Analyze Diet
PloS one2016; 11(5); e0154179; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154179

The Effect of Noseband Tightening on Horses’ Behavior, Eye Temperature, and Cardiac Responses.

Abstract: Restrictive nosebands are common in equestrian sport. This is concerning, as recent evidence suggests that very tight nosebands can cause a physiological stress response, and may compromise welfare. The objective of the current study was to investigate relationships that noseband tightness has with oral behavior and with physiological changes that indicate a stress response, such as increases in eye temperature (measured with infrared thermography) and heart rate and decreases in heart rate variability (HRV). Horses (n = 12) wearing a double bridle and crank noseband, as is common in dressage at elite levels, were randomly assigned to four treatments: unfastened noseband (UN), conventional area under noseband (CAUN) with two fingers of space available under the noseband, half conventional area under noseband (HCAUN) with one finger of space under the noseband, and no area under the noseband (NAUN). During the tightest treatment (NAUN), horse heart rate increased (P = 0.003), HRV decreased (P < 0.001), and eye temperature increased (P = 0.011) compared with baseline readings, indicating a physiological stress response. The behavioral results suggest some effects from bits alone but the chief findings are the physiological readings that reflect responses to the nosebands at their tightest. Chewing decreased during the HCAUN (P < 0.001) and NAUN (P < 0.001) treatments. Yawning rates were negligible in all treatments. Similarly, licking was eliminated by the NAUN treatment. Following the removal of the noseband and double bridle during the recovery session, yawning (P = 0.015), swallowing (P = 0.003), and licking (P < 0.001) significantly increased compared with baseline, indicating a post-inhibitory rebound response. This suggests a rise in motivation to perform these behaviors and implies that their inhibition may place horses in a state of deprivation. It is evident that a very tight noseband can cause physiological stress responses and inhibit the expression of oral behaviors.
Publication Date: 2016-05-03 PubMed ID: 27140187PubMed Central: PMC4854461DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154179Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates the relationship between the tightness of a horse’s noseband (a common piece of equestrian equipment) and its impact on the horse’s stress levels and behaviors. The research found that very tight nosebands can lead to physiological stress responses and inhibit natural oral behaviors in horses.

Research Methodology

  • The research involved 12 horses wearing a double bridle and crank noseband, a type of gear typically used in elite dressage events.
  • The horses were randomly assigned to four different treatments: unfastened noseband (UN), conventional area under noseband (CAUN) with two fingers of space available under the noseband, half conventional area under noseband (HCAUN) with one finger of space under the noseband, and no area under the noseband (NAUN).

Measurements and Observations

  • The researchers measured physiological changes indicative of stress responses. This includes increased heart rate, decreased heart rate variability (HRV), and increased eye temperature (measured using infrared thermography).
  • Behaviors like chewing, yawning, and licking were also monitored to observe if there were any variations based on the tightness of the noseband.
  • On removal of the noseband, there was a rebound in yawning, swallowing, and licking compared to their baseline rates, suggesting a rise in the motivation to perform these suppressed behaviors. This suggested that inhibiting these actions possibly placed the horses in a state of deprivation.

Research Findings

  • During the NAUN treatment (no area under the noseband), the horses’ heart rate increased and HRV decreased compared to their baselines, indicating a physiological stress response.
  • Eye temperature also increased during NAUN treatment, underlining the physiological stress placed on the horses.
  • Chewing decreased significantly during the HCAUN (one finger of space under the noseband) and NAUN treatments, suggesting that the noseband tightness inhibited normal oral behaviors.
  • Licking was entirely eliminated by the NAUN treatment, further confirming that extreme tightness of a noseband can negatively impact normal horse behaviors.
  • Yawning rates were negligible across all treatments.

Implications of Findings

  • The findings suggest that very tight nosebands, commonly used in equestrian sports, can cause physiological stress responses in horses and inhibit their natural oral behaviors.
  • This has welfare implications suggesting a need for a review in guidelines for the use of nosebands in equestrian practices and possibly the design of this equipment to ensure the comfort and well-being of horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Fenner K, Yoon S, White P, Starling M, McGreevy P. (2016). The Effect of Noseband Tightening on Horses’ Behavior, Eye Temperature, and Cardiac Responses. PLoS One, 11(5), e0154179. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154179

