FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2020; 10(11); 2003; doi: 10.3390/ani10112003

The Impact of COVID-19 on Staff Working Practices in UK Horseracing.

Abstract: Due to COVID-19, horseracing was required to cease all activity in March 2020; however, little is known about the pandemic's impact on staff working practices. This study investigated the impact of COVID-19 on staff working practices during the initial lockdown phases. An online survey about working conditions during lockdown was answered by 287 participants. Chi-squared tests for independence and binary logistic regression (BLR) analysis was undertaken. A total of 53.7% (n = 154) of staff were working during lockdown. Pandemic-specific workplace changes were reported as effective by 87.8% (n = 115) of staff. Flat grooms reported workplace changes as less effective (χ (52, n = 131) = 92.996, < 0.001). A total of 67.2% (n = 193) of staff were positive about job security. Trainers and grooms were significantly less likely to report jobs as secure (χ (52, n = 287) = 75.653, < 0.05). The findings suggest that most of the racing industry positively received changes made by their employers to tackle the pandemic, and for staff still working during lockdown, their health and safety was prioritised. Continued development of employee support structures to promote job security and workforce stability is advised, which will minimise the disruption of staff changes on the care and welfare of the horses.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-10-30 PubMed ID: 33143200PubMed Central: PMC7692747DOI: 10.3390/ani10112003Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study explores the effect of COVID-19 on staff working practices in the UK horseracing industry and finds that although most employees appreciated their employer’s changes to cope with the pandemic, there’s a need for continued development of employee support systems to promote job security and workforce stability.

Objective of the Study

  • The goal of this research was to understand the impact of COVID-19 on the staff working practices of the UK horseracing industry during the initial stages of lockdown.

Methodology

  • An online survey regarding the employees’ working conditions during the lockdown, was responded to by 287 participants.
  • In order to interpret the data collected, Chi-squared tests for independence and binary logistic regression (BLR) analysis were employed.

Findings

  • The study found out that about 53.7 % of the horseracing staff were working during the lockdown.
  • A whopping 87.8% of these stated that the alterations instituted by their employers specifically to deal with the pandemic, were effective.
  • However, Flat grooms (the employees responsible for the daily care of racehorses) were less satisfied with the pandemic-specific workplace changes, reporting them as less effective.
  • A total of 67.2% of the staff affirmed they were positive about their job security. But trainers and grooms were less likely to consider their jobs as secure, suggesting mixed feelings about job security amidst the pandemic.

Conclusion

  • The outcome of the research suggests that the majority of the racing industry received favourably, the adaptations enacted by their employers to curtail the pandemic. This applied especially to those who kept working during the lockdown as their health and safety were given priority.
  • The study advocates for the ongoing enhancement of employee support structures in order to encourage job security and workforce stability. Such improvements will help lessen the disruption of staff changes on the care and welfare of the horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Davies E, McConn-Palfreyman W, Williams JM, Lovell GP. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Staff Working Practices in UK Horseracing. Animals (Basel), 10(11), 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112003

