Analyze Diet
Scientific reports2016; 6; 38548; doi: 10.1038/srep38548

Spotted phenotypes in horses lost attractiveness in the Middle Ages.

Abstract: Horses have been valued for their diversity of coat colour since prehistoric times; this is especially the case since their domestication in the Caspian steppe in ~3,500 BC. Although we can assume that human preferences were not constant, we have only anecdotal information about how domestic horses were influenced by humans. Our results from genotype analyses show a significant increase in spotted coats in early domestic horses (Copper Age to Iron Age). In contrast, medieval horses carried significantly fewer alleles for these phenotypes, whereas solid phenotypes (i.e., chestnut) became dominant. This shift may have been supported because of (i) pleiotropic disadvantages, (ii) a reduced need to separate domestic horses from their wild counterparts, (iii) a lower religious prestige, or (iv) novel developments in weaponry. These scenarios may have acted alone or in combination. However, the dominance of chestnut is a remarkable feature of the medieval horse population.
Publication Date: 2016-12-07 PubMed ID: 27924839PubMed Central: PMC5141471DOI: 10.1038/srep38548Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the historical preference for horse coat colors and patterns, revealing that while spotted horses were popular in ancient times, solid coats became the favorite in the Middle Ages.

Research Context and Methodology

  • This research is anchored in the understanding that horse coat color has been a crucial factor in the value assigned to the animals since prehistoric times, especially since human domestication began. The scientists note that the preferences likely varied over time and that apart from anecdotal evidence, there has been little methodical analysis to understand these historical trends.
  • The researchers employed genotype analysis to study these trends. Genotype analysis involves studying the genetic makeup of an individual to understand its traits and lineage. In this case, this approach was used to discern the changes in the coat color patterns across different historical periods.

Findings and Interpretation

  • The study shows a substantial increase in the prevalence of the spotted coat phenotype from the Copper Age until the Iron Age, signifying that these patterns were favoured during these periods.
  • However, during the Middle Ages, the researchers found a significant drop in the alleles responsible for the spotted phenotype, indicating a shift in preference towards solid coat colors, especially the chestnut color.
  • The researchers suggest several reasons for this change. Pleiotropic disadvantages associated with the spotted phenotype – where one gene could lead to multiple observable characteristics, which may have undesirable effects, could be one factor. The reduced need to distinguish domestic horses from their wild counterparts could be another reason. The religious prestige associated with certain colors or patterns may have contributed as well, and finally, changes in warfare techniques and weaponry could also have affected horse color preferences. However, the exact reasons remain speculative, and none of these factors can be definitively established as the primary cause for the shift.
  • The predominance of the chestnut color during the Middle Ages is a significant finding of this research, highlighting distinct changes in human preferences over time.

Cite This Article

APA
Wutke S, Benecke N, Sandoval-Castellanos E, Döhle HJ, Friederich S, Gonzalez J, Hallsson JH, Hofreiter M, Lõugas L, Magnell O, Morales-Muniz A, Orlando L, Pálsdóttir AH, Reissmann M, Ruttkay M, Trinks A, Ludwig A. (2016). Spotted phenotypes in horses lost attractiveness in the Middle Ages. Sci Rep, 6, 38548. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38548

Publication

ISSN: 2045-2322
NlmUniqueID: 101563288
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 6
Pages: 38548

Researcher Affiliations

Wutke, Saskia
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Department of Evolutionary Genetics, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
Benecke, Norbert
  • German Archaeological Institute, Department of Natural Sciences, Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Sandoval-Castellanos, Edson
  • Centro de Ciencias de la Complejidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Döhle, Hans-Jürgen
  • Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt - Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte, 06114 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Friederich, Susanne
  • Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt - Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte, 06114 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Gonzalez, Javier
  • University of Potsdam, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Hallsson, Jón Hallsteinn
  • The Agricultural University of Iceland, Faculty of Land and Animal Resources, IS-112 Reykjavik, Iceland.
Hofreiter, Michael
  • University of Potsdam, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Lõugas, Lembi
  • Archaeological Research Collection, Tallinn University, Rüütli 10, 10130 Tallinn, Estonia.
Magnell, Ola
  • National Historical Museums, Contract Archaeology, 226 60 Lund, Sweden.
Morales-Muniz, Arturo
  • Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Laboratory of Archaeozoology, Madrid, Spain.
Orlando, Ludovic
  • Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1350K Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pálsdóttir, Albína Hulda
  • The Agricultural University of Iceland, Faculty of Land and Animal Resources, IS-112 Reykjavik, Iceland.
Reissmann, Monika
  • Humboldt University Berlin, Faculty of Life Sciences, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Ruttkay, Matej
  • Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Archaeology, 949 21 Nitra, Slovak Republic.
Trinks, Alexandra
  • University of Potsdam, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Ludwig, Arne
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Department of Evolutionary Genetics, 10315 Berlin, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Computer Simulation
  • DNA, Ancient / analysis
  • Horses / physiology
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Phenotype
  • Pigmentation
  • Time Factors

