FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Eur J Appl Physiol / The physiological demands of horseback mustering when wearin...
European journal of applied physiology2008; 104(2); 289-296; doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0659-5

The physiological demands of horseback mustering when wearing an equestrian helmet.

Abstract: The hottest months on northern Australian cattle stations are from September to November, and it is during these months that horseback cattle mustering occurs. Stockmen wear clothing that restricts heat loss, and protective helmets have recently been introduced. Anecdotal evidence points to the possibility that helmets may increase the probability of developing heat illness, or reducing workplace performance. In this project, we quantified the working (thermal) environment on such cattle stations, and measured the metabolic demands on, and concurrent physiological strain in stockmen during mustering, whilst wearing an equestrian helmet. During horseback work, the average heart rate was 102.0 beats min(-1) (SD 14.0), with almost 90% of the time (238 min) spent working at intensities <50% of the heart rate reserve. The projected metabolic heat production during mustering ranged between 178 and 333 W (women), and between 212 and 542 W (men). The average core temperature was 37.6 degrees C, while the mean skin temperature averaged 34.1 degrees C. It was concluded that the working environment is, on average, thermally uncompensable during the mustering season. However, horseback mustering per se is a relatively low-intensity activity, interspersed with short periods of high-intensity work. This activity level was reflected within core temperatures, which rarely climbed above values associated with light-moderate exercise. Thus, whilst the climatic state was uncompensable, stockmen used behavioural strategies to minimise the risk of heat illness. Finally, it was observed that the helmet, though unpleasant to wear, did not appear to increase thermal strain in a manner that would disadvantage stockmen.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2008-01-05 PubMed ID: 18176814DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0659-5Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the impact of wearing equestrian helmets on the physiological strain experienced by stockmen during horseback cattle mustering in northern Australia. Findings suggest that the helmet does not significantly increase heat stress therefore could be safely worn without affecting the performance or health of the stockmen.

Research Context: Thermal Environment of Northern Australian cattle stations

  • The study is set in northern Australian cattle stations, highlighting the seasonal patterns, specifically during their hot months from September to November when horseback cattle mustering is typically done.
  • The focus is the working environment and conditions faced by stockmen during mustering season which is hot and demands physical exertion.
  • The clothing of stockmen, including protective helmets recently introduced, is noted for potentially restricting heat loss and possibly increasing the risk of heat illness.

Research Methodology: Quantifying Working Conditions

  • The researchers conducted an empirical study where they quantified the thermal environment on cattle stations.
  • They measured the metabolic demands and physiological strain on stockmen during mustering while wearing equestrian helmets.
  • Parameters including heart rate, metabolic heat production, core temperature, and skin temperature were recorded during horseback work.

Findings: Effect of Helmets on Physiological Strain

  • The findings revealed that the average heart rate during horseback work was 102.0 beats per minute (SD 14.0), with almost 90% of the time (238 min) spent working at intensities less than 50% of the heart rate reserve.
  • The projected metabolic heat production during mustering varied between individuals and genders, ranging from 178 to 333 W for women and between 212 and 542 W for men.
  • Mean core temperature was recorded as 37.6 degrees Celsius, and mean skin temperature averaged at 34.1 degrees Celsius.
  • The working environment was deemed thermally uncompensable during the mustering season due to high temperatures.
  • However, horseback mustering activity was found to be low-intensity involving short periods of high-intensity work and did not significantly increase core temperatures beyond those associated with light-moderate exercise.

Conclusion: Helmets do not Increase Thermal Strain

  • The researchers concluded, despite the thermally uncompensable climate, stockmen were found to use behavioural strategies to minimize the risks of heat illness.
  • The use of a helmet, while subjectively uncomfortable to wear, did not objectively increase thermal strain to a level that would disadvantage stockmen or increase their risk of heat-related illness.

Cite This Article

APA
Taylor NA, Caldwell JN, Dyer R. (2008). The physiological demands of horseback mustering when wearing an equestrian helmet. Eur J Appl Physiol, 104(2), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0659-5

Publication

European journal of applied physiology
ISSN: 1439-6319
NlmUniqueID: 100954790
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 104
Issue: 2
Pages: 289-296

Researcher Affiliations

Taylor, Nigel A S
  • Human Performance Laboratories, School of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. nigel_taylor@uow.edu.au
Caldwell, Joanne N
    Dyer, Rodd

      MeSH Terms

      • Adolescent
      • Adult
      • Animals
      • Body Temperature / physiology
      • Cattle
      • Cognition / physiology
      • Data Interpretation, Statistical
      • Exercise / physiology
      • Female
      • Head Protective Devices
      • Heart Rate / physiology
      • Horses
      • Humans
      • Humidity
      • Male
      • Middle Aged
      • Oxygen Consumption / physiology
      • Psychomotor Performance / physiology
      • Sex Characteristics
      • Temperature
      • Thermogenesis / physiology

