FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2006; 70(4); 317-320;

The effects of equine skin preparation on transdermal drug penetration in vitro.

Abstract: An increasing number of formulations are applied to equine skin, yet variable penetration can affect efficacy, or the incidence of adverse effects, or both. To investigate the effects of common methods of skin preparation on transdermal drug penetration in vitro, we clipped, harvested, and froze skin samples from 5 Thoroughbred geldings. Thawed samples were prepared as follows: control (no preparation); cleaned with aqueous chlorhexidine (Aq-C, 0.1% w/v); cleaned with alcoholic chlorhexidine (Al-C, 0.5% w/v); shaved (Sh); or tape-stripped (Ta) with the use of adhesive tape. The samples were then placed in diffusion cells, and 2 g of methylsalicylate (MeSa) gel (Dencorub) was applied to the stratum corneum side. The penetration of MeSa and its analyte, salicylate (Sa), through the skin samples was measured over 10 h. Compared with control skin, significantly more MeSa penetrated through skin prepared with Al-C or Sh (P < 0.01) or with Aq-C or Ta (P < 0.05), and significantly more Sa was recovered in the receptor phase from skin prepared with Aq-C, Al-C, or Sh (P < 0.05) or with Ta (P < 0.01). A significantly higher rate of penetration and shorter lag time were also noted for MeSa with all the prepared skin samples, compared with the control samples. The results show that clinical techniques routinely used to clean or prepare skin can significantly affect the rate and extent of penetration of a topically applied drug. This may result in greater systemic availability of active drug, which could lead to enhanced efficacy and, possibly, a higher incidence of adverse effects. stratum corneum. P < P < P < P < (Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier)
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2006-10-18 PubMed ID: 17042388PubMed Central: PMC1562528
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates how different methods of equine skin preparation can affect the penetration of drugs applied transdermally, or through the skin. It finds that routine preparation techniques can significantly affect how quickly and how much of a drug is absorbed, potentially improving efficacy and influencing side effects.

Methods

  • The researchers studied the skin of five Thoroughbred geldings, a breed of horse.
  • The skin samples were harvested, frozen, and then thawed to be prepared in different ways.
  • These preparation methods included no preparation (control), cleaning with aqueous chlorhexidine, cleaning with alcoholic chlorhexidine, shaving, or tape-stripping with adhesive tape.
  • The skin samples were then placed in diffusion cells, and a gel containing the drug methylsalicylate was applied to each one.
  • The researchers assessed how much of the drug, along with its analyte salicylate, penetrated through the skin samples over a period of 10 hours.

Results

  • Compared to the skin samples that were not prepared, the ones cleaned with alcoholic chlorhexidine or shaved allowed significantly more of the drug to penetrate through.
  • Similarly, more of the drug was also absorbed through the skin cleaned with aqueous chlorhexidine or tape-stripped.
  • The rate of drug penetration was also significantly higher for all the prepared skin samples compared to the control samples.
  • Additionally, there was a shorter lag time before the drug began to penetrate the prepared skin samples.

Implications

  • This research shows that common clinical techniques used to prepare equine skin can affect how a drug is absorbed when it is applied topically.
  • If more of the active drug becomes systemically available because of skin preparation methods, this could potentially increase its effectiveness.
  • However, this same factor could potentially also raise the incidence of adverse effects related to the drug.
  • As such, this research underscores the importance of factoring in skin preparation techniques when considering the effects and effectiveness of transdermal drug applications.

Cite This Article

APA
Mills PC, Cross SE. (2006). The effects of equine skin preparation on transdermal drug penetration in vitro. Can J Vet Res, 70(4), 317-320.

