Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2026; doi: 10.1002/evj.70321

Spatial and temporal radiation exposure during equine bone scintigraphy: Implications for occupational safety and post-scintigraphy isolation.

Abstract: Bone scintigraphy is a valuable diagnostic modality in equine orthopaedics, but it is associated with occupational radiation exposure and regulatory requirements for post-procedural isolation. Objective: To quantify radiation dose rates emitted from horses undergoing bone scintigraphy, to evaluate the effects of distance (spatial) and time (temporal) on radiation exposure, and to derive evidence-based recommendations for post-scintigraphy isolation periods. Methods: Prospective, cross-sectional study. Methods: Twenty warmblood horses underwent musculoskeletal scintigraphy following intravenous administration of Tc-methylene diphosphonate (approximately 10 MBq/kg). Radiation dose rates (μSv/h) were measured at the head, kidney, and pelvic regions at distances of 5, 30, and 100 cm from the skin. Measurements were recorded from 5 min up to 72 h post-injection. Results: At 5 min post-injection and 5 cm distance, the kidney region exhibited dose rates 38% higher than the head (p = 0.001; 95% CI = 39.1-101.8), whereas the pelvic region showed significantly lower values (28.2%-55.5% reduction; p < 0.05). Increasing the distance from 5 cm to 30 cm and 100 cm reduced radiation exposure by 65%-82%, representing a greater protective effect than time decay alone (p < 0.05). Across all anatomical regions, dose rates at 5 cm decreased to ≤45 μSv/h by 6 h and to ≤7.5 μSv/h by 18 h post-injection. Conclusions: Potential effects of pathological tracer uptake and limited representation of older horses requiring higher radiotracer doses. Conclusions: Maintaining a minimum distance of 30 cm from horses undergoing bone scintigraphy substantially reduces occupational radiation exposure. The post-scintigraphy isolation periods can be shortened to 6 h under German regulations and to approximately 18 h to meet international standards.
Publication Date: 2026-08-26 PubMed ID: 42655946DOI: 10.1002/evj.70321Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study measured radiation exposure levels from horses during bone scintigraphy to understand how distance and time affect radiation doses, aiming to provide safety guidelines for workers and recommended isolation times after the procedure.

Introduction and Background

  • Bone scintigraphy is a diagnostic imaging technique used in equine orthopedics to detect bone abnormalities by injecting a radiotracer (Tc-methylene diphosphonate).
  • The procedure involves exposure to radiation, which poses occupational risks to veterinary staff and requires regulatory measures, including isolation of horses to limit public or personnel exposure post-procedure.
  • Despite widespread use, clear data quantifying radiation exposure around treated horses and evidence-based isolation period recommendations remain limited.

Study Objectives

  • To quantify radiation dose rates emitted from various anatomical regions of horses following bone scintigraphy.
  • To evaluate how radiation exposure changes with varying distances (spatial factor) and over time (temporal factor) post-injection.
  • To formulate evidence-based recommendations on occupational safety measures and the duration of mandatory post-scintigraphy isolation periods.

Methods

  • Study Design: Prospective, cross-sectional approach involving twenty warmblood horses undergoing musculoskeletal scintigraphy.
  • Procedure: Intravenous administration of Tc-methylene diphosphonate at a dosage of ~10 MBq/kg.
  • Measurement Points: Radiation dose rates (μSv/h) measured at three anatomical sites – the head, kidney, and pelvic regions.
  • Distance Parameters: Dose rates recorded at three distances from horse’s skin: 5 cm, 30 cm, and 100 cm.
  • Timeframe: Radiation levels were measured repeatedly from 5 minutes up to 72 hours after injection.

Key Results

  • At 5 minutes post-injection and 5 cm distance:
    • Kidney region showed 38% higher radiation dose rates compared to the head region (statistically significant with p=0.001).
    • Pelvic region showed significantly lower dose rates than the head (reduction of 28.2%-55.5%, p < 0.05).
  • Effect of Increasing Distance:
    • When distance increased from 5 cm to 30 cm and 100 cm, radiation exposure reduced by 65%-82%.
    • This distance-related reduction was more effective in lowering radiation dose than the natural decay of radioactivity over time alone (p < 0.05).
  • Effect of Time:
    • Radiation dose rates at 5 cm decreased significantly over time—falling to ≤45 μSv/h at 6 hours post-injection.
    • By 18 hours post-injection, dose rates dropped further to ≤7.5 μSv/h across all regions measured.

Discussion and Implications

  • The highest radiation exposure was detected near the kidney region shortly after injection, likely reflecting tracer uptake and concentration there.
  • Spatial distancing is highly effective for radiation protection; maintaining at least 30 cm distance drastically reduces occupational exposure.
  • Time also plays a critical role, with natural radioactive decay reducing dose rates significantly within hours post-injection.
  • Risks might vary with pathological tracer uptake (e.g., due to bone disease) which could lead to localized areas of increased radiation emission.
  • The study primarily included warmblood horses and relatively young animals; older horses often require higher dosages, which may influence dose rates and isolation guidelines.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Occupational Safety:
    • Veterinary personnel should maintain a minimum distance of 30 cm from horses undergoing bone scintigraphy to substantially lower radiation exposure.
  • Post-Scintigraphy Isolation Period:
    • Data supports shortening the isolation period to 6 hours to comply with German radiation safety regulations.
    • To meet international standards, an isolation period of approximately 18 hours is recommended to allow dose rates to drop to safer levels.

