FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Equine Vet J / Spinal articular dysfunction is common in athletic horses.
Equine veterinary journal2025; doi: 10.1111/evj.14541

Spinal articular dysfunction is common in athletic horses.

Abstract: Spinal articular dysfunction disrupts normal neural function and may lead to stiffness, pain or poor performance. Back pain is common in equine athletes, and it is a common complaint by horse owners requesting chiropractic evaluations. Objective: To describe the prevalence of spinal articular dysfunction in showjumping horses. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical records. Methods: Records from 3 years of examinations in horses, from beginners to high-performance levels. Each horse had 30 spinal segments evaluated for the presence of dysfunctional articulations. Exams were performed by a certified International Veterinary Chiropractic Association veterinarian. Data recorded included age, sex, complaint and history of previous veterinary chiropractic examinations. Descriptive and statistical analysis was performed by age groups: G1 up to 6 years old, G2 from 7 to 10 years, G3 from 11 to 14 years, and G4 from 15 years and above. Significance was set as p < 0.05; results were presented as mean ± SD. Results: Four hundred and ninety-two jumping horses were included (4-19 years old). On average, animals had 11.9 (±3.5) dysfunctional spinal segments. The minimal number observed was 2 and the maximum was 23. No animals were free of spinal dysfunction, and 442 (89.8%) were found to have segmental dysfunction in all 3 spinal regions. The most affected vertebrae were L3, L2, L4, C1 and T7. Dysfunctional segments in the cervical region were diagnosed less frequently in G1 horses (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Objective pain measurements were unavailable. Lameness, when present, was not graded and was not directly correlated with spinal dysfunction. Conclusions: Jumping horses had a high prevalence of spinal articular dysfunction, mainly in the lumbar spine, thoracic sling area and atlanto-occipital joint. The prevalence of dysfunction of the cervical spine increases with age. No equine athlete in this study was free of spinal articular dysfunction.
© 2025 The Author(s). Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-06-01 PubMed ID: 40452204DOI: 10.1111/evj.14541Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research looks at the frequency of spinal joint dysfunction in showjumping horses. This is a worryingly common issue that can lead to pain, stiffness, or decreased performance in these equines.

Objective and Methods

The study aims to determine how prevalent the issue of spinal articular dysfunction is in showjumping horses. The researchers did this by analyzing three years’ worth of clinical exam records for these horses, ranging from those just starting in the sport to high-experience-level competitors.

Each horse’s spinal health was assessed across 30 segments for signs of dysfunction, with the examinations carried out by a veterinarian certified by the International Veterinary Chiropractic Association. The data recorded included each horse’s age, sex, any complaints voiced, and their history of veterinary chiropractic examinations.

The study divided the horses into four age groups for analysis. Group 1 (G1) included horses aged up to 6 years, Group 2 (G2) ranged from 7 to 10 years, Group 3 (G3) covered horses from 11-14 years, and Group 4 (G4) were horses aged 15 and above.

Results

The study encompassed 492 showjumping horses aged between four and nineteen years. The results revealed startling trends in spinal health:

  • Average number of dysfunctional spinal segments found in horses was 11.9, with figures ranging from a minimum of 2 to a maximum of 23.
  • No horses surveyed were free of spinal dysfunction.
  • Almost 90% of the horses had segmental dysfunction in all three regions of the spine.
  • The most frequently affected vertebrae were L3, L2, L4, C1, and T7.
  • Horses in the G1 group were less likely to have dysfunction in the cervical region (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Unfortunately, this study could not measure pain objectively, and it did not grade lameness or correlate it with spinal dysfunction.

But the main conclusion is disturbing: a high prevalence of spinal articular dysfunction exists among jumping horses. The most affected areas were the lumbar spine, thoracic sling area, and atlanto-occipital joint. The prevalence of cervical spine dysfunction increased with age, and no equine athlete in this study was free from spinal articular dysfunction.

