Abstract: Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of antibiotic-containing extender of on sperm quality and control of bacterial growth. In Experiment 1, ejaculates were diluted in extender containing no antibiotics, potassium penicillin G-amikacin disulfate (PEN-AMIK), ticarcillin disodium-potassium clavulanate (TICAR-CLAV), piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium (PIP-TAZ), or meropenem (MERO). In freshly extended semen, only slight differences were detected among some antibiotic treatments for total sperm motility, curvilinear velocity, and viable acrosome-intact sperm (P < 0.05). In cool-stored semen, slight differences were also detected among certain antibiotic treatments for curvilinear velocity and chromatin integrity (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, ejaculates were diluted in extender and subjected to no bacterial spiking, or inoculated with lower or higher doses of K. pneumoniae or P. aeruginosa. Following cooled storage of semen, colony forming units/ml (CFU/mL) were less in PEN-AMIK (706 ± 244) and MERO (1576 ± 1076) treatment groups than in TICAR-CLAV (4678 ± 1388) or PIP-TAZ (8108 ± 3198) treatment groups (P < 0.05). The CFU/mL were lower in all antibiotic-containing treatment groups than the control group (18478 ± 4374; P < 0.05). The percentage of culture plates containing no bacterial growth in unspiked semen was greater in PEN-AMIK (75%) than PIP-TAZ (15%) or TICAR-CLAV (20%; P < 0.05). The percentages of culture plates containing no bacterial growth in semen spiked with a lower doses of K. pneumoniae or P. aeruginosa were higher in PEN-AMIK (70% and 50%, respectively) then in all other treatment groups (0-40% and 0-15% for K. pneumonia and P. aeruginosa, respectively; P < 0.05); however, complete control of bacterial load was only modest even with PEN-AMIK. In both experiments, freezing and thawing extender prior to use did not have any appreciable detrimental effect on sperm quality or antibiotic efficacy. In summary, all antibiotics tested had minimal effects on measures of sperm quality in fresh or cool-stored semen extenders; however, PEN-AMIK, followed by MERO, yielded the best results in terms of antimicrobial efficacy. None of the antibiotic types controlled bacterial growth, in comparison with the antibiotic-free control group, when extended semen was spiked with a high concentration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cooled storage of extended semen reduced bacterial growth in comparison with freshly extended semen.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study assesses the effects different antibiotics and their storage methods can have on the quality of stallion sperm and the control of bacterial growth. The findings reveal subtle differences in sperm quality based on the antibiotic used, with PEN-AMIK and MERO having the best antibacterial efficacy, but none of the antibiotics significantly controlling bacterial growth when faced with a high concentration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Objective of the Research
The main objective of this research was to determine the influence of different antibiotics and storage methods on the quality of stallion sperm and their effectiveness in controlling bacterial growth. Two experiments were conducted to achieve this aim.
Investigations and Findings
Experiment 1 involved diluting ejaculates with extenders containing different antibiotics. These antibiotics were potassium penicillin G-amikacin disulfate (PEN-AMIK), ticarcillin disodium-potassium clavulanate (TICAR-CLAV), piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium (PIP-TAZ), and meropenem (MERO). In freshly extended semen, some antibiotic treatments showed slight differences in total sperm motility, curvilinear velocity, and viable acrosome-intact sperm. These differences were also noted in cool-stored semen, where slight differences were seen in curvilinear velocity and chromatin integrity.
Experiment 2 involved diluting ejaculates with an extender that then either had no bacterial spiking, or a low or high dose of K. pneumoniae or P. aeruginosa added. After cooled storage, fewer signs of bacterial growth (colony forming units/ml or CFU/mL) were seen in the PEN-AMIK and MERO treatment groups as compared to the TICAR-CLAV or PIP-TAZ groups. Still, none of the antibiotic types completely controlled bacterial growth, especially when the semen had been spiked with a high concentration of P. aeruginosa.
Significance in Results
The results reveal that the type of antibiotic used can subtly affect the quality of stallion sperm, specifically their motility, curvilinear velocity, chromatin integrity, and acrosome intactness. Additionally, these results show that while antibiotics can reduce bacterial growth, they may not completely eliminate it, especially in the case of high concentrations of certain bacteria.
The experiment also showed that freezing and thawing the extender before usage didn’t negatively impact sperm quality or the efficacy of the antibiotics.
Overall, it was concluded that of the antibiotics tested, PEN-AMIK and MERO yielded the best results in terms of both sperm quality and antimicrobial efficacy.
Impact of the Study
The findings of this study could contribute to improvements in the process of storing and preserving stallion sperm, potentially increasing fertility rates of insemination.
The findings also highlight the need for further investigation into effective methods to completely control bacterial growth in extended semen.
Cite This Article
APA
Hernández-Avilés C, Serafini R, Love CC, Teague SR, LaCaze KA, Lawhon SD, Wu J, Blanchard TL, Varner DD.
(2018).
The effects of antibiotic type and extender storage method on sperm quality and antibacterial effectiveness in fresh and cooled-stored stallion semen.
Theriogenology, 122, 23-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.08.022
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Serafini, R
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Love, C C
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Teague, S R
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
LaCaze, K A
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Lawhon, S D
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Wu, J
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Blanchard, T L
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Varner, D D
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. Electronic address: dvarner@cvm.tamu.edu.
MeSH Terms
Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
Horses
Male
Semen / microbiology
Semen Analysis / veterinary
Semen Preservation / methods
Semen Preservation / veterinary
Sperm Motility
Spermatozoa / drug effects
Spermatozoa / physiology
Citations
This article has been cited 7 times.
Ghoneim IM, Al-Mubarak AH, Fayez MM, Waheed MM, El-Bahr SM. Impact of antibiotics on spermatozoa quality and bacterial load of chilled-stored camels (Camelus dromedarius) semen. Trop Anim Health Prod 2021 Dec 22;54(1):21.
Santos CS, Silva AR. Current and alternative trends in antibacterial agents used in mammalian semen technology. Anim Reprod 2020 Mar 17;17(1):e20190111.