Publication

Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire
ISSN: 0830-9000
NlmUniqueID: 8607793
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 70
Issue: 4
Pages: 317-320

Researcher Affiliations

Mills, Paul C
  • School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. p.mills@uq.edu.au
Cross, Sheree E

    MeSH Terms

    • Administration, Cutaneous
    • Administration, Topical
    • Animals
    • Area Under Curve
    • Chlorhexidine / pharmacology
    • Ethanol / pharmacology
    • Hair / physiology
    • Horses
    • In Vitro Techniques
    • Male
    • Salicylates / pharmacokinetics
    • Skin / metabolism
    • Skin Absorption / drug effects
    • Skin Absorption / physiology

    References

    This article includes 25 references
    1. Walters KA, Roberts MS. The structure and function of skin. In: Walters KA, ed. Dermatological and Transdermal Formulations. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2002:1–40.
    2. Roberts MS, Cross SE, Pellett MA. Skin transport. In: Walters KA, ed. Dermatological and Transdermal Formulations. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2002:89–196.
    3. Riviere JE, Papich MG. Potential and problems of developing transdermal patches for veterinary applications.. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001 Sep 1;50(3):175-203.
      pubmed: 11500227doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00157-0google scholar: lookup
    4. Roberts MS, Cross SE. A physiological pharmacokinetic model for solute disposition in tissues below a topical below a topical application site.. Pharm Res 1999 Sep;16(9):1392-8.
      pubmed: 10496655doi: 10.1023/a:1018998908655google scholar: lookup
    5. Monteiro-Riviere NA, Bristol DG, Manning TO, Rogers RA, Riviere JE. Interspecies and interregional analysis of the comparative histologic thickness and laser Doppler blood flow measurements at five cutaneous sites in nine species.. J Invest Dermatol 1990 Nov;95(5):582-6.
      pubmed: 2230221doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12505567google scholar: lookup
    6. Qiao GL, Riviere JE. Significant effects of application site and occlusion on the pharmacokinetics of cutaneous penetration and biotransformation of parathion in vivo in swine.. J Pharm Sci 1995 Apr;84(4):425-32.
      pubmed: 7629731doi: 10.1002/jps.2600840408google scholar: lookup
    7. Hueber F, Schaefer H, Wepierre J. Role of transepidermal and transfollicular routes in percutaneous absorption of steroids: in vitro studies on human skin.. Skin Pharmacol 1994;7(5):237-44.
      pubmed: 7519865doi: 10.1159/000211300google scholar: lookup
    8. Schaefer H, Lademann J. The role of follicular penetration. A differential view.. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2001;14 Suppl 1:23-7.
      pubmed: 11509903doi: 10.1159/000056386google scholar: lookup
    9. Potts RO, Guy RH. Predicting skin permeability.. Pharm Res 1992 May;9(5):663-9.
      pubmed: 1608900doi: 10.1023/a:1015810312465google scholar: lookup
    10. Riegelman S. Pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic factors affecting epidermal penetration and percutaneous adsorption.. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1974 Nov;16(5 Part 2):873-83.
      pubmed: 4422031doi: 10.1002/cpt1974165part2873google scholar: lookup
    11. Honeywell-Nguyen PL, Gooris GS, Bouwstra JA. Quantitative assessment of the transport of elastic and rigid vesicle components and a model drug from these vesicle formulations into human skin in vivo.. J Invest Dermatol 2004 Nov;123(5):902-10.
      pubmed: 15482478doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202x.2004.23441.xgoogle scholar: lookup
    12. Benfeldt E, Serup J, Menné T. Effect of barrier perturbation on cutaneous salicylic acid penetration in human skin: in vivo pharmacokinetics using microdialysis and non-invasive quantification of barrier function.. Br J Dermatol 1999 Apr;140(4):739-48.
      pubmed: 10233334doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02859.xgoogle scholar: lookup