Publication

ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 5
Pages: e0154179

Researcher Affiliations

Fenner, Kate
  • Kandoo Equine, Towrang, New South Wales, Australia.
Yoon, Samuel
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
White, Peter
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Starling, Melissa
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
McGreevy, Paul
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Body Temperature
  • Eye
  • Heart Rate
  • Horses / physiology
  • Restraint, Physical / physiology
  • Software
  • Stress, Physiological

Conflict of Interest Statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 26 references
  1. McGreevy PD, McLean AN. Equitation Science. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. 314 p..
  2. Fédération Equestre Internationale. Dressage Rules. Lausanne, Switzerland: FEI; 2015. [20 August, 2015]. 25:[Available from: https://www.fei.org/sites/default/files/DRE-Rules_2015_GAapproved_black.pdf.
  3. Manfredi J, Clayton HM, Derksen FJ. Effects of different bits and bridles on frequency of induced swallowing in cantering horses. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 2005;2(4):241–4.
    doi: 10.1079/ecp200569google scholar: lookup
  4. ISES. Position Statement on Restrictive Noseband. International Society for Equitation Science; 2012. [20 August, 2015]. Available from: http://www.equitationscience.com/documents/Statements/RestrictiveNosebands_Jan2012.pdf.
  5. McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior-Clinical Applications and Research 2010;5(4):187–95.
  6. McGreevy P, Warren-Smith A, Guisard Y. The effect of double bridles and jaw-clamping crank nosebands on temperature of eyes and facial skin of horses. Journal of Veterinary Behavior-Clinical Applications and Research 2012;7(3):142–8.
  7. Casey V, McGreevy PD, O'Muiris E, Doherty O. A preliminary report on estimating the pressures exerted by a crank noseband in the horse. Journal of Veterinary Behavior-Clinical Applications and Research 2013;8(6):479–84.
  8. Freire R, Buckley P, Cooper JJ. Effects of different forms of exercise on post inhibitory rebound and unwanted behaviour in stabled horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41(5):487–92.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309x383883pubmed: 19642410google scholar: lookup
  9. Nicol C. Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction. Animal Behaviour 1987;35:1709–19.
  10. McGreevy PD. Right under our noses. Equine Veterinary Education 2015;27(10):503–4.
  11. Yarnell K, Hall C, Royle C, Walker SL. Domesticated horses differ in their behavioural and physiological responses to isolated and group housing. Physiology & Behavior 2015;143:51–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.040pubmed: 25725117google scholar: lookup
  12. Stewart M, Stafford KJ, Dowling SK, Schaefer AL, Webster JR. Eye temperature and heart rate variability of calves disbí·­ with or without local anaesthetic. Physiology & Behavior 2008;93(4–5):789–97.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.11.044pubmed: 18177678google scholar: lookup
  13. Quick JS, Warren-Smith AK. Preliminary investigations of horses' (Equus caballus) responses to different bridles during foundation training. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 2009;4(4):169–76.
  14. Visser EK, van Reenen CG, van der Werf JTN, Schilder MBH, Knaap JH, Barneveld A. Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and a handling test in young horses. Physiology & Behavior 2002;76(2):289–96.
    doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00698-4pubmed: 12044602google scholar: lookup
  15. Rietmann TR, Stuart AEA, Bernasconi P, Staï¬her M, Auer JA, Weishaupt MA. Assessment of mental stress in warmblood horses: heart rate variability in comparison to heart rate and selected behavioural parameters. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2004;88(1):121–36.
  16. Ashley FH, Waterman-Pearson AE, Whay HR. Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies. Equine Veterinary Journal 2005;37(6):565–75.
    doi: 10.2746/042516405775314826pubmed: 16295937google scholar: lookup
  17. Von Borell E, Langbein J, Despres G, Hansen S, Leterrier C, Marchant-Forde J. Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals—A review. Physiology & Behavior 2007;92(3):293–316.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.007pubmed: 17320122google scholar: lookup
  18. Pierard M, Hall C, König von Borstel U, Hawson LA, McLean A, Averis A. Evolving protocols for research in equitation science. Jorunal of Veterinary Behaviour: Clinical Applications nad Research 2015;10(3):255–66.
  19. Stewart M, Webster JR, Verkerk GA, Schaefer AL, Colyn JJ, Stafford KJ. Non-invasive measurement of stress in dairy cows using infrared thermography. Physiology & Behavior 2007;92(3):520–5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.04.034pubmed: 17555778google scholar: lookup
  20. Valera M, Bartolome E, Jose Sanchez M, Molina A, Cook N, Schaefer A. Changes in Eye Temperature and Stress Assessment in Horses During Show Jumping Competitions. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2012;32(12):827–30.
  21. Dai F, Cogi NH, Heinzl EUL, Dalla Costa E, Canali E, Minero M. Validation of a fear test in sport horses using infrared thermography. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 2014.
  22. Webster AJF. Animal welfare: a cool eye towards Eden. London: Blackwell Science; 1994.
  23. Fureix C, Gorecka-Bruzda A, Gautier E, Hausberger M. Cooccurrence of yawning and stereotypic behaviour in horses (Equus caballus). ISRN Zoology 2011;2011:271209-Article ID 10.5402/2011/271209.
    doi: 10.5402/2011/271209google scholar: lookup
  24. Greco M, Baenningre R, Govern J. On the context of yawning: when, where, and why?. The Psychological Record 1993;42(2):175.
  25. Gallup AC, Gallup GG. Yawning and thermoregulation. Physiology & Behavior 2008;95:10–6.
    pubmed: 18550130
  26. Miller ML, Gallup AC, Vogel AR, Clark AB. Handling stress initially inhibits, but then potentiates yawning in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Animal Behaviour 2010;80(4):615–9.