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 11
PII: 2003

Researcher Affiliations

Davies, Emma
  • Equine Department, Hartpury University, Gloucester GL193BE, Gloucestershire, UK.
McConn-Palfreyman, Will
  • SportScotland Institute of Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
Williams, Jane M
  • Equine Department, Hartpury University, Gloucester GL193BE, Gloucestershire, UK.
Lovell, Geoff P
  • Sport Department, Hartpury University, Gloucester GL193BE, Gloucestershire, UK.
  • School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs QLD 4556, Australia.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 60 references
  1. British Horseracing Authority. Covid-19 (Coronavirus) and Resumption of Racing—Industry Guidance and Updates. .
  2. Frontier Economics. An Economic Analysis of the Funding of Horseracing. .
  3. British Horseracing Authority. BHA Racing Data Pack. .
  4. British Racing School. Careers in the Home of Horseracing. .
  5. Public Perspectives. Racing Industry Recruitment, Skills and Retention Survey 2018. .
  6. Public Perspectives. Racing Industry Recruitment, Skills and Retention Survey 2016. .
  7. Racing Post. Racecourse Groups Forced to Furlough Staff Due to the Coronavirus. .
  8. Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak.. J Autoimmun 2020 May;109:102433.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433pmc: PMC7127067pubmed: 32113704google scholar: lookup
  9. Wang L, Wang Y, Ye D, Liu Q. Review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) based on current evidence.. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020 Jun;55(6):105948.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105948pmc: PMC7156162pubmed: 32201353google scholar: lookup
  10. Anderson RM, Heesterbeek H, Klinkenberg D, Hollingsworth TD. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?. Lancet 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):931-934.
    doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5pmc: PMC7158572pubmed: 32164834google scholar: lookup
  11. McKibben W, Levine D. Preventing the Spread of Coronavirus and the Scale of Potential Damage. Asia and the Pacific Policy Society. Policy Forum 20th February.
  12. Toresdahl BG, Asif IM. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Considerations for the Competitive Athlete.. Sports Health 2020 May Jun;12(3):221-224.
    doi: 10.1177/1941738120918876pmc: PMC7222670pubmed: 32250193google scholar: lookup
  13. Wilder-Smith A, Chiew CJ, Lee VJ. Can we contain the COVID-19 outbreak with the same measures as for SARS?. Lancet Infect Dis 2020 May;20(5):e102-e107.
    doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30129-8pmc: PMC7102636pubmed: 32145768google scholar: lookup
  14. Gov.UK. Coronavirus (COVID-19). .
  15. Butler D, Valenchon M, Annan R, Whay HR, Mullan S. Living the 'Best Life' or 'One Size Fits All'-Stakeholder Perceptions of Racehorse Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Mar 31;9(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9040134pmc: PMC6523604pubmed: 30935137google scholar: lookup
  16. Figley CR, Roop RG. Compassion Fatigue in The Animal-Care Community. .
  17. Dembe AE, Erickson JB, Delbos RG, Banks SM. The impact of overtime and long work hours on occupational injuries and illnesses: new evidence from the United States.. Occup Environ Med 2005 Sep;62(9):588-97.
    doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.016667pmc: PMC1741083pubmed: 16109814google scholar: lookup
  18. de Castro AB, Fujishiro K, Rue T, Tagalog EA, Samaco-Paquiz LP, Gee GC. Associations between work schedule characteristics and occupational injury and illness.. Int Nurs Rev 2010 Jun;57(2):188-94.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00793.xpmc: PMC2964142pubmed: 20579153google scholar: lookup
  19. Racing Welfare. A Change of Pace Executive Summary Background Phase 1 Analysis—Is There Really a Problem? Industry Report. 2012; pp. 1–126.
  20. Juckes E, Williams J, Challinor C, Davies E. Racing to a staffing solution: An investigation into the current staffing crisis within the UK horseracing industry. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2020:1–18.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP200018google scholar: lookup
  21. Filby MP. The Newmarket Racing Lad: Tradition and Change in a Marginal Occupation. Work. Employ. Soc. 1987;1:205–224.
    doi: 10.1177/0950017087001002004google scholar: lookup
  22. Sear S. Occupational Stressors for Racehorse Trainers in Great Britain and their Impact on Health and Occupational Stressors for Racehorse Trainers in Great. Int. Thoroughbred. 2018;86:1–69.
  23. National Association of Racing Staff. Working in Racing during Covid-19 Lockdown—Survey. .
  24. Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C, Agha M, Agha R. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review.. Int J Surg 2020 Jun;78:185-193.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018pmc: PMC7162753pubmed: 32305533google scholar: lookup
