Analyze Diet
BMC veterinary research2019; 15(1); 242; doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1998-2

The diagnostic performance of human urinary dipsticks to estimate urine pH, specific gravity (SpG), and protein in horses: are they reliable?

Abstract: Urinalysis is a critical diagnostic test which is performed in routine veterinary medicine practice. In this diagnostic test, semiquantitative measurement of urine biochemical substances is carried out using urinary dipstick. In the current study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of human urinary dipsticks to estimate pH, specific gravity (SpG), and protein in 80 urine specimens collected from horses. These parameters were measured using two commercial human dipsticks (KP and MN in abbreviation) and quantitative reference methods. The reference methods for pH, SpG, and protein were pH meter, handheld refractometer, and pyrogallol red method, respectively. The correlation between the semiquantitative dipstick analysis and quantitative reference methods was determined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Results: In general, our results revealed that the both human urinary dipsticks are unreliable tests for urinary pH, SpG, and protein content in horses. The analysis indicated that there was a poor correlation between the urine dipsticks and reference method (KP: r = 0.534 and MN: r = 0.485, Ps < 0.001) for protein. Additionally, there was a weak correlation between the results of pH measured using the urine dipsticks and reference method (KP: r = 0.445 and MN: r = 0.370, Ps < 0.001). Similar findings were obtained for SpG (KP: r = 0.285, MN: r = 0.338, Ps < 0.001). The estimation of proteinuria using the human dipsticks in horses lacked specificity, as many false positive protein results were obtained. Conclusions: We observed that the human commercial urinary dipsticks used in this study were not reliable to correctly estimate urine protein, SpG, and pH in horses.
Publication Date: 2019-07-12 PubMed ID: 31300054PubMed Central: PMC6626356DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-1998-2Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examines the efficacy of human urinary dipsticks in estimating pH, specific gravity, and protein in horse urine, and concludes they are unreliable for this purpose.

Research Objective

  • The aim of the research was to investigate the accuracy of human urinary dipsticks used to measure three parameters — pH, specific gravity (SpG), and protein — in horse urine. The reliability of these standard diagnostic tools, typically used in human patients, was evaluated against quantitative reference methods designed for animal testing.

Methodology

  • 80 urine samples were collected from horses and tested using two different commercial human urinary dipsticks (named KP and MN in the study).
  • The results from the dipstick tests were compared to those of reference methods for each parameter: a pH meter was used for pH, a handheld refractometer was used for SpG, and the pyrogallol red method was used for protein levels. The correlation between the dipstick analysis and the reference methods was determined through Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.

Results

  • Generally, the human urinary dipsticks proved unreliable in accurately estimating the pH, SpG, and protein content in the horse urine samples.
  • There was only a poor correlation between the protein results from the dipstick tests and the reference method (KP: r = 0.534 and MN: r = 0.485, P<0.001).
  • There was a weak correlation between the pH results from the dipstick tests and the reference method (KP: r = 0.445 and MN: r = 0.370, P<0.001).
  • Similar findings were obtained for SpG, with the correlations being the weakest (KP: r = 0.285, MN: r = 0.338, P<0.001).
  • Further, use of human dipsticks for detecting protein in horse urine often produced false positive results, indicating a serious lack of specificity.

Conclusion

  • The study emphasised that human commercial urinary dipsticks were not reliable for accurate estimation of urine protein, SpG, and pH in horses.
  • The inaccuracies and unreliability of these dipsticks in the veterinary context makes clear the need for specific diagnostic tools designed for animal urinalysis.

Cite This Article

APA
Hekmatynia F, Eskandarzadeh N, Imani M, Rezaei M, Zamani-Ahmadmahmudi M. (2019). The diagnostic performance of human urinary dipsticks to estimate urine pH, specific gravity (SpG), and protein in horses: are they reliable? BMC Vet Res, 15(1), 242. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1998-2

Publication

ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 1
Pages: 242
PII: 242

Researcher Affiliations

Hekmatynia, Fatemeh
  • Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, P.O Box: 76169133, Kerman, Iran.
Eskandarzadeh, Neda
  • Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Imani, Masoud
  • Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, P.O Box: 76169133, Kerman, Iran.
Rezaei, Mahdieh
  • Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, P.O Box: 76169133, Kerman, Iran.
Zamani-Ahmadmahmudi, Mohamad
  • Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, P.O Box: 76169133, Kerman, Iran. zamani_2012@uk.ac.ir.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Female
  • Horses / urine
  • Humans
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Male
  • Proteinuria / diagnosis
  • Proteinuria / veterinary
  • Reagent Strips / standards
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Specific Gravity
  • Urinalysis / instrumentation
  • Urinalysis / methods
  • Urinalysis / veterinary