Citations

This article has been cited 41 times.
  1. Henshall C, McGreevy P, Shea G, Doherty O, Christensen JW, Fenner K, Warren-Smith A, McLean A. Commentary on MacKechnie-Guire et al. Measuring Noseband Tightness on the Lateral Aspect of the Horse's Face. Animals 2015, 15, 537. Animals (Basel) 2026 Jan 28;16(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani16030412pubmed: 41681393google scholar: lookup
  2. Doherty O, Conway R, McGreevy P. Using an Equine Cadaver Head to Investigate Associations Between Sub-Noseband Space, Noseband Tension, and Sub-Noseband Pressure at Three Locations. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 19;15(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15142141pubmed: 40723604google scholar: lookup
  3. Uldahl M, Mellor DJ. Regulatory Integrity and Welfare in Horse Sport: A Constructively Critical Perspective. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jun 30;15(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15131934pubmed: 40646833google scholar: lookup
  4. Jardat P, Yamamoto S, Ringhofer M, Tanguy-Guillo N, Parias C, Reigner F, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Emotional contagion of fear and joy from humans to horses using a combination of facial and vocal cues. Sci Rep 2025 May 21;15(1):17689.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98794-3pubmed: 40399542google scholar: lookup
  5. MacKechnie-Guire R, Clayton H, Williams J, Marlin D, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Murray RC. Comparison of Rein Forces and Pressure Beneath the Noseband and Headpiece of a Snaffle Bridle and a Double Bridle. Animals (Basel) 2025 Apr 5;15(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15071058pubmed: 40218450google scholar: lookup
  6. MacKechnie-Guire R, Clayton H, Williams J, Marlin D, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Murray R. Measuring Noseband Tightness on the Lateral Aspect of the Horse's Face. Animals (Basel) 2025 Feb 13;15(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15040537pubmed: 40003019google scholar: lookup
  7. Fletcher KA, Padalino B, Felici M, Bigi D, Limon-Vega G, Grist A, Gibson TJ. Assessment of ante mortem welfare indicators and the pathophysiology of captive-bolt trauma in equids at slaughter. Anim Welf 2024;33:e65.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.70pubmed: 39777369google scholar: lookup
  8. Fletcher K, Limon G, Agongo E, Akunzule A, Essel G, Padalino B, Grist A, Gibson TJ. Assessment of Donkey (Equus asinus) Welfare at Slaughter in Ghana. Animals (Basel) 2024 Dec 19;14(24).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14243673pubmed: 39765577google scholar: lookup
  9. Clayton HM, Murray R, Williams JM, Walker V, Fisher M, Fisher D, Nixon J, Mackechnie-Guire R. Facial pressure beneath a cavesson noseband adjusted to different tightness levels during standing and chewing. Equine Vet J 2025 Jul;57(4):1127-1137.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14451pubmed: 39710981google scholar: lookup
  10. Hall C, Kay R. Living the good life? A systematic review of behavioural signs of affective state in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) and factors relating to quality of life. Part 2: Horse-human interactions. Anim Welf 2024;33:e41.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.41pubmed: 39469043google scholar: lookup
  11. König von Borstel U, Kienapfel K, McLean A, Wilkins C, McGreevy P. Hyperflexing the horse's neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2024 Oct 2;14(1):22886.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72766-5pubmed: 39358404google scholar: lookup
  12. MacKechnie-Guire R, Murray R, Williams JM, Nixon J, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Clayton HM. Noseband type and tightness level affect pressure on the horse's face at trot. Equine Vet J 2025 May;57(3):774-788.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14420pubmed: 39305099google scholar: lookup
  13. Scholler D, Wittenberg J, Zablotski Y, May A. Do tight nosebands have an effect on the upper airways of horses?. Vet Med Sci 2024 Jul;10(4):e1478.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.1478pubmed: 38885311google scholar: lookup