Cite This Article

APA
Patricio CR, Winter GHZ, Garbade P. (2025). Spinal articular dysfunction is common in athletic horses. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14541

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Patricio, Claudia R
  • Veterinary Faculty, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • International Veterinary Chiropractic Association (IVCA) Committee Member, Hamburg, Germany.
Winter, Gustavo H Z
  • Veterinary Faculty, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Garbade, Petra
  • Veterinary Faculty, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

References

This article includes 22 references
  1. Haussler KK. Back problems. Chiropractic evaluation and management.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1999;15(1):195–209.
    doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30172-4google scholar: lookup
  2. Schultz JA, Haffner JC, Wooten MS, Hoffman R, Spooner H. 24 the effect of chiropractic treatment on performance and behavior of lesson horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 2015;35(5):393.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.03.032google scholar: lookup
  3. Lesimple C, Fureix C, Menguy H, Hausberger M. Human direct actions may alter animal welfare, a study on horses (Equus caballus).. PLoS One 2010;5(4):e10257.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010257google scholar: lookup
  4. Haussler KK. Application of chiropractic principles and techniques to equine practice.. Proc Ann Conv AAEP 1997;43:312–318.
  5. Landman MA, de Blaauw JA, van Weeren PR, Hofland LJ. Field study of the prevalence of lameness in horses with back problems.. Vet Rec 2004;155(6):165–168.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.155.6.165google scholar: lookup
  6. Langstone J, Ellis J, Cunliffe C. A preliminary study of the effect of manual chiropractic treatment on the splenius muscle in horses when measured by surface electromyography.. Equine Vet J 2015;47(S48):18.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12486_41google scholar: lookup
  7. Haussler KK, Manchon PT, Donnell JR, Frisbie DD. Effects of low‐level laser therapy and chiropractic care on back pain in quarter horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;86:102891.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102891google scholar: lookup
  8. Zsoldos RR, Groesel M, Kotschwar A, Kotschwar AB, Licka T, Peham C. A preliminary modelling study on the equine cervical spine with inverse kinematics at walk.. Equine Vet J 2010;42(S38):516–522.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00265.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  9. Clayton HM, Kaiser LJ, Lavagnino M, Stubbs NC. Dynamic mobilisations in cervical flexion: effects on intervertebral angulations.. Equine Vet J 2010;42(S38):688–694.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00196.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  10. Maldonado MD, Parkinson SD, Story MR, Haussler KK. The effect of chiropractic treatment on limb lameness and concurrent axial skeleton pain and dysfunction in horses.. Animals (Basel) 2022;12:2845.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12202845google scholar: lookup
  11. Fonseca BPA, Alves ALG, Nicoletti JLM, Thomassian A, Hussni CA, Mikail S. Thermography and ultrasonography in back pain diagnosis of equine athletes.. J Equine Vet Sci 2006;26:507–516.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2006.09.007google scholar: lookup
  12. Jeffcott LB. Disorders of the thoracolumbar spine of the horse—a survey of 443 cases.. Equine Vet J 1980;12:197–210.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1980.tb03427.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  13. Denoix JM. Spinal biomechanics and functional anatomy.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1999;15:27–60.
    doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30162-1google scholar: lookup
  14. Cooperstein R, Young M, Haneline M. Interexaminer reliability of cervical motion palpation using continuous measures and rater confidence levels.. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2013;57(2):156–164.
  15. Rooney JR. Congenital equine scoliosis and lordosis.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1969;62:25–30.
  16. Jeffcott LB. Radiographic features of the normal equine thoracolumbar spine.. Vet Radiol 1979;20:140–147.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.1979.tb01192.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  17. Sisson S. Articulações dos equinos.. In: Getty R, editor. Anatomia dos animais domésticos. 5a ed. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil: Guanabara Koogan; 1986. p. 324–349.
  18. Townsend HG, Leach DH, Fretz PB. Kinematics of the equine thoracolumbar spine.. Equine Vet J 1983;15(2):117–122.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb01732.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  19. Haussler KK, Stover SM, Willits NH. Developmental variation in lumbosacropelvic anatomy of thoroughbred racehorses.. Am J Vet Res 1997;58(10):1083–1091.
  20. Haussler KK. Anatomy of the thoracolumbar vertebral region.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1999;15(1):13–26.
    doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30161-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  21. Faber MJ, van Weeren PR, Schepers M, Barneveld A. Long‐term follow‐up of manipulative treatment in a horse with back problems.. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2003;50(5):241–245.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0442.2003.00527.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  22. Gomez Alvarez CB, L'ami JJ, Moffat D, Back W, van Weeren PR. Effect of chiropractic manipulations on the kinematics of back and limbs in horses with clinically diagnosed back problems.. Equine Vet J 2008;40:153–159.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408x250292google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.