Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2026; 106148; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106148

Stable Beginnings – A call to transform methods of weaning horses.

Abstract: There are currently a range of different weaning methods used in the UK, with no clear consensus or guidance to support the optimal welfare of both mares and foals during and post weaning. Objective: To explore welfare charity professionals' perceptions of approaches to weaning horses in the UK. Methods: Participants from welfare charities with experience in management, and welfare of horses from birth to death were recruited. They reviewed videos of weaning approaches and a chart of behavioural welfare indicators. They then took part in discussions on methods of weaning, considering their opinions and experiences of the impact on the mare and foal. Discussions were recorded, transcribed and reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: There were five participants, whose primary roles were in equine welfare charities. Thematic analysis revealed five main themes including i) Responsibility and accountability of the equine community, ii) Flexibility and tailoring for individual needs, iii) The complexities of assessing welfare, iv) The short-term impacts of weaning, and v) The long-term impacts of weaning. Participants unanimously agreed that abrupt and isolating forms of weaning separation compromised the short-term welfare of the mare and foal and could cause long-term psychological issues. Education was considered important in creating cultural shifts in the industry, and the demand for horses with good early years experiences was discussed as a change enabler. Conclusions: Participants agreed unanimously for the need to change away from abrupt and isolating forms of weaning, based on short- and long-term impacts on the mare and foal. They identified barriers to change within the equine industry and proposed ways forward.
Publication Date: 2026-09-11 PubMed ID: 42727646DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106148Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study explores the opinions of equine welfare charity professionals in the UK regarding current horse weaning methods.
  • It highlights the welfare concerns associated with abrupt and isolating weaning practices and calls for changes to improve both mare and foal welfare.

Introduction and Objective

  • Weaning horses is a critical process impacting both mares and foals, yet the UK lacks standardized guidance or consensus on optimal methods.
  • The study aimed to understand welfare charity professionals’ perceptions of various weaning approaches and their effects on horse welfare during and after weaning.

Methodology

  • Participants: Five professionals primarily working in equine welfare charities with experience managing horses from birth to death were recruited.
  • Materials: They reviewed videos depicting different weaning techniques and a chart illustrating behavioral indicators relevant to assessing welfare.
  • Data Collection: Participants engaged in recorded discussions reflecting on weaning methods and their personal opinions and experiences regarding impacts on both mare and foal.
  • Analysis: Reflexive thematic analysis was employed to interpret transcribed discussions, allowing themes to be identified from the data.

Key Findings – Thematic Results

  • 1. Responsibility and Accountability of the Equine Community:
    • Participants emphasized that the entire equine community shares responsibility to improve weaning practices.
    • Accountability is essential to implement welfare-positive changes industry-wide.
  • 2. Flexibility and Tailoring for Individual Needs:
    • There was recognition that no single weaning method suits all horses; individual differences must inform approach selection.
    • Flexibility in timing and method helps address the needs of both mare and foal for better welfare outcomes.
  • 3. The Complexities of Assessing Welfare:
    • Participants acknowledged challenges in objectively measuring welfare during weaning.
    • They discussed the use of behavioral indicators but noted that assessing emotional and psychological states remains complex.
  • 4. The Short-term Impacts of Weaning:
    • Abrupt and isolating separation methods were unanimously agreed to negatively affect immediate welfare.
    • Short-term stress and behavioral disturbances were common when these harsher methods were used.
  • 5. The Long-term Impacts of Weaning:
    • Participants expressed concerns about psychological issues persisting from poor early weaning experiences.
    • The lasting effects may influence foal behavior and welfare well into adulthood.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • All participants agreed that the current prevalent abrupt and isolating weaning methods are detrimental to both short- and long-term welfare.
  • They highlighted education as a key tool to shift equine industry culture towards better practices.
  • The demand for horses with positive early life experiences was viewed as an incentive to encourage welfare-friendly weaning methods among breeders, trainers, and owners.
  • Barriers within the industry were acknowledged, including tradition and lack of awareness, but proactive engagement and shared responsibility can drive improvements.
  • Overall, the research calls for transforming weaning methodologies to prioritize the emotional and physical welfare of mares and foals alike, favoring gradual, social, and less stressful alternatives.

Cite This Article

APA
Dwyer J, Freeman SL, Hill B, Roshier AL. (2026). Stable Beginnings – A call to transform methods of weaning horses. J Equine Vet Sci, 106148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106148

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 106148
PII: S0737-0806(26)00383-7

Researcher Affiliations

Dwyer, Joanne
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.
Freeman, Sarah L
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK. Electronic address: jo.dwyer1@outlook.com.
Hill, Brad
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.
Roshier, Amanda L
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interests The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.