References

This article includes 51 references
  1. Cieslak M, Reissmann M, Hofreiter M, Ludwig A. Colours of domestication. Biol. Rev. 86, 885–899 (2011).
    pubmed: 21443614
  2. Linderholm A, Larson G. The role of humans in facilitating and sustaining coat colour variation in domestic animals. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 587–593 (2013).
    pubmed: 23567209
  3. Hofreiter M et al. The future of ancient DNA: Technical advances and conceptual shifts. BioEssays 37, 284–93 (2015).
    pubmed: 25413709
  4. Girdland Flink L et al. Establishing the validity of domestication genes using DNA from ancient chickens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 6184–6189 (2014).
    pmc: PMC4035994pubmed: 24753608
  5. Der Sarkissian C et al. Evolutionary Genomics and Conservation of the Endangered Przewalski’s Horse. Curr. Biol. 25, 2577–2583 (2015).
    pmc: PMC5104162pubmed: 26412128
  6. Ludwig A et al. Twenty-five thousand years of fluctuating selection on leopard complex spotting and congenital night blindness in horses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 370, (2015).
    pmc: PMC4275893pubmed: 25487337
  7. Peters J. Römische Tierhaltung und Tierzucht: eine Synthese aus archäozoologischer Untersuchung und schriftlich-bildlicher Überlieferung. 5 (Leidorf, 1998).
  8. Albarella U, Johnstone C, Vickers K. The development of animal husbandry from the Late Iron Age to the end of the Roman period: a case study from South-East Britain. J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 1828–1848 (2008).
  9. Ludwig A et al. Tracing the genetic roots of the indigenous White Park Cattle. Anim. Genet. 44, 383–386 (2013).
    pubmed: 23350719
  10. Schibler J, Schlumbaum A. History and economic importance of cattle (Bos taurus, L.) in Switzerland from Neolithic to Early Middle Ages. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 149, 23–29 (2007).
    pubmed: 17243447
  11. Crabtree P J. Animal husbandry and farming in East Anglia from the 5th to the 10th centuries CE. Quat. Int. 346, 102–108 (2014).
  12. Ludwig A et al. Coat Color Variation at the Beginning of Horse Domestication. Science (80-) 324, 485 (2009).
    pmc: PMC5102060pubmed: 19390039
  13. Pruvost M et al. Genotypes of predomestic horses match phenotypes painted in Paleolithic works of cave art. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 18626–18630 (2011).
    pmc: PMC3219153pubmed: 22065780
  14. Svensson E M et al. Tracing genetic change over time using nuclear SNPs in ancient and modern cattle. Anim. Genet. 38, 378–383 (2007).
    pubmed: 17596126
  15. Ollivier M et al. Evidence of coat color variation sheds new light on ancient canids. PLoS One 8, e75110 (2013).
    pmc: PMC3788791pubmed: 24098367
  16. Fang M, Larson G, Soares Ribeiro H, Li N, Andersson L. Contrasting Mode of Evolution at a Coat Color Locus in Wild and Domestic Pigs. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000341 (2009).
    pmc: PMC2613536pubmed: 19148282
  17. Outram A K et al. The earliest horse harnessing and milking. Science (80-) 323, 1332–5 (2009).
    pubmed: 19265018
  18. Wutke S et al. The origin of ambling horses. Curr. Biol. 26, R697–R699 (2016).
    pubmed: 27505236
  19. Benecke N. Zu den Anfängen der Pferdehaltung in Eurasien. Aktuelle archäozoologische Beiträge aus drei Regionen. Ethnogr. Zeitschrift 43, 187–226 (2002).
  20. Bellone R R. Pleiotropic effects of pigmentation genes in horses. Anim. Genet. 41, 100–110 (2010).
    pubmed: 21070283
  21. Bellone R R et al. Evidence for a Retroviral Insertion in TRPM1 as the Cause of Congenital Stationary Night Blindness and Leopard Complex Spotting in the Horse. PLoS One 8, e78280 (2013).
    pmc: PMC3805535pubmed: 24167615
  22. Reissmann M, Ludwig A. Pleiotropic effects of coat colour-associated mutations in humans, mice and other mammals. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 576–586 (2013).
    pubmed: 23583561
  23. Hedrick P W. What is the evidence for heterozygote advantage selection?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 698–704 (2012).
    pubmed: 22975220
  24. Hedrick P W. Heterozygote Advantage: The Effect of Artificial Selection in Livestock and Pets. J. Hered. 106, 141–154 (2015).
    pubmed: 25524994
  25. Stuckenbruck L T. Revelation in Commentary on the Bible. 1535–1536 (Eerdmans 2003).