  25. Restubog SLD, Ocampo ACG, Wang L. Taking control amidst the chaos: Emotion regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic.. J Vocat Behav 2020 Jun;119:103440.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103440pmc: PMC7206430pubmed: 32390659google scholar: lookup
  26. Atkeson A. What Will Be the Economic Impact of COVID-19 in the US? Rough Estimates of Disease Scenarios. .
  27. Angrave D, Charlwood A, Charlwood A. What is the relationship between long working hours, over-employment, under-employment and the subjective well-being of workers? Longitudinal evidence from the UK. Hum. Relat. 2015;68:1491–1515.
    doi: 10.1177/0018726714559752google scholar: lookup
  28. Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC. Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Pers. Psychol. 2005;58:281–342.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  29. Racing Welfare. Coronavirus: Latest Information and Guidance. .
  30. Evans JR, Mathur A. The value of online surveys. Int. Res. 2005;15:195–219.
    doi: 10.1108/10662240510590360google scholar: lookup
  31. Browne K. Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2005;8:47–60.
    doi: 10.1080/1364557032000081663google scholar: lookup
  32. McConn-Palfreyman W, Littlewood M, Nesti M. A Lifestyle Rather than a Job. .
  33. Pallant J. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. .
  34. George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows Step by Step. A Simple Study Guide and Reference. .
  35. Williams J, Marlin D, Langley N, Parkin T, Randle H. The Grand National: A review of factors associated with non-completion and horse-falls, 1990 to 2012. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2013;9:131–146.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP13013google scholar: lookup
  36. Lamperd W, Clarke D, Wolframm I, Williams J. What makes an elite equestrian rider?. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2016;12:105–118.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP160011google scholar: lookup
  37. Richardson H, Collins R, Williams J. Sport science relevance and integration in horseracing: Perceptions of UK racehorse trainers. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2020;16:5–19.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP190003google scholar: lookup
  38. Driver C, Oprescu F, Lovell GP. An exploration of physiotherapists' perceived benefits and barriers towards using psychosocial strategies in their practice.. Musculoskeletal Care 2020 Jun;18(2):111-121.
    doi: 10.1002/msc.1437pubmed: 31943730google scholar: lookup
  39. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process.. J Adv Nurs 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.xpubmed: 18352969google scholar: lookup
  40. British Equestrian Trade Association. National Equestrian Survey 2019. .
  41. Kinman G, Grant C, Fraser J, Bell N, Breslin G, Colville T, Waites B. Working from Home: Healthy Sustainable Working During the Covid-19 Pandemic and Beyond. .
  42. The Thoroughbred Breeders’ Association. Coronavirus—Latest Information and Guidance. .
  43. Lunn PD, Belton CA, Lavin C, McGowan FP, Timmons S, Robertson DA. Using Behavioral Science to help fight the Coronavirus. J. Behav. Public Adm. 2020;3.
    doi: 10.30636/jbpa.31.147google scholar: lookup
  44. Bavel JJV, Baicker K, Boggio PS, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M, Crockett MJ, Crum AJ, Douglas KM, Druckman JN, Drury J, Dube O, Ellemers N, Finkel EJ, Fowler JH, Gelfand M, Han S, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Kitayama S, Mobbs D, Napper LE, Packer DJ, Pennycook G, Peters E, Petty RE, Rand DG, Reicher SD, Schnall S, Shariff A, Skitka LJ, Smith SS, Sunstein CR, Tabri N, Tucker JA, Linden SV, Lange PV, Weeden KA, Wohl MJA, Zaki J, Zion SR, Willer R. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.. Nat Hum Behav 2020 May;4(5):460-471.
    doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-zpubmed: 32355299google scholar: lookup
  45. Cassidy R. The Sport of Kings. .
  46. Geutjens CA, Clayton HM, Kaiser LJ. Forces and pressures beneath the saddle during mounting from the ground and from a raised mounting platform.. Vet J 2008 Mar;175(3):332-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.03.025pubmed: 17572121google scholar: lookup
  47. Spurk D, Straub C. Flexible employment relationships and careers in times of the COVID-19 pandemic.. J Vocat Behav 2020 Jun;119:103435.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103435pmc: PMC7204672pubmed: 32382161google scholar: lookup
  48. Rothstein MA, Talbott MK. Encouraging compliance with quarantine: a proposal to provide job security and income replacement.. Am J Public Health 2007 Apr;97 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S49-56.
    doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.097303pmc: PMC1854999pubmed: 17413059google scholar: lookup
  49. Shoss MK. Job Insecurity: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research. J. Manag. 2017;43:1911–1939.
    doi: 10.1177/0149206317691574google scholar: lookup
  50. Resolution Foundation. Coronavirus. .
  51. International Labour Organization. COVID-19 and the World of Work. .
  52. Sakurai K, Nakata A, Ikeda T, Otsuka Y, Kawahito J. How do employment types and job stressors relate to occupational injury? A cross-sectional investigation of employees in Japan.. Public Health 2013 Nov;127(11):1012-20.
    doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.08.019pubmed: 24225401google scholar: lookup
  53. Filby M, Jackson C, Turner M. Only falls and horses: accidents and injuries in racehorse training.. Occup Med (Lond) 2012 Jul;62(5):343-9.
    doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqs068pubmed: 22764272google scholar: lookup
  54. Holmes EA, O'Connor RC, Perry VH, Tracey I, Wessely S, Arseneault L, Ballard C, Christensen H, Cohen Silver R, Everall I, Ford T, John A, Kabir T, King K, Madan I, Michie S, Przybylski AK, Shafran R, Sweeney A, Worthman CM, Yardley L, Cowan K, Cope C, Hotopf M, Bullmore E. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science.. Lancet Psychiatry 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560.
    doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1pmc: PMC7159850pubmed: 32304649google scholar: lookup
  55. McKibbin W, Fernando R. The Economic Impact of COVID-19. Economics in the Time of COVID-19 .
  56. Kim J. Psychological distress and occupational injury: findings from the National Health Interview Survey 2000-2003.. J Prev Med Public Health 2008 May;41(3):200-7.
    doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.3.200pubmed: 18515998google scholar: lookup
  57. Landolt K, O’Halloran P, Hale MW, Horan B, Kinsella GJ, Kingsley M, Wright BJ. Identifying the sources of stress and rewards in a group of Australian apprentice jockeys. Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health. 2017;9:583–599.
    doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2017.1340329google scholar: lookup
  58. Singh H, Conroy DE. Systematic review of stress-related injury vulnerability in athletic and occupational contexts. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2017;33:37–44.
    doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.08.001google scholar: lookup
  59. Trimpop R, Kirkcaldy B, Athanasou J, Cooper C. Individual differences in working hours, work perceptions and accident rates in veterinary surgeries. Work. Stress. 2000;14:181–188.
    doi: 10.1080/026783700750051685google scholar: lookup
  60. Wright KB. Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services. J. Comput. Commun. 2006;10.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.xgoogle scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 6 times.
  1. Domino M, Borowska M, Zdrojkowski Ł, Jasiński T, Sikorska U, Skibniewski M, Maśko M. Application of the Two-Dimensional Entropy Measures in the Infrared Thermography-Based Detection of Rider: Horse Bodyweight Ratio in Horseback Riding. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Aug 13;22(16).
    doi: 10.3390/s22166052pubmed: 36015813google scholar: lookup
  2. Davies E, McConn-Palfreyman W, Parker JK, Cameron LJ, Williams JM. Is Injury an Occupational Hazard for Horseracing Staff?. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 Feb 12;19(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042054pubmed: 35206242google scholar: lookup
  3. Ekstrand K, Flanagan AJ, Lin IE, Vejseli B, Cole A, Lally AP, Morris RL, Morgan KN. Animal Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and the Welfare of Animals during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 8;11(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11072044pubmed: 34359172google scholar: lookup
  4. Butler D, Upton L, Mullan S. Capturing Beneficial Changes to Racehorse Veterinary Care Implemented during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Animals (Basel) 2021 Apr 26;11(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051251pubmed: 33926093google scholar: lookup
  5. García Pinillos R. One welfare impacts of COVID-19 - A summary of key highlights within the one welfare framework. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2021 Mar;236:105262.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105262pubmed: 33612900google scholar: lookup
  6. Davies E, Liddiard S, McConn-Palfreyman WJ, Parker JK, Cameron LJ, Williams JM. Anxiety and Depression in British Horseracing Stud and Stable Staff Following Occupational Injury. Animals (Basel) 2023 Oct 26;13(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13213337pubmed: 37958092google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.