      References

      This article includes 20 references
      1. Clark RP, Toy N. Natural convection around the human head.. J Physiol 1975 Jan;244(2):283-93.
        pubmed: 1142118doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010797google scholar: lookup
      2. Liu X, Holmér I. Evaporative heat transfer characteristics of industrial safety helmets.. Appl Ergon 1995 Apr;26(2):135-40.
        pubmed: 15677011doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00010-agoogle scholar: lookup
      3. Gopinathan PM, Pichan G, Sharma VM. Role of dehydration in heat stress-induced variations in mental performance.. Arch Environ Health 1988 Jan-Feb;43(1):15-7.
        pubmed: 3355239doi: 10.1080/00039896.1988.9934367google scholar: lookup
      4. Shephard JM, Kosslyn SM. The minicog rapid assessment battery: developing a "blood pressure cuff for the mind".. Aviat Space Environ Med 2005 Jun;76(6 Suppl):B192-7.
        pubmed: 15943212
      5. FROESE G, BURTON AC. Heat losses from the human head.. J Appl Physiol 1957 Mar;10(2):235-41.
        pubmed: 13428652doi: 10.1152/jappl.1957.10.2.235google scholar: lookup
      6. Szinnai G, Schachinger H, Arnaud MJ, Linder L, Keller U. Effect of water deprivation on cognitive-motor performance in healthy men and women.. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2005 Jul;289(1):R275-80.
        pubmed: 15845879doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00501.2004google scholar: lookup
      7. Hancock PA, Vasmatzidis I. Effects of heat stress on cognitive performance: the current state of knowledge.. Int J Hyperthermia 2003 May-Jun;19(3):355-72.
        pubmed: 12745975doi: 10.1080/0265673021000054630google scholar: lookup
      8. Armstrong LE, Maresh CM, Castellani JW, Bergeron MF, Kenefick RW, LaGasse KE, Riebe D. Urinary indices of hydration status.. Int J Sport Nutr 1994 Sep;4(3):265-79.
        pubmed: 7987361doi: 10.1123/ijsn.4.3.265google scholar: lookup
      9. Gisolfi CV, Rohlf DP, Navarude SN, Hayes CL, Sayeed SA. Effects of Wearing a Helmet on Thermal Balance While Cycling in the Heat.. Phys Sportsmed 1988 Jan;16(1):139-46.
        pubmed: 27427111doi: 10.1080/00913847.1988.11709412google scholar: lookup
      10. Zenker W, Kubik S. Brain cooling in humans--anatomical considerations.. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1996 Jan;193(1):1-13.
        pubmed: 8838492doi: 10.1007/BF00186829google scholar: lookup
      11. Sheffield-Moore M, Short KR, Kerr CG, Parcell AC, Bolster DR, Costill DL. Thermoregulatory responses to cycling with and without a helmet.. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997 Jun;29(6):755-61.
        pubmed: 9219202doi: 10.1097/00005768-199706000-00004google scholar: lookup
      12. Nunneley SA, Reader DC, Maldonado RJ. Head-temperature effects on physiology, comfort, and performance during hyperthermia.. Aviat Space Environ Med 1982 Jul;53(7):623-8.
        pubmed: 7115249
      13. Vital JM, Senegas J. Anatomical bases of the study of the constraints to which the cervical spine is subject in the sagittal plane. A study of the center of gravity of the head.. Surg Radiol Anat 1986;8(3):169-73.
        pubmed: 3099407doi: 10.1007/BF02427845google scholar: lookup
      14. Gant N, Atkinson G, Williams C. The validity and reliability of intestinal temperature during intermittent running.. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006 Nov;38(11):1926-31.
        pubmed: 17095925doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000233800.69776.efgoogle scholar: lookup
      15. Rasch W, Samson P, Cote J, Cabanac M. Heat loss from the human head during exercise.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1991 Aug;71(2):590-5.
        pubmed: 1938732doi: 10.1152/jappl.1991.71.2.590google scholar: lookup
      16. Nunneley SA. Heat stress in protective clothing. Interactions among physical and physiological factors.. Scand J Work Environ Health 1989;15 Suppl 1:52-7.
        pubmed: 2692140
      17. Holland EJ, Laing RM, Lemmon TL, Niven BE. Helmet design to facilitate thermoneutrality during forest harvesting.. Ergonomics 2002 Aug 15;45(10):699-716.
        pubmed: 12437853doi: 10.1080/00140130210159959google scholar: lookup
      18. Patel R, Mohan D. An improved motorcycle helmet design for tropical climates.. Appl Ergon 1993 Dec;24(6):427-31.
        pubmed: 15676941doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(93)90175-9google scholar: lookup
      19. Brühwiler PA, Buyan M, Huber R, Bogerd CP, Sznitman J, Graf SF, Rösgen T. Heat transfer variations of bicycle helmets.. J Sports Sci 2006 Sep;24(9):999-1011.
        pubmed: 16882634doi: 10.1080/02640410500457877google scholar: lookup
      20. Reischl U. Fire fighter helmet ventilation analysis.. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1986 Sep;47(9):546-51.
        pubmed: 3766398doi: 10.1080/15298668691390205google scholar: lookup

      Citations

      This article has been cited 3 times.
      1. Tan YH, Hitesh A, Li KHH. Application of Machine Learning Algorithm on MEMS-Based Sensors for Determination of Helmet Wearing for Workplace Safety. Micromachines (Basel) 2021 Apr 16;12(4).
        doi: 10.3390/mi12040449pubmed: 33923785google scholar: lookup
      2. Jay O, Brotherhood JR. Occupational heat stress in Australian workplaces. Temperature (Austin) 2016;3(3):394-411.
        doi: 10.1080/23328940.2016.1216256pubmed: 28349081google scholar: lookup
      3. Caldwell JN, Patterson MJ, Taylor NA. Exertional thermal strain, protective clothing and auxiliary cooling in dry heat: evidence for physiological but not cognitive impairment. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012 Oct;112(10):3597-606.
        doi: 10.1007/s00421-012-2340-xpubmed: 22328005google scholar: lookup
      Subscribe to our newsletter
      Join 99,001 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.