  26. Barney S A, Lewis W J, Beach J A, Berghof O. The etymologies of Isidore of Seville. (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
  27. Echegaray J G, del Campo Hernández A, Freeman L G, Soto J L C. Obras completas y complementarias de Beato de Liébana. I: Comentario al Apocalipsis. Himno O Dei Verbum. Apologético: 1. 1. (Biblioteca de autores cristianos, 2004).
  28. Clark W B. A medieval book of beasts: the second-family bestiary: commentary, art, text and translation. (Woodbridge, 2013).
  29. Finn J L et al. The relationship between coat colour phenotype and equine behaviour: A pilot study. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 174, 66–69 (2016).
  30. Sponenberg D P. Equine Color Genetics. (Wiley, 2009).
  31. Brooks S A, Lear T L, Adelson D L, Bailey E. A chromosome inversion near the KIT gene and the Tobiano spotting pattern in horses. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 119, 225–230 (2007).
    pubmed: 18253033
  32. Hauswirth R et al. Mutations in MITF and PAX3 cause ‘splashed white’ and other white spotting phenotypes in horses. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002653 (2012).
    pmc: PMC3325211pubmed: 22511888
  33. Haase B et al. Seven novel KIT mutations in horses with white coat colour phenotypes. Anim. Genet. 40, 623–629 (2009).
    pubmed: 19456317
  34. Nolf P S. Detecting Icelandic Horse Origins. Icelandic Horse Q. 18–23 (2012).
  35. Dabney J et al. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a Middle Pleistocene cave bear reconstructed from ultrashort DNA fragments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 10, 15758–15763 (2013).
    pmc: PMC3785785pubmed: 24019490
  36. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 17, 10–12 (2011).
  37. Bolger A M, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics (2014).
  38. Magoč T, Salzberg S L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963 (2011).
    pmc: PMC3198573pubmed: 21903629
  39. Langmead B, Salzberg S L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
    pmc: PMC3322381pubmed: 22388286
  40. Li H et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
    pmc: PMC2723002pubmed: 19505943
  41. Gagneux P, Boesch C, Woodruff D S. Microsatellite scoring errors associated with noninvasive genotyping based on nuclear DNA amplified from shed hair. Mol. Ecol. 6, 861–868 (1997).
    pubmed: 9301074
  42. Sandoval-Castellanos E. Testing temporal changes in allele frequencies: a simulation approach. Genet. Res. (Camb). 92, 309–320 (2010).
    pubmed: 20943011
  43. Schraiber J G, Evans S N, Slatkin M. Bayesian inference of natural selection from allele frequency time series. Genetics 203, 493–511 (2016).
    pmc: PMC4858794pubmed: 27010022
  44. Nielsen R, Wakeley J. Distinguishing Migration From Isolation: A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach. Genetics 158, 885–896 (2001).
    pmc: PMC1461674pubmed: 11404349
  45. Gerbault P et al. In Population Dynamics in Pre- and Early History New Approaches by Stable Isotopes and Genetics. 17–30 (De Gruyter, 2012).
  46. Lippold S, Matzke N J, Reissmann M, Hofreiter M. Whole mitochondrial genome sequencing of domestic horses reveals incorporation of extensive wild horse diversity during domestication. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 328 (2011).
    pmc: PMC3247663pubmed: 22082251
  47. Achilli A et al. Mitochondrial genomes from modern horses reveal the major haplogroups that underwent domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 2449–2454 (2012).
    pmc: PMC3289334pubmed: 22308342
  48. Warmuth V et al. Reconstructing the origin and spread of horse domestication in the Eurasian steppe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 8202–8206 (2012).
    pmc: PMC3361400pubmed: 22566639
  49. Lippold S et al. Discovery of lost diversity of paternal horse lineages using ancient DNA. Nat. Commun. 2, 450 (2011).
    pubmed: 21863017
  50. Librado P et al. Tracking the origins of Yakutian horses and the genetic basis for their fast adaptation to subarctic environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, E6889–E6897 (2015).
    pmc: PMC4687531pubmed: 26598656
  51. Ronquist F et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).
    pmc: PMC3329765pubmed: 22357727