Analyze Diet
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution1997; 51(5); 1341-1351; doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01457.x

Stabilizing Selection and the Comparative Analysis of Adaptation.

Abstract: Comparative studies tend to differ from optimality and functionality studies in how they treat adaptation. While the comparative approach focuses on the origin and change of traits, optimality studies assume that adaptations are maintained at an optimum by stabilizing selection. This paper presents a model of adaptive evolution on a macroevolutionary time scale that includes the maintenance of traits at adaptive optima by stabilizing selection as the dominant evolutionary force. Interspecific variation is treated as variation in the position of adaptive optima. The model illustrates how phylogenetic constraints not only lead to correlations between phylogenetically related species, but also to imperfect adaptations. From this model, a statistical comparative method is derived that can be used to estimate the effect of a selective factor on adaptive optima in a way that would be consistent with an optimality study of adaptation to this factor. The method is illustrated with an analysis of dental evolution in fossil horses. The use of comparative methods to study evolutionary trends is also discussed.
Publication Date: 1997-10-01 PubMed ID: 28568616DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01457.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article presents a new model of adaptive evolution that combines optimality studies with comparative studies. The model incorporates stabilizing selection — a dominant evolutionary force that maintains traits at their most favorable or optimum states.

Model of Adaptive Evolution

  • The model developed in this study offers a more comprehensive understanding of adaptive evolution by blending the insights of both comparative and optimality studies. Previous research has pointed to differences between these styles of study: comparative studies center on the origin and evolutionary changes of traits, while optimality studies conjecture that the most advantageous adaptations are preserved at an optimum level through stabilizing selection.
  • The authors propose that interspecific variation — difference between species — can be conceptualized as variations in the positioning of adaptive optima, or the most advantageous states of traits. Hence, the model implies that variations among species essentially represent different ‘peaks’ of adaptation.

Phylogenetic Constraints and Imperfect Adaptations

  • The new model also examines the role of phylogenetic constraints in evolution. These constraints, which include genetic and historical influences, can both link phylogenetically-related species and lead to imperfect adaptations.
  • Imperfect adaptations refer to traits that are less than optimal due to evolutionary hurdles, which in this context are the phylogenetic constraints. Despite stabilizing selection attempting to optimize traits, some features may not reach their ideal state due to these constraints.

Statistical Comparative Method

  • Moving beyond conceptual modeling, the research provides a statistically-backed comparative method derived from the new model. This allows for the estimation of a selective factor’s impact on adaptive optima, aligning with an optimality analysis of adaptation.
  • To illustrate this method, the researchers conduct an analysis of dental evolution in fossil horses, providing an empirical application of their evolutionary model and analytical method.

Focusing on Evolutionary Trends

  • Fascinatingly, the paper finishes by discussing how their comparative method can be used to study larger evolutionary trends. This suggests a broader application of the research findings, offering a novel approach to the comprehensive study of evolutionary tendencies.

The research contributes a unique model and method for studying adaptive evolution, bridging the conceptual gap between comparative and optimality studies, and offering new insights into the impact of stabilizing selection and phylogenetic constraints on evolutionary development.

Cite This Article

APA
Hansen TF. (1997). Stabilizing Selection and the Comparative Analysis of Adaptation. Evolution, 51(5), 1341-1351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01457.x

Publication

ISSN: 1558-5646
NlmUniqueID: 0373224
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 5
Pages: 1341-1351

Researcher Affiliations

Hansen, Thomas F
  • Division of Zoology, Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1050, Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway.

Citations

This article has been cited 277 times.