  14. Comin M, Atallah E, Chincarini M, Mazzola SM, Canali E, Minero M, Cozzi B, Rossi E, Vignola G, Dalla Costa E. Events with Different Emotional Valence Affect the Eye's Lacrimal Caruncle Temperature Changes in Sheep. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 22;14(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14010050pubmed: 38200782google scholar: lookup
  15. Goma AA, Uddin J, Kieson E. Lateralised Behavioural Responses in Livestock to Environmental Stressors: Implications for Using Infrared Thermography to Assess Welfare Conditions. Animals (Basel) 2023 Nov 27;13(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13233663pubmed: 38067014google scholar: lookup
  16. Kim SM, Cho GJ. Analysis of Various Facial Expressions of Horses as a Welfare Indicator Using Deep Learning. Vet Sci 2023 Apr 10;10(4).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci10040283pubmed: 37104439google scholar: lookup
  17. Scholler D, Zablotski Y, May A. Evaluation of Substance P as a New Stress Parameter in Horses in a Stress Model Involving Four Different Stress Levels. Animals (Basel) 2023 Mar 24;13(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13071142pubmed: 37048398google scholar: lookup
  18. Merkies K, Copelin C, Small N, Young J. Noseband Fit: Measurements and Perceptions of Canadian Equestrians. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 6;12(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12192685pubmed: 36230425google scholar: lookup
  19. Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 5;12(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
  20. de Mira MC, Lamy E, Santos R, Williams J, Pinto MV, Martins PS, Rodrigues P, Marlin D. Salivary cortisol and eye temperature changes during endurance competitions. BMC Vet Res 2021 Oct 14;17(1):329.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02985-9pubmed: 34649565google scholar: lookup
  21. Travain T, Valsecchi P. Infrared Thermography in the Study of Animals' Emotional Responses: A Critical Review. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 26;11(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11092510pubmed: 34573476google scholar: lookup
  22. Contalbrigo L, Borgi M, De Santis M, Collacchi B, Tuozzi A, Toson M, Redaelli V, Odore R, Vercelli C, Stefani A, Luzi F, Valle E, Cirulli F. Equine-Assisted Interventions (EAIs) for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD): Behavioural and Physiological Indices of Stress in Domestic Horses (Equus caballus) during Riding Sessions. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 27;11(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061562pubmed: 34071859google scholar: lookup
  23. McKenzie J, Fenner K, Hyde M, Anzulewicz A, Burattini B, Romness N, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Equine Responses to Acceleration and Deceleration Cues May Reflect Their Exposure to Multiple Riders. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 31;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010066pubmed: 33396451google scholar: lookup
  24. Fenner K, Dashper K, Serpell J, McLean A, Wilkins C, Klinck M, Wilson B, McGreevy P. The Development of a Novel Questionnaire Approach to the Investigation of Horse Training, Management, and Behaviour. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 24;10(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10111960pubmed: 33114408google scholar: lookup
  25. Rørvang MV, Nielsen BL, McLean AN. Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:633.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633pubmed: 33033724google scholar: lookup
  26. Pérez-Manrique L, León-Pérez K, Zamora-Sánchez E, Davies S, Ober C, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Prevalence and Distribution of Lesions in the Nasal Bones and Mandibles of a Sample of 144 Riding Horses. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 16;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091661pubmed: 32947819google scholar: lookup
  27. Bergmann IM. Naturalness and the Legitimacy of Thoroughbred Racing: A Photo-Elicitation Study with Industry and Animal Advocacy Informants. Animals (Basel) 2020 Aug 26;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091513pubmed: 32859112google scholar: lookup