    13. Finnin BC, Morgan TM. Transdermal penetration enhancers: applications, limitations, and potential.. J Pharm Sci 1999 Oct;88(10):955-8.
      pubmed: 10514338doi: 10.1021/js990154ggoogle scholar: lookup
    14. Mills PC, Magnusson BM, Cross SE. Effect of solute lipophilicity on penetration through canine skin.. Aust Vet J 2003 Dec;81(12):752-5.
      pubmed: 15080487doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2003.tb14608.xgoogle scholar: lookup
    15. Mills PC, Magnusson BM, Cross SE. Investigation of in vitro transdermal absorption of fentanyl from patches placed on skin samples obtained from various anatomic regions of dogs.. Am J Vet Res 2004 Dec;65(12):1697-700.
      pubmed: 15631036doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1697google scholar: lookup
    16. Mills PC, Magnusson BM, Cross SE. Effects of vehicle and region of application on absorption of hydrocortisone through canine skin.. Am J Vet Res 2005 Jan;66(1):43-7.
      pubmed: 15691034doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.43google scholar: lookup
    17. Cross SE, Anderson C, Roberts MS. Topical penetration of commercial salicylate esters and salts using human isolated skin and clinical microdialysis studies.. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998 Jul;46(1):29-35.
      pmc: PMC1873984pubmed: 9690946doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00045.xgoogle scholar: lookup
    18. Yardley HJ, Summerly R. Lipid composition and metabolism in normal and diseased epidermis.. Pharmacol Ther 1981;13(2):357-83.
      pubmed: 6169098doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(81)90006-1google scholar: lookup
    19. Wilhelm KP, Pasche F, Surber C, Maibach HI. Sodium hydroxide-induced subclinical irritation. A test for evaluating stratum corneum barrier function.. Acta Derm Venereol 1990;70(6):463-7.
      pubmed: 1981416
    20. Monteiro-Riviere NA, Inman AO, Mak V, Wertz P, Riviere JE. Effect of selective lipid extraction from different body regions on epidermal barrier function.. Pharm Res 2001 Jul;18(7):992-8.
      pubmed: 11496960doi: 10.1023/a:1010944529387google scholar: lookup
    21. Mills PC, Magnusson BM, Cross SE. The effect of solute lipophilicity on penetration through feline skin.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2003 Aug;26(4):311-4.
      pubmed: 12887616doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2885.2003.00488.xgoogle scholar: lookup
    22. Peck KD, Ghanem AH, Higuchi WI. Hindered diffusion of polar molecules through and effective pore radii estimates of intact and ethanol treated human epidermal membrane.. Pharm Res 1994 Sep;11(9):1306-14.
      pubmed: 7816761doi: 10.1023/a:1018998529283google scholar: lookup
    23. Bamba FL, Wepierre J. Role of the appendageal pathway in the percutaneous absorption of pyridostigmine bromide in various vehicles.. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 1993 Oct-Dec;18(4):339-48.
      pubmed: 8020532doi: 10.1007/bf03190183google scholar: lookup
    24. Cross SE, Magnusson BM, Winckle G, Anissimov Y, Roberts MS. Determination of the effect of lipophilicity on the in vitro permeability and tissue reservoir characteristics of topically applied solutes in human skin layers.. J Invest Dermatol 2003 May;120(5):759-64.
      pubmed: 12713577doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12131.xgoogle scholar: lookup
    25. Tsai JC, Lin CY, Sheu HM, Lo YL, Huang YH. Noninvasive characterization of regional variation in drug transport into human stratum corneum in vivo.. Pharm Res 2003 Apr;20(4):632-8.
      pubmed: 12739772doi: 10.1023/a:1023255001371google scholar: lookup

    Citations

    This article has been cited 1 times.
    1. Song Y, Day CM, Afinjuomo F, Tan JE, Page SW, Garg S. Advanced Strategies of Drug Delivery via Oral, Topical, and Parenteral Administration Routes: Where Do Equine Medications Stand?. Pharmaceutics 2023 Jan 4;15(1).
      doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010186pubmed: 36678815google scholar: lookup
    Subscribe to our newsletter
    Join 100,151 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.