Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2024; 11; 1393325; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1393325

The difference in radiographic findings in the distal limbs of working Lipizzan horses, used for dressage or driving.

Abstract: Lameness originating from the distal limb is common in sport horses and can vary depending on the dynamics of movement and the surface, with differences in shoeing exacerbating this variability. Driving horses work primarily on hard surfaces (pavement), whereas dressage horses work primarily on soft surfaces (riding arenas with sand). Driving horses are traditionally shod with small fixed studs made of hard metal, which are attached to the horseshoe at 4 points, while dressage horses are shod with a simple horseshoe. We investigated the hypothesis that there is a difference in the pathological radiographic findings of the distal limbs between driving and dressage horses. The variability in the stable management and training program was minimized by including horses from the same farm. Unassigned: Twenty horses in a driving training program and 20 horses in a dressage program were included in the study. Radiographs of the both front feet were obtained and quantitatively evaluated for radiographic changes by three surgery/diagnostic imaging specialists. Interrater reliability was measured, and multivariate analysis was performed to compare differences in pathological radiographic findings of the distal limbs between the two groups. Unassigned: Kendal's concordance coefficient indicated an agreement among raters (Kw ≠ 0) for all observations. Radiographic signs of degenerative joint disease of the distal interphalangeal joint were more common in the group of driving horses compared to dressage horses. Unassigned: Our hypothesis was confirmed, as there were significant pathological differences between groups in distal articular margin of middle phalanx, joint space narrowing, and irregular joint surface of the middle phalanx.
Publication Date: 2024-05-29 PubMed ID: 38868502PubMed Central: PMC11168202DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1393325Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on understanding the differences in pathological radiographic findings in the distal limbs of Lipizzan horses, segregated based on their usage – for driving or dressage. The study identifies more signs of degenerative joint disease in driving horses compared to dressage horses.

Research Overview

  • The research investigated the hypothesis that differences exist in the pathological radiographic findings between Lipizzan horses used for driving compared to those used for dressage.
  • The analysis was bound by the fact that driving horses primarily operate on hard surfaces (like pavement), and dressage horses on soft surfaces (like sand riding arenas).
  • This difference in operation surfaces leads to differences in shoeing, with driving horses shod with four-point fixed studs and dressage horses wearing a simple horseshoe.
  • Twenty horses from both sets (a total of forty) were included in the study, sourced from the same farm to minimize variability in stable management and training program.

Research Method

  • Radiographs of the front feet of all forty horses were obtained and analysed for pathological changes by three surgery/diagnostic imaging specialists.
  • To ensure consistency in findings, the interrater reliability was measured, and a multivariate analysis was performed to emphasize differences.
  • Kendal’s concordance coefficient was utilized to measure agreement among the evaluations made by the raters, thereby ensuring the reliability of the findings.

Research Findings

  • Radiographic signs indicative of degenerative joint disease of the distal interphalangeal joint were discovered to be more prevalent in horses used for driving.
  • The research further revealed significant pathological differences between the two groups in the distal articular margin of the middle phalanx, joint space narrowing, and irregular joint surface of the middle phalanx.

Conclusion

  • The research confirmed the study’s initial hypothesis, suggesting disparities in pathological radiographic findings between driving and dressage horses.
  • This lays ground for future exploration in addressing these issues appropriately according to the horse’s primary usage to enhance their health and performance.

Cite This Article

APA
Zalig V, Vengust M, Blagus R, Berner D, Sandow C, Hanna A, Miklavcic M. (2024). The difference in radiographic findings in the distal limbs of working Lipizzan horses, used for dressage or driving. Front Vet Sci, 11, 1393325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1393325