  28. Starling M, Spurrett A, McGreevy P. A Pilot Study of Methods for Evaluating the Effects of Arousal and Emotional Valence on Performance of Racing Greyhounds. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jun 15;10(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061037pubmed: 32549411google scholar: lookup
  29. Sutherland MA, Worth GM, Dowling SK, Lowe GL, Cave VM, Stewart M. Evaluation of infrared thermography as a non-invasive method of measuring the autonomic nervous response in sheep. PLoS One 2020;15(5):e0233558.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233558pubmed: 32469977google scholar: lookup
  30. Weller D, Franklin S, Shea G, White P, Fenner K, Wilson B, Wilkins C, McGreevy P. The Reported Use of Nosebands in Racing and Equestrian Pursuits. Animals (Basel) 2020 Apr 30;10(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10050776pubmed: 32365844google scholar: lookup
  31. Mellor DJ. Mouth Pain in Horses: Physiological Foundations, Behavioural Indices, Welfare Implications, and a Suggested Solution. Animals (Basel) 2020 Mar 29;10(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10040572pubmed: 32235343google scholar: lookup
  32. Kau S, Potz IK, Pospisil K, Sellke L, Schramel JP, Peham C. Bit type exerts an influence on self-controlled rein tension in unridden horses. Sci Rep 2020 Feb 12;10(1):2420.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59400-wpubmed: 32051498google scholar: lookup
  33. Visser EK, Kuypers MMF, Stam JSM, Riedstra B. Practice of Noseband Use and Intentions Towards Behavioural Change in Dutch Equestrians. Animals (Basel) 2019 Dec 12;9(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121131pubmed: 31842468google scholar: lookup
  34. Maśko M, Zdrojkowski L, Domino M, Jasinski T, Gajewski Z. The Pattern of Superficial Body Temperatures in Leisure Horses Lunged with Commonly Used Lunging Aids. Animals (Basel) 2019 Dec 7;9(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121095pubmed: 31817842google scholar: lookup
  35. Fenner K, Caspar G, Hyde M, Henshall C, Dhand N, Probyn-Rapsey F, Dashper K, McLean A, McGreevy P. It's all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament. PLoS One 2019;14(5):e0216699.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216699pubmed: 31086385google scholar: lookup
  36. Redaelli V, Luzi F, Mazzola S, Bariffi GD, Zappaterra M, Nanni Costa L, Padalino B. The Use of Infrared Thermography (IRT) as Stress Indicator in Horses Trained for Endurance: A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel) 2019 Mar 7;9(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9030084pubmed: 30866503google scholar: lookup
  37. Zakari FO, Ayo JO, Rekwot PI, Kawu MU, Minka NS. Daily rhythms of rectal and body surface temperatures in donkeys during the cold-dry (harmattan) and hot-dry seasons in a tropical savannah. Int J Biometeorol 2018 Dec;62(12):2231-2243.
    doi: 10.1007/s00484-018-1626-zpubmed: 30374600google scholar: lookup
  38. Zakari FO, Ayo JO, Rekwot PI, Kawu MU, Minka NS. Diurnal rhythms of heart and respiratory rates in donkeys of different age groups during the cold-dry and hot-dry seasons in a tropical savannah. Physiol Rep 2018 Sep;6(17):e13855.
    doi: 10.14814/phy2.13855pubmed: 30187687google scholar: lookup
  39. McGreevy P, Berger J, de Brauwere N, Doherty O, Harrison A, Fiedler J, Jones C, McDonnell S, McLean A, Nakonechny L, Nicol C, Preshaw L, Thomson P, Tzioumis V, Webster J, Wolfensohn S, Yeates J, Jones B. Using the Five Domains Model to Assess the Adverse Impacts of Husbandry, Veterinary, and Equitation Interventions on Horse Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2018 Mar 18;8(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani8030041pubmed: 29562654google scholar: lookup
  40. Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ. Equine Welfare during Exercise: An Evaluation of Breathing, Breathlessness and Bridles. Animals (Basel) 2017 May 26;7(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani7060041pubmed: 28587125google scholar: lookup
  41. Doherty O, Conway T, Conway R, Murray G, Casey V. An Objective Measure of Noseband Tightness and Its Measurement Using a Novel Digital Tightness Gauge. PLoS One 2017;12(1):e0168996.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168996pubmed: 28045955google scholar: lookup