Poker face: Discrepancies in behaviour and affective states in horses during stressful handling procedures.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;202:34–38.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.02.003google scholar: lookup
  57. Hall C, Randle H, Pearson G, Preshaw L, Waran N. Assessing equine emotional state.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;205:183–193.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.03.006google scholar: lookup
  58. Færevik G, Jensen MB, Bøe KE. Dairy calves social preferences and the significance of a companion animal during separation from the group.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;99(3):205–221.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.10.012google scholar: lookup
  59. Gheusi G, Bluthé RM, Goodall G, Dantzer R. Social and individual recognition in rodents: Methodological aspects and neurobiological bases.. Behav Processes 1994 Dec;33(1-2):59-87.
    doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(94)90060-4pubmed: 24925240google scholar: lookup
  60. Dale J, Lank DB, Reeve HK. Signaling individual identity versus quality: a model and case studies with ruffs, queleas, and house finches.. Am Nat 2001 Jul;158(1):75-86.
    doi: 10.1086/320861pubmed: 18707316google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Fletcher KA, Limon G, Padalino B, Hall GK, Chancellor N, Grist A, Gibson TJ. Impact of Social Buffering and Restraint on Welfare Indicators during UK Commercial Horse Slaughter. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jul 12;13(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13142276pubmed: 37508053google scholar: lookup
  2. Janicka W, Wilk I, Próchniak T. Does social motivation mitigate fear caused by a sudden sound in horses?. Anim Cogn 2023 Sep;26(5):1649-1660.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01805-xpubmed: 37450226google scholar: lookup
  3. Janicka W, Wilk I, Próchniak T, Janczarek I. Can Sound Alone Act as a Virtual Barrier for Horses? A Preliminary Study. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 15;12(22).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12223151pubmed: 36428379google scholar: lookup
  4. Wiśniewska A, Janczarek I, Tkaczyk E, Wilk I, Janicka W, Próchniak T, Kaczmarek B, Pokora E, Łuszczyński J. Minimizing the Effects of Social Isolation of Horses by Contact with Animals of a Different Species: The Domestic Goat as an Example. Animals (Basel) 2022 Sep 2;12(17).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12172271pubmed: 36077991google scholar: lookup
  5. Roth LSV, McGreevy P. Horse vision through two lenses: Tinbergen's Four Questions and the Five Domains. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1647911.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1647911pubmed: 40895790google scholar: lookup
  6. Di Lucrezia A, Scandurra A, Lotito D, Iervolino V, D'Aniello B, Mastellone V, Lombardi P, Pinelli C. The power of interspecific sociality: how humans provide social buffering for horses. Anim Cogn 2025 Mar 12;28(1):20.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01942-5pubmed: 40072705google scholar: lookup
  7. Hall C, Kay R. Living the good life? A systematic review of behavioural signs of affective state in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) and factors relating to quality of life. Part 2: Horse-human interactions. Anim Welf 2024;33:e41.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.41pubmed: 39469043google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.