Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2020; 34(5); 2101-2108; doi: 10.1111/jvim.15795

Stall-side screening potential of a smartphone electrocardiogram recorded over both sides of the thorax in horses.

Abstract: Comparisons between smartphone ECG (SpECG) recordings obtained from the right and left sides of the thorax have not been reported in animals. Objective: To evaluate the screening potential of a SpECG obtained from both sides of the thorax and to compare the degree of agreement between the SpECG and a reference ECG (rECG) for measurement of the duration of baseline electrical deflections recorded over both sides of the thorax. Methods: Fifty horses admitted to the equine hospital, university-owned horses, and horses from an endurance riding facility. Methods: Prospective observational study. Simultaneous rECG and SpECG tracings were recorded on both sides of the thorax and evaluated by 2 experienced observers for interpretability, presence and classification of arrhythmias, and duration of deflections of the electrical baseline. Results: Fifteen (15/50) horses had spontaneous arrhythmias. Excellent agreement was found between the 2 devices (κ = 0.91; P < .001; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.03) for the detection of arrhythmias. Significantly more P waves were of diagnostic quality from the right side (20 versus 5, P = .001) and significantly more QRS and QT intervals were of diagnostic quality from the left side (66 versus 38 and 62 versus 34, respectively, P < .001). Substantial agreement for the duration of deflections between devices only was observed for the QRS interval (SpECG left). Conclusions: It is important to obtain SpECG tracings from both sides of the thorax in horses. The SpECG is a useful stall-sidearrhythmia-screening tool for some common arrhythmias in horses.
Publication Date: 2020-07-08 PubMed ID: 32639655PubMed Central: PMC7517866DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15795Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Observational Study
  • Veterinary

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research evaluates the potential of a smartphone electrocardiograms (SpECG) taken from both sides of the thorax on horses for detecting arrhythmias, by comparing the results with those obtained from a standard reference ECG (rECG).

Objective and Methodology

  • The main objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of SpECG recorded on both sides of the thorax of horses as a feasible arrhythmia screening tool. Moreover, the research was also aimed at comparing the level of agreement between SpECG collected from both sides and rECG, in terms of measuring baseline electrical deflections.
  • The method involved 50 horses, which included those admitted to an equine hospital, university-owned horses, and some from an endurance riding facility. These horses were subjected to a prospective observational study as the researchers recorded simultaneous rECG and SpECG tracings from both sides of their thorax. The recording tracings were then analyzed by two experienced observers based on interpretability, duration of baseline electrical deflections, presence and classification of arrhythmias.

Findings and Conclusion

  • The results showed that 15 out of 50 horses had spontaneous arrhythmias. There was also excellent agreement observed between the SpECG and rECG devices for the detection of arrhythmias (with a kappa value of 0.91; Significantly significant at P less than .001).
  • The study further noticed that fundamental waves (P waves) of diagnostic quality were significantly more present when SpECG was taken from the right side of the thorax (20 compared to 5 instances). In contrast, the QRS and QT intervals — which represent the electric conduction time of the heart — of diagnostic quality were significantly higher when SpECG was recorded from the left side (66 versus 38 and 62 versus 34, respectively).
  • However, substantial agreement for the duration of deflections between both devices was only observed for the QRS interval when SpECG was recorded from the left side.
  • The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of obtaining SpECG tracings from both sides of the thorax in horses. It also reinstates that SpECG can be used as a useful arrhythmia-screening tool for diagnosing common arrhythmias in horses, especially when used on-site at a stable.

Cite This Article

APA
Corradini I, Fernández-Ruiz A, Barba M, Engel-Manchado J. (2020). Stall-side screening potential of a smartphone electrocardiogram recorded over both sides of the thorax in horses. J Vet Intern Med, 34(5), 2101-2108. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15795

Publication

ISSN: 1939-1676
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 34
Issue: 5
Pages: 2101-2108

Researcher Affiliations

Corradini, Ignacio
  • Servicio de Medicina Interna Equina, Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Fernández-Ruiz, Alicia
  • Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Veterinario, Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Barba, Marta
  • Servicio de Medicina Interna Equina, Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Engel-Manchado, Javier
  • Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Veterinario, Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / diagnosis
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / veterinary
  • Electrocardiography / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horses
  • Smartphone
  • Thorax

Conflict of Interest Statement

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 18 references
  1. Bonelli F, Vezzosi T, Meylan M. Comparison of smartphone‐based and standard base‐apex electrocardiography in healthy dairy cows. J Vet Intern Med 2019;33(2):981‐986.
    pmc: PMC6430901pubmed: 30592089
  2. Gropler MR, Dalal AS, Van Hare GF, Silva JNA. Can smartphone wireless ECGs be used to accurately assess ECG intervals in pediatrics? A comparison of mobile health monitoring to standard 12‐lead ECG. PloS One 2018;13:e0204403.
  3. Haberman ZC, Jahn RT, Bose R. Wireless smartphone ECG enables large‐scale screening in diverse populations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2015;26(5):520‐526.
    pubmed: 25651872
  4. Kraus MS, Gelzer AR, Rishniw M. Detection of heart rate and rhythm with a smartphone‐based electrocardiograph versus a reference standard electrocardiograph in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2016;249(2):189‐194.
    pubmed: 27379594
  5. Muhlestein JB, Le V, Albert D. Smartphone ECG for evaluation of STEMI: results of the ST LEUIS pilot study. J Electrocardiol 2015;48(2):249‐259.
    pubmed: 25601407
  6. Vezzosi T, Buralli C, Marchesotti F. Diagnostic accuracy of a smartphone electrocardiograph in dogs: comparison with standard 6‐lead electrocardiography. Vet J 2016;216:33‐37.
    pubmed: 27687923
  7. Kraus MS, Rishniw M, Divers TJ, Reef VB, Gelzer AR. Utility and accuracy of a smartphone‐based electrocardiogram device as compared to a standard base‐apex electrocardiogram in the horse. Res Vet Sci 2019;125:141‐147.
    pubmed: 31228737
  8. Vezzosi T, Sgorbini M, Bonelli F. Evaluation of a smartphone electrocardiograph in healthy horses: comparison with standard base‐apex electrocardiography. J Equine Vet Sci 2018;67:61‐65.
    pmc: PMC10998801pubmed: 37947988
  9. Verheyen T, Decloedt A, De Clercq D. Electrocardiography in horses, part 1: how to make a good recording. Vlaams Diergen Tijds 2010;79:331‐336.
  10. Bujang MA, Baharum N. Guidelines of the minimum sample size requirements for kappa agreement test. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health 2017;4(2):e12267.
  11. Garabelli P, Stavrakis S, Albert M. Comparison of QT interval readings in normal sinus rhythm between a smartphone heart monitor and a 12‐lead ECG for healthy volunteers and inpatients receiving sotalol or dofetilide. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2016;27(7):827‐832.
    pubmed: 27027653
  12. Bujang MA, Baharum N. A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Arch Orofac Sci 2017;12:1‐11.
  13. Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2015;25(2):141‐151.
    pmc: PMC4470095pubmed: 26110027
  14. Magari RT. Statistics for laboratory method comparison studies. BioPharm 2002;15:28‐32.
  15. Holmes JR, Alps BJ. Studies into equine electrocardiography and vectorcardiography II. Cardiac vector distributions in apparently healthy horses. Can J Comp Med 1967;31:150‐155.
    pmc: PMC1494694pubmed: 17649589
  16. Verheyen T, Decloedt A, Van Der Vekens N. Ventricular response during lungeing exercise in horses with lone atrial fibrillation. Equine Vet J 2013;45(3):309‐314.
    pubmed: 23094848
  17. Decloedt A, Broux B, De Clercq D. Effect of sotalol on heart rate, QT interval, and atrial fibrillation cycle length in horses with atrial fibrillation. J Vet Intern Med 2018;32(2):815‐821.
    pmc: PMC5866983pubmed: 29460446
  18. Schwarzwald CC, Kedo M, Birkmann K, Hamlin RL. Relationship of heart rate and electrocardiographic time intervals to body mass in horses and ponies. J Vet Cardiol 2012;14(2):343‐350.
    pubmed: 22560718