Social relations in a mixed group of mules, ponies and donkeys reflect differences in equid type.
Abstract: Donkeys and mules are frequently kept as companion animals for horses and ponies, with these different equids often being considered a homogenous group. However, the extent to which domestic equids form inter-specific bonds and display similar social behaviour when living in a mixed herd has not previously been studied. Here we compare the social organization of these three (sub)species when housed together, providing the first systematic analysis of how genetic hybridization is expressed in the social behaviour of mules. A group of 16 mules, donkeys and ponies was observed for 70h and preferred associates, dominance rank and the linearity of the group's hierarchy was determined. The different equids formed distinct affiliative groups that were ordered in a linear hierarchy with ponies as the most dominant, mules in the middle ranks and donkeys in the lowest ranks. Within each equid subgroup, the strength of the hierarchy also varied. Thus in the present study, the three (sub)species displayed different social organization and levels of dominance and preferred to associate with animals of the same equid type, given the opportunity. These results suggest that different domestic equid (sub)species display variations in social behaviour that are likely to have a strong genetic basis.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2012-04-03 PubMed ID: 22709577DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.012Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study investigates the social behaviors of mules, ponies, and donkeys when they are living together. Thereby, finding that their social relations are influenced by their species type, which also determines their rank in the hierarchy.
Study Overview and Methodology
- The research carried out a systematic analysis to understand how genetic hybridization influences the social behavior of mules. For the first time, the social organization of these three equid (sub)species when housed together has been compared.
- The study was conducted over a total duration of 70 hours, with a group of 16 mules, donkeys, and ponies under observation.
- Preferred associates, dominance rank, and the linearity of the herd’s hierarchy within this mixed group were determined through observation.
Findings of the study
- The researchers found that the different equids formed distinct affiliative groups, with their internal hierarchy being linear.
- Ponies were found to be the most dominant, mules held the middle ranks, and donkeys occupied the lowest ranks.
- The strength of the hierarchy also varied within each equid subgroup.
- The equids displayed a preference to associate with animals of the same type when given the option.
Implication of the Findings
- The behaviors and social organization exhibited by the groups suggest that different domestic equid (sub)species show significant variations in their social behavior.
- These differences are likely to have a strong genetic basis, implying that the species of the equid has a critical impact on how they relate with other equids in a mixed group.
- These findings question the standard practice of deeming these different equids as a homogeneous group when they are kept as companion animals for horses and ponies.
Cite This Article
APA
Proops L, Burden F, Osthaus B.
(2012).
Social relations in a mixed group of mules, ponies and donkeys reflect differences in equid type.
Behav Processes, 90(3), 337-342.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.012 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- School of Psychology, University of Exeter, UK. leanne.proops@gmail.com
MeSH Terms
- Aggression / physiology
- Animals
- Behavior, Animal / physiology
- Cluster Analysis
- Dominance-Subordination
- Equidae / physiology
- Female
- Horses / physiology
- Hybrid Vigor
- Hybridization, Genetic
- Linear Models
- Male
- Social Behavior
- Social Dominance
- Species Specificity
Citations
This article has been cited 4 times.- Cruz-Aleixo AS, de Oliveira KC, de Oliveira Ferreira LV, Cedeo Quevedo DA, Cruz RKS, Tsunemi MH, Chiacchio SB, Lourenço MLG. Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Parameters in Pega Breed Donkeys: A Descriptive Study. Animals (Basel) 2023 Feb 27;13(5).
- McLean A, Varnum A, Ali A, Heleski C, Navas González FJ. Comparing and Contrasting Knowledge on Mules and Hinnies as a Tool to Comprehend Their Behavior and Improve Their Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jul 26;9(8).
- Niedźwiedź A, Kubiak K, Nicpoń J. Plasma total antioxidant status in horses after 8-hours of road transportation. Acta Vet Scand 2013 Aug 14;55(1):58.
- Masebo NT, Benedetti B, Angeloni MG, Lee L, Bigi D, Padalino B. Systematic Literature Review on Donkeys (Equus asinus): Husbandry and Welfare in Europe. Animals (Basel) 2025 Sep 23;15(19).
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists