Analyze Diet
Veterinary medicine and science2025; 11(6); e70677; doi: 10.1002/vms3.70677

Tear Film Osmolarity in Horses With Bacterial Conjunctivitis.

Abstract: Conjunctivitis is an inflammation of the conjunctiva caused by infectious or non-infectious factors. Infectious conjunctivitis comes in two forms: viral and bacterial. Bacterial conjunctivitis is commonly caused by organisms such as Staphylococcus and Streptococcus, with the severity of the disease influenced by the specific bacterial species involved. Because both viral and bacterial conjunctivitis are highly contagious, preventive measures are essential to reduce transmission-especially to the unaffected eye. Objective: To evaluate the tear film osmolality in horses with bacterial conjunctivitis. Methods: A total of 40 healthy horses and those with conjunctivitis were included in the study. Tear samples were collected from both eyes with microcapillary tubes three times at 5-min intervals. The tear samples for each horse were pooled, and the osmolality and electrolyte concentrations were measured. The mean (SD) was calculated for each variable to establish preliminary guidelines for tear film osmolality and electrolyte composition in healthy horses. Results: The mean (SD) tear film osmolality was 283.51 (9.33) mmol/kg, and the mean (SD) sodium, potassium, magnesium and calcium concentrations were 134.75 (10), 16.3 (5.77), 3.48 (1.97) and 1.06 (0.42) mmol/L, respectively. The sodium concentration in the tear film was similar to that in serum, whereas the potassium concentration in the tear film was approximately 4.75 times that of serum. Conclusions: Measuring tear-film osmolality offers a non-invasive, easy and practical approach to gaining valuable insights into baseline conditions and potential changes in ocular diseases. However, its true clinical utility requires integration with other ocular parameters and further controlled studies in horses suffering from conjunctivitis. The development of such tools could lead to more accurate diagnoses and more comprehensive treatment strategies.
Publication Date: 2025-11-17 PubMed ID: 41243880PubMed Central: PMC12620991DOI: 10.1002/vms3.70677Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Cite This Article

APA
Saberinia A, Ozmaei S, Anoushepour A. (2025). Tear Film Osmolarity in Horses With Bacterial Conjunctivitis. Vet Med Sci, 11(6), e70677. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70677

Publication

ISSN: 2053-1095
NlmUniqueID: 101678837
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 6
Pages: e70677
PII: e70677

Researcher Affiliations

Saberinia, Ahad
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Ozmaei, Saeed
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Anoushepour, Amin
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Ka.C., Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Tears / chemistry
  • Tears / physiology
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horse Diseases / physiopathology
  • Osmolar Concentration
  • Conjunctivitis, Bacterial / veterinary
  • Conjunctivitis, Bacterial / microbiology
  • Conjunctivitis, Bacterial / physiopathology
  • Male
  • Female

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 12 references
  1. Almutleb, E. S. , Almutairi M. S., El‐Hiti G. A., et al. 2025. “Assessment of Tear Film in Arabian Horses With a Portable Device Compared to Human's Healthy Eyes.” Egyptian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 56, no. 13: 51–58.
  2. Best, L. J. , Hendrix D. V., and Ward D. A.. 2015. “Tear Film Osmolality and Electrolyte Composition in Healthy Horses.” American Journal of Veterinary Research 76, no. 12: 1066–1069. 10.2460/ajvr.76.12.1066.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.76.12.1066pubmed: 26618731google scholar: lookup
  3. Bron, A. J. , de Paiva C. S., Chauhan S. K., et al. 2017. “TFOS DEWS II Pathophysiology Report.” Ocular Surface 15, no. 3: 438–510.
    pubmed: 28736340
  4. Bron, A. J. , and Willshire C.. 2021. “Tear Osmolarity in the Diagnosis of Systemic Dehydration and Dry Eye Disease.” Diagnostics 11, no. 3: 387. 10.3390/diagnostics11030387.
    doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030387pmc: PMC7996182pubmed: 33668748google scholar: lookup
  5. Brooks, D. E. 2010. “Equine Conjunctival Diseases: A Commentary.” Equine Veterinary Education 22, no. 8: 382–386.
  6. Davis, K. , and Townsend W.. 2011. “Tear‐Film Osmolarity in Normal Cats and Cats With Conjunctivitis.” Veterinary Ophthalmology 14, no. S1: 54–59. 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2011.00916.x.
  7. Gilbard, J. P. , and Farris R. L.. 1979. “Tear Osmolarity and Ocular Surface Disease in Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.” Archives of Ophthalmology 97, no. 9: 1642–1646.
    pubmed: 475632
  8. Lamkin, I. D. , Zimmerman K. L., Smith Fleming K. M., and Martins B. C.. 2020. “Osmolarity of Basal and Reflex Tears of Normal Dogs.” Veterinary Ophthalmology 23, no. 4: 747–753. 10.1111/vop.12798.
    doi: 10.1111/vop.12798pubmed: 32584492google scholar: lookup
  9. Maggs, D. J. , Miller P. E., Ofri R., et al. 2017. Slatter's Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology. Saunders.
  10. Potvin, R. , Makari S., and Rapuano C. J.. 2015. “Tear Film Osmolarity and Dry Eye Disease: A Review of the Literature.” Clinical Ophthalmology 9: 2039–2047. 10.2147/OPTH.S95242.
    doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S95242pmc: PMC4636089pubmed: 26586933google scholar: lookup
  11. Sebbag, L. , Park S. A., Kass P. H., et al. 2016. “Assessment of Tear Film Osmolarity Using the TearLab™ Osmometer in Normal Dogs and Dogs With Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.” Veterinary Ophthalmology 20, no. 4: 357–364. 10.1111/vop.12436.
    doi: 10.1111/vop.12436pubmed: 27761982google scholar: lookup
  12. Tashbayev, B. , Utheim T. P., Utheim Ø. A., et al. 2020. “Utility of Tear Osmolarity Measurement in Diagnosis of Dry Eye Disease.” Scientific Reports 10: 5542. 10.1038/s41598-020-62583-x.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62583-xpmc: PMC7099018pubmed: 32218518google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.