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 16 references
  1. Bauer N, Rettig S, Moritz A. Evaluation the Clinitek status automated dipstick analysis device for semiquantitative testing of canine urine.. Res Vet Sci 2008 Dec;85(3):467-72.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2008.02.003pubmed: 18346768google scholar: lookup
  2. Ikonomov V, Melzer H, Nenov V, Stoicheva A, Stiller S, Mann H. Importance of sodium dodecyl sulfate pore-graduated polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the differential diagnostic of Balkan nephropathy.. Artif Organs 1999 Jan;23(1):75-80.
  3. Jung K. Urinary enzymes and low molecular weight proteins as markers of tubular dysfunction.. Kidney Int Suppl 1994 Nov;47:S29-33.
    pubmed: 7869668
  4. Defontis M, Bauer N, Failing K, Moritz A. Automated and visual analysis of commercial urinary dipsticks in dogs, cats and cattle.. Res Vet Sci 2013 Jun;94(3):440-5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.01.002pubmed: 23360686google scholar: lookup
  5. Reine NJ, Langston CE. Urinalysis interpretation: how to squeeze out the maximum information from a small sample.. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2005 Feb;20(1):2-10.
    doi: 10.1053/j.ctsap.2004.12.002pubmed: 15822525google scholar: lookup
  6. Raskin RE, Murray KA, Levy JK. Comparison of home monitoring methods for feline urine pH measurement.. Vet Clin Pathol 2002;31(2):51-5.
  7. Théron ML, Piane L, Lucarelli L, Henrion R, Layssol-Lamour C, Palanché F, Concordet D, Braun JD, Trumel C, Lavoué R. Effects of storage conditions on results for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of proteins in canine urine.. Am J Vet Res 2017 Aug;78(8):990-999.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.78.8.990pubmed: 28738002google scholar: lookup
  8. Welles EG, Whatley EM, Hall AS, Wright JC. Comparison of Multistix PRO dipsticks with other biochemical assays for determining urine protein (UP), urine creatinine (UC) and UP:UC ratio in dogs and cats.. Vet Clin Pathol 2006 Mar;35(1):31-6.
  9. Athanasiou LV, Katsoulos PD, Katsogiannou EG, Polizopoulou ZS, Diamantaki M, Kamatsos C, Christodoulopoulos G. Comparison between the urine dipstick and the pH-meter to assess urine pH in sheep and dogs.. Vet Clin Pathol 2018 Jun;47(2):284-288.
    doi: 10.1111/vcp.12581pubmed: 29406602google scholar: lookup
  10. Nappert G, Naylor JM. A comparison of pH determination methods in food animal practice.. Can Vet J 2001 May;42(5):364-7.
    pmc: PMC1476504pubmed: 11360858
  11. Johnson KY, Lulich JP, Osborne CA. Evaluation of the reproducibility and accuracy of pH-determining devices used to measure urine pH in dogs.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007 Feb 1;230(3):364-9.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.230.3.364pubmed: 17269867google scholar: lookup
  12. van Vonderen IK, Kooistra HS, de Bruijne JJ. [Evaluation of a test strip for the determination of urine specific gravity in the dog].. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 1995 Jul 1;120(13):400-2.
    pubmed: 7610450
  13. Holan KM, Kruger JM, Gibbons SN, Swenson CL. Clinical evaluation of a leukocyte esterase test-strip for detection of feline pyuria.. Vet Clin Pathol 1997;26(3):126-131.
  14. de Buys Roessingh AS, Drukker A, Guignard JP. Dipstick measurements of urine specific gravity are unreliable.. Arch Dis Child 2001 Aug;85(2):155-7.
    doi: 10.1136/adc.85.2.155pmc: PMC1718890pubmed: 11466191google scholar: lookup
  15. Papasouliotis K, Cue S, Crawford E, Pinches M, Dumont M, Burley K. Comparison of white blood cell differential percentages determined by the in-house LaserCyte hematology analyzer and a manual method.. Vet Clin Pathol 2006 Sep;35(3):295-302.
  16. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. 1. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1990.

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Yadav SN, Ahmed N, Nath AJ, Mahanta D, Kalita MK. Urinalysis in dog and cat: A review. Vet World 2020 Oct;13(10):2133-2141.
  2. Kovarikova S, Blahova J, Steffenova V, Vaskova N, Jahn P. Exploratory Study of the Urine Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio in Apparently Healthy Horses. Vet Sci 2025 Aug 21;12(8).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci12080783pubmed: 40872733google scholar: lookup
  3. Back JP, Bicca-Marques JC. Urinary health indicators in folivorous-frugivorous primates with and without food supplementation. Primates 2025 Jan;66(1):129-141.
    doi: 10.1007/s10329-024-01164-2pubmed: 39485588google scholar: lookup