Limitations and Considerations

  • The influence of disease states causing altered or pathological tracer distribution was not fully explored.
  • Findings may be less applicable to older horses or patients receiving higher radiotracer doses, which could elevate radiation exposure risks.

Cite This Article

APA
Mageed M, Dyab S, Przewoźny M. (2026). Spatial and temporal radiation exposure during equine bone scintigraphy: Implications for occupational safety and post-scintigraphy isolation. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1002/evj.70321

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Mageed, Mahmoud
  • Equipixel Veterinary Teleradiology, Bakum, Germany.
Dyab, Shahlaa
  • Equipixel Veterinary Teleradiology, Bakum, Germany.
Przewoźny, Maciej
  • Equi Vet Serwis, Buk, Poland.

References

This article includes 22 references
  1. Mageed M, Dyab S, Lindner M, Swagemakers J. Questionnaire study of nuclear scintigraphy protocols in equine clinical practice: preliminary data. Equine Vet Educ 2023;35:533–539.
  2. Marshall SK, Prom‐on P, Sangkue S, Thiangsook W. Assessment of radiation exposure in a nuclear medicine department during 99mTc‐MDP bone scintigraphy. Toxics 2023;11:814.
  3. Marshall SK, Hayeeabdunromae A, Noomad N, Durawee W, Sirieak N, Karnkorn P. Evaluation of environmental radiation exposure and algorithms for determining the occupational effective dose during 99mTc‐MDP bone scintigraphy: a comprehensive analysis. Appl Sci 2024;14:11211.
  4. Gatherer ME, Faulkner J, Voûte LC. Exposure of veterinary personnel to ionising radiation during bone scanning of horses by nuclear scintigraphy with 99mtechnetium methylene diphosphonate. Vet Rec 2007;160:832–835.
  5. Whitelock RG. Radiation hazards from horses undergoing scintigraphy using technetium−99m. Equine Vet J 2015;29:26–30.
  6. Yamada K, Araki M, Tokushige H, Fujiki R, Sakai S, Tateno O. Experience of using water‐dispersed paper bedding for equine scintigraphy. J Equine Sci 2018;29:105–109.
  7. Steyn PF, Uhrig J. The role of protective lead clothing in reducing radiation exposure rates to personnel during equine bone scintigraphy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005;46:529–532.
  8. Mayer MN, Sukut SL, Blakley B. Workers should take steps to mitigate surface lead exposure when using lead‐containing personal protective equipment. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2021;63:23–29.
  9. Mageed M, Dyab S, Swagemakers J, Gerlach K. The impact of different bone tracers and acquisition times on image quality of equine bone scintigraphy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2022;63:593–600.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.13107google scholar: lookup
  10. Warren‐Forward H, Cardew P, Smith B, Clack L, McWhirter K, Johnson S. A comparison of dose savings of lead and lightweight aprons for shielding of 99m‐technetium radiation. Radiat Prot Dosim 2007;124:89–96.
  11. Kafka UCM, Beukes P, Slabbert JP, Carstens A. Effects of lead shielding on gamma radiation scatter energy spectrum during equine bone scintigraphy. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2024;95:63–70.
  12. Pentreath RJ, Applegate KE, Higley KA, Peremans K, Natsuhori M, Randall E. Radiological protection of the patient in veterinary medicine and the role of ICRP. Ann ICRP 2020;49:169–181.
  13. Strahlenschutzverordnung vom 29. November 2018 (BGBl. I S. 2034, 2036; 2021 I S. 5261), die zuletzt durch Artikel 10 des Gesetzes vom 23. Oktober 2024 geändert worden ist. [cited 2026 Apr 28]. Available from: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/strlschv_2018/BJNR203600018.html
  14. Smith DS, Stabin MG. Exposure rate constants and lead shielding values for over 1,100 radionuclides. Health Phys 2012;102:271–291.
  15. Toribio RE. Essentials of equine renal and urinary tract physiology. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2007;23:533–561.
  16. Akar A, Baltaş H, Çevik U, Korkmaz F, Okumuşoğlu NT. Measurement of attenuation coefficients for bone, muscle, fat and water at 140, 364 and 662 keV γ‐ray energies. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2006;102:203–211.
  17. Mageed M, Wegert J, Dyab S, Gerlach K. Furosemide administration one hour before bone scintigraphy examination in horses does not improve the image quality or reduce the radiation dose rate. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2020;62:126–132.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12917google scholar: lookup
  18. Helman J, Turner RJ, Fox PC, Baum BJ. 99mTc‐pertechnetate uptake in parotid acinar cells by the Na+/K+/Cl− co‐transport system. J Clin Investig 1987;79:1310–1313.
  19. Marcelino L, Falk E, Johansson J, Rydén J, Uhlhorn M, Ley CJ. Radiation from the equine perineal region is low compared with the elbow and head 24 hours after bone scintigraphic examination. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2024;65(2):68–75.
  20. Riddolls LJ, Byford GG, McKee SL. Biological and imaging characteristics and radiation dose rates associated with the use of technetium‐99m‐labelled imidodiphosphate in the horse. Can J Vet Res Rev Can Rech Vet 1996;60:81–88.
  21. Vieras F, Boyd CM, Rock L. Diagnostic value of renal imaging incidental to bone scintigraphy with 99mTc‐phosphate compounds. J Nucl Med 1975;16:1109–1114.
  22. Ross MW, Stacy VS. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, editors. Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011. p. 215–234.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.