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Pages: 1393325

Researcher Affiliations

Zalig, Valentina
  • Veterina Marc, Sezana, Slovenia.
Vengust, Modest
  • Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Blagus, Rok
  • Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Berner, Dagmar
  • Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Sandow, Cole
  • Cole Sandow - Hagyard Equine Medical Institute, Lexington, KY, United States.
Hanna, Ashley
  • Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Miklavcic, Mitja
  • UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA, United States.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 30 references
  1. Johnson SA, Donnell JR, Donnell AD, Frisbie DD. Retrospective analysis of lameness localisation in Western performance horses: a ten-year review. Equine Vet J (2021) 53:1150–8.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13397pubmed: 33617019google scholar: lookup
  2. Dyson SJ, Murray R, Schramme MC. Lameness associated with foot pain: results of magnetic resonance imaging in 199 horses (January 2001-December 2003) and response to treatment. Equine Vet J (2005) 37:113–21.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054223804pubmed: 15779622google scholar: lookup
  3. Parkes RS, Richard Newton J, Dyson SJ. An investigation of risk factors for foot-related lameness in a United Kingdom referral population of horses. Vet J (2013) 196:218–25.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.09.006pubmed: 23122618google scholar: lookup
  4. Dyson S. Lameness and Poor Performance in the Sports Horse: Dressage, Show Jumping and Horse Trials (Eventing). 2000 AAEP Convention Proceedings (2000) 308–315.
  5. Murray RC, Walters JM, Snart H, Dyson SJ, Parkin TD. Identification of risk factors for lameness in dressage horses. Vet J (2010) 184:27–36.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.020pubmed: 19369100google scholar: lookup
  6. Murray RC, Walters J, Snart H, Dyson S, Parkin T. How do features of dressage arenas influence training surface properties which are potentially associated with lameness?. Vet J (2010) 186:172–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.04.026pubmed: 20888276google scholar: lookup
  7. Crevier-Denoix N, Robin D, Pourcelot P, Falala S, Holden L, Estoup P. Ground reaction force and kinematic analysis of limb loading on two different beach sand tracks in harness trotters. Equine Vet J (2010) 42:544–51.
  8. Maher O. Jumping, Eventing and dressage horse. Adams and Stashak’s Lamenesss in horses 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; (2020). 986–97.
  9. Thomason JJ, Biewener AA, Bertram JE. Surface strain on the equine Hoof Wall in vivo: implications for the material design and functional morphology of the wall. J Exp Biol (1992) 166:145–68.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.166.1.145google scholar: lookup
  10. Janet BA, Christopher CM, Sue DJ, Svend KE. Clinical radiology of the horse. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; (2017).
  11. Team RC. A language and enviroment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput (2021):20–8.
  12. Signorell A, Aho K, Alfons A, Anderegg N, Aragon T, Arachchige C. DescTools: tools for descriptive statistics. R package version (2021).
  13. Ripeley A.C.. boot: Bootstrap R (S-plus) Functions. R package version (2021) 1.3-27.
  14. Højsgaard S, Halekoh U, Yan J. The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw (2005) 15:1–11.
    doi: 10.18637/jss.v015.i02google scholar: lookup
  15. Lepeule J, Seegers H, Rondeau V, Robert C, Denoix JM, Bareille N. Risk factors for the presence and extent of developmental Orthopaedic disease in the limbs of young horses: insights from a count model. Prev Vet Med (2011) 101:96–106.
  16. Dyhre-Poulsen P, Smedegaard HH, Roed J, Korsgaard E. Equine hoof function investigated by pressure transducers inside the hoof and accelerometers mounted on the first phalanx. Equine Vet J (1994) 26:362–6.
  17. Thomason JJ. Variation in surface strain on the equine hoof wall at the midstep with shoeing, gait, substrate, direction of travel, and hoof shape. Equine Vet J Suppl (1998) 30:86–95.
  18. Trotter GW. Hoof balance in equine lameness. J Equine Vet (2004) 24:494.
  19. Dyson S. Is there an association between conformation and lameness?. UK-Vet Equine (2018) 2:57–61.
    doi: 10.12968/ukve.2018.2.2.57google scholar: lookup
  20. Johnston C, Back W. Hoof ground interaction: when biomechanical stimuli challenge the tissues of the distal limb. Equine Vet J (2006) 38:634–41.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406X158341pubmed: 17228578google scholar: lookup
  21. Holden-Douilly L, Pourcelot P, Desquilbet L, Falala S, Crevier-Denoix N, Chateau H. Equine hoof slip distance during trot at training speed: comparison between kinematic and accelerometric measurement techniques. Vet J (2013) 197:198.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.02.004pubmed: 23489849google scholar: lookup
  22. Dittmer KE, Firth EC. Mechanisms of bone response to injury. J Vet Diagnostic Investig (2017) 29:385–95.
    doi: 10.1177/1040638716679861pubmed: 28061633google scholar: lookup
  23. Cardoso M, Alexandre N, Bettencourt E, Alexandre N, Bettencourt E, Monteiro S. Prevalence of radiographic signs of osteoarthritis in Lusitano purebred horses. J Equine Vet Sci 94:103196.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103196pubmed: 33077091google scholar: lookup
  24. Peter VG, O’Keeffe TA, Smith LCR, Schweizer-Gorgas D. Radiographic identification of osseous cyst-like lesions in the distal phalanx in 22 lame thoroughbred horses managed conservatively and their racing performance. Front Vet Sci (2018) 5:286.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00286pmc: PMC6262755pubmed: 30525046google scholar: lookup
  25. Wilson AM, McGuigan MP, Fouracre L, MacMahon L. The force and contact stress on the navicular bone during trot locomotion in sound horses and horses with navicular disease. Equine Vet J (2001) 33:159–65.
  26. Dyson S. Radiological interpretation of the navicular bone. Equine Vet Educ (2011) 23:73–87.
  27. Tivey MEL, Van Dijk J, Dyson S. Extensive ossification of the ungular cartilages and other osseous abnormalities of the proximal and distal phalanges. Equine Vet Educ (2020) 32:25–30.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13165google scholar: lookup
  28. Holm AW, Bjørnstad G, Ruohoniemi M. Ossification of the cartilages in the front feet of young Norwegian coldblooded horses. Equine Vet J (2000) 32:156–60.
    doi: 10.2746/042516400777591642pubmed: 10743972google scholar: lookup
  29. Barrett M. Radiography. Adams and Stashak’s Lamenesss in horses vol. 211. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; (2020).
  30. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics (1977) 33:159–74.
    doi: 10.2307/2529310pubmed: 843571